-
Cancer Treatment Reviews Jul 2022Despite promising results following targeted treatment with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-inhibitors in HER2-positive gastric and esophageal... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Despite promising results following targeted treatment with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-inhibitors in HER2-positive gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), prognosis remains dismal. Many patients ultimately demonstrate progression following treatment due to resistance to HER2-targeted therapy. Here, we describe the potential primary and secondary resistance mechanisms to HER2-targeted therapy in GEA.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for eligible studies describing changes that were associated with drug resistance. Study quality was assessed using an adjusted version of the OHAT risk of bias tool. Quality of proposed resistance mechanisms was assessed using predefined criteria.
RESULTS
In total, 913 records were screened, of which 73 were included that investigated mechanisms of resistance against anti-HER2 treatment in cell lines, xenograft models, patient tissue samples, and publicly available datasets. HER2-targeted therapy resistance was found to be caused by HER2 receptor changes, upregulation of compensatory receptors, (re)activation of downstream signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT and MAPK, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, acquirement of stem cell-like properties, alterations in cell cycle related genes, cellular metabolism, and drug pharmacokinetics.
DISCUSSION
Several different mechanisms can contribute to drug resistance to anti-HER2 treatment in GEA, mainly through loss of or mutations in the HER2 receptor and upregulation of alternative receptors such as MET, HER3, and FGFRs. Despite these preclinical results, methods to overcome the proposed resistance mechanisms in the clinical setting are lacking. Therefore, further investigation of therapy resistance in GEA patients treated with HER2 targeted therapy is essential to overcome resistance and improve treatment outcome of these patients.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Receptor, ErbB-2; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 35689885
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102418 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Jun 2023Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast volume, toxicity, and number of radiotherapy sessions and can allow tumor downstaging. In this review, we assessed tumor response and clinical outcomes after preoperative PBI.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of studies on preoperative PBI in patients with low-risk breast cancer using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus (PROSPERO registration CRD42022301435). References of eligible manuscripts were checked for other relevant manuscripts. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR).
RESULTS
A total of eight prospective and one retrospective cohort study were identified (n = 359). In up to 42% of the patients, pCR was obtained and this increased after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS (0.5-8 months). After a maximum median follow-up of 5.0 years, three studies on external beam radiotherapy reported low local recurrence rates (0-3%) and overall survival of 97-100%. Acute toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1 skin toxicity (0-34%) and seroma (0-31%). Late toxicity was predominantly fibrosis grade 1 (46-100%) and grade 2 (10-11%). Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 78-100% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative PBI showed a higher pCR rate after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS. Mild late toxicity and good oncological and cosmetic outcomes were reported. In the ongoing ABLATIVE-2 trial, BCS is performed at a longer interval of 12 months after preoperative PBI aiming to achieve a higher pCR rate.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Breast; Mastectomy, Segmental
PubMed: 36869253
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13233-9 -
Dose-response : a Publication of... 2019Radiation therapy induces acute and chronic radiological toxicity, in particular hematological toxicity (HT). This study aimed to explore the mechanistic clue and... (Review)
Review
Analysis of mRNA Expression Patterns in Peripheral Blood Cells of 3 Patients With Cancer After the First Fraction of 2 Gy Irradiation: An Integrated Case Report and Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND
Radiation therapy induces acute and chronic radiological toxicity, in particular hematological toxicity (HT). This study aimed to explore the mechanistic clue and potential predictors at the messenger RNA (mRNA) level.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Peripheral blood was collected from 3 patients with cervical cancer (CC), nasopharynx cancer (NC), and tongue cancer (TC) after the first 2 Gy fraction of radiotherapy (RT). High-throughput sequencing was used to assess mRNA profiles.
RESULTS
Eleven genes, such as ALAS2(5-aminolevulinate synthase), SLC4A1(solute carrier family 4 member 1), (hemoglobin subunit gamma 2), (TNF α-induced protein 3), (period circadian clock 1), (coiled-coil domain containing 136), (chromosome 9 open reading frame 84), (interleukin 1β), (FosB protooncogene), (nuclear receptor subfamily 4), (polymerase family member 15), had overlapping expression changes in all 3 cancers of which 3 (, and ) are suggested as potential predictors for the early diagnosis of HT after RT.
CONCLUSIONS
may be useful predictors of HT in patients after RT. Eleven overlapping expression mRNAs among 3 cancers might be potential predictors for early diagnosis of radiation toxicity in patients.
