-
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Apr 2023Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the... (Review)
Review
Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the disease and its sight-threatening sequelae. This immunomodulation can be achieved through topical and/or systemic medications, and the choice of one drug over the other is determined by the underlying systemic disease. These immunosuppressive agents require a minimum of 6-8 weeks to achieve their beneficial effect, and during this time, the patient is usually placed on topical corticosteroids. Antimetabolites such as methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil, along with calcineurin inhibitors, are commonly used as first-line medications. The latter have a pivotal role in immunomodulation since T cells contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of ocular surface inflammation in dry eye disease. Alkylating agents are largely limited to controlling acute exacerbations with pulse doses of cyclophosphamide. Biologic agents, such as rituximab, are particularly useful in patients with refractory disease. Each group of drugs has its own side-effect profiles and requires a stringent monitoring schedule that must be followed to prevent systemic morbidity. A customized combination of topical and systemic medications is usually required to achieve adequate control, and this review aims to help the clinician choose the most appropriate modality and monitoring regimen for a given case of ADDE.
Topics: Humans; Azathioprine; Dry Eye Syndromes; Immunosuppression Therapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammation; Methotrexate
PubMed: 37026249
DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2818_22 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2016The results from controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the treatment of active Crohn's disease have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The results from controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the treatment of active Crohn's disease have been conflicting and controversial. An updated meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of these drugs for the induction of remission in active Crohn's disease.
OBJECTIVES
The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for induction of remission in active Crohn's disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to 30 October 2015. Review articles and conference proceedings were also searched to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine compared to placebo or active therapy involving adult patients with active Crohn's disease were selected for inclusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were extracted by two independent observers based on the intention-to-treat principle. Outcomes of interest included: clinical remission, clinical improvement, fistula improvement or healing, steroid sparing, adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each outcome. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting each outcome was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirteen RCTs (n = 1211 patients) of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine therapy in adult patients were identified: nine included placebo comparators and six included active comparators. The majority of included studies were rated as low risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical remission rates between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and placebo. Forty-eight per cent (95/197) of patients receiving antimetabolites achieved remission compared to 37% (68/183) of placebo patients (5 studies, 380 patients; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.55). There was no statistically significant difference in clinical improvement rates between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and placebo. Forty-eight per cent (107/225) of patients receiving antimetabolites achieved clinical improvement or remission compared to 36% (75/209) of placebo patients (8 studies, 434 patients; RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62). There was a statistically significant difference in steroid sparing (defined as prednisone dose < 10 mg/day while maintaining remission) between azathioprine and placebo. Sixty-four per cent (47/163) of azathioprine patients were able to reduce their prednisone dose to < 10 mg/day compared to 46% (32/70) of placebo patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.77). GRADE analyses rated the overall quality of the evidence for the outcomes clinical remission, clinical improvement and steroid sparing as moderate due to sparse data. There was no statistically significant difference in withdrawals due to adverse events or serious adverse events between antimetabolites and placebo. Ten percent of patients in the antimetabolite group withdrew due to adverse events compared to 5% of placebo patients (8 studies, 510 patients; RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.08). Serious adverse events were reported in 14% of patients receiving azathioprine compared to 4% of placebo patients (2 studies, 216 patients; RR 2.57, 95% CI 0.92 to 7.13). Common adverse events reported in the placebo controlled studies included: allergic reactions. leukopenia, pancreatitis and nausea. Azathioprine was significantly inferior to infliximab for induction of steroid-free clinical remission. Thirty per cent (51/170) of azathioprine patients achieved steroid-free remission compared to 44% (75/169) of infliximab patients (1 study, 339 patients; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90). The combination of azathioprine and infliximab was significantly superior to infliximab alone for induction of steroid-free clinical remission. Sixty per cent (116/194) of patients in the combined azathioprine and infliximab group achieved steroid-free remission compared to 48% (91/189) of infliximab patients (2 studies, 383 patients; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47). Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine therapy was found to be no better at inducing steroid free clinical remission compared to methotrexate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.49) and 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.91). There were no statistically significant differences in withdrawals due to adverse events between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.71); between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.54); between azathioprine and infliximab (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.23); or between the combination of azathioprine and infliximab and infliximab (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.80). Common adverse events in the active comparator trials included nausea, abdominal pain, pyrexia and headache.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine offer no advantage over placebo for induction of remission or clinical improvement in active Crohn's disease. Antimetaboilte therapy may allow patients to reduce steroid consumption. Adverse events were more common in patients receiving antimetabolites although differences with placebo were not statistically significant. Azathioprine therapy is inferior to infliximab for induction of steroid-free remission. However, the combination of azathioprine and infliximab was superior to infliximab alone for induction of steroid-free remission.
