-
Kardiologia Polska Jan 2021Sotalol is a class III antiarrhythmic drug commonly used in various arrhythmia treatments. However, due to its potent potassium channel inhibition, it can prolong the QT...
BACKGROUND
Sotalol is a class III antiarrhythmic drug commonly used in various arrhythmia treatments. However, due to its potent potassium channel inhibition, it can prolong the QT interval and lead to malignant arrhythmias. Empagliflozin is an inhibitor of sodium‑glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) and has a positive effect on cardiovascular outcomes. Since the effect of empagliflozin on the activation of potassium channels is unknown, there is no recommendation regarding the coadministration of these drugs.
AIMS
The study aimed to evaluate the possible protective effects of empagliflozin on sotalol‑induced QT prolongation.
METHODS
We randomized 24 rats into 4 groups. The control group received only physiological saline, the EMPA group, empagliflozin; the SOT group, sotalol; and the EMPA+SOT group, empagliflozin and sotalol. PR and QT intervals and heart rates were measured under anesthesia at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 hours in lead II.
RESULTS
In the SOT group, the QT and QTc intervals as well as T‑wave duration were statistically longer, whereas heart rates were lower than in the control group (P <0.001 for all parameters). Empagliflozin ameliorated sotalol‑induced QT and QTc prolongation in the EMPA+SOT group. The QT interval, T‑wave duration, and QTc interval were shorter, and the heart rate was greater than in the SOT group (P <0.001, P = 0.002, P <0.001, and P <0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Empagliflozin significantly ameliorates sotalol‑induced QT prolongation and could be used safely with sotalol in clinical practice. Future clinical trials might recommend the routine use of empagliflozin to prevent QTc prolongation in diabetic patients receiving sotalol.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Electrocardiography; Glucosides; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Rats; Sotalol
PubMed: 33146500
DOI: 10.33963/KP.15666 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2015Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation frequently recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation frequently recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence, but the effect of these drugs on mortality and other clinical outcomes is unclear. This is an update of a review previously published in 2008 and 2012.
OBJECTIVES
To determine in patients who have recovered sinus rhythm after having atrial fibrillation, the effects of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke, embolism, drug adverse effects and recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
SEARCH METHODS
We updated the searches of CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2013, Issue 12 of 12), MEDLINE (to January 2014) and EMBASE (to January 2014). The reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses were checked.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Two independent authors selected randomised controlled trials comparing any antiarrhythmic drug with a control (no treatment, placebo, drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic drug in adults who had atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. Post-operative atrial fibrillation was excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. Studies were pooled, if appropriate, using Peto odds ratio (OR). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up.
MAIN RESULTS
In this update three new studies, with 534 patients, were included making a total of 59 included studies comprising 21,305 patients. All included studies were randomised controlled trials. Allocation concealment was adequate in 17 trials, it was unclear in the remaining 42 trials. Risk of bias was assessed in all domains only in the trials included in this update.Compared with controls, class IA drugs quinidine and disopyramide (OR 2.39, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03 to 5.59, number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 109, 95% CI 34 to 4985) and sotalol (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.50, NNTH 169, 95% CI 60 to 2068) were associated with increased all-cause mortality. Other antiarrhythmics did not seem to modify mortality, but our data could be underpowered to detect mild increases in mortality for several of the drugs studied.Several class IA (disopyramide, quinidine), IC (flecainide, propafenone) and III (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, sotalol) drugs significantly reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (OR 0.19 to 0.70, number needed to treat to beneft (NNTB) 3 to 16). Beta-blockers (metoprolol) also significantly reduced atrial fibrillation recurrences (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, NNTB 9).All analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse affects and all but amiodarone, dronedarone and propafenone increased pro-arrhythmia. Only 11 trials reported data on stroke. None of them found any significant difference with the exception of a single trial than found less strokes in the group treated with dronedarone compared to placebo. This finding was not confirmed in others studies on dronedarone.We could not analyse heart failure and use of anticoagulation because few original studies reported on these measures.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Several class IA, IC and III drugs, as well as class II drugs (beta-blockers), are moderately effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. However, they increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and some of them (disopyramide, quinidine and sotalol) may increase mortality. Possible benefits on clinically relevant outcomes (stroke, embolism, heart failure) remain to be established.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Electric Countershock; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention; Stroke
PubMed: 25820938
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub4 -
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology : the... Jun 2023Atrioventricular accessory pathways are abnormal electrical connections between the atria and ventricles that predispose to ventricular pre-excitation (VPE) and...
