-
PloS One 2016The correlation between gestational hypertension-preeclampsia (GH-PE) and placenta previa (PP) is controversial. Specifically, it is unknown whether placenta previa has...
BACKGROUND
The correlation between gestational hypertension-preeclampsia (GH-PE) and placenta previa (PP) is controversial. Specifically, it is unknown whether placenta previa has any effect on the various types of preeclampsia (PE), and the role PP with concurrent placenta accreta (PA) play in the occurrence of GH-PE are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to identify the effects of PP on GH, mild and severe preeclampsia (MPE and SPE), and early- and late-onset preeclampsia (EPE and LPE). Another aim of the study was to determine if concurrent PA impacts the relationship between PP and GH-PE.
METHODS
A retrospective single-center study of 1,058 patients having singleton pregnancies with PP was performed, and 2,116 pregnant women were randomly included as controls. These cases were collected from a tertiary hospital and met the inclusion criteria for the study. Clinical information, including PP and the gestational age at the onset of GH-PE were collected. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted after the confounding variables were controlled to assess the effects of PP on different types of GH-PE.
RESULTS
There were 155 patients with GH-PE in the two groups. The incidences of GH-PE in the PP group and the control group were 2.5% (26/1058) and 6.1% (129/2116), respectively (P = 0.000). Binary and multiple regression analyses were conducted after controlling for confounding variables. Compared to the control group, in the PP group, the risk of GH-PE was reduced significantly by 78% (AOR: 0.216; 95% CI: 0.135-0.345); the risks of GH and PE were reduced by 55% (AOR: 0.451; 95% CI: 0.233-0.873) and 86% (AOR: 0.141; 95% CI: 0.073-0.271), respectively; the risks of MPE and SPE were reduced by 73% (AOR: 0.269; 95% CI: 0.087-0828) and 88% (AOR: 0.123; 95% CI: 0.055-0.279), respectively; and the risks of EPE and LPE were reduced by 95% (AOR: 0.047; 95% CI: 0.012-0.190) and 67% (AOR: 0.330; 95% CI: 0.153-0.715), respectively. The incidence of concurrent PA in women with PP was 5.86%; PP with PA did not significantly further reduce the incidence of GH-PE compared with PP without PA (1.64% vs. 2.51%, P>0.05). Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted after controlling for confounding variables, compared with the non-PP + GH-PE group, and the AOR of FGR in the non-PP + non-GH-PE group was 0.206 (0.124-0.342). Compared with the PP + GH-PE group, the AOR of FGR in the PP + non-GH-PE group was 0.430 (0.123-1.500).
CONCLUSION
PP is not only associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of GH-PE, but also is associated with a reduction in incidence of various types of PE. Concurrent PA and PP do not show association with a reduction in incidence of GH-PE.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Incidence; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Young Adult
PubMed: 26731265
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146126 -
Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and... Feb 2023Placenta previa is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study aims to add to the limited literature from the developing world on the...
OBJECTIVE
Placenta previa is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study aims to add to the limited literature from the developing world on the association of different anaesthetic techniques with blood loss, the need for blood transfusion, and maternal/ neonatal outcomes among women undergoing caesarean section with placenta previa.
METHODS
This retrospective study was conducted at Aga University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. The patient population included parturients undergoing caesarean section for placenta previa from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2019.
RESULTS
Out of 276 consecutive cases of placenta previa progressing to caesarean section during the study period, 36.24% were performed under regional anaesthesia and 63.76% under general anaesthesia. When compared to general anaesthesia, significantly less regional anaesthesia was used for emergency caesarean section (26% vs. 38.6%, P = .033) and for grade IV placenta previa (50% vs. 68.8%, P = .013). Blood loss was found to be significantly low with regional anaesthesia (P = .005) and posterior placenta (P = .042), while it was found to be high in grade IV placenta previa (P = .024). The odds of requiring blood transfusion were low in regional anaesthesia (odds ratio = 0.122; 95% CI = 0.041-0.36, P = .0005) and posterior placenta (odds ratio = 0.402; 95% CI = 0.201-0.804, P = .010), while they were high in grade IV placenta previa (odds ratio: 4.13; 95% CI = 0.90-19.80, P = .0681). The rate of neonatal deaths and intensive care admission was significantly lower in regional anaesthesia than in general anaesthesia (7% vs. 3% and 9% vs. 3%). The maternal mortality was zero; however, intensive care admission was less in regional anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia (<1% vs. 4%).