PubMed: 30833875
DOI: 10.1177/1559325819833474 -
Oncotarget Sep 2017Poly-(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are becoming important actors of anti-neoplasic agents landscape, with recent but narrow FDA's approvals for ovarian BRCA... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Poly-(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are becoming important actors of anti-neoplasic agents landscape, with recent but narrow FDA's approvals for ovarian BRCA mutated cancers and prostatic cancer. Nevertheless, PARP inhibitors are also promising drugs for combined treatments particularly with radiotherapy. More than seven PARP inhibitors have been currently developed. Central Role of PARP in DNA repair, makes consider PARP inhibitor as potential radiosensitizers, especially for tumors with DNA repair defects, such as BRCA mutation, because of synthetic lethality. Furthermore the replication-dependent activity of PARP inhibitor helps to maintain the differential effect between tumoral and healthy tissues. Inhibition of chromatin remodeling, G2/M arrest, vasodilatory effect induced by PARP inhibitor, also participate to their radio-sensitization effect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Here, after highlighting mechanisms of PARP inhibitors radiosensitization we methodically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Databases and meeting proceedings for human pre-clinical and clinical studies that evaluated PARP inhibitor radiosensitizing effect. Enhancement ratio, when available, was systematically reported.
RESULTS
Sixty four studies finally met our selection criteria and were included in the analysis. Only three pre-clinical studies didn't find any radiosensitizing effect. Median enhancement ratio vary from 1,3 for prostate tumors to 1,5 for lung cancers. Nine phase I or II trials assessed safety data.
CONCLUSION
PARP inhibitors are promising radiosensitizers, but need more clinical investigation. The next ten years will be determining for judging their real potential.
PubMed: 28978184
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19079 -
Technology in Cancer Research &... 2020It is well known that radiation damage of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles, the glottic larynx, and the supraglottic larynx may lead to dysphagia, an unwanted effect... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
It is well known that radiation damage of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles, the glottic larynx, and the supraglottic larynx may lead to dysphagia, an unwanted effect of head and neck radiotherapy. The reduction of radiotherapy-induced dysphagia might be achieved by adaptive radiotherapy. Although the number of studies concerning adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer is continuously increasing, there are only a few studies concerning changes in dysphagia-related structures during radiotherapy.The goal of this review is to summarize the current knowledge about volumetric, dosimetric, and other changes of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles associated with head and neck radiotherapy. A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE database according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The conclusions of 8 studies that passed the criteria indicate a significant increase in the volume and the thickness of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles during radiotherapy. Moreover, the changes in magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles correlate with the absorbed dose (typically higher than 50 Gy) and also with the grade of dysphagia. This systematic review presents 2 variables, which are suitable for estimation of radiotherapy-related pharyngeal constrictor muscles changes-magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity and the thickness. In the case of the thickness, there is no consensus in the level of the measurement-C2 vertebra, C3 vertebra, and the middle of the craniocaudal axis are used. It seems that reference to a position associated with a vertebral body could be more reproducible and beneficial for future research. Although late pharyngeal toxicity remains a challenge in head and neck cancer treatment, better knowledge of radiotherapy-related changes in the pharyngeal constrictor muscles contributes to adaptive radiotherapy development and thus improves the treatment results.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Organs at Risk; Pharyngeal Muscles; Radiotherapy Dosage; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32734851
DOI: 10.1177/1533033820945805 -
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt... 2021Since protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is abnormally expressed in various tumors, in this study we aim to assess the association between PRMT5 and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Since protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is abnormally expressed in various tumors, in this study we aim to assess the association between PRMT5 and clinicopathological and prognostic features.
METHODS
Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 25, 2021. The critical appraisal of the eligible studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess the effect. Engauge Digitizer version 12.1, STATA version 15.1, and R version 4.0.5 were used to obtain and analysis the data.
RESULTS
A total of 32 original studies covering 15,583 patients were included. In our data, it indicated that high level of PRMT5 was significantly correlated with advanced tumor stage (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.22-3.70, =.008; = 80.7%) and positively correlated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.46-1.73, < .001; = 50%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.88, < .001; = 0%). In addition, sub-group analysis showed that high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor overall survival for such 5 kinds of cancers as hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer.
CONCLUSION
For the first time we found PRMT5 was pan-cancerous as a prognostic biomarker and high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor prognosis for certain cancers.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasms; Protein-Arginine N-Methyltransferases; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 34758643
DOI: 10.1177/10732748211050583 -
Scientific Reports Sep 2018Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, focusing on overall survival (OS). The quality of the studies was assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0-7 points based on modified REMARK criteria. To evaluate all identified prognostic biomarkers, the hallmarks of cancer were adapted to fit all biomarkers based on their biological function in EAC, resulting in the features angiogenesis, cell adhesion and extra-cellular matrix remodeling, cell cycle, immune, invasion and metastasis, proliferation, and self-renewal. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived by random effects meta-analyses performed on each hallmarks of cancer feature. Of the 3298 unique articles identified, 84 were included, with a mean quality of 5.9 points (range 3.5-7). The hallmarks of cancer feature 'immune' was most significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.88, (95%CI 1.20-2.93)). Of the 82 unique prognostic biomarkers identified, meta-analyses showed prominent biomarkers, including COX-2, PAK-1, p14ARF, PD-L1, MET, LC3B, IGFBP7 and LGR5, associated to each hallmark of cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Biomarkers, Tumor; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 30185893
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6 -
BMJ Open Dec 2021This study aimed to assess the accuracy of CT texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiating low-grade and high-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to assess the accuracy of CT texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiating low-grade and high-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, OVID Medline, Science Direct and Springer were searched to identify the included studies.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR INCLUDING STUDIES
Clinical studies that report about the accuracy of CTTA in differentiating low-grade and high-grade RCC.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched to identify studies from their inception to 20 October 2021. Two radiologists independently extracted data from the primary studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic OR (DOR) were calculated to assess CTTA performance. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of CTTA in grading RCC.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 11 studies, with 1603 lesions observed in 1601 patients. Values of the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR were 0.79 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.84), 0.84 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.87), 5.1 (95% CI 4.0 to 6.4), 0.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.32) and 21 (95% CI 13 to 33), respectively. The SROC curve showed that the AUC was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.90). Deeks' test found no significant publication bias among the studies (p=0.42).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that CTTA has a high accuracy in differentiating low-grade and high-grade RCC. A standardised methodology and large sample-based study are necessary to certain the diagnostic accuracy of CTTA in RCC grading for clinical decision making.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34937716
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051470 -
International Journal of Radiation... 2022Brain development during embryogenesis and in early postnatal life is particularly complex and involves the interplay of many cellular processes and molecular...
