-
The Oncologist Jan 2018Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an exceedingly rare and orphan disease, without active drugs approved in the front line. Pazopanib and trabectedin are licensed for...
BACKGROUND
Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an exceedingly rare and orphan disease, without active drugs approved in the front line. Pazopanib and trabectedin are licensed for sarcoma treatment from second-line, but very little and contradictory data are available on their activity in ASPS. Lacking ongoing and/or planned clinical trials, we conducted a multi-institutional study involving the reference sites for sarcoma in Europe, U.S., and Japan, within the World Sarcoma Network, to investigate the efficacy of pazopanib and trabectedin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From May 2007, 14 of the 27 centers that were asked to retrospectively review their databases had identified 44 advanced ASPS patients treated with pazopanib and/or trabectedin. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
Among 30 patients who received pazopanib, 18 were pretreated (13 with other antiangiogenics). Response was evaluable in 29/30 patients. Best responses were 1 complete response, 7 partial response (PR), 17 stable disease (SD), and 4 progressions. At a 19-month median follow-up, median PFS was 13.6 months (range: 1.6-32.2+), with 59% of patients progression-free at 1 year. Median OS was not reached.Among 23 patients treated with trabectedin, all were pretreated and evaluable for response. Best responses were 1 PR, 13 SD, and 9 progressions. At a 27-month median follow-up, median PFS was 3.7 months (range: 0.7-109), with 13% of patients progression-free at 1 year. Median OS was 9.1 months.
CONCLUSION
The value of pazopanib in advanced ASPS is confirmed, with durable responses, whereas the value of trabectedin appears limited. These results are relevant to defining the best approach to advanced ASPS.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This retrospective study, conducted among the world reference centers for treatment of sarcoma, confirms the value of pazopanib in patients with advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), with dimensional and durable responses, whereas trabectedin shows a limited activity. Alveolar soft part sarcoma is resistant to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Pazopanib and trabectedin are licensed for treatment of sarcoma from second line; in the lack of prospective clinical trials, these results are relevant to defining ASPS best management and strongly support initiatives aimed at obtaining the approval of pazopanib in the front line of the disease.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma, Alveolar Soft Part; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Trabectedin
PubMed: 28754721
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0161 -
Anti-cancer Drugs Jan 2023Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the backbone of the systemic treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). TKIs such as pazopanib and...
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the backbone of the systemic treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). TKIs such as pazopanib and cabozantinib can interact with other drugs concomitantly administered, particularly with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), possibly impacting the effectiveness of the anticancer treatment and patients outcome. Few data are available about this interaction. We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational data collection of patients with mRCC treated with pazopanib or cabozantinib between January 2012 and December 2020 in nine Italian centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The aim was to describe the impact of baseline concomitant PPIs on the outcome of patients to pazopanib and cabozantinib in terms of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), toxicity, and treatment compliance. The use of PPI in our study population (301 patients) significantly influenced the effectiveness of TKIs with worse PFS (16.3 vs. 9.9 months; P < 0.001) and OS (30.6 vs. 18.4 months; P = 0.013) in patients taking PPI at TKI initiation. This detrimental effect was maintained both in the pazopanib and cabozantinib groups. The use of PPI influenced the toxicity and TKI treatment compliance with a reduction of dose or schedule modifications, and treatment interruptions in the population taking PPIs. Our study demonstrates that the use of PPIs can significantly influence the outcome and compliance of patients with mRCC to TKI treatment, suggesting the importance of a more careful selection of patients who need a gastroprotective therapy, avoiding indiscriminate use of PPIs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 36539370
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001356 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Dec 2019The phase III COMPARZ study showed noninferior efficacy of pazopanib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma. In this COMPARZ post hoc analysis we... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The phase III COMPARZ study showed noninferior efficacy of pazopanib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma. In this COMPARZ post hoc analysis we characterized pazopanib responders, patient subgroups with better outcomes, and the effect of dose modification on efficacy and safety.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were randomized to pazopanib 800 mg/d (n = 557) or sunitinib 50 mg/d, 4 weeks on/2 weeks off (n = 553). Secondary end points included time to complete response (CR)/partial response (PR); the proportion of patients with CR/PR ≥10 months and progression-free survival (PFS) ≥10 months; efficacy in patients with baseline metastasis; and logistic regression analyses of patient characteristics associated with CR/PR ≥10 months. Median PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and safety were evaluated in patients with or without dose reductions or interruptions lasting ≥7 days.
