-
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Aug 2023External ventricular drains (EVDs) are used to monitor and treat elevated intracranial pressure. EVDs are often placed blindly without the use of imaging guidance, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
External ventricular drains (EVDs) are used to monitor and treat elevated intracranial pressure. EVDs are often placed blindly without the use of imaging guidance, and successful placement with respect to pass attempts and final catheter location may suffer as a result of this freehand technique.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify studies pertaining to freehand EVD placement through March 30, 2022. Studies were included if they reported percentage of EVDs placed successfully on the first pass attempt, or final catheter location as defined by the Kakarla Grading System. Pooled weighted incidence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Of the 2964 results returned from the literature search, 39 studies were included in this meta-analysis. These studies reported on 6313 EVDs placed via freehand technique in 6070 patients with the following respective incidence: successful EVD placement on the first attempt (78%, 95%CI: 67-86%); placement with a Kakarla Grade of 1 (optimal location) (72%, 95%CI: 66-77%); hemorrhage (7%, 95%CI: 6-10%), and infection (5%, 95%CI: 3-8%).
CONCLUSIONS
Only 78% of EVDs in this meta-analysis were placed successfully on the first pass, and only 72% of final placements were deemed optimal. This represents a relatively high rate of suboptimal outcomes with respect to EVD placement, which could potentially be avoided with the use of navigation-assisted placement techniques.
Topics: Humans; Ventriculostomy; Drainage; Intracranial Hypertension; Catheters; Databases, Factual; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37399698
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107852 -
Neurosurgery Sep 2023Treatment decision-making for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) with microsurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Treatment decision-making for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) with microsurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare microsurgery vs SRS for bAVMs.
METHOD
Medline and PubMed were searched from inception to June 21, 2022. The primary outcomes were obliteration and follow-up hemorrhage, and secondary outcomes were permanent neurological deficit, worsened modified Rankin scale (mRS), follow-up mRS > 2, and mortality. The GRADE approach was used for grading the level of evidence.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included, which yielded 817 patients, of which 432 (52.8%) and 385 (47.1%) patients underwent microsurgery and SRS, respectively. Two cohorts were comparable in age, sex, Spetzler-Martin grade, nidus size, location, deep venous drainage, eloquence, and follow-up. In the microsurgery group, the odds ratio (OR) of obliteration was higher (OR = 18.51 [11.05, 31.01], P < .000001, evidence: high) and the hazard ratio of follow-up hemorrhage was lower (hazard ratio = 0.47 [0.23, 0.97], P = .04, evidence: moderate). The OR of permanent neurological deficit was higher with microsurgery (OR = 2.85 [1.63, 4.97], P = .0002, evidence: low), whereas the OR of worsened mRS (OR = 1.24 [0.65, 2.38], P = .52, evidence: moderate), follow-up mRS > 2 (OR = 0.78 [0.36, 1.7], P = .53, evidence: moderate), and mortality (OR = 1.17 [0.41, 3.3], P = .77, evidence: moderate) were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSION
Microsurgery was superior at obliterating bAVMs and preventing further hemorrhage. Despite a higher rate of postoperative neurological deficit with microsurgery, functional status and mortality were comparable with patients who underwent SRS. Microsurgery should remain a first-line consideration for bAVMs, with SRS reserved for inaccessible locations, highly eloquent areas, and medically high-risk or unwilling patients.
Topics: Humans; Microsurgery; Treatment Outcome; Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Brain; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 36999929
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002460 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Feb 2024Optimal preoperative biliary drainage for patients with pancreatic cancer before pancreatoduodenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the comparison of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Optimal preoperative biliary drainage for patients with pancreatic cancer before pancreatoduodenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the comparison of efficacy and safety between a metallic stent (MS) and a plastic stent (PS).
METHODS
Comparative studies on the use of MS and PS for pancreatic cancer before pancreatoduodenectomy were systematically searched using the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Pre- and postoperative data also were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compare post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications as well as intra- and postoperative outcomes between the two arms of the study, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated with 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
The study analyzed 12 studies involving 683 patients. Insertion of MS was associated with a lower incidence of re-intervention (OR, 0.06; 95% CI 0.03-0.15; P < 0.001), increased post-ERCP adverse events (OR, 2.22; 95% CI 1.13-4.36; P = 0.02), and similar operation time (MD, 18.0 min; 95% CI -29.1 to 65.6 min; P = 0.46), amount of blood loss (MD, 43.0 ml; 95% CI -207.1 to 288.2 ml; P = 0.73), and surgical complication rate (OR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.53-1.15; P = 0.21). The cumulative stent patency rate after 3 months was higher in the MS group than in the PS group (70-100 % vs 30.0-45.0 %).
CONCLUSION
For biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer during this era of multidisciplinary treatment, MS use might be the first choice because MS provides a more durable biliary drainage and a similar risk of postoperative outcomes compared with PS.