CONCLUSION
Our data demonstrated less blood loss, need for blood transfusion, and better maternal and neonatal outcomes with regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in women with placenta previa.
PubMed: 36847316
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR. -
Placenta Jun 2022Our study aimed to distinguish patients with placenta accreta (crete, increta, and percreta) from those with placenta previa using maternal plasma levels of soluble...
INTRODUCTION
Our study aimed to distinguish patients with placenta accreta (crete, increta, and percreta) from those with placenta previa using maternal plasma levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PLGF) and the sFlt-1/PLGF ratio.
METHODS
We obtained maternal plasma from 185 women in late pregnancy and sorted them into three groups: 72 women with normal placental imaging results (control group), 50 women with placenta previa alone (PP group), and 63 women with placenta previa and placenta accreta (PAS group). The concentrations of sFlt-1 and PLGF in the maternal plasma were measured using ELISA kits and the sFlt-1/PLGF ratio was calculated.
RESULT
The median (min-max) sFlt-1 levels and the sFlt-1/PLGF ratio in the PAS group (12.8 ng/ml, 3.8-34.2 ng/ml) (133, 14-361) were lower than in the PP group (28.7 ng/ml, 13.1-60.3 ng/ml) (621, 156-2013) (p < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The median (min-max) PLGF levels in the PAS group (108 pg/ml, 38-679 pg/ml) was higher than that in the PP group (43 pg/ml, 12-111 pg/ml) (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The area under the ROC of the sFlt-1 levels, PLGF levels, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio were 0.91, 0.90, and 0.99, respectively; the cut-off values were 18.9 ng/ml, 75.9 pg/ml, and 229.5, respectively. The concentration of sFlt-1 and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio were associated with the volume of blood loss (-.288*, -.301*).
DISCUSSION
The concentrations of sFlt-1 and PLGF and ratio of plasma sFlt-1/PLGF may distinguish patients with placenta accreta from those with placenta previa.
Topics: Biomarkers; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Placenta; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Growth Factor; Placenta Previa; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1
PubMed: 35635854
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.05.009 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but studies with larger sample sizes are few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search in July 2022 using the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, and finally, 32 studies (N = 3812) were included. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of placenta-related disorders, including placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and retained placenta. We also included other obstetric and neonatal outcomes like postpartum hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, oligohydramnios, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrauterine growth restriction. The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in studies with a control group, but otherwise as prevalence (%) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
The overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 58.97% and 45.56%, respectively. The prevalence of placenta previa differed in pregnant women who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with those who did not (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.28-8.36). In studies without a comparative group, the pooled rate of placenta accreta was 7% (95% CI, 4-11) in 20 studies; placenta increta was 1% (95% CI, 0-4) in 5 studies; a retained placenta was 11% (95% CI, 5-24) in 5 studies; postpartum hemorrhage was 12% (95% CI, 8-18) in 12 studies; ectopic pregnancy was 1% (95% CI, 0-2) in 13 studies; oligohydramnios was 3% (95% CI, 1-6) in 3 studies; intrauterine growth restriction was 3% (95% CI, 1-8) in 3 studies; gestational hypertension was 5% (95% CI, 2-11) in 4 studies; and diabetes mellitus was 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in 3 studies.
DISCUSSION
Due to the paucity of good quality comparative data, the question of whether there is an increased prevalence of obstetric and neonatal complications in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with the general population remains unanswered. The findings from this review will provide a basis for more well-designed studies in the future.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=364021, identifier [CRD42022364021].
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Placenta, Retained; Oligohydramnios; Placenta; Pregnancy, Ectopic
PubMed: 37033233
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1126740 -
Journal of Health Economics Mar 2020We revisit the causal effect of birthweight. Because variation in birthweight in developed countries primarily stems from variation in gestational age rather than...
