-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2017Empyema refers to pus in the pleural space, commonly due to adjacent pneumonia, chest wall injury, or a complication of thoracic surgery. A range of therapeutic options... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Empyema refers to pus in the pleural space, commonly due to adjacent pneumonia, chest wall injury, or a complication of thoracic surgery. A range of therapeutic options are available for its management, ranging from percutaneous aspiration and intercostal drainage to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy drainage. Intrapleural fibrinolytics may also be administered following intercostal drain insertion to facilitate pleural drainage. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding optimal treatment.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of surgical versus non-surgical treatments for complicated parapneumonic effusion or pleural empyema.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2016, Issue 9), MEDLINE (Ebscohost) (1946 to July week 3 2013, July 2015 to October 2016) and MEDLINE (Ovid) (1 May 2013 to July week 1 2015), Embase (2010 to October 2016), CINAHL (1981 to October 2016) and LILACS (1982 to October 2016) on 20 October 2016. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing studies (December 2016).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials that compared a surgical with a non-surgical method of management for all age groups with pleural empyema.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked the data for accuracy. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included eight randomised controlled trials with a total of 391 participants. Six trials focused on children and two on adults. Trials compared tube thoracostomy drainage (non-surgical), with or without intrapleural fibrinolytics, to either VATS or thoracotomy (surgical) for the management of pleural empyema. Assessment of risk of bias for the included studies was generally unclear for selection and blinding but low for attrition and reporting bias. Data analyses compared thoracotomy versus tube thoracostomy and VATS versus tube thoracostomy. We pooled data for meta-analysis where appropriate. We performed a subgroup analysis for children along with a sensitivity analysis for studies that used fibrinolysis in non-surgical treatment arms.The comparison of open thoracotomy versus thoracostomy drainage included only one study in children, which reported no deaths in either treatment arm. However, the trial showed a statistically significant reduction in mean hospital stay of 5.90 days for those treated with primary thoracotomy. It also showed a statistically significant reduction in procedural complications for those treated with thoracotomy compared to thoracostomy drainage. We downgraded the quality of the evidence for length of hospital stay and procedural complications outcomes to moderate due to the small sample size.The comparison of VATS versus thoracostomy drainage included seven studies, which we pooled in a meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality or procedural complications between groups. This was true for both adults and children with or without fibrinolysis. However, mortality data were limited: one study reported one death in each treatment arm, and seven studies reported no deaths. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean length of hospital stay for those treated with VATS. The subgroup analysis showed the same result in adults, but there was insufficient evidence to estimate an effect for children. We could not perform a separate analysis for fibrinolysis for this outcome because all included studies used fibrinolysis in the non-surgical arms. We downgraded the quality of the evidence to low for mortality (due to wide confidence intervals and indirectness), and moderate for other outcomes in this comparison due to either high heterogeneity or wide confidence intervals.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest there is no statistically significant difference in mortality between primary surgical and non-surgical management of pleural empyema for all age groups. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may reduce length of hospital stay compared to thoracostomy drainage alone.There was insufficient evidence to assess the impact of fibrinolytic therapy.A number of common outcomes were reported in the included studies that were not directly examined in our primary and secondary outcomes. These included duration of chest tube drainage, duration of fever, analgesia requirement, and total cost of treatment. Future studies focusing on patient-centred outcomes, such as patient functional scores, and other clinically relevant outcomes, such as radiographic improvement, treatment failure rates, and amount of fluid drainage, are needed to inform clinical decisions.
Topics: Adult; Child; Drainage; Empyema, Pleural; Humans; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selection Bias; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Thoracostomy; Thrombolytic Therapy
PubMed: 28304084
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2 -
Revue Medicale de Liege May 2018Cardiac tamponade is a vital emergency. It occurs when the accumulation of intra-pericardial fluid exceeds the pericardial adaptation capacity. Pericardial pressure is... (Review)
Review
Cardiac tamponade is a vital emergency. It occurs when the accumulation of intra-pericardial fluid exceeds the pericardial adaptation capacity. Pericardial pressure is equalized with that of cardiac cavities and severe heart failure occurs, most often rapidly. Several clinical presentations are possible. The diagnosis is based on the assessment of pericardial effusion and its impact on the heart by echocardiography. Supportive treatments have limited effectiveness. The only emergency treatment is drainage of the pericardium by direct puncture or by surgical approach.
