-
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Mar 2024Depression and anxiety are significant contributors to maternal perinatal morbidity and a range of negative child outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Depression and anxiety are significant contributors to maternal perinatal morbidity and a range of negative child outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review and assess the diagnostic test accuracy of selected screening tools (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS], EPDS-3A, Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]-, PHQ-2, Matthey Generic Mood Question [MGMQ], Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale [GAD-7], GAD-2, and the Whooley questions) used to identify women with antenatal depression or anxiety in Western countries.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
On January 16, 2023, we searched 10 databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, CRD Database, Embase, Epistemonikos, International HTA Database, KSR Evidence, Ovid MEDLINE, PROSPERO and PsycINFO); the references of included studies were also screened. We included studies of any design that compared case-identification with a relevant screening tool to the outcome of a diagnostic interview based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth or fifth edition (DSM-IV or DSM-5), or the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10). Diagnoses of interest were major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-texts for relevance and evaluated the risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Data extraction was performed by one person and checked by another team member for accuracy. For synthesis, a bivariate model was used. The certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021236333.
RESULTS
We screened 8276 records for eligibility and included 16 original articles reporting on diagnostic test accuracy: 12 for the EPDS, one article each for the GAD-2, MGMQ, PHQ-9, PHQ-2, and Whooley questions, and no articles for the EPDS-3A or GAD-7. Most of the studies had moderate to high risk of bias. Ten of the EPDS articles provided data for synthesis at cutoffs ≥10 to ≥14 for diagnosing major depressive disorder. Cutoff ≥10 gave the optimal combined sensitivity (0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.90) and specificity (0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS
Findings from the meta-analysis suggest that the EPDS alone is not perfectly suitable for detection of major depressive disorder during pregnancy. Few studies have evaluated the other instruments, therefore, their usefulness for identification of women with depression and anxiety during pregnancy remains very uncertain. At present, case-identification with any tool may best serve as a complement to a broader dialogue between healthcare professionals and their patients.
Topics: Child; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depression; Mass Screening; Anxiety Disorders; Anxiety; Depression, Postpartum
PubMed: 38014572
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14734 -
Psychiatry Research Jan 2024Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is endorsed as a principal treatment approach for major depressive disorder (MDD) worldwide. Despite prior studies highlighting potential... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is endorsed as a principal treatment approach for major depressive disorder (MDD) worldwide. Despite prior studies highlighting potential short-term cognitive deficits post-ECT, the debate regarding its long-term implications persists. This study endeavors to elucidate the reasons for this contention using an evidence-based approach.
METHODS
This investigation, meticulously aligned with PRISMA guidelines, was prospectively enlisted on PROSPERO (CRD42023439259). A comprehensive search was performed across various databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and OpenGrey. This review, traversing the literature from inception until June 2023, encapsulated 10 studies (five RCTs and five quasi-experimental studies) involving a cohort of 868 individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis revealed that the persistent discourse on ECT-induced long-term cognitive impairment chiefly emanates from the inadequacies in the specificity and sensitivity of conventional assessment instruments. Conversely, subgroup analyses showed that cognitive impairment in ECT, as gauged by the nascent assessment tool, Electroconvulsive Therapy Cognitive Assessment (ECCA) (SMD = -0.94, 95 % CI [-1.33, -0.54], p < 0.00001), exerted a detrimental influence on the long-term trajectory of individuals with MDD. Notably, there was an adverse effect of ECT on the subdomain of long-term learning cognitive abilities in patients with MDD (SMD = -0.37, 95 % CI [-0.55, -0.18], p < 0.0001). Contrarily, memory (SMD = 0.16, 95 % CI [-0.02, 0.34], p = 0.08), attention (SMD = 0.23, 95 % CI [-0.07, 0.54], p = 0.14), language (SMD = -0.10, 95 % CI [-0.25, 0.05], p = 0.19), spatial perception, and orientation (SMD = -0.04, 95 % CI [-0.28, 0.20], p = 0.75) exhibited no significant detriments. Intriguingly, ECT showed favorable effects on executive function and processing speed among patients with MDD (SMD = 0.52, 95 % CI [0.29, 0.74], p < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis underscores ECCA's superior sensitivity of the ECCA compared to the MMSE or MoCA in detecting cognitive changes in patients with post-ECT MDD. Following Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), deterioration was observed in overall cognitive function and learning capabilities, while memory, attention, language, and spatial perception remained stable. Notably, enhancements were discerned in executive function and processing speed, which not only augmented academic perspectives but also steered the formulation of international clinical guidelines, accentuating the progressive role of ECT in the therapeutic approach to MDD.