OBJECTIVES
Atrioventricular accessory pathways are abnormal electrical connections between the atria and ventricles that predispose to ventricular pre-excitation (VPE) and tachycardias.
ANIMALS
Seventeen cats with VPE and 15 healthy matched-control cats.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Multicenter case-control retrospective study. Clinical records were searched for cats with VPE, defined as preserved atrioventricular synchrony, reduced PQ interval, and increased QRS complex duration with a delta wave. Clinical, electrocardiography, echocardiographic, and outcome data were collated.
RESULTS
Most cats with VPE were male (16/17 cats), non-pedigree cats (11/17 cats). Median age and mean body weight were 5.4 years (0.3-11.9 years) and 4.6 ± 0.8 kg, respectively. Clinical signs at presentation included lethargy (10/17 cats), tachypnea (6/17 cats), and/or syncope (3/17 cats). In two cats, VPE was an incidental finding. Congestive heart failure was uncommon (3/17 cats). Nine (9/17) cats had tachyarrhythmias: 7/9 cats had narrow QRS complex tachycardia and 2/9 cats had wide QRS complex tachycardia. Four cats had ventricular arrhythmias. Cats with VPE had larger left (P < 0.001) and right (P < 0.001) atria and thicker interventricular septum (P = 0.019) and left ventricular free wall (P = 0.028) than controls. Three cats had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Treatment included different combinations of sotalol (5/17 cats), diltiazem (5/17 cats), atenolol (4/17 cats), furosemide (4/17 cats), and platelet inhibitors (4/17 cats). Five cats died, all from cardiac death (median survival time 1882 days [2-1882 days]).
CONCLUSIONS
Cats with VPE had a relatively long survival, albeit showing larger atria and thicker left ventricular walls than healthy cats.
Topics: Male; Cats; Animals; Female; Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome; Retrospective Studies; Pre-Excitation Syndromes; Tachycardia; Electrocardiography; Cat Diseases
PubMed: 37267820
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2023.04.005 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Jun 2023Various agents may be utilized to manage supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in neonates and infants. Recently, sotalol has piqued interest given its reported success in...
INTRODUCTION
Various agents may be utilized to manage supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in neonates and infants. Recently, sotalol has piqued interest given its reported success in managing neonates and infants with SVTs, especially with the intravenous formulation. While the manufacturer recommends using an age-related nomogram in neonates and young infants to guide doses, clinical reports describe various dosing based on weight (mg/kg) or on body surface area (BSA) in mg/m . Given the reported variation in clinical practice with regard to dosing in neonates, there is a gap in the literature and translation into clinical practice regarding applicability of the nomogram into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA in neonates for SVT.
METHODS
This is a single center retrospective study evaluating effective sotalol dosing from January 2011 and June 2021 (inclusive). Neonates who received intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) sotalol for SVT were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA. Secondary outcomes include comparison of doses to the manufacturer nomogram, description of dose titrations, reported adverse outcomes, and change in therapy. Two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine statistically significant differences.
RESULTS
Thirty-one eligible patients were included in this study. The median (range) age and weight were 16.5 (1-28) days and 3.2 (1.8-4.9) kg, respectively. The median initial dose was 7.3 (1.9-10.8) mg/kg or 114.3 (30.9-166.7) mg/m /day. Fourteen (45.2%) of patients required a dose increase for SVT control. The median dose required for rhythm control was 8.5 (2-14.8) mg/kg/day or 120.7 (30.9-225) mg/m /day. Of note, the median recommended dose per manufacturer nomogram for our patients would have been 51.3 (16.2-73.8) mg/m /day, which is significantly lower than both the initial dose (p < .001) and final doses (p < .001) utilized in our study. A total of 7 (22.9%) patients were uncontrolled on sotalol monotherapy using our dosing regimen. Two patients (6.5%) had reports of hypotension and one patient (3.3%) had a report of bradycardia requiring discontinuation of therapy. The average change in baseline QTC following sotalol initiation was 6.8%. Twenty-seven (87.1%), 3 (9.7%), 1 (3.3%) experienced prolongation, no change, or a decrease in QTc, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that a sotalol strategy significantly higher than the manufacture dose recommendations are required for rhythm control in neonates with SVT. There were few adverse events reported with this dosing. Further prospective studies would be advantageous to confirm these findings.
Topics: Infant; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Sotalol; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Tachycardia, Supraventricular; Body Weight
PubMed: 37210614
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15939 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2015Despite many advances in nonpharmacologic management of ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs remain important in both the acute conversion and chronic... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Despite many advances in nonpharmacologic management of ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs remain important in both the acute conversion and chronic prevention of ventricular arrhythmias.
