-
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jul 2017Women with a history of previous cesarean delivery, presenting with a placenta previa, have become the largest group with the highest risk for placenta previa accreta. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Women with a history of previous cesarean delivery, presenting with a placenta previa, have become the largest group with the highest risk for placenta previa accreta.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta and the impact of the depth of villous invasion on management in women presenting with placenta previa or low-lying placenta and with 1 or more prior cesarean deliveries.
STUDY DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES
We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, clinicalTrials.gov, and MEDLINE for studies published between 1982 and November 2016.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Criteria for the study were cohort studies that provided data on previous mode of delivery, placenta previa, or low-lying placenta on prenatal ultrasound imaging and pregnancy outcome. The initial search identified 171 records, of which 5 retrospective and 9 prospective cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in the quantitative analysis.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
The studies were scored on methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
RESULTS
The 14 cohort studies included 3889 pregnancies presenting with placenta previa or low-lying placenta and 1 or more prior cesarean deliveries screened for placenta accreta. There were 328 cases of placenta previa accreta (8.4%), of which 298 (90.9%) were diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound. The incidence of placenta previa accreta was 4.1% in women with 1 prior cesarean and 13.3% in women with ≥2 previous cesarean deliveries. The pooled performance of ultrasound for the antenatal detection of placenta previa accreta was higher in prospective than retrospective studies, with a diagnostic odds ratios of 228.5 (95% confidence interval, 67.2-776.9) and 80.8 (95% confidence interval, 13.0-501.4), respectively. Only 2 studies provided detailed data on the relationship between the depth of villous invasion and the number of previous cesarean deliveries, independently of the depth of the villous invasion. A cesarean hysterectomy was performed in 208 of 232 cases (89.7%) for which detailed data on management were available. Positive correlations were found in the largest prospective studies between the cumulative rates of the more invasive forms of accreta placentation and the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound imaging but not with diagnostic odds ratio values. We found no data on the ultrasound screening of placenta accreta at the routine midtrimester ultrasound examination from the nonexpert ultrasound units.
CONCLUSION
Planning individual management for delivery is possible only with accurate evaluation of prenatal risk of accreta placentation in women presenting with a low-lying placenta/previa and a history of prior cesarean delivery. Ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific in the prenatal diagnosis of accreta placentation when performed by skilled operators. Developing a prenatal screening protocol is now essential to further improve the outcome of this increasingly more common major obstetric complication.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; MEDLINE; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Placentation; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 28268196
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050 -
BMJ Open Nov 2019To estimate the prevalence and incidence of placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to examine the different criteria being used for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the prevalence and incidence of placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to examine the different criteria being used for the diagnosis.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and MEDLINE were searched between August 1982 and September 2018.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies reporting on placenta previa complicated by PAS diagnosed in a defined obstetric population.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two independent reviewers performed the data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, with difference agreed by consensus. The primary outcomes were overall prevalence of placenta previa, incidence of PAS according to the type of placenta previa and the reported clinical outcomes, including the number of peripartum hysterectomies and direct maternal mortality. The secondary outcomes included the criteria used for the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa and the criteria used to diagnose and grade PAS at birth.
RESULTS
A total of 258 articles were reviewed and 13 retrospective and 7 prospective studies were included in the analysis, which reported on 587 women with placenta previa and PAS. The meta-analysis indicated a significant (p<0.001) heterogeneity between study estimates for the prevalence of placenta previa, the prevalence of placenta previa with PAS and the incidence of PAS in the placenta previa cohort. The median prevalence of placenta previa was 0.56% (IQR 0.39-1.24) whereas the median prevalence of placenta previa with PAS was 0.07% (IQR 0.05-0.16). The incidence of PAS in women with a placenta previa was 11.10% (IQR 7.65-17.35).