Topics: Adult; Antimetabolites; Azathioprine; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Induction Chemotherapy; Infliximab; Mercaptopurine; Mesalamine; Prednisone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfasalazine; Withholding Treatment
PubMed: 27783843
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000545.pub5 -
Arthritis Care & Research Nov 2019Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are immunosuppressants frequently used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We...
OBJECTIVE
Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are immunosuppressants frequently used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We studied longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence to AZA and MMF in a nationwide US SLE cohort.
METHODS
In the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (2000-2010) database, we identified patients with SLE who initiated AZA or MMF (no use in the prior 6 months) with ≥12 months of continuous follow-up. We dichotomized adherence at 80%, with ≥24 of 30 days per month considered adherent. We used group-based trajectory models to estimate monthly adherence patterns and multivariable multinomial logistic regression to determine the association between demographic, SLE and utilization-related predictors, and the odds ratios (OR) of belonging to a nonadherent versus the adherent trajectory, separately for AZA and MMF.
RESULTS
We identified 2,309 AZA initiators and 2,070 MMF initiators with SLE. Four-group trajectory models classified 17% of AZA and 21% of MMF initiators as adherent. AZA and MMF nonadherers followed similar trajectory patterns. African American race (OR 1.67 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20-2.31]) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.58 [95% CI 1.06-2.35]) increased odds of AZA nonadherence; there were no significant associations between race/ethnicity and MMF nonadherence. Male sex and polypharmacy were associated with lower odds of nonadherence to both medications; lupus nephritis was associated with lower odds of nonadherence to MMF (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.55-0.99]).
CONCLUSION
Adherence to AZA or MMF over the first year of use was rare. Race, sex, and lupus nephritis were modestly associated with adherence, but the magnitude, direction, and significance of predictors differed by medication, suggesting the complexity of predicting adherence behavior.
Topics: Adult; Azathioprine; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Logistic Models; Longitudinal Studies; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Medicaid; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Racial Groups; Sex Factors; United States
PubMed: 30354025
DOI: 10.1002/acr.23792 -
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aug 2017
Topics: Aged; Azathioprine; Biopsy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Sweet Syndrome
PubMed: 28284013
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4022-1 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Oct 2021Thiopurines are immunomodulators used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and inflammatory bowel diseases. Adverse reactions to these agents are one of the...
Thiopurines are immunomodulators used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and inflammatory bowel diseases. Adverse reactions to these agents are one of the main causes of treatment discontinuation or interruption. Myelosuppression is the most frequent adverse effect; however, approximately 5%-20% of patients develop gastrointestinal toxicity. The identification of biomarkers able to prevent and/or monitor these adverse reactions would be useful for clinicians for the proactive management of long-term thiopurine therapy. In this editorial, we discuss evidence supporting the use of , , and genes, in addition to and as possible biomarkers for thiopurine-related gastrointestinal toxicity.
Topics: Azathioprine; Biomarkers; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Mercaptopurine; Methyltransferases; Pyrophosphatases
PubMed: 34720526
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6348 -
Clinical Rheumatology Jan 2021Precision medicine aims to personalize treatment for both effectiveness and safety. As a critical component of this emerging initiative, pharmacogenomics seeks to guide... (Review)
Review
Precision medicine aims to personalize treatment for both effectiveness and safety. As a critical component of this emerging initiative, pharmacogenomics seeks to guide drug treatment based on genetics. In this review article, we give an overview of pharmacogenomics in the setting of an immunosuppressant frequently prescribed by rheumatologists, azathioprine. Azathioprine has a narrow therapeutic index and a high risk of adverse events. By applying candidate gene analysis and unbiased approaches, researchers have identified multiple variants associated with an increased risk for adverse events associated with azathioprine, particularly bone marrow suppression. Variants in two genes, TPMT and NUDT15, are widely recognized, leading drug regulatory agencies and professional organizations to adopt recommendations for testing before initiation of azathioprine therapy. As more gene-drug interactions are discovered, our field will continue to face the challenge of balancing benefits and costs associated with genetic testing. However, novel approaches in genomics and the integration of clinical and genetic factors into risk scores offer unprecedented opportunities for the application of pharmacogenomics in routine practice. Key Points • Pharmacogenomics can help us understand how individuals' genetics may impact their response to medications. • Azathioprine is a success story for the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics, particularly the effects of TPMT and NUDT15 variants on myelosuppression. • As our knowledge advances, testing and dosing recommendations will continue to evolve, with our field striving to balance costs and benefits to patients. • As we aim toward the goals of precision medicine, future research may integrate increasingly individualized traits-including clinical and genetic characteristics-to predict the safety and efficacy of particular medications for individual patients.