Topics: Humans; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Depressive Disorder, Major; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Executive Function
PubMed: 38101070
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115611 -
Medicine Nov 2023Depression affects millions globally and often coexists with cognitive deficits. This study explored the potential of probiotics in enhancing cognition and ameliorating... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Depression affects millions globally and often coexists with cognitive deficits. This study explored the potential of probiotics in enhancing cognition and ameliorating depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder patients.
METHODS
Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol and the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design framework, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials examining probiotic effects on cognition and depressive symptoms. Searches spanned 7 databases from January 2010 to May 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0, and meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.4.1. Publication bias was evaluated via Egger test.
RESULTS
In a systematic review on the effects of probiotic supplementation on cognition and depressive symptoms in depression patients, 635 records were initially identified, with 4 studies ultimately included. These randomized controlled trials were conducted across diverse regions, primarily involving females, with assessment periods ranging from 1 to 2 months. Concerning cognitive outcomes, a statistically significant moderate improvement was found with probiotic supplementation, based on the mean difference and its 95% confidence interval. However, for depressive symptoms, the overall effect was negligible and not statistically significant. A heterogeneity test indicated consistent findings across studies for both cognitive and depressive outcomes (I² = 0% for both). The potential for publication bias was evaluated using the Egger linear regression test, suggesting no significant bias, though caution is advised due to the limited number of studies.
CONCLUSION
Probiotics may enhance cognitive domains and mitigate depressive symptoms, emphasizing the gut-brain axis role. However, methodological variations and brief intervention durations call for more standardized, extensive research.
Topics: Female; Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depression; Probiotics; Cognition; Research Design
PubMed: 38013351
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036005 -
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Mar 2024To update the major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment guidelines of the Japanese Society of Mood Disorders, we conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To update the major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment guidelines of the Japanese Society of Mood Disorders, we conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of available antidepressants in Japan for older adults with MDD.
METHODS
Outcome measures included response rate (primary), improvement in depressive symptom scale score, remission rate, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and at least one adverse event. A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
RESULTS
Nine double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 2145) were identified. No study has been conducted in Japan. Our meta-analysis included the following antidepressants: duloxetine, escitalopram, imipramine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine. Antidepressants have significantly higher response rates than placebo (RR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.04, 1.83], p = 0.02). Antidepressants outperformed placebo in terms of improving depressive symptom scale score (SMD [95% CI] = -0.62 [-0.92, -0.33], p < 0.0001). However, antidepressants were associated with a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events (RR [95% CI] = 1.94 [1.30, 2.88], p = 0.001) and a higher incidence of at least one adverse event (RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.02, 1.21], p = 0.02) compared to placebo. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of remission rate or all-cause discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis concluded that treatment with antidepressants available in Japan is only weakly recommended for moderate to severe MDD in older adults.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Depressive Disorder, Major; Japan; Antidepressive Agents; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38318955
DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12422 -
Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2023Major depressive disorder is a difficult-to-treat psychological disorder. Approximately 30% of patients with major depressive disorder do not respond to conventional...
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder is a difficult-to-treat psychological disorder. Approximately 30% of patients with major depressive disorder do not respond to conventional therapies; thus, the efficacy of alternative therapies for treating major depressive disorder, such as neurofeedback, a non-invasive neuromodulation method used in the treatment of psychiatric diseases, must be investigated.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of neurofeedback in minimizing and treating major depressive disorder and its application as a substitute to or an adjuvant with conventional therapies.