Topics: Humans; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Cholestasis; Drainage; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37952017
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14523-y -
Asian Journal of Surgery Sep 2023Whether thymectomy (TM) or thymomectomy (TMM) is better for non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Whether thymectomy (TM) or thymomectomy (TMM) is better for non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes and prognoses of non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma treated using thymectomy versus thymomectomy. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were systematically searched for relevant studies on the surgical treatment (TM and TMM) of non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma published before March 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies, and the data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.30. Fixed or random effect models were used for the meta-analysis depending on heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare short-term perioperative and long-term tumor outcomes. A total of 15 eligible studies, including 3023 patients, were identified in the electronic databases. Our analysis indicated that TMM patients might benefit from a shorter duration of surgery (p = 0.006), lower blood loss volume (p < 0.001), less postoperative drainage (p = 0.03), and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate (p = 0.47) or disease-free survival rate (p = 0.66) between the two surgery treatment groups. Likewise, TM and TMM were similar in the administration of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.29), resection completeness (p = 0.38), and postoperative thymoma recurrence (p = 0.99). Our study revealed that TMM might be a more appropriate option in treating non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma.
Topics: Humans; Thymoma; Thymectomy; Neoplasm Staging; Retrospective Studies; Thymus Neoplasms; Prognosis; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 37005182
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.03.063 -
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Aug 2023Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment, still burdened by a risk of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment, still burdened by a risk of intraoperative biliary duct injury. An alternative strategy to manage patients with severe acute cholecystitis is the percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGBD).
METHODS
The Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to clarify controversies about the preoperative use of PGBD. We extracted 32 studies: 9 Randomized Control Trial Studies (RCTs) and 23 no RCTs.
RESULTS OF CRITICAL OUTCOMES
The incidence of post-operative complications was lower in the PGBD associated at LC than in the LC alone (RCTs: RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.56, I2 = 63%). The incidence of the post-operative biliary leakage was higher in late PGBD' group (RCTs: RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80).
RESULTS OF OTHER OUTCOMES
The incidence of intraabdominal abscess, blood loss, conversion to open, subtotal cholecystectomy, operative time and wound infection was lower in PGBD' group. The total hospital stay was the same.
CONCLUSION
A strong recommendation is performed to the use of the PGBD + LC than upfront LC to reduce biliary leakage (recommendation "strong positive") in high risk acute cholecystitis especially in patients with higher perioperative risks or longstanding acute cholecystitis. For post-operative complications a recommendation "positive weak" suggests that PGBD + LC could be used than upfront LC to reduce the rate of post-operative complications.
Topics: Humans; Cholecystostomy; Cholecystitis, Acute; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Drainage; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36577652
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2022.12.003 -
BMC Gastroenterology Jul 2023This study was performed to compare a metal stent (MS) and plastic stent (PS) in terms of efficacy and complications during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of metal versus plastic stent for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
This study was performed to compare a metal stent (MS) and plastic stent (PS) in terms of efficacy and complications during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and the perioperative period.
METHODS
We performed an electronic search of the following databases until 1 June 2022: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies comparing an MS versus PS for PBD in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing NAT were included.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis showed that use of an MS was associated with lower rates of reintervention (p < 0.00001), delay of NAT (p = 0.007), recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) (p = 0.003), and cholangitis (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of stent migration (p = 0.31), postoperative complications (p = 0.20), leakage (p = 0.90), and R0 resection (p = 0.50).
CONCLUSIONS
Use of an MS for PBD in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing NAT followed by surgery was associated with lower rates of reintervention, delay of NAT, RBO, and cholangitis compared with use of a PS. However, the postoperative outcomes were comparable between the MS and PS. Further studies on this topic are recommended.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Drainage; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Metals; Stents; Cholangitis; Cholestasis; Plastics
PubMed: 37438761
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02874-5 -
Academic Emergency Medicine : Official... Aug 2023Distinguishing peritonsillar abscess (PTA) from peritonsillar cellulitis using clinical assessment is challenging as many features overlap for both conditions, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Distinguishing peritonsillar abscess (PTA) from peritonsillar cellulitis using clinical assessment is challenging as many features overlap for both conditions, and physical examination is only about 75% sensitive and 50% specific for diagnosing PTA. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the test characteristics of ultrasound for diagnosing PTA when compared to a reference standard of computed tomography or acquisition of pus via needle aspiration or incision and drainage.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. We searched seven databases from 1960 to November 2022. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, data extraction, and QUADAS-2 risk-of-bias assessment. We used a bivariate random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-). We also conducted subgroup analyses on radiology ultrasound compared to point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and intraoral compared to transcervical scanning techniques.
RESULTS
From 339 citations, we identified 18 studies for inclusion. Because one study only reported positive cases of PTA (thereby preventing the calculation of specificity), it was excluded from the analysis, so the analysis included a total of 17 studies with 812 patients, of whom 541 had PTA. Pooled bivariate sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78%-91%), specificity 76% (95% CI 67%-82%), LR+ 3.51 (95% CI 2.59-4.89), and LR- 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.30). On subgroup analysis, radiology-performed ultrasound had a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 71%, compared to POCUS, which had a sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 79%. Comparing the two different techniques, intraoral had a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 75% while transcervical had a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 81%.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound demonstrates high sensitivity for ruling out PTA, but it only has moderate specificity for ruling in the diagnosis.