CONCLUSIONS
The high heterogeneity in qualitative and diagnostic data between studies emphasises the need to implement standardised protocols for the diagnoses of both placenta previa and PAS, including the type of placenta previa and grade of villous invasiveness.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42017068589.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Incidence; Peripartum Period; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Prevalence; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 31722942
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031193 -
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association... Aug 2020
Review
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32839166
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.200304 -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Nov 2019The increasing incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) has resulted in an increase in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), adversely impacting maternal outcomes globally.... (Review)
Review
The increasing incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) has resulted in an increase in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), adversely impacting maternal outcomes globally. Currently, more than 90% of women diagnosed with PAS present with a placenta praevia (praevia PAS). Praevia PAS can be reliably diagnosed antenatally with ultrasound, and it is unclear whether magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnosis beyond what can be achieved by skilled ultrasound operators. Therefore, any screening programme for PAS will require improved training in the diagnosis of placental disorders and development of targeted scanning protocols. Management strategies for praevia PAS vary depending on the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis, findings at laparotomy and local surgical expertise. Current epidemiological data for PAS are highly heterogeneous, mainly due to wide variation in the clinical criteria used to diagnose the condition at birth. This significantly impacts research into all aspects of the condition, especially comparison of the efficacy of different management strategies.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis
PubMed: 31126811
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.006 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Sep 2020The evolution of multidisciplinary team-based care for women with placenta accreta spectrum disorder has delivered stepwise improvements in clinical outcomes. Central to... (Review)
Review
The evolution of multidisciplinary team-based care for women with placenta accreta spectrum disorder has delivered stepwise improvements in clinical outcomes. Central to this overall goal is the ability to limit blood loss at surgery. Placement of inflatable balloons within the pelvic arteries, most commonly in the anterior divisions of the internal iliac arteries, became popular in many centers, at the expense of prolonging surgical care and with attendant risks of vascular injury. In tandem, the need to expose pelvic sidewall anatomy to safely identify the course of the ureters re-popularized the alternative strategy of ligating the same anterior divisions of the internal iliac arteries. With incremental gains in surgical expertise, described in 5 steps in this review, our teams have witnessed a steady decline in surgical blood loss. Nevertheless, a subset of women has the most severe form of placenta accreta spectrum, namely placenta previa-percreta. Such women are at risk of major hemorrhage during surgery from vessels arising outside the territories of the internal iliac arteries. These additional blood supplies, mostly from the external iliac arteries, pose significant risks of major blood loss even in experienced hands. To address this risk, some centers, principally in China, have adopted an approach of routinely placing an infrarenal aortic balloon, with both impressively low rates of blood loss and an ability to conserve the uterus by resecting the placenta with the affected portion of the uterine wall. We review these literature developments in the context of safely performing elective cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa-percreta, the most severe placenta accreta spectrum disorder.
Topics: Balloon Occlusion; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cesarean Section; Colpotomy; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Iliac Artery; Ligation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32007492
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.044 -
Fertility and Sterility Feb 2020The use of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has increased over the past decade with improvements in technology and increasing live birth rates. FET facilitates... (Review)
Review
The use of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has increased over the past decade with improvements in technology and increasing live birth rates. FET facilitates elective single-embryo transfer, reduces ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, optimizes endometrial receptivity, allows time for preimplantation genetics testing, and facilitates fertility preservation. FET cycles have been associated, however, with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for reasons that are not clear. Recent evidence suggests that absence of the corpus luteum (CL) could be at least partly responsible for this increased risk. In a recent prospective cohort study, programmed FET cycles (no CL) were associated with higher rates of preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features compared with modified natural FET cycles. FET cycles are commonly performed in the context of a programmed cycle in which the endometrium is prepared with the use of exogenous E and P. In these cycles, ovulation is suppressed and therefore the CL is absent. The CL produces not only E and P, but also vasoactive products, such as relaxin and vascular endothelial growth factor, which are not replaced in a programmed FET cycle and which are hypothesized to be important for initial placentation. Emerging evidence has also revealed other adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes, including postpartum hemorrhage, macrosomia, and post-term birth specifically in programmed FET cycles compared with natural FET cycles. Despite the widespread use of FET, the optimal protocol with respect to live birth rate, maternal health, and perinatal outcomes has yet to be determined. Future practice regarding FET should be based on high-quality evidence, including rigorous controlled trials.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Corpus Luteum; Cryopreservation; Embryo Transfer; Female; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Placenta Previa; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 32106972
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.007 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Aug 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess clinical characteristics related to pathologically proven placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess clinical characteristics related to pathologically proven placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Web of Science was performed from inception to September 7, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The primary outcomes were invasive placenta (including increta or percreta), blood loss, hysterectomy, and antenatal diagnosis. In addition, maternal age, assisted reproductive technology, previous cesarean delivery, and previous uterine procedures were investigated as potential risk factors. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the clinical presentation of pathologically diagnosed PAS without placenta previa.
