-
Clinical Spine Surgery Aug 2023A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of local steroid application (LSA) on dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Dysphagia is one of the most common adverse events in the early postoperative period of ACDF. LSA is reported as an effective method to reduce the swelling of soft tissues, thereby decreasing the incidence of dysphagia. However, the safety and efficacy of LSA on dysphagia after ACDF need to be systematically reviewed and analyzed.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was carried out in the database PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical key, Cochrane library, and Wiley Online Library to screen papers that report LSA in ACDF surgery. The Cochrane Collaboration tool and a methodological index for nonrandomized studies were used for the assessment of study quality. Data were analyzed with the Review Manager 5.3 software.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies were included. The results revealed no significant differences between the steroid group and the control group in ACDF regarding postoperative drainage, estimated blood loss, and neck disability index score ( P > 0.05). LSA significantly alleviates visual analog scale score for neck pain (or odynophagia) ( P < 0.05), reduces the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -1.00 (-1.05 to -0.95); P < 0.001), and mitigates dysphagia rate and prevertebral soft-tissue swelling in the early postoperative period ( P < 0.05). There seemed to be no significant increase in the complication rate and steroid-related adverse events in the steroid group compared with the control group ( P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
LSA shows advantages in reducing the length of hospital stay, decreasing dysphagia rate, and mitigating prevertebral soft-tissue swelling in the early postoperative period of ACDF. Further large-scale studies are urgently required for the development of a standard protocol for LSA and further analysis of potential delay complications.
Topics: Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Postoperative Complications; Diskectomy; Neck Pain; Steroids; Cervical Vertebrae; Spinal Fusion; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36727904
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001433 -
Acta Neurochirurgica Jan 2024Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion has become increasingly recognized as the utilization of lumbar fusion has grown. Despite the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion has become increasingly recognized as the utilization of lumbar fusion has grown. Despite the significant morbidity associated with this condition, uncertainty regarding its diagnosis and treatment remains. We aim to update the current knowledge of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of post-lumbar surgery SIJD.
METHODS
PRISMA guidelines were used to search the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and OVID databases for literature published in the last 10 years. The ROBIS tool was utilized for risk of bias assessment. Statistical analyses were performed using the R foundation. A Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the risk of SIJD based on operative technique, gender, and symptom onset timeline. Odds ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals. A p-value [Formula: see text] 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Seventeen publications were included. The incidence of new onset SIJD was 7.0%. The mean age was 56 years, and the follow-up length was 30 months. SIJD was more common with fixed lumbar fusion vs floating fusion (OR = 1.48 [0.92, 2.37], p = 0.083), fusion of [Formula: see text] 3 segments (p < 0.05), and male gender increased incidence of SIJD (OR = 1.93 [1.27, 2.98], p = 0.001). Intra-articular injection decreased the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score by 75%, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduced the score by 90%. An open approach resulted in a 13% reduction in VAS score versus 68 and 29% for SIJ fixation using the iFuse and DIANA approaches, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Lumbar fusion predisposes patients to SIJD, likely through manipulation of the SIJ's biomechanics. Definitive diagnosis of SIJD remains multifaceted and a newer modality such as SPECT/CT may find a future role. When conservative measures are ineffective, RFA and SIJ fixation using the iFuse System yield the greatest improvement VAS and ODI.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Lumbosacral Region; Sacroiliac Joint; Spinal Fusion; Female
PubMed: 38280117
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05918-1 -
Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica... 2024To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on... (Review)
Review
Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.
RESULTS
Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91 degrees was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION
In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.
PubMed: 37423383
DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.06.016 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... May 2024Hirayama disease, a rare cervical myelopathy in children and young adults, leads to progressive upper limb weakness and muscle loss. Non-invasive external cervical... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Hirayama disease, a rare cervical myelopathy in children and young adults, leads to progressive upper limb weakness and muscle loss. Non-invasive external cervical orthosis has been shown to prevent further neurologic decline; however, this treatment modality has not been successful at restoring neurologic and motor function, especially in long standing cases with significant weakness. The pathophysiology remains not entirely understood, complicating standardized operative guidelines; however, some studies report favorable outcomes with internal fixation. We report a successful surgically treated case of pediatric Hirayama disease, supplemented by a systematic review and collation of reported cases in the literature.