METHODS
We searched for experimental studies published between 1962-2021 in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases and identified 1,487 studies, among which 13 met the inclusion exclusion criteria.
RESULTS
We noted that not all patients responded to neurofeedback. Based on depression scales, major depressive disorder significantly improved in response to neurofeedback only in a few individuals. Additionally, the number of training sessions did not influence the results.
CONCLUSION
Neurofeedback can reduce depression symptoms in patients; however, not all patients respond to the treatment. Therefore, further studies must be conducted to validate the effectiveness of neurofeedback in treating major depressive disorder.
Topics: Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Neurofeedback
PubMed: 37493834
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023RW0253 -
Psychopharmacology Oct 2023Nitrous oxide (NO) has been initially confirmed by clinical trials to benefit to patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, there needs to be a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nitrous oxide (NO) has been initially confirmed by clinical trials to benefit to patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, there needs to be a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of NO in MDD.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies up to Jan 1st, 2023. The meta-analysis mainly compared the outcome of the change in depression severity scores, response, remission, and adverse events in patients with MDD receiving 50% NO and placebo.
RESULTS
Four studies with 133 patients were eventually identified. We found that the NO group and control group showed an overall significant difference in the change in depression severity score for patients at 2 h, 24 h, and 2 weeks or more (2 h, SMD = - 0.64, 95% CI - 0.01 to - 0.28, p < 0.0001) (24 h, SMD = - 0.65, 95% CI - 1.01 to - 0.29, p < 0.0001) (2 weeks, SMD = - 0.76, 95% CI - 1.16 to - 0.36, p < 0.0001). For the response and remission rate, the long-term effect of NO was also statistically significant (for the response, RR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.44, p = 0.01) (for the remission, RR = 4.68, 95% CI 1.49 to 14.68, p = 0.008). For safety outcomes, patients treated with NO had higher odds of nausea or vomiting (RR = 10.15, 95% CI 1.96 to 52.59, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSION
Our study suggested that NO has a rapid and long-lasting antidepressant effect in patients with MDD. However, the efficacy of lower or titrated concentration of N2O should be further investigated.
Topics: Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Nitrous Oxide; Nausea; Vomiting
PubMed: 37608194
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06449-w -
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Aug 2023The present systematic review was aimed at critically summarizing the evidence about treatment-emergent manic/hypomanic and depressive switches during the course of... (Review)
Review
A systematic review of manic/hypomanic and depressive switches in patients with bipolar disorder in naturalistic settings: The role of antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs.
The present systematic review was aimed at critically summarizing the evidence about treatment-emergent manic/hypomanic and depressive switches during the course of bipolar disorder (BD). A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo electronic databases was conducted until March 24th, 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Observational studies clearly reporting data regarding the prevalence of treatment-emergent mood switches in patients with BD were considered for inclusion. Thirty-two original studies met the inclusion criteria. In the majority of cases, manic switches were analyzed; only 3 papers investigated depressive switches in type I BD. Treatment-emergent mania/hypomania in BD subjects ranged from 17.3% to 48.8% and was more frequent with antidepressant monotherapy compared to combination treatment with mood stabilizers, especially lithium, or second-generation antipsychotics. A higher likelihood of mood switch has been reported with tricyclics and a lower rate with bupropion. Depressive switches were detected in 5-16% of type I BD subjects and were associated with first-generation antipsychotic use, the concomitant use of first- and second-generation antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines. The included studies presented considerable methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes and comparability flaws. In conclusion, many studies, although heterogeneous and partly discordant, have been conducted on manic/hypomanic switches, whereas depressive switches during treatment with antipsychotics are poorly investigated. In BD subjects, both antidepressant and antipsychotic medications seems to play a role in the occurrence of mood switches, although the effects of different pharmacological compounds have yet to be fully investigated.