We revisit the causal effect of birthweight. Because variation in birthweight in developed countries primarily stems from variation in gestational age rather than intrauterine growth restriction, we depart from the widely-used twin fixed-effects estimator and employ an instrumental variable - the diagnosis of placenta previa, which provides exogenous variation in gestation length. We find protective effects of additional birthweight against infant mortality and health capital loss, such as cerebral palsy, but in contrast to sibling and twin studies, no strong evidence for non-health long-run outcomes, such as test scores. We also find that short-run birthweight effects have diminished significantly over the decades.
Topics: Birth Weight; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant; Infant Health; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy
PubMed: 31951828
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102269 -
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... May 2022To clarify whether "low-risk total PP" patients bleed more than partial/marginal PP patients.
OBJECTIVE
To clarify whether "low-risk total PP" patients bleed more than partial/marginal PP patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The retrospective cohort study was performed involving patients with PP between April 2006 and December 2018. The placental position was determined by ultrasound. From medical charts, the backgrounds as well as obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PP patients were retrieved.
RESULTS
This study included 349 patients with PP, which was classified into three types according to the distance between the placenta and internal ostium: total (n = 174), partial (n = 52), and marginal (n = 123) PP. In total PP patients, three factors (prior CS, anterior placenta, and placental lacunae on ultrasound) significantly increased blood loss at CS, the need for hysterectomy, homologous transfusion (≥10 U), and ICU admission. No significant difference was observed in bleeding-related poor outcomes (rate of blood loss ≥2000 mL, amount of homologous transfusion, need for hysterectomy, and ICU admission) between total PP patients without all three factors: "low-risk total PP patients" and partial/marginal PP patients (19.8 vs. 17.1%; p = 0.604, 3.7 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.330, 1.2 vs. 1.1%; p = 1.000, and 1.2 vs. 1.1%; p = 1.000, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Prior CS, anterior placenta, and placental lacunae on ultrasound were risk factors for a bleeding-related poor outcome in total PP patients. Total PP patients without these three factors showed the same bleeding-related poor outcome as partial/marginal PP patients.
Topics: Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Placenta; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35595436
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.03.007 -
Annals of Saudi Medicine 2023Antenatal assessment of maternal risk factors and imaging evaluation can help in diagnosis and treatment of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in major placenta previa...
BACKGROUND
Antenatal assessment of maternal risk factors and imaging evaluation can help in diagnosis and treatment of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in major placenta previa (PP). Recent evidence suggests that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could complement ultrasonography (US) in the PAS diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES
Evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and maternal morbidity related to the MRI diagnosis of PAS in major PP.
DESIGN
A 10-year retrospective cohort study.
SETTING
Tertiary care hospital.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We report on patients with major PP who had cesarean delivery in Abha Maternity and Children's Hospital (AMCH) over a 10-year period (2012-2021). They were evaluated with ultrasonography (US) and color Doppler for evidence of PAS. Antenatal MRI was ordered either to confirm the diagnosis (if equivocal US) or to assess the depth of invasion/extra-uterine extension (if definitive US).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Risk factors for PAS in major PP and maternal complications.
SAMPLE SIZE
299 patients RESULTS: Among 299 patients, MRI confirmed the PAS diagnosis in 91/299 (30.5%) patients. The independent risk factors for MRI diagnosis of PAS in major PP included only repeated cesarean sections and advanced maternal age. The commonest maternal morbidity in major PP with PAS was significantly excessive intraoperative bleeding.
CONCLUSION
MRI may be a valuable adjunct in the evaluation of PAS in major PP; as a complement, but not substitute US. MRI may be suitable in major PP/PAS patients who are older and have repeated cesarean deliveries with equivocal results or deep/extra-uterine extension on US.
LIMITATION
Single center, small sample size, lack of complete histopathological diagnosis.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
Topics: Child; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Incidence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 37554027
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.219 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Aug 2020Low-lying placentas, placenta previa and abnormally invasive placentas are the most frequently occurring placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. These...