Topics: Cardiac Tamponade; Drainage; Echocardiography; Humans; Pericardial Effusion
PubMed: 29926566
DOI: No ID Found -
JAMA Neurology Aug 2023After aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, the use of lumbar drains has been suggested to decrease the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia and improve long-term... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
After aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, the use of lumbar drains has been suggested to decrease the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia and improve long-term outcome.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effectiveness of early lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage added to standard of care in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
The EARLYDRAIN trial was a pragmatic, multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial with blinded end point evaluation conducted at 19 centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Canada. The first patient entered January 31, 2011, and the last on January 24, 2016, after 307 randomizations. Follow-up was completed July 2016. Query and retrieval of data on missing items in the case report forms was completed in September 2020. A total of 20 randomizations were invalid, the main reason being lack of informed consent. No participants meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria were excluded from the intention-to-treat analysis. Exclusion of patients was only performed in per-protocol sensitivity analysis. A total of 287 adult patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage of all clinical grades were analyzable. Aneurysm treatment with clipping or coiling was performed within 48 hours.
INTERVENTION
A total of 144 patients were randomized to receive an additional lumbar drain after aneurysm treatment and 143 patients to standard of care only. Early lumbar drainage with 5 mL per hour was started within 72 hours of the subarachnoid hemorrhage.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 6 (range, 0 to 6), obtained by masked assessors 6 months after hemorrhage.
RESULTS
Of 287 included patients, 197 (68.6%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 55 (48-63) years. Lumbar drainage started at a median (IQR) of day 2 (1-2) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. At 6 months, 47 patients (32.6%) in the lumbar drain group and 64 patients (44.8%) in the standard of care group had an unfavorable neurological outcome (risk ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98; absolute risk difference, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.01; P = .04). Patients treated with a lumbar drain had fewer secondary infarctions at discharge (41 patients [28.5%] vs 57 patients [39.9%]; risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99; absolute risk difference, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0; P = .04).
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
In this trial, prophylactic lumbar drainage after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage lessened the burden of secondary infarction and decreased the rate of unfavorable outcome at 6 months. These findings support the use of lumbar drains after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01258257.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Drainage; Cerebral Infarction; Brain Ischemia; Aneurysm; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37330974
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1792 -
Lakartidningen Feb 2022A couple of decades ago, most large pneumothoraces were managed initially through the insertion of large-bore chest tubes, active suction and in hospital admission.... (Review)
Review
A couple of decades ago, most large pneumothoraces were managed initially through the insertion of large-bore chest tubes, active suction and in hospital admission. Mounting evidence has since established that the patient's symptoms, not the size of the pneumothorax, should guide whether invasive management is required for spontaneous pneumothoraces. There is also mounting evidence that small traumatic and iatrogenic pneumothoraces can be managed conservatively. Small-bore chest tubes are just as effective as large-bore chest tubes for all types of pneumothoraces and likely associated with fewer complications. Passive drainage allows for out-of-hospital follow-up for selected patients. This article presents a stepwise approach to the management of pneumothoraces in the emergency department based on a review of the current literature.
Topics: Chest Tubes; Drainage; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Pneumothorax; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35226352
DOI: No ID Found -
World Journal of Gastroenterology May 2024The article by Ker explores the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection (PFC). The use of percutaneous drainage, endoscopy, and surgery for managing PFC are...
The article by Ker explores the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection (PFC). The use of percutaneous drainage, endoscopy, and surgery for managing PFC are discussed. Percutaneous drainage is noted for its low risk profile, while endoscopic cystogastrostomy is more effective due to the wider orifice of the metallic stent. Surgical cystogastrostomy is a definitive treatment with a reduced need for reintervention, especially for cases with extensive collections and significant necrosis. The choice of treatment modality should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and disease factors, considering the expertise available.
Topics: Humans; Drainage; Treatment Outcome; Stents; Gastrostomy; Pancreatic Pseudocyst
PubMed: 38813046
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i17.2298 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Jan 2022The term "orbital complication" does not designate an independent nosological entity, but is rather a collective designation for diseases or disease effects that involve... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The term "orbital complication" does not designate an independent nosological entity, but is rather a collective designation for diseases or disease effects that involve the orbit and its internal structures by extension from outside. In general, their most prominent manifestation is swelling of the orbital soft tissues, usually unilaterally. The incidence of sinogenic orbital complications is approximately 1.6 per 100 000 children and 0.1 per 100 000 adults per year.
METHODS
This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sinogenic orbital complications.
RESULTS
Acute sinusitis is the most common cause of orbital complications. These are diseases of the orbit with potentially serious consequences for the eye and the risk of intracranial complications such as cavernous sinus thrombosis, meningitis, or brain abscess. Aside from acute sinusitis, many other infectious and non-infectious diseases can extend to and involve the orbit. Because of the complexity and severity of the condition, its diagnosis and treatment are always an interdisciplinary matter. The treatment is primarily conservative, under observation in a hospital, and generally consists of the treatment of acute sinusitis with measures to combat edema along with the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surgical intervention is needed in severe cases or if there is an abscess. An endonasal approach is usually used for drainage.