AREAS COVERED
Key trials related to antiarrhythmic drug use are reviewed, emphasizing the impact of recent discoveries. Sodium channel blockers are discussed with an emphasis on recently identified specialized uses. Beta blockers, amiodarone, sotalol, and dofetilide are discussed together in the context of structural heart disease, because they do not increase mortality in this group of patients. Other medications found to reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden are discussed last.
EXPERT OPINION
Since most patients with ventricular arrhythmias have structural heart disease, pharmacologic treatment is limited to amiodarone, d-,l-sotalol, and dofetilide (off-label indication), in conjunction with defibrillator implantation. While amiodarone has superior reduction in arrhythmias, its long-term extracardiac toxicities can cause significant morbidity. A trial of sotalol is reasonable if there are no contraindications, recognizing that over 20% of patients have to discontinue it because of adverse effects. Beta blockers are first line therapy for most patients. Genetic testing is particularly informative regarding treatment approach in long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic VT. Research should continue to focus on developing more effective antiarrhythmic medications with less long-term toxicity.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Potassium Channel Blockers; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Channel Blockers; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 26513538
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1100170 -
Journal of the American Heart... Feb 2022Background Atrial tachyarrhythmias are common after atrial fibrillation ablation, so adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often used. Data on the effectiveness and...
Background Atrial tachyarrhythmias are common after atrial fibrillation ablation, so adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often used. Data on the effectiveness and safety of dronedarone and sotalol after AF ablation are limited. Here, we compared health outcomes of ablated patients treated with dronedarone versus sotalol. Methods and Results A comparative analysis of propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts was performed using IBM MarketScan Research Databases. Patients treated with dronedarone after atrial fibrillation ablation were matched 1:1 to patients treated with sotalol between January 1, 2013 and March 31, 2018. Outcomes of interest included cardiovascular hospitalization, proarrhythmia, repeat ablation, and cardioversion. This study was exempt from institutional review board review. Among 30 696 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation, 2086 were treated with dronedarone and 3665 with sotalol after ablation. Propensity-score matching resulted in 1815 patients receiving dronedarone matched 1:1 to patients receiving sotalol. Risk of cardiovascular hospitalization was lower with dronedarone versus sotalol at 3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.97]), 6 months (aHR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63-0.93]), and 12 months after ablation (aHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66-0.93]). Risk of repeat ablation and cardioversion generally did not differ between the 2 groups. A lower risk of proarrhythmia was associated with dronedarone versus sotalol at 3 months (aHR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.90]), 6 months (aHR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.93]), and 12 months (aHR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.94]) after ablation. Conclusions These data suggest that dronedarone may be a more effective and safer alternative after ablation than sotalol.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dronedarone; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Sotalol
PubMed: 35060388
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020506 -
Economics and outcomes of sotalol in-patient dosing approaches in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of Cardiovascular... Mar 2022There exists variability in the administration of in-patient sotalol therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of this variability on patient...
INTRODUCTION
There exists variability in the administration of in-patient sotalol therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of this variability on patient in-hospital and 30-day posthospitalization costs and outcomes is not known. Also, the cost impact of intravenous sotalol, which can accelerate drug loading to therapeutic levels, is unknown.
METHODS
One hundred and thirty-three AF patients admitted for oral sotalol initiation at an Intermountain Healthcare Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were included. Patient and dosing characteristics were described descriptively and the impact of dosing schedule was correlated with daily hospital costs/clinical outcomes during the index hospitalization and for 30 days. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement for 3-day sotalol initiation is $9263.51. Projections of cost savings were made considering a 1-day load using intravenous sotalol that costs $2500.00 to administer.
RESULTS
The average age was 70.3 ± 12.3 years and 60.2% were male with comorbidities of hypertension (83%), diabetes (36%), and coronary artery disease (53%). The mean ejection fraction was 59.9 ± 7.8% and the median corrected QT interval was 453.7 ± 37.6 ms before sotalol dosing. No ventricular arrhythmias developed, but bradycardia (<60 bpm) was observed in 37.6% of patients. The average length of stay was 3.9 ± 4.6 (median: 2.2) days. Postdischarge outcomes and rehospitalization rates stratified by length of stay were similar. The cost per day was estimated at $2931.55 (1. $2931.55, 2. $5863.10, 3. $8794.65, 4. $11 726.20).