RESULTS
Median time to response was numerically shorter for patients treated with pazopanib versus sunitinib (11.9 vs. 17.4 weeks). Similar percentages of pazopanib and sunitinib patients had CR/PR ≥10 months (14% and 13%, respectively), and PFS ≥10 months (31% and 34%, respectively). For patients without versus with adverse event (AE)-related dose reductions, median PFS, median overall survival, and ORR were 7.3 versus 12.5 months, 21.7 versus 36.8 months, and 22% versus 42% (all P < .0001) for pazopanib, and 5.5 versus 13.8 months, 18.1 versus 38.0 months, and 16% versus 34% (all P < .0001) for sunitinib; results were similar for dose interruptions.
CONCLUSION
Dose modifications when required because of AEs were associated with improved efficacy, suggesting that AEs might be used as a surrogate marker of adequate dosing for individual patients.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Logistic Models; Male; Pyrimidines; Random Allocation; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31601514
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.015 -
Translational Andrology and Urology Mar 2021The efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been demonstrated by a Chinese subgroup analysis of the...
BACKGROUND
The efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been demonstrated by a Chinese subgroup analysis of the COMPARZ (Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma) trial. However, the real-world data are still unknown. This single-center, retrospective study was designed to verify the real-world effects of pazopanib in Chinese patients with mRCC.
METHODS
Patients with mRCC and a clinical decision to initiate pazopanib as first-line therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety being evaluated as secondary endpoints. The effectiveness according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model, number of risk factors in the intermediate risk group, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), and the number and site of organ metastasis were also assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 32 patients were enrolled, including 23 (71.9%) males and 9 (28.1%) females. The median age was 57 years (range 29-75 years). With a median follow-up time of 23.8 months, a median PFS of 18.3 months, and an ORR of 37.5%. Median OS was not reached, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 90.6%, 78.1, and 65.6%, respectively. According to IMDC risk model, 37.5% were placed in the favorable risk (FR) subgroup, 56.2% (the majority) were placed in the intermediate risk (IR) subgroup, and 6.3% were placed in the poor risk (PR) subgroup. Compared with the IR and PR groups, the FR group achieved the best ORR (58.3%) and median PFS (22.1 months). Having 1 risk factor, ECOG PS <2, 1 organ metastasis site, and only lung metastasis associated with a higher ORR and better median PFS. The IMDC risk model and number of metastases were associated with PFS. The most common adverse events were change in hair color (69.0%), diarrhea (63%), and hypertension (50%).
CONCLUSIONS
Pazopanib showed efficacy and safety in real-world Chinese mRCC patients.
PubMed: 33850766
DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-111 -
Thoracic Cancer Sep 2022Pazopanib is an approved multitarget anticancer agent for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is also under clinical investigation for other...
BACKGROUND
Pazopanib is an approved multitarget anticancer agent for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is also under clinical investigation for other malignancies, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the potential anti-SCLC mechanisms of pazopanib remain unclear.
METHODS
Cell viability was evaluated by CCK-8, apoptotic cell detection was conducted using annexin V/PI staining followed by flow cytometry, and Western blot analysis was used to detect the apoptotic-related molecules and ER-stress pathway effectors. The intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level was determined by DCFH-HA staining followed by flow cytometry. An NCI-H446 xenograft model was established to evaluate pazopanib on tumor suppression in vivo. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to assess the proliferative activity of xenograft in NCI-H446 cell-bearing NOD-SCID mice.
RESULTS
Pazopanib dose- and time-dependently inhibited SCLC cell proliferation induced significant apoptosis in SCLC cell lines, increased cleaved-caspase3 and Bax, and decreased Bcl-2. Moreover, the PERK-related ER-stress pathway was potently activated by pazopanib treatment, inhibiting ER-stress by salubrinal significantly reversing pazopanib-mediated apoptosis in SCLC cell lines. Furthermore, pazopanib-induced intracellular ROS levels increased, while inhibiting ROS by NAC significantly reversed pazopanib-induced apoptosis in SCLC cells. In addition, pazopanib significantly suppressed NCI-H446 xenograft growth and decreased Ki67 positive cells in the tumor.
CONCLUSION
Our findings indicate that pazopanib induces SCLC cell apoptosis through the ER-stress process via upregulation of ROS levels. Further investigation of relevant biomarkers to accurately select patients for benefit from pazopanib should be further investigated.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred NOD; Mice, SCID; Pyrimidines; Reactive Oxygen Species; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 35866204
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14543 -
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Jun 2019Vandetanib and pazopanib are clinically available, multi-targeted inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)...