Topics: Azathioprine; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Pharmacogenetics; Precision Medicine; Rheumatologists
PubMed: 32617765
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05258-2 -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... Jan 2023Azathioprine is a widely prescribed drug for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as myasthenia gravis or organ transplant recipients. Azathioprine exerts...
BACKGROUND
Azathioprine is a widely prescribed drug for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as myasthenia gravis or organ transplant recipients. Azathioprine exerts immunosuppressive effects by inhibiting intracellular purine synthesis and reducing the numbers of circulating B and T lymphocytes. Case reports indicate increased risk for serious infections that can occur despite regular measurements of lymphocyte counts during azathioprine therapy.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to comprehensively investigate therapy-associated patient risks and the underlying immune dysfunction of azathioprine use.
METHODS
Peripheral blood leukocytes were analyzed using single-cell mass and spectral flow cytometry to detect specific effects of azathioprine use on the systemic immune signature. Therapy-associated clinical features were analyzed in 2 independent cohorts of myasthenia gravis patients.
RESULTS
Azathioprine therapy selectively induced pronounced CD56CD16 natural killer cell depletion and concomitant IFN-γ deficiency. Cytokine profiling revealed a specific contraction of classical T1 cells during azathioprine treatment. We further observed an increased occurrence of reactivation of endogenous latent herpesviruses in the azathioprine-treated group versus in patients with myasthenia gravis who were not receiving immunomodulatory treatment; this increased occurrence was validated in an independent cohort.
CONCLUSION
Our study highlights the risk of development of adverse events during azathioprine therapy and suggests that natural killer cell monitoring could be valuable in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Azathioprine; Killer Cells, Natural; Interferon-gamma; Herpesviridae; Myasthenia Gravis
PubMed: 36122787
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.09.010 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2018Cyclophosphamide, in combination with corticosteroids, has been first-line treatment for inducing disease remission for proliferative lupus nephritis, reducing death at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cyclophosphamide, in combination with corticosteroids, has been first-line treatment for inducing disease remission for proliferative lupus nephritis, reducing death at five years from over 50% in the 1950s and 1960s to less than 10% in recent years. Several treatment strategies designed to improve remission rates and minimise toxicity have become available. Treatments, including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors, alone and in combination, may have equivalent or improved rates of remission, lower toxicity (less alopecia and ovarian failure) and uncertain effects on death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and infection. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004 and updated in 2012.
OBJECTIVES
Our objective was to assess the evidence and evaluate the benefits and harms of different immunosuppressive treatments in people with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. The following questions relating to management of proliferative lupus nephritis were addressed: 1) Are new immunosuppressive agents superior to or as effective as cyclophosphamide plus corticosteroids? 2) Which agents, dosages, routes of administration and duration of therapy should be used? 3) Which toxicities occur with the different treatment regimens?
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register up to 2 March 2018 with support from the Cochrane Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any immunosuppressive treatment for biopsy-proven class III, IV, V+III and V+VI lupus nephritis in adult or paediatric patients were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were abstracted and the risks of bias were assessed independently by two authors. Dichotomous outcomes were calculated as risk ratio (RR) and measures on continuous scales calculated as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were death (all causes) and complete disease remission for induction therapy and disease relapse for maintenance therapy. Evidence certainty was determined using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
In this review update, 26 new studies were identified, to include 74 studies involving 5175 participants overall. Twenty-nine studies included children under the age of 18 years with lupus nephritis, however only two studies exclusively examined the treatment of lupus nephritis in patients less than 18 years of age.Induction therapy Sixty-seven studies (4791 participants; median 12 months duration (range 2.5 to 48 months)) reported induction therapy. The effects of all treatment strategies on death (all causes) and ESKD were uncertain (very low certainty evidence) as this outcome occurred very infrequently. Compared with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, MMF may have increased complete disease remission (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.42; low certainty evidence), although the range of effects includes the possibility of little or no difference.Compared to IV cyclophosphamide, MMF is probably associated with decreased alopecia (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.46; 170 less (129 less to 194 less) per 1000 people) (moderate certainty evidence), increased diarrhoea (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.58; 142 more (64 more to 257 more) per 1000 people) (moderate certainty evidence) and may have made little or no difference to major infection (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.54; 2 less (38 less to 62 more) per 1000 people) (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain if MMF decreased ovarian failure compared to IV cyclophosphamide because the certainty of the evidence was very low (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.18; 26 less (39 less to 49 more) per 1000 people). Studies were not generally designed to measure ESKD.MMF combined with tacrolimus may have increased complete disease remission (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 5.30; 336 more (17 to 1048 more) per 1000 people (low certainty evidence) compared with IV cyclophosphamide, however the effects on alopecia, diarrhoea, ovarian failure, and major infection remain uncertain. Compared to standard of care, the effects of biologics on most outcomes were uncertain because of low to very low certainty of evidence.Maintenance therapyNine studies (767 participants; median 30 months duration (range 6 to 63 months)) reported maintenance therapy. In maintenance therapy, disease relapse is probably increased with azathioprine compared with MMF (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.55; 114 more (30 to 236 more) per 1000 people (moderate certainty evidence). Multiple other interventions were compared as maintenance therapy, but patient-outcome data were sparse leading to imprecise estimates.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In this review update, studies assessing treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis were not designed to assess death (all causes) or ESKD. MMF may lead to increased complete disease remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide, with an acceptable adverse event profile, although evidence certainty was low and included the possibility of no difference. Calcineurin combined with lower dose MMF may improve induction of disease remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide, but the comparative safety profile of these therapies is uncertain. Azathioprine may increase disease relapse as maintenance therapy compared with MMF.