CONCLUSIONS
In-patient oral sotalol dosing is markedly variable and results in the potential of both cost gain and loss to a hospital. In consideration of estimated costs, there is the potential for $871.55 cost savings compared to a 2-day oral load and $3803.10 compared to a 3-day oral load.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Sotalol; United States
PubMed: 34953091
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15342 -
Heart Rhythm Jun 2022
Topics: Adenosine; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Humans; Sotalol; Tachycardia, Supraventricular
PubMed: 35144018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.002 -
Journal of Atrial Fibrillation 2017Advances in surgical techniques have led to the survival of most patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) up to their adulthood. During their lifetime, many of them... (Review)
Review
Advances in surgical techniques have led to the survival of most patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) up to their adulthood. During their lifetime, many of them develop atrial tachyarrhythmias due to atrial dilatation and scarring from surgical procedures. More complex defects and palliative repairs are linked to a higher incidence and earlier occurrence of arrhythmias. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients who have atrial septal defects repaired after age 55 and in patients with tetralogy of Fallot repaired after age 45. Patients with dextrotransposition of the great arteries who undergo Mustard or Senning atrial switch procedures have an increased risk of atrial flutter due to atrial baffle suture lines. Patients with Ebstein's anomaly are also prone to supraventricular tachycardias caused by accessory bypass tracts. Patients with a single ventricle who undergo Fontan palliation are at risk of developing persistent or permanent AF due to extreme atrial enlargement and hypertrophy. In addition, obtaining vascular access to the pulmonary venous atrium can present unique challenges during radiofrequency ablation for patients with a Fontan palliation. Patients with cyanotic CHD who develop AF have substantial morbidity because of limited hemodynamic reserve and a high viscosity state. Amiodarone is an effective therapy for patients with arrhythmias from CHD, but its use carries long-term risks for toxicity. Dofetilide and sotalol have good short-term effectiveness and are reasonable alternatives to amiodarone. Pulmonary vein isolation is associated with better outcomes in patients taking antiarrhythmic medications. Anticoagulants are challenging to prescribe for patients with CHD because of a lack of data that can be extrapolated to this patient population. Surgical ablation is the gold standard for invasive rhythm control in patients with CHD and should be considered at the time of surgical repair or revision of congenital heart defects. When possible, patients with complex CHD should be referred for care to an adult congenital heart disease center of excellence.
PubMed: 29250225
DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1612 -
Current Cardiology Reports Sep 2017Ventricular tachycardia occurrence in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients may result in shock delivery and is associated with increased morbidity and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Ventricular tachycardia occurrence in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients may result in shock delivery and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In addition, shocks may have deleterious mechanical and psychological effects. Prevention of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation may be warranted. Antiarrhythmic drugs are limited by incomplete efficacy and an unfavorable adverse effect profile. Catheter ablation can be effective but acute complications and long-term VT recurrence risk necessitating repeat ablation should be recognized. A shared clinical decision process accounting for patients' cardiac status, comorbidities, and goals of care is often required.
RECENT FINDINGS
There are four published randomized trials of catheter ablation for sustained monomorphic VT (SMVT) in the setting of ischemic heart disease; there are no randomized studies for non-ischemic ventricular substrates. The most recent trial is the VANISH trial which randomly allocated patients with ICD, prior infarction, and SMVT despite first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy to catheter ablation or more aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. During 28 months of follow-up, catheter ablation resulted in a 28% relative risk reduction in the composite endpoint of death, VT storm, and appropriate ICD shock (p = 0.04). In a subgroup analysis, patients having VT despite amiodarone had better outcomes with ablation as compared to increasing amiodarone dose or adding mexiletine. There is evidence for the effectiveness of both catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with myocardial infarction, an implantable defibrillator, and VT. If sotalol is ineffective in suppressing VT, either catheter ablation or initiation of amiodarone is a reasonable option. If VT occurs despite amiodarone therapy, there is evidence that catheter ablation is superior to administration of more aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Early catheter ablation may be appropriate in some clinical situations such as patients presenting with relatively slow VT below ICD detection, electrical storms, hemodynamically stable VT, or in very selected patients with left ventricular assist devices. The optimal first-line suppressive therapy for VT, after ICD implantation and appropriate programming, remains to be determined. Thus far, there has not been a randomized controlled trial to compare catheter ablation to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as a first-line treatment; the VANISH-2 study has been initiated as a pilot to examine this question.
Topics: Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Catheter Ablation; Defibrillators, Implantable; Electric Countershock; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sotalol; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28900864
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0924-0