BACKGROUND
Brain development during embryogenesis and in early postnatal life is particularly complex and involves the interplay of many cellular processes and molecular mechanisms, making it extremely vulnerable to exogenous insults, including ionizing radiation (IR). Microcephaly is one of the most frequent neurodevelopmental abnormalities that is characterized by small brain size, and is often associated with intellectual deficiency. Decades of research span from epidemiological data on exposure of the A-bomb survivors, to studies on animal and cellular models that allowed deciphering the most prominent molecular mechanisms leading to microcephaly. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is used to organize, evaluate and portray the scientific knowledge of toxicological effects spanning different biological levels of organizations, from the initial interaction with molecular targets to the occurrence of a disease or adversity. In the present study, the framework was used in an attempt to organize the current scientific knowledge on microcephaly progression in the context of ionizing radiation (IR) exposure. This work was performed by a group of experts formed during a recent workshop organized jointly by the Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative (MELODI) and the European Radioecology Alliance (ALLIANCE) associations to present the AOP approach and tools. Here we report on the development of a putative AOP for congenital microcephaly resulting from IR exposure based on discussions of the working group and we emphasize the use of a novel machine-learning approach to assist in the screening of the available literature to develop AOPs.
CONCLUSION
The expert consultation led to the identification of crucial biological events for the progression of microcephaly upon exposure to IR, and highlighted current knowledge gaps. The machine learning approach was successfully used to screen the existing knowledge and helped to rapidly screen the body of evidence and in particular the epidemiological data. This systematic review approach also ensured that the analysis was sufficiently comprehensive to identify the most relevant data and facilitate rapid and consistent AOP development. We anticipate that as machine learning approaches become more user-friendly through easy-to-use web interface, this would allow AOP development to become more efficient and less time consuming.
Topics: Animals; Adverse Outcome Pathways; Microcephaly; Risk Assessment; Machine Learning; Referral and Consultation
PubMed: 35947014
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2110312 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2019Cancer patients who have undergone radiotherapy may have an increased risk of subsequent stroke. A clear and detailed understanding of this risk has not been...
Cancer patients who have undergone radiotherapy may have an increased risk of subsequent stroke. A clear and detailed understanding of this risk has not been established. A search for research articles published from January 1990 to November 2017 in the English language was conducted. Subsequent stroke risk in cancer survivors was compared using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to whether or not radiotherapy was given. A total of 12 eligible studies were identified including 57,881 total patients. All studies were retrospective, as no prospective studies were identified. The meta-analysis revealed a higher overall risk of subsequent stroke in cancer survivors/patients given radiotherapy compared to those not given radiotherapy (RR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.45, 3.16). In addition, compared to patients not given radiotherapy, there was an increased risk of subsequent stroke for radiotherapy treated patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR: 2.81, 95% CI: 0.69, 4.93) or head/neck/brain/nasopharyngeal cancer (RR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.16), for patients younger than 40 years (RR: 3.53, 95% CI: 2.51, 4.97) or aged 40-49 years (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.45) and for patients treated in Asia (RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.48, 2.29), the United States (RR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.23), or in Europe (RR: 4.11, 95% CI 2.62, 6.45). The available literature indicates an approximate overall doubling of the subsequent stroke risk in cancer patients given radiotherapy. The elevated risk was generally statistically significant according to cancer type, baseline patient age and region or country where treatment was given. Caution is required in interpreting these findings due to the heterogeneity of populations represented and lack of standardization and completeness across published studies. Further, if real, we cannot conclude the extent to which patient, treatment and/or investigational factors are responsible for this apparent elevated risk. An objective and more detailed understanding of the risks of radiotherapy, and how to prevent them, is urgently required. It is the responsibility of all who provide cancer services to ensure that the experience of all their patients is documented and analyzed using quality registries.
PubMed: 30930843
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00233