CONCLUSION
In 95-98% of cases in stages I-IV, healing is complete and without further sequelae. Even if vision is affected preoperatively, it usually recovers fully when therapy is appropriate. Approximately 15% of the patients who undergo surgery need more than one operative procedure.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Abscess; Sinusitis; Drainage; Acute Disease; Disease Progression; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34874263
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0379 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Jul 2018Scleral buckling is a surgical technique that is employed successfully to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) for more than 60 years. With the introduction of... (Review)
Review
Scleral buckling is a surgical technique that is employed successfully to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) for more than 60 years. With the introduction of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), there is a growing trend towards the use of PPV for treatment of retinal detachment. There is a reluctance to perform scleral buckling (SB) in RRD due to the perceived steep learning curve, declining mastery over indirect ophthalmoscopy, and poor ergonomics associated with SB. In this article, we discuss the surgical challenges and tips to overcome these in four headings: localization of the break, retinopexy, SB, and subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage. Localization of the break can be performed by the use of forceps or illuminated scleral depressor. It can be facilitated by prior drainage of SRF in cases with bullous RRD. Chandelier with wide-angle viewing system can be used for easier localization of break and cryopexy. Sutureless buckling and suprachoroidal buckling are easier and faster alternatives to the conventional technique. Reshaping the silicone segment helps in accommodating the wider circumferential band. Modified needle drainage, laser choroidotomy, and infusion-assisted drainage can make SRF drainage easier and safer. The above techniques and other practical tips have been explained in detail with the illustrations to make the process of learning the art of SB easier.
Topics: Drainage; Humans; Retinal Detachment; Scleral Buckling; Subretinal Fluid
PubMed: 29941729
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_136_18 -
HNO Dec 2022Use of the term "drainage" is inconsistent in clinical practice and the existing literature. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Use of the term "drainage" is inconsistent in clinical practice and the existing literature.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to clarify the meaning of the term and to raise awareness of its proper use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A selective literature search was performed.
RESULTS
Drainage is the process of removing fluid but the term is often used interchangeably with the drain tube, which is often inserted at the same time, which is linguistically referred to as a metonymy. A tympanostomy tube is used for middle ear ventilation and pressure equalization. Lymphatic and abscess drainage are not objects.
CONCLUSION
Standardized technical terminology serves to prevent vagueness and consecutive misunderstandings in a scientific context. This is particularly important in medicine, but is subject to a certain variability in everyday language use.
Topics: Middle Ear Ventilation; Drainage
PubMed: 36347954
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01242-1 -
Journal of Investigative Surgery : the... Dec 2023Tendon-exposed wounds are complex injuries with challenging reconstructions and no unified treatment mode. Furthermore, insufficient tissue volume and blood circulation... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tendon-exposed wounds are complex injuries with challenging reconstructions and no unified treatment mode. Furthermore, insufficient tissue volume and blood circulation disorders affect healing, which increases pain for the patient and affects their families and caretakers.
REVIEW
As modern medicine advances, considerable progress has been made in understanding and treating tendon-exposed wounds, and current research encompasses both macro-and micro-studies. Additionally, new treatment methods have emerged alongside the classic surgical methods, such as new dressing therapies, vacuum sealing drainage combination therapy, platelet-rich plasma therapy, and live-cell bioengineering.
CONCLUSIONS
This review summarizes the latest treatment methods for tendon-exposed wounds to provide ideas and improve their treatment.
Topics: Humans; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Wound Healing; Drainage; Tendons; Vacuum; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37813390
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2023.2266758 -
Gastroenterology Nov 2023Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage of First Intent With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (ELEMENT Trial).
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with potential for better stent patency. We compared its outcomes with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stenting (ERCP-M).
METHODS
In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients with MDBO secondary to borderline resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable peri-ampullary cancers across 10 Canadian institutions and 1 French institution. This was a superiority trial with a noninferiority assessment of technical success. Patients were randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP-M. The primary end point was the rate of stent dysfunction at 1 year, considering competing risks of death, clinical failure, and surgical resection. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles.
RESULTS
From February 2019 to February 2022, 144 patients were recruited; 73 were randomized to EUS-CDS and 71 were randomized to ERCP-M. The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. Technical success was achieved in 90.4% (95% CI, 81.5% to 95.3%) of EUS-CDS and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.7% to 90.1%) of ERCP-M with a risk difference of 7.3% (95% CI, -4.0% to 18.8%) indicating noninferiority. Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96). No differences in adverse events, pancreaticoduodenectomy and oncologic outcomes, or quality of life were noted.
CONCLUSIONS
Although not superior in stent function, EUS-CDS is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP-M in patients with MDBO. These findings provide evidence for greater adoption of EUS-CDS in clinical practice as a complementary and exchangeable first-line modality to ERCP in patients with MDBO.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov, Number: NCT03870386.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Aged; Cholestasis; Middle Aged; Drainage; Stents; Endosonography; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Choledochostomy; Metals; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 37549753
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.024