Topics: Humans; Peritonsillar Abscess; Ultrasonography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Sensitivity and Specificity; Physical Examination
PubMed: 36625850
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14660 -
Research in Veterinary Science Mar 2024Mammary gland tumours are the most common neoplasms in intact bitches. Over the last decades, veterinary oncology has evolved in detecting and determining the lymph... (Review)
Review
Mammary gland tumours are the most common neoplasms in intact bitches. Over the last decades, veterinary oncology has evolved in detecting and determining the lymph nodes to be removed in these patients for an accurate staging and prognosis, as well as to achieve better disease control and higher overall survival time. Our objective was to describe recent advances related to lymphatic drainage in bitches with mammary gland tumours, focusing on surgery, diagnosis, and prognosis. Through a systematic review using PubMed as the database, a thorough multi-step search reduced 316 studies to 30 for analysis. Vital dyes appear to be crucial in reducing the overall surgery time through transoperative staining of the lymph nodes. Imaging contrasts provide information regarding specific tumour drainage; however, there is still little evidence for their use. The axillary and superficial inguinal lymph nodes are well-established as regional lymph nodes of the cranial and caudal mammary glands. In sequence, accessory axillary, medial iliac, popliteal, and sternal lymph nodes should receive attention if they demonstrate contrast drainage, even considering that the literature has not shown a relationship between drainage and metastasis in these cases. In conclusion, recent studies have provided us with more support in regional lymph node excision regarding the TNM staging system. Studies are highly heterogeneous and method comparisons do not fit due to the non-uniformity of samples, materials, and procedures. We suggest further studies with a larger sample size, complete follow-up of patients, contrast use, and lymph node morphological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Topics: Animals; Dogs; Humans; Mammary Glands, Human; Lymph Nodes; Prognosis; Neoplasm Staging
PubMed: 38194890
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105139 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Nov 2023Extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) or left hemicolectomy (LHC) are accepted as the standard-of-care for colonic tumours of the splenic flexure. Lymphatic drainage at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) or left hemicolectomy (LHC) are accepted as the standard-of-care for colonic tumours of the splenic flexure. Lymphatic drainage at this site is poorly defined and subject to significant heterogeneity. Nevertheless, emerging evidence demonstrates the potential oncological safety of segmental splenic flexure colectomy (SFC).
AIM
To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare outcomes following ERHC, LHC and SFC for splenic flexure tumours (SFTs).
METHODS
A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. NMA was performed using R Shiny and Netmeta packages.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies, involving 6176 patients (ERHC n = 785; LHC n = 1527; SFC n = 3864) were included in the NMA. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) (SFC vs LHC Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.76,1.34; SFC vs ERHC HR 1.18, 95% CrI 0.85,1.58) between the groups. SFC had a shorter operation time (Mean 176.37 min; Mean Difference [MD] SFC vs LHC 20.34 min 95% CrI 10.9, 29.97; SFC vs ERHC MD 22.19 95% CrI 11.09, 33.29) but also had a lower average lymph node yield (LNY) compared with ERHC (MD 7.15, 95% CrI 5.71, 8.60). ERHC had a significantly higher incidence of post-operative ileus (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.47, 95% CrI 1.11, 10.84). There was also no difference observed for minimally invasive approaches, anastomotic leak rate, perioperative mortality, reoperation rates or length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS
While SFC may allow for reduced operative duration and improved bowel function postoperatively. SFC, LHC, ERHC are all acceptable approaches for curative resection of cancers of the splenic flexure, with no difference in OS observed. Thus, surgeon preference and candidate-specific factors will likely determine the management of SFTs.
Topics: Humans; Colon, Transverse; Network Meta-Analysis; Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome; Colorectal Neoplasms; Colonic Neoplasms; Splenic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37793302
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107087 -
PloS One 2023Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is commonly treated via surgical removal of the hematoma, placement of a routine indwelling drainage tube, and continuous drainage to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is commonly treated via surgical removal of the hematoma, placement of a routine indwelling drainage tube, and continuous drainage to ensure that the blood does not re-aggregate following removal. However, the optimal location for placement of the drainage tube remains to be determined.
OBJECTIVES
To aid in establishing a reference for selecting the optimal method, we compared the effects of different drainage tube placements on CSDH prognosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous clinical studies.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We searched for clinical studies comparing the outcomes of subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage (SPGD) and subdural drainage (SDD) for CSDH published in English prior to April 1, 2022.
PARTICIPANTS
The final analysis included 15 studies involving 4,318 patients.
RESULTS
Our analysis of the pooled results revealed no significant differences in recurrence rate between the SDD and SPGD groups. We also observed no significant differences in mortality or rates of postoperative complications (infection, pneumocephalus, or epilepsy) between the SDD and SPGD groups.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that the choice of SDD vs. SPGD has no significant effect on CSDH prognosis, highlighting SPGD as an alternative treatment option for CSDH.
Topics: Humans; Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; Treatment Outcome; Drainage; Postoperative Complications; Periosteum; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37527264
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288872