Vandetanib and pazopanib are clinically available, multi-targeted inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor tyrosine kinases. Short-term VEGF receptor inhibition is associated with hypertension in 15%-60% of patients, which may limit the use of these anticancer therapies over the longer term. To evaluate the longer-term cardiovascular implications of treatment, we investigated the "on"-treatment (21 days) and "off"-treatment (10 days) effects following daily administration of vandetanib, pazopanib, or vehicle, in conscious rats. Cardiovascular variables were monitored in unrestrained Sprague-Dawley rats instrumented with radiotelemetric devices. In Study 1, rats were randomly assigned to receive either daily intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (volume 0.5 mL; n = 5) or vandetanib 25 mg/kg/day (volume 0.5 mL; n = 6). In Study 2, rats received either vehicle (volume 0.5 mL; n = 4) or pazopanib 30 mg/kg/day (volume 0.5 mL; n = 7), dosed once every 24 hours for 21 days. All solutions were in 2% Tween, 5% propylene glycol in 0.9% saline solution. Vandetanib caused sustained increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to baseline and vehicle. Vandetanib also significantly altered the circadian cycling of MAP, SBP, and DBP. Elevations in SBP were detectable 162 hours after the last dose of vandetanib. Pazopanib also caused increases in MAP, SBP, and DBP. However, compared to vandetanib, these increases were of slower onset and a smaller magnitude. These data suggest that the cardiovascular consequences of vandetanib and pazopanib treatment are sustained, even after prolonged cessation of drug treatment.
Topics: Animals; Arterial Pressure; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Male; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 31164986
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.477 -
JCI Insight Nov 2020BACKGROUNDSurgery remains the frontline therapy for patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, 20%-40% recur. Angiogenesis inhibitors have...
BACKGROUNDSurgery remains the frontline therapy for patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, 20%-40% recur. Angiogenesis inhibitors have improved survival in metastatic patients and may result in responses in the neoadjuvant setting. The impact of these agents on the tumor genetic heterogeneity or the immune milieu is largely unknown. This phase II study was designed to evaluate safety, response, and effect on tumor tissue of neoadjuvant pazopanib.METHODSccRCC patients with localized disease received pazopanib (800 mg daily; median 8 weeks), followed by nephrectomy. Five tumors were examined for mutations by whole exome sequencing from samples collected before therapy and at nephrectomy. These samples underwent RNA sequencing; 17 samples were available for posttreatment assessment.RESULTSTwenty-one patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 8 of 21 (38%). No patients with progressive disease. At 1-year, response-free survival and overall survival was 83% and 89%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 toxicity was hypertension (33%, 7 of 21). Sequencing revealed strong concordance between pre- and posttreatment samples within individual tumors, suggesting tumors harbor stable core profiles. However, a reduction in private mutations followed treatment, suggesting a selective process favoring enrichment of driver mutations.CONCLUSIONNeoadjuvant pazopanib is safe and active in ccRCC. Future genomic analyses may enable the segregation of driver and passenger mutations. Furthermore, tumor infiltrating immune cells persist during therapy, suggesting that pazopanib can be combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors without dampening the immune response.FUNDINGSupport was provided by Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline as part of an investigator-initiated study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Case-Control Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Prognosis; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Transcriptome
PubMed: 33208553
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.132852 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2019Sarcomas are a diverse set of malignancies. For soft tissue sarcomas, the kinase and chaperone inhibitor pazopanib is a standard of care therapeutic. Previously, we...
Sarcomas are a diverse set of malignancies. For soft tissue sarcomas, the kinase and chaperone inhibitor pazopanib is a standard of care therapeutic. Previously, we demonstrated that HDAC inhibitors enhanced pazopanib lethality against sarcoma and other tumor cell types and . The present studies defined mechanisms of drug-combination resistance. Exposure of sarcoma and PDX ovarian carcinoma cells to [pazopanib + entinostat] caused a prolonged activation of ERBB1 and transient/prolonged activations of ERBB2, c-KIT, and c-MET, in a cell-specific fashion. The activities of mTORC1, mTORC2, GRP78, HSP90, and HSP70 were reduced, expression of Beclin1 and ATG5 enhanced, and the ATM-AMPK-ULK1-ATG13-Beclin1/ATG5 pathway activated. Inhibition of ERBB1/2/4 using neratinib or of c-MET using crizotinib significantly enhanced [pazopanib + entinostat] lethality. For neratinib with [pazopanib + entinostat], this effect correlated with reduced phosphorylation and expression of ERBB1, ERBB2, c-KIT, and c-MET and reduced expression, regardless of mutational status, of N-RAS and K-RAS. [Pazopanib + entinostat + neratinib] reduced the phosphorylation of the Hippo pathway proteins MST1/3/4 and MOB1 whereas this treatment increased the phosphorylation of LATS1, YAP, and TAZ. The activation of ATM, ULK-1, and eIF2α was further enhanced by [pazopanib + entinostat + neratinib] as was the expression of ATG5 and Beclin1. Compared to other manipulations, knock down of eIF2α or over-expression of BCL-XL significantly reduced killing by the three-drug interaction. , pazopanib and entinostat, and also neratinib and entinostat, both combined to significantly suppress the growth of sarcoma tumors.
