-
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Jan 2022The term "orbital complication" does not designate an independent nosological entity, but is rather a collective designation for diseases or disease effects that involve... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The term "orbital complication" does not designate an independent nosological entity, but is rather a collective designation for diseases or disease effects that involve the orbit and its internal structures by extension from outside. In general, their most prominent manifestation is swelling of the orbital soft tissues, usually unilaterally. The incidence of sinogenic orbital complications is approximately 1.6 per 100 000 children and 0.1 per 100 000 adults per year.
METHODS
This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sinogenic orbital complications.
RESULTS
Acute sinusitis is the most common cause of orbital complications. These are diseases of the orbit with potentially serious consequences for the eye and the risk of intracranial complications such as cavernous sinus thrombosis, meningitis, or brain abscess. Aside from acute sinusitis, many other infectious and non-infectious diseases can extend to and involve the orbit. Because of the complexity and severity of the condition, its diagnosis and treatment are always an interdisciplinary matter. The treatment is primarily conservative, under observation in a hospital, and generally consists of the treatment of acute sinusitis with measures to combat edema along with the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surgical intervention is needed in severe cases or if there is an abscess. An endonasal approach is usually used for drainage.
CONCLUSION
In 95-98% of cases in stages I-IV, healing is complete and without further sequelae. Even if vision is affected preoperatively, it usually recovers fully when therapy is appropriate. Approximately 15% of the patients who undergo surgery need more than one operative procedure.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Abscess; Sinusitis; Drainage; Acute Disease; Disease Progression; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34874263
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0379 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Jul 2018Scleral buckling is a surgical technique that is employed successfully to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) for more than 60 years. With the introduction of... (Review)
Review
Scleral buckling is a surgical technique that is employed successfully to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) for more than 60 years. With the introduction of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), there is a growing trend towards the use of PPV for treatment of retinal detachment. There is a reluctance to perform scleral buckling (SB) in RRD due to the perceived steep learning curve, declining mastery over indirect ophthalmoscopy, and poor ergonomics associated with SB. In this article, we discuss the surgical challenges and tips to overcome these in four headings: localization of the break, retinopexy, SB, and subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage. Localization of the break can be performed by the use of forceps or illuminated scleral depressor. It can be facilitated by prior drainage of SRF in cases with bullous RRD. Chandelier with wide-angle viewing system can be used for easier localization of break and cryopexy. Sutureless buckling and suprachoroidal buckling are easier and faster alternatives to the conventional technique. Reshaping the silicone segment helps in accommodating the wider circumferential band. Modified needle drainage, laser choroidotomy, and infusion-assisted drainage can make SRF drainage easier and safer. The above techniques and other practical tips have been explained in detail with the illustrations to make the process of learning the art of SB easier.
Topics: Drainage; Humans; Retinal Detachment; Scleral Buckling; Subretinal Fluid
PubMed: 29941729
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_136_18 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2017The development of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) is one of the most common complications of acute severe pancreatitis. Most of the acute pancreatic fluid... (Review)
Review
The development of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) is one of the most common complications of acute severe pancreatitis. Most of the acute pancreatic fluid collections resolve and do not require endoscopic drainage. However, a substantial proportion of acute necrotic collections get walled off and may require drainage. Endoscopic drainage of PFC is now the preferred mode of drainage due to reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to surgical or percutaneous drainage. With the introduction of new metal stents, the efficiency of endoscopic drainage has improved and the task of direct endoscopic necrosectomy has become easier. The requirement of re-intervention is less with new metal stents as compared to plastic stents. However, endoscopic drainage is not free of adverse events. Severe complications including bleeding, perforation, sepsis and embolism have been described with endoscopic approach to PFC. Therefore, the endoscopic management of PFC is a multidisciplinary affair and involves interventional radiologists as well as GI surgeons to deal with unplanned adverse events and failures. In this review we discuss the recent advances and controversies in the endoscopic management of PFC.
Topics: Drainage; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Humans; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Stents
PubMed: 28487603
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2660 -
Gut and Liver Sep 2017In the past decade, there has been a progressive paradigm shift in the management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections after acute pancreatitis. Refinements in the... (Review)
Review
In the past decade, there has been a progressive paradigm shift in the management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections after acute pancreatitis. Refinements in the definitions of fluid collections from the updated Atlanta classification have enabled better communication amongst physicians in an effort to formulate optimal treatments. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts has emerged as the procedure of choice over surgical cystogastrostomy. The approach provides similar success rates with low complications and better quality of life compared with surgery. However, an endoscopic "step up" approach in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis has also been advocated. Both endoscopic and percutaneous drainage routes may be used depending on the anatomical location of the collections. New-generation large diameter EUS-specific stent systems have also recently been described. The device allows precise and effective drainage of the collections and permits endoscopic necrosectomy through the stents.
Topics: Acute Disease; Drainage; Endosonography; Gastrostomy; Humans; Necrosis; Pancreas; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Pancreatitis; Stents
PubMed: 28494574
DOI: 10.5009/gnl16178 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2020The advent of lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) has revolutionized the management of many complex gastroenterological conditions that previously required surgical or... (Review)
Review
The advent of lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) has revolutionized the management of many complex gastroenterological conditions that previously required surgical or radiological interventions. These procedures have garnered popularity due to their minimally invasive nature, higher technical and clinical success rate and lower rate of adverse events. By virtue of their unique design, LAMS provide more efficient drainage, serve as conduit for endoscopic access, are associated with lower rates of leakage and are easy to be removed. Initially used for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, the use of LAMS has been extended to gallbladder and biliary drainage, treatment of luminal strictures, creation of gastrointestinal fistulae, pancreaticobiliary drainage, improved access for surgically altered anatomy, and drainage of intra-abdominal and pelvic abscesses as well as post-surgical fluid collections. As new indications of endosonographic techniques and LAMS continue to evolve, this review summarizes the current role of LAMS in the management of these various complex conditions and also highlights clinical pearls to guide successful placement of LAMS.