METHODS
A review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Full-length articles were included if they reported clinical data regarding the treatment of at least one patient with Hirayama disease and the neurologic outcome of that treatment. Articles were excluded if they did not provide information on treatment outcomes, were abstract-only publications, or were published in languages other than English.
RESULTS
Of the fifteen articles reviewed, 63 patients were described, with 59 undergoing surgery. This encompassed both anterior and posterior spinal procedures and 1 hand tendon transfer. Fifty-five patients, including one from our institution, showed improvement post-treatment. Eleven of these patients were under 18 years old.
CONCLUSION
Hirayama disease is an infrequent yet impactful cervical myelopathy with limited high-quality evidence available for optimal treatment. The current literature supports surgical decompression and stabilization as promising interventions. However, comprehensive research is crucial for evolving diagnosis and treatment paradigms.
Topics: Young Adult; Child; Humans; Adolescent; Cervical Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood; Spinal Cord Diseases; Treatment Outcome; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 38231402
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06281-3 -
Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica... 2024To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on... (Review)
Review
[Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.
RESULTS
Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91° was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION
In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.
PubMed: 37995814
DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.11.013 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Nov 2023Although oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has produced good results for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs), its efficacy vis-a-vis posterior lumbar interbody... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Although oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has produced good results for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs), its efficacy vis-a-vis posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of OLIF and PLIF for the treatment of LDDs.
METHODS
A comprehensive assessment of the literature was conducted, and the quality of retrieved studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Clinical parameters included the visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for pain, disability, and functional levels. Statistical analysis related to operative time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, lumbar lordosis angle, postoperative disc height, and complication rates was performed. The PROSPERO number for the present systematic review is CRD42023406695.
RESULTS
In total, 574 patients (287 for OLIF, 287 for PLIF) from eight studies were included. The combined mean postoperative difference in ODI and lumbar VAS scores was - 1.22 and - 0.43, respectively. In postoperative disc, height between OLIF and PLIF was 2.05. The combined advantage ratio of the total surgical complication rate and the mean difference in lumbar lordosis angle between OLIF and PLIF were 0.46 and 1.72, respectively. The combined mean difference in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay between OLIF and PLIF was - 128.67 and - 2.32, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both the OLIF and PLIF interventions showed good clinical efficacy for LDDs. However, OLIF demonstrated a superior advantage in terms of intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, degree of postoperative disc height recovery, and postoperative complication rate.
Topics: Humans; Lordosis; Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Vertebrae; Treatment Outcome; Lumbosacral Region; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37950267
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04312-4 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Sep 2023This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in postoperative efficacy between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in postoperative efficacy between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strictly based on the search strategy, we searched the published papers on OLIF and TLIF for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. A total of 607 related papers were retrieved, and 15 articles were finally included. The quality of the papers was evaluated according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology, and the data were extracted and meta-analyzed using Review manager 5.4 software.
RESULTS
Through comparison, it was found that in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, the OLIF group had certain advantages over the TLIF group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry disability index (ODI), disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH), fused segmental lordosis (FSL), and cage height, and the differences were statistically significant. The results were similar in terms of surgery time, complications, fusion rate, VAS for back pain (VAS-BP) and various sagittal imaging indicators, and there was no significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS
OLIF and TLIF can relieve low back pain symptoms in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, but OLIF has certain advantages in terms of ODI and VAS-LP. In addition, OLIF has the advantages of minor intraoperative trauma and quick postoperative recovery.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Lumbar Vertebrae; Spinal Fusion; Lumbosacral Region; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 37079105
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04880-4 -
BMC Surgery Dec 2023To systematically assess the safety and effectiveness of titanium mesh grafting compared with bone grafting in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To systematically assess the safety and effectiveness of titanium mesh grafting compared with bone grafting in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis.
METHODS
Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched from their inception until April 2023. The outcome indicators for patients treated with titanium mesh grafting or bone grafting for spinal tuberculosis include surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, graft fusion time, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Spinal Cord Injury Grade E assessment, VAS score, lumbar pain score, post-graft kyphotic angle, and postoperative complications. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were used for quality assessment and evidence grading of clinical studies. Funnel plots and Begg's test were employed for bias assessment.