Topics: Adult; Azathioprine; Calcineurin; Child; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Induction Chemotherapy; Lupus Nephritis; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Mycophenolic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Tacrolimus
PubMed: 29957821
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002922.pub4 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jan 2023Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) is a crucial enzyme for azathioprine biotransformation and its activity is higher in very early onset inflammatory bowel disease... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) is a crucial enzyme for azathioprine biotransformation and its activity is higher in very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) patients than in adolescents with IBD (aIBD).
AIMS
The aims of this pharmacoepigenetic study were to evaluate differences in peripheral blood DNA methylation of the TPMT gene and in azathioprine pharmacokinetics in patients with VEO-IBD compared to aIBD.
METHODS
The association of age with whole genome DNA methylation profile was evaluated in a pilot group of patients and confirmed by a meta-analysis on 3 cohorts of patients available on the public functional genomics data repository. Effects of candidate CpG sites in the TPMT gene were validated in a larger cohort using pyrosequencing. TPMT activity and azathioprine metabolites (TGN) were measured in patients' erythrocytes by HPLC and associated with patients' age group and TPMT DNA methylation.
RESULTS
Whole genome DNA methylation pilot analysis, combined with the meta-analysis revealed cg22736354, located on TPMT downstream neighboring region, as the only statistically significant CpG whose methylation increases with age, resulting lower in VEO-IBD patients compared to aIBD (median 9.6% vs 12%, p = 0.029). Pyrosequencing confirmed lower cg22736354 methylation in VEO-IBD patients (median 4.0% vs 6.0%, p = 4.6 ×10). No differences in TPMT promoter methylation were found. Reduced cg22736354 methylation was associated with lower TGN concentrations (rho = 0.31, p = 0.01) in patients with VEO-IBD and aIBD.
CONCLUSION
Methylation of cg22736354 in TPMT gene neighborhood is lower in patients with VEO-IBD and is associated with reduced azathioprine inactivation and increased TGN concentrations.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Azathioprine; DNA Methylation; Methyltransferases; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 36462311
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113901 -
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Jan 2017The objective of the study was to define the clinical, biochemical, and histologic features of liver injury from thiopurines.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to define the clinical, biochemical, and histologic features of liver injury from thiopurines.
BACKGROUND
Azathioprine (Aza) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) can cause liver injury, but no large series exist.
METHODS
Clinical and laboratory data and 6-month outcomes of patients with thiopurine hepatotoxicity from the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Prospective Study were analyzed.
RESULTS
Twenty-two patients were identified, 12 due to Aza and 10 due to 6-MP, with a median age of 55 years; the majority were female (68%). Inflammatory bowel disease was the indication in 55%, and the median thiopurine dose was 150 (range, 25 to 300) mg daily. The median latency to onset was 75 (range, 3 to 2584) days. Injury first arose after a dose escalation in 59% of patients, the median latency after dose increase being 44 (range, 3 to 254) days. At onset, the median alanine aminotransferase level was 210 U/L, alkaline phosphatase was 151 U/L, and bilirubin was 7.4 mg/dL (peak, 13.4 mg/dL). There were no major differences between Aza and 6-MP cases, but anicteric cases typically had nonspecific symptoms and a hepatocellular pattern of enzyme elevations, whereas icteric cases experienced cholestatic hepatitis with modest enzyme elevations in a mixed pattern. One patient with preexisting cirrhosis required liver transplantation; all others resolved clinically. One patient still had moderate alkaline phosphatase elevations 2 years after onset.
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly three-quarters of patients with thiopurine-induced liver injury present with self-limited, cholestatic hepatitis, typically within 3 months of starting or a dose increase. The prognosis is favorable except in patients with preexisting cirrhosis.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Alkaline Phosphatase; Azathioprine; Bilirubin; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Child; Cholestasis; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Male; Mercaptopurine; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Young Adult
PubMed: 27648552
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000568