METHODS
Study screening was conducted after duplicates were identified and removed. The quality of each study and the publication bias were assessed. Forest plots and I statistics were calculated for each study outcome for each group. The main analysis was a random-effects analysis.
RESULTS
Among 2598 studies that were initially retrieved, 5 were included in the review. With the exception of 1 study, 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa was associated with less risk of invasive placenta (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.37), blood loss (mean difference, -1.19; 95% confidence interval, -2.09 to -0.28) and hysterectomy (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.53), and more difficult to diagnose prenatally (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.45) than placenta accreta spectrum with placenta previa. In addition, assisted reproductive technology and a previous uterine procedure were strong risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa, whhereas previous cesarean delivery was a strong risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum with placenta previa.
CONCLUSION
The differences in clinical aspects of placenta accreta spectrum with and without placenta previa need to be understood.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Retrospective Studies; Placenta Previa; Hysterectomy; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37211089
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101027 -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Aug 2023Screening for clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is possible with a high degree of accuracy (both sensitivity and specificity >90-95%). The group of... (Review)
Review
Screening for clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is possible with a high degree of accuracy (both sensitivity and specificity >90-95%). The group of women to focus on are those with placenta previa and one or more prior Cesarean deliveries. Screening for PAS not associated with placenta previa is not as productive, and several false negatives have been described. The results of the screening program indicate that women have a low or high probability of PAS. Screen-positive women or those with uncertain ultrasound features should be referred to a center of excellence. Those confirmed to have a high probability of PAS should electively be delivered at such centers.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Retrospective Studies; Cesarean Section; Ultrasonography; Placenta
PubMed: 37541113
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102392 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Feb 2018Placenta previa is associated with maternal hemorrhage, but most literature focuses on morbidity in the setting of placenta accreta. We aim to characterize maternal...
OBJECTIVE
Placenta previa is associated with maternal hemorrhage, but most literature focuses on morbidity in the setting of placenta accreta. We aim to characterize maternal morbidity associated with previa and to define risk factors for hemorrhage.
METHODS
This is a secondary cohort analysis of the NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Cesarean Section Registry. This analysis included all women undergoing primary Cesarean delivery without placenta accreta. About 496 women with previa were compared with 24,201 women without previa. Primary outcome was composite maternal hemorrhagic morbidity. Non-hemorrhagic morbidities and risk factors for hemorrhage were also evaluated.
RESULTS
Maternal hemorrhagic morbidity was more common in women with previa (19 versus 7%, aRR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.5). Atony requiring uterotonics (aRR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0-4.9), red blood cell transfusion (aRR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5-5.7), and hysterectomy (aRR 5.1, 95% CI 1.5-17.3) were also more common with previa. For women with previa, factors associated with maternal hemorrhage were pre-delivery anemia, thrombocytopenia, diabetes, magnesium use, and general anesthesia.
CONCLUSION
Placenta previa is an independent risk factor for maternal hemorrhagic morbidity. Some risk factors are modifiable, but many are intrinsic to the clinical scenario.
Topics: Adult; Anemia; Case-Control Studies; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Magnesium; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 28140723
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1289163 -
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... Sep 2022
Topics: Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Uterine Diseases
PubMed: 36088070
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.06.008