-
Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases 2022Deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone are the current standard of care for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) based on evidence that they improve muscle... (Review)
Review
Deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone are the current standard of care for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) based on evidence that they improve muscle strength, improve timed motor function, delay loss of ambulation, improve pulmonary function, reduce the need for scoliosis surgery, delay onset of cardiomyopathy, and increase survival. Both have been used off-label for many years (choice dependent on patient preference, cost, and geographic location) before FDA approval of deflazacort for DMD in 2017. In this review, we compare deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in terms of their key pharmacological features, relative efficacy, and safety profiles in patients with DMD. Differentiating features include lipid solubility, pharmacokinetics, changes in gene expression profiles, affinity for the mineralocorticoid receptor, and impact on glucose metabolism. Evidence from randomized clinical trials, prospective studies, meta-analyses, and post-hoc analyses suggests that patients receiving deflazacort experience similar or slower rates of functional decline compared with those receiving prednisone/prednisolone. Regarding side effects, weight gain and behavior side effects appear to be greater with prednisone/prednisolone than with deflazacort, whereas bone health, growth parameters, and cataracts appear worse with deflazacort.
Topics: Humans; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Prednisolone; Prednisone; Pregnenediones; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 35723111
DOI: 10.3233/JND-210776 -
Pediatrics Sep 2019The use of either prednisolone or low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of childhood croup lacks a rigorous evidence base despite widespread use. In this study, we... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
The use of either prednisolone or low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of childhood croup lacks a rigorous evidence base despite widespread use. In this study, we compare dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg with both low-dose dexamethasone at 0.15 mg/kg and prednisolone at 1 mg/kg.
METHODS
Prospective, double-blind, noninferiority randomized controlled trial based in 1 tertiary pediatric emergency department and 1 urban district emergency department in Perth, Western Australia. Inclusions were age >6 months, maximum weight 20 kg, contactable by telephone, and English-speaking caregivers. Exclusion criteria were known prednisolone or dexamethasone allergy, immunosuppressive disease or treatment, steroid therapy or enrollment in the study within the previous 14 days, and a high clinical suspicion of an alternative diagnosis. A total of 1252 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg; = 410), low-dose dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg; = 410), or prednisolone (1 mg/kg; = 411). Primary outcome measures included Westley Croup Score 1-hour after treatment and unscheduled medical re-attendance during the 7 days after treatment.
RESULTS
Mean Westley Croup Score at baseline was 1.4 for dexamethasone, 1.5 for low-dose dexamethasone, and 1.5 for prednisolone. Adjusted difference in scores at 1 hour, compared with dexamethasone, was 0.03 (95% confidence interval -0.09 to 0.15) for low-dose dexamethasone and 0.05 (95% confidence interval -0.07 to 0.17) for prednisolone. Re-attendance rates were 17.8% for dexamethasone, 19.5% for low-dose dexamethasone, and 21.7% for prednisolone (not significant [ = .59 and .19]).
CONCLUSIONS
Noninferiority was demonstrated for both low-dose dexamethasone and prednisolone. The type of oral steroid seems to have no clinically significant impact on efficacy, both acutely and during the week after treatment.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Child, Preschool; Croup; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Emergency Service, Hospital; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infant; Male; Prednisolone; Prospective Studies; Western Australia
PubMed: 31416827
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3772 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Dec 2023In this case report, a 55-year-old man presented with back pain, urinary retention, sensory disturbances, erectile dysfunction, leg paresis and orthostatism. Spinal MRI...
In this case report, a 55-year-old man presented with back pain, urinary retention, sensory disturbances, erectile dysfunction, leg paresis and orthostatism. Spinal MRI showed longitudinal extensive myelitis. Lymph node biopsy was compatible with sarcoidosis and a diagnosis of probable neurosarcoidosis (NS) was made. The patient benefited from prednisolone but relapsed during withdrawal. Infliximab resulted in almost complete remission. In conclusion, relapse is often seen when phasing out prednisolone, whereas infliximab appears to have a lasting effect and should be considered in the early stages of severe NS.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Infliximab; Central Nervous System Diseases; Sarcoidosis; Myelitis; Prednisolone; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 38078475
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Case Reports May 2020
Topics: Adult; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Mouth Diseases; Pemphigus; Prednisolone
PubMed: 32404374
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-235410 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2022The incidence of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) increases worldwide. If undiagnosed, it may progress end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, there is no characteristic...