Topics: Humans; Bipolar Disorder; Antipsychotic Agents; Mania; Antidepressive Agents; Lithium
PubMed: 37119556
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.04.013 -
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 2024Cognitive dysfunction or deficits are common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The current study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes multiple... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Cognitive dysfunction or deficits are common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The current study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes multiple domains of cognitive impairment in patients with MDD.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception through May 17, 2023, with no language limits. Studies with the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) patients with a diagnosis of MDD using standardized diagnostic criteria; (2) healthy controls (i.e., those without MDD); (3) neuropsychological assessments of cognitive impairment using Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB); and (4) reports of sufficient data to quantify standardized effect sizes. Hedges' g standardized mean differences (SMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to quantify effect sizes of cognitive impairments in MDD. SMDs were estimated using a fixed- or random-effects models.
RESULTS
Overall, 33 studies consisting of 2,596 subjects (n = 1,337 for patients with MDD and n = 1,259 for healthy controls) were included. Patients with MDD, when compared to healthy controls, had moderate cognitive deficits (SMD, -0.39 [95% CI, -0.47 to -0.31]). In our subgroup analyses, patients with treatment-resistant depression (SMD, -0.56 [95% CI, -0.78 to -0.34]) and older adults with MDD (SMD, -0.51 [95% CI, -0.66 to -0.36]) had greater cognitive deficits than healthy controls. The effect size was small among unmedicated patients with MDD (SMD, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.37 to -0.00]), and we did not find any statistical difference among children. Cognitive deficits were consistently found in all domains, except the reaction time. No publication bias was reported.
CONCLUSION
Because cognitive impairment in MDD can persist in remission or increase the risk of major neurodegenerative disorders, remediation of cognitive impairment in addition to alleviation of depressive symptoms should be an important goal when treating patients with MDD.
Topics: Child; Humans; Aged; Depressive Disorder, Major; Cognitive Dysfunction; Neuropsychological Tests
PubMed: 38272009
DOI: 10.1159/000535665 -
Bipolar Disorders Dec 2023Glutamatergic transmission and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) have been implicated in the pathophysiology schizophrenic spectrum and major depressive disorders.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Glutamatergic transmission and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) have been implicated in the pathophysiology schizophrenic spectrum and major depressive disorders. Less is known about the role of NMDARs in bipolar disorder (BD). The present systematic review aimed to investigate the role of NMDARs in BD, along with its possible neurobiological and clinical implications.
METHODS
We performed a computerized literature research on PubMed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, using the following string: (("Bipolar Disorder"[Mesh]) OR (manic-depressive disorder[Mesh]) OR ("BD") OR ("MDD")) AND ((NMDA [Mesh]) OR (N-methyl-D-aspartate) OR (NMDAR[Mesh]) OR (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor)).
RESULTS
Genetic studies yield conflicting results, and the most studied candidate for an association with BD is the GRIN2B gene. Postmortem expression studies (in situ hybridization and autoradiographic and immunological studies) are also contradictory but suggest a reduced activity of NMDARs in the prefrontal, superior temporal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampus.
CONCLUSIONS
Glutamatergic transmission and NMDARs do not appear to be primarily involved in the pathophysiology of BD, but they might be linked to the severity and chronicity of the disorder. Disease progression could be associated with a long phase of enhanced glutamatergic transmission, with ensuing excitotoxicity and neuronal damage, resulting into a reduced density of functional NMDARs.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Bipolar Disorder; Depressive Disorder, Major; Neurons; Gyrus Cinguli
PubMed: 37208966
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13335 -
Psychiatry Research Oct 2023Our meta-analysis demonstrated that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)/bilateral-TBS (Bi-TBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)/bilateral-TBS (Bi-TBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS)/bilateral-rTMS (Bi-rTMS) had similar efficacy, acceptability, and safety profiles for antidepressant treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (AD-TRD). In our sensitivity analysis that excluded a study that compared Bi-TBS with Bi-rTMS for older adults, all efficacy outcomes were also comparable between iTBS and HF-rTMS. Because iTBS does not require higher stimulation intensity and a longer stimulus time than conventional HF-rTMS protocols, we speculated that for those with AD-TRD, iTBS/Bi-TBS is a more helpful therapeutic modality in clinical practice than HF-rTMS/Bi-rTMS.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Depressive Disorder, Major; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Antidepressive Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37657200
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115452