PubMed: 31380285
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00650 -
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors and the Risk of Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection.JAMA Network Open Mar 2024Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors (VPIs) pose a concern for aortic aneurysm (AA) and aortic dissection (AD), signaling potential vascular disease...
IMPORTANCE
Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors (VPIs) pose a concern for aortic aneurysm (AA) and aortic dissection (AD), signaling potential vascular disease development.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate VPI-associated AA and AD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This case-control study with a nested design used full population data from a national claims database in Taiwan between 2011 and 2019. Eligible participants were aged 20 years or older with kidney, hepatic, gastrointestinal, or pancreatic cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. The first cancer diagnosis date was defined as the cohort entry date. Cases were patients who received a diagnosis of AA or AD in hospitalizations or emergency visits between the cohort entry date and December 31, 2019. Controls were matched by ratio (up to 1:5) based on age, sex, cancer type, cohort entry date, and the index date (ie, the first AA or AD event date). Data analysis was performed between January 2022 and December 2023.
EXPOSURES
Use of the oral VPIs sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib between cohort entry date and index date.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
In the primary analysis, AA and AD were evaluated compositely, while in the secondary analyses, they were evaluated separately. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression to assess the association with VPI use (sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib) considering various VPI exposure windows and cumulative use.
RESULTS
A total of 1461 cases were included (mean [SD] age, 73.0 [12.3] years; 1118 male patients [76.5%]), matched to 7198 controls. AA or AD risk increased with a VPI exposure of 100 days or less before the index date (aOR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.40-3.15), mainly from VPI-associated AD (aOR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.77-5.39). Longer VPI duration (68 days or more: aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.66-4.19) and higher cumulative dose (61 or more defined daily doses: aOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.66-4.23) increased the risk.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The use of the 3 study VPIs (sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib) was associated with an increased risk of AA and AD in patients with cancer, essentially all of the risk from VPI-associated AD. Future studies are needed to determine the risk factors of VPI-associated AA and AD, as well as to establish a class effect.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Case-Control Studies; Sorafenib; Sunitinib; Aortic Aneurysm; Aortic Dissection; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Indazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 38436956
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0940 -
International Journal of Cancer Jun 2021Co-treatment with gastric acid suppressants (GAS) in patients taking anticancer drugs that exhibit pH-dependant absorption may lead to decreased drug exposure and may... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Co-treatment with gastric acid suppressants (GAS) in patients taking anticancer drugs that exhibit pH-dependant absorption may lead to decreased drug exposure and may hamper drug efficacy. In our study, we investigated whether a 1-hour time interval between subsequent intake of pazopanib and GAS could mitigate this negative effect on drug exposure. We performed an observational study in which we collected the first steady-state pazopanib trough concentration (C ) levels from patients treated with pazopanib 800 mg once daily (OD) taken fasted or pazopanib 600 mg OD taken with food. All patients were advised to take GAS 1 hour after pazopanib. Patients were grouped based on the use of GAS and the geometric (GM) C levels were compared between groups for each dose regimen. Additionally, the percentage of patients with exposure below the target threshold of 20.5 mg/L and the effect of the type of PPI was explored. The GM C levels were lower in GAS users vs non-GAS users for both the 800 and 600 mg cohorts (23.7 mg/L [95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.1-26.7] vs 28.2 mg/L [95% CI: 25.9-30.5], P = .015 and 26.0 mg/L [95% CI: 22.4-30.3] vs 33.5 mg/L [95% CI: 30.3-37.1], P = .006). Subtherapeutic exposure was more prevalent in GAS users vs non-GAS users (33.3% vs 19.5% and 29.6% vs 14%). Sub-analysis showed lower GM pazopanib C in patients who received omeprazole, while minimal difference was observed in those receiving pantoprazole compared to non-users. Our research showed that a 1-hour time interval between intake of pazopanib and GAS did not mitigate the negative effect of GAS on pazopanib exposure and may hamper pazopanib efficacy.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Eating; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 33428771
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33469