The incidence of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) increases worldwide. If undiagnosed, it may progress end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, there is no characteristic clinical presentation of this disease, which makes the illness hard to recognize. A case report illustrates the difficulties of diagnosing the patient during his two hospitalizations and his final treatment with prednisolone which improved the patient's condition.
Topics: Hepatitis, Autoimmune; Humans; Incidence; Prednisolone
PubMed: 35888614
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070896 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2022Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is defined as the presence of gas within the submucosal or subserosal layer of the gastrointestinal tract. It is a radiologic sign...
Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is defined as the presence of gas within the submucosal or subserosal layer of the gastrointestinal tract. It is a radiologic sign suspicious for bowel ischemia, hence non-viable bowel must be ruled out in patients with PI. However, up to 15% of cases with PI are not associated with bowel ischemia or acute abdomen. We described an asymptomatic patient with prednisolone-induced PI and modified the Naranjo score to aid in a surgeon's decision-making for emergency laparotomy non-operative management with serial assessment in patients who are immunocompromised due to long-term steroid use.
Topics: Humans; Ischemia; Laparotomy; Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis; Pneumoperitoneum; Prednisolone
PubMed: 36161037
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3739 -
Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie Mar 2022
Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Prednisolone; Sinusitis
PubMed: 35226951
DOI: 10.1055/a-1675-9977 -
Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie Mar 2022
Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Prednisolone; Sinusitis
PubMed: 35226952
DOI: 10.1055/a-1676-0211 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2016Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute paralysing disease caused by inflammation of the peripheral nerves, which corticosteroids would be expected to benefit. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute paralysing disease caused by inflammation of the peripheral nerves, which corticosteroids would be expected to benefit.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the ability of corticosteroids to hasten recovery and reduce the long-term morbidity from GBS.
SEARCH METHODS
On 12 January 2016, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched trials registries.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of any form of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone versus placebo or supportive care alone in GBS. Our primary outcome was change in disability grade on a seven-point scale after four weeks. Secondary outcomes included time from randomisation until recovery of unaided walking, time from randomisation until discontinuation of ventilation (for those ventilated), death, death or disability (inability to walk without aid) after 12 months, relapse, and adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The review authors used standard methods expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
The review authors discovered no new trials in the new searches in June 2009, November 2011, or January 2016. Six trials with 587 participants provided data for the primary outcome. According to moderate quality evidence, the disability grade change after four weeks in the corticosteroid groups was not significantly different from that in the control groups, mean difference (MD) 0.36 less improvement (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.16 more to 0.88 less improvement). In four trials of oral corticosteroids with 120 participants in total, there was very low quality evidence of less improvement after four weeks with corticosteroids than without corticosteroids, MD 0.82 disability grades less improvement (95% CI 0.17 to 1.47 grades less). In two trials with a combined total of 467 participants, there was moderate quality evidence of no significant difference of a disability grade more improvement after four weeks with intravenous corticosteroids (MD 0.17, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.39). According to moderate quality evidence, there was also no significant difference between the corticosteroid treated and control groups for improvement by one or more grades after four weeks (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.24) or for death or disability after one year (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.5). We found high quality evidence that the occurrence of diabetes was more common (RR 2.21, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.12) and hypertension less common (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.41) in the corticosteroid-treated participants.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
According to moderate quality evidence, corticosteroids given alone do not significantly hasten recovery from GBS or affect the long-term outcome. According to very low quality evidence, oral corticosteroids delay recovery. Diabetes requiring insulin was more common and hypertension less common with corticosteroids based on high quality evidence.
Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Child; Glucocorticoids; Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans; Methylprednisolone; Prednisolone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27775812
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001446.pub5 -
International Journal of Dermatology Sep 2016
Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Brain Diseases; Dapsone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Methylprednisolone; Prednisolone; Recurrence; Sweet Syndrome
PubMed: 27027253
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.13287