RESULTS
A total of 8 studies were finally included, comprising 523 patients, with 267 cases of titanium mesh fixation and 256 cases of bone grafting. The meta-analysis showed no significant statistical differences in surgical duration (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = -7.20, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -28.06 to 13.67, P = 0.499), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 16.22, 95% CI: -40.62 to 73.06, P = 0.576), graft fusion time (WMD = 0.97, 95% CI: -0.88 to 2.81, P = 0.304), ASIA Spinal Cord Injury Grade E assessment (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.09, P = 0.346), and overall complications (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.55, P = 0.643). Differences in VAS score, ODI lumbar pain score, and post-graft kyphotic angle between the titanium mesh grafting group and the bone grafting group were not significant within the 95% CI range. The rate of postoperative implant subsidence was slightly lower in bone grafting than in titanium mesh grafting (RR = 9.30, 95% CI: 1.05 to 82.22, P = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS
Both bone grafting and titanium mesh grafting are effective and safe for the surgery, with no significant statistical differences in the results. Considering the limitations of the present study, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to further verify the reliability of this finding.
Topics: Humans; Blood Loss, Surgical; Bone Transplantation; Kyphosis; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Cord Injuries; Spinal Fusion; Surgical Mesh; Thoracic Vertebrae; Titanium; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis, Spinal
PubMed: 38087216
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02283-1 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Oct 2023Several strategies have been shown to have some efficacy in the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA): chronic antibiotic suppression, a second two-stage...
INTRODUCTION
Several strategies have been shown to have some efficacy in the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA): chronic antibiotic suppression, a second two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and above-the-knee amputation (AKA). We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of these treatments in patients who had previously received a two-stage revision.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed which investigated PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Chronic infection was defined as a persistent infection of a TKA after a previous two-stage revision. Studies were independently evaluated by two reviewers. Quality appraisal was performed using MINORS Criteria.
RESULTS
14 studies were included for the final review. For chronically infected TKA, a second two-stage revision was often sufficient to control infection. If revision failed, the most common next procedure was either a repeat revision or AKA. AKA patients had less pain and higher quality of life scores compared to arthrodesis, but a higher five-year mortality rate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Chronic infection in TKA offers a multitude of challenges for orthopedic surgeons. We found that arthrodesis and AKA were not significantly different in rates of infection eradication or quality of life. We recommend clinicians to actively discuss options with patients to find a procedure most suitable for them.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Persistent Infection; Quality of Life; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reoperation; Amputation, Surgical; Arthrodesis; Knee Prosthesis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36912949
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03507-z -
European Review For Medical and... Oct 2023This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety between titanium mesh cage (TMC) and nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety between titanium mesh cage (TMC) and nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage (n-HA/PA66) in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) through anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We implemented a comprehensive search strategy across multiple databases, including Wanfang, China Knowledge Network, China Biomedical Literature Database, Wipu, PubMed, Cochran, Embase, and Web of Science. To ensure a thorough examination of available literature, the databases were searched from their inception to January 2023. Two independent researchers evaluated the quality of the included studies by using established criteria. We used RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager Web, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) to facilitate data extraction and analysis.
RESULTS
This analysis included seven controlled clinical studies. The meta-analysis results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time, intraoperative bleeding, preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, preoperative and final follow-up C2-7 Cobb angles, and intervertebral fusion rate (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the final follow-up JOA [MD = 0.77, 95% CI (0.58, 0.97), p < 0.00001], VAS [MD = -0.50, 95% CI (-0.71, -0.30), p < 0.00001], and sedimentation rate [RR = 0.30, 95% CI (0.18, 0.48), p < 0.00001].
CONCLUSIONS
The use of n-HA/PA66 in ACCF for treating CSM is safe and effective treatment with positive clinical efficacy. In addition, n-HA/PA66 has both effective clinical efficacy and significantly lower fusion settling rates compared to TMC.
Topics: Humans; Nylons; Durapatite; Spinal Fusion; Spondylosis; Treatment Outcome; Spinal Cord Diseases; Cervical Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37916330
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202310_34136