Low-lying placentas, placenta previa and abnormally invasive placentas are the most frequently occurring placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. These conditions can have serious consequences for mother and fetus mainly due to excessive blood loss before, during or after delivery. The incidence of such abnormalities is increasing, but treatment options and preventive strategies are limited. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the etiology of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. Placental formation already starts at implantation and therefore disorders during implantation may cause these abnormalities. Understanding of the normal placental structure and development is essential to comprehend the etiology of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy, to diagnose the affected women and to guide future research for treatment and preventive strategies. We reviewed the literature on the structure and development of the normal placenta and the placental development resulting in low-lying placentas, placenta previa and abnormally invasive placentas.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Placenta Diseases; Pregnancy
PubMed: 32108320
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13834 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2024The objective of the meta-analysis was to determine the influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes, with specific emphasis on multiple or large (≥ 5 cm in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the meta-analysis was to determine the influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes, with specific emphasis on multiple or large (≥ 5 cm in diameter) fibroids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and SinoMed databases for eligible studies that investigated the influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes in pregnancy. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of the variables was estimated with fixed effect or random effect models.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies with 237 509 participants were included. The pooled results showed that fibroids elevated the risk of adverse outcomes, including preterm birth, cesarean delivery, placenta previa, miscarriage, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), fetal distress, malposition, intrauterine fetal death, low birth weight, breech presentation, and preeclampsia. However, after adjusting for the potential factors, negative effects were only seen for preterm birth, cesarean delivery, placenta previa, placental abruption, PPH, intrauterine fetal death, breech presentation, and preeclampsia. Subgroup analysis showed an association between larger fibroids and significantly elevated risks of breech presentation, PPH, and placenta previa in comparison with small fibroids. Multiple fibroids did not increase the risk of breech presentation, placental abruption, cesarean delivery, PPH, placenta previa, PPROM, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth restriction. Meta-regression analyses indicated that maternal age only affected the relationship between uterine fibroids and preterm birth, and BMI influenced the relationship between uterine fibroids and intrauterine fetal death. Other potential confounding factors had no impact on malposition, fetal distress, PPROM, miscarriage, placenta previa, placental abruption, and PPH.
CONCLUSION
The presence of uterine fibroids poses increased risks of adverse pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Fibroid size influenced the risk of breech presentation, PPH, and placenta previa, while fibroid numbers had no impact on the risk of these outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Leiomyoma; Pregnancy Outcome; Uterine Neoplasms; Cesarean Section; Premature Birth; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic; Abortion, Spontaneous; Abruptio Placentae; Breech Presentation; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38710995
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06545-5 -
Ginekologia Polska 2019This study was carried out to evaluate outcomes of pregnancies with complete placenta previa diagnosedin mid-pregnancy, and evaluate whether a history of caesarean... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
This study was carried out to evaluate outcomes of pregnancies with complete placenta previa diagnosedin mid-pregnancy, and evaluate whether a history of caesarean section and placenta location effect the resolution ofplacenta previa.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A prospective observational study was conducted on patients diagnosed with complete placentaprevia by ultrasound examination between 20+0 weeks and 25+6 weeks of gestation. Patients were grouped in terms ofplacenta location (anteriorly or posteriorly located) and presence/absence of prior caesarean section. Maternal demographics,ultrasound findings and pregnancy outcomes were subsequently compared between these groups. Statistical analysiswas performed by using SPSS version 16.0.
RESULTS
70 patients with the above characteristics were recruited in our study. Of the 70 patients, 21 (30%) had prior caesareansection, and 41 (58.6%) had an anteriorly located placenta. Patients with prior cesarean delivery delivered earlier(36.9 ± 2.2 weeks versus 38.0 ± 1.8 weeks, P = 0.039). Furthermore, 74.3% of the placenta previa resolved by delivery. Priorcaesarean section (RR 2.941, 95% CI 0.938-9.216, P 0.024) and anterior placenta (RR 3.805, 95% CI 1.126-12.855, P 0.031)were related to greater risk of persistence of placenta previa to term.
CONCLUSIONS
Prior caesarean section and anteriorly located placenta are important factors that modify the risk that previawill complicate delivery. Our findings may be useful for patient counselling and future management of the condition.
Topics: Adult; Cesarean Section; Female; Gravidity; Humans; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Prospective Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 31588552
DOI: 10.5603/GP.2019.0093