Topics: Drainage; Endoscopy; Endosonography; Fluoroscopy; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Stents
PubMed: 32550749
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2715 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2016Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In... (Review)
Review
Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82% (221/270), the clinical success rate was 97% (218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23% (62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUS-HGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.
Topics: Cholestasis; Drainage; Endosonography; Gastrostomy; Humans; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 27099437
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Feb 2012Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to percutaneous and surgical interventions for patients with biliary... (Review)
Review
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to percutaneous and surgical interventions for patients with biliary obstruction who had failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). EUS-guided biliary drainage has become feasible due to the development of large channel curvilinear therapeutic echo-endoscopes and the use of real-time ultrasound and fluoroscopy imaging in addition to standard ERCP devices and techniques. EUS-guided biliary drainage is an attractive option because of its minimally invasive, single step procedure which provides internal biliary decompression. Multiple investigators have reported high success and low complication rates. Unfortunately, high quality prospective data are still lacking. We provide detailed review of the use of EUS for biliary drainage from the perspective of practicing endoscopists with specific focus on the technical aspects of the procedure.
Topics: Biliary Tract Diseases; Drainage; Endosonography; Humans; Stents
PubMed: 22363114
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.491 -
Journal of Visceral Surgery Apr 2018The use of surgical drains is the subject of much debate but they continue to be commonly used. The phenomenon of drain migration from their desired position following...
INTRODUCTION
The use of surgical drains is the subject of much debate but they continue to be commonly used. The phenomenon of drain migration from their desired position following surgery has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of the displacement of surgical drains among patients undergoing abdominal gastrointestinal surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We performed a review of all patients who underwent an early CT-scan postoperatively after abdominal gastrointestinal surgery prior to drain mobilization, between January 2013 and April 2016 in the Dijon University Hospital Center. Pre-and intra-operative data (number, type and position of drains) and postoperative data (imaging and evolution) were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS
This study included 125 patients. Thirty-five (28%) were found to have a displacement of at least one drain from its original position. Forty-one (19.8%) of the 207 studied drains had moved. Postoperative morbidity was not higher in patients with displaced drains (P=0.51). None of all the studied preoperative and operative factors have been found to be a risk factor for drain displacement.
CONCLUSION
Surgical drains displacement is frequently encountered in patients undergoing digestive abdominal surgery. In our experience, this phenomenon does not seem to have any clinical implications. When a benefit is expected from the use of surgical drains, intraperitoneal fixation appears to be necessary.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Cohort Studies; Device Removal; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Drainage; Female; Foreign-Body Migration; France; Hospitals, University; Humans; Incidence; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Peritoneal Cavity; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sex Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 29102315
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.10.001 -
Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990) 2018Frequently appearing as a complication of pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocysts are rare appearances in current medical practice. Multiple therapeutical options are... (Review)
Review
Frequently appearing as a complication of pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocysts are rare appearances in current medical practice. Multiple therapeutical options are available, from minimum invasive methods to complex open surgical techniques. The indications of drainage include symptomatic pseudocysts, large pseudocysts along with the development of complications such as hemorrhage, secondary infection, and rupture. Choosing the best drainage technique is often a challenge. Multiple factors need to be considered in managing a pseudoocyst, including its location, dimension and the patient's general state and comorbidities. Thus, a therapeutical algorithm may be of great use in choosing the most feasible technique for the diagnosed lesion that is also patient-adapted.
Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Drainage; Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Pancreatitis; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29981666
DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.113.3.353 -
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular... 2021The aim of the study was to assess the degree of aerosolisation in different chest drainage systems according to different air leak volumes, in a simulated environment....
The aim of the study was to assess the degree of aerosolisation in different chest drainage systems according to different air leak volumes, in a simulated environment. This novel simulation model was designed to produce an air leak by passing air through and agitating a fluorescent fluid. The air leak volume and amount of fluorescent fluid were tested in various combinations and aerosolisation was assessed at 10-minute intervals using the ultraviolet light. The following chest drainage systems were compared: (1) single-chamber chest drainage system, (2) 3-compartment wet-dry suction chest drainage system, (3) digital drainage and monitoring system. The impact of suction (-2 and -4 kPa) in generating aerosolised particles was tested as well. A total number of 187 of 10-minute interval measurements were performed. The single-chamber chest drainage system generated the largest number of aerosolised particles at different air leak volumes and drainage output. The 3-compartment wet-dry suction system and the digital drainage and monitoring system did not generate any identifiable aerosolised particles at any of the air leak or drain output volumes considered. Suction applied to the chest drainage systems did not have an effect on aerosolisation. Aerosol generation in the simulated air-leak model demonstrated the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 spread in the clinical setting. Full personal protective equipment must be used in patients with an air leak. Single-chamber chest drainage system generates the highest rate of aerosolised particles and it should not be used as an open system in patients with an air leak.
Topics: COVID-19; Chest Tubes; Drainage; Humans; Pneumonectomy; SARS-CoV-2; Suction
PubMed: 33171236
DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.10.002