-
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Oct 2023To compare the long term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To compare the long term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease.
DESIGN
Randomised, open label, multicentre trial.
SETTING
12 hospitals in South Korea, September 2016 to November 2019.
PARTICIPANTS
4400 adults (age ≥19 years) with coronary artery disease.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were assigned to receive either rosuvastatin (n=2204) or atorvastatin (n=2196) using 2×2 factorial randomisation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome was a three year composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were safety endpoints: new onset diabetes mellitus; hospital admissions due to heart failure; deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism; endovascular revascularisation for peripheral artery disease; aortic intervention or surgery; end stage kidney disease; discontinuation of study drugs owing to intolerance; cataract surgery; and a composite of laboratory detected abnormalities.
RESULTS
4341 of the 4400 participants (98.7%) completed the trial. Mean daily dose of study drugs was 17.1 mg (standard deviation (SD) 5.2 mg) in the rosuvastatin group and 36.0 (12.8) mg in the atorvastatin group at three years (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 189 participants (8.7%) in the rosuvastatin group and 178 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.58). The mean low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level during treatment was 1.8 mmol/L (SD 0.5 mmol/L) in the rosuvastatin group and 1.9 (0.5) mmol/L in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). The rosuvastatin group had a higher incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring initiation of antidiabetics (7.2% 5.3%; hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.87; P=0.03) and cataract surgery (2.5% 1.5%; 1.66, 1.07 to 2.58; P=0.02). Other safety endpoints did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In adults with coronary artery disease, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin showed comparable efficacy for the composite outcome of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation at three years. Rosuvastatin was associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels but a higher risk of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring antidiabetics and cataract surgery compared with atorvastatin.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02579499.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Young Adult; Atorvastatin; Cataract; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Myocardial Infarction; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37852649
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075837 -
JAMA Aug 2023Anthracyclines treat a broad range of cancers. Basic and retrospective clinical data have suggested that use of atorvastatin may be associated with a reduction in... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Anthracyclines treat a broad range of cancers. Basic and retrospective clinical data have suggested that use of atorvastatin may be associated with a reduction in cardiac dysfunction due to anthracycline use.
OBJECTIVE
To test whether atorvastatin is associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients with lymphoma receiving anthracyclines who develop cardiac dysfunction.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at 9 academic medical centers in the US and Canada among 300 patients with lymphoma who were scheduled to receive anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Enrollment occurred between January 25, 2017, and September 10, 2021, with final follow-up on October 10, 2022.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were randomized to receive atorvastatin, 40 mg/d (n = 150), or placebo (n = 150) for 12 months.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with an absolute decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥10% from prior to chemotherapy to a final value of <55% over 12 months. A secondary outcome was the proportion of participants with an absolute decline in LVEF of ≥5% from prior to chemotherapy to a final value of <55% over 12 months.
RESULTS
Of the 300 participants randomized (mean age, 50 [SD, 17] years; 142 women [47%]), 286 (95%) completed the trial. Among the entire cohort, the baseline mean LVEF was 63% (SD, 4.6%) and the follow-up LVEF was 58% (SD, 5.7%). Study drug adherence was noted in 91% of participants. At 12-month follow-up, 46 (15%) had a decline in LVEF of 10% or greater from prior to chemotherapy to a final value of less than 55%. The incidence of the primary end point was 9% (13/150) in the atorvastatin group and 22% (33/150) in the placebo group (P = .002). The odds of a 10% or greater decline in LVEF to a final value of less than 55% after anthracycline treatment was almost 3 times greater for participants randomized to placebo compared with those randomized to atorvastatin (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.4). Compared with placebo, atorvastatin also reduced the incidence of the secondary end point (13% vs 29%; P = .001). There were 13 adjudicated heart failure events (4%) over 24 months of follow-up. There was no difference in the rates of incident heart failure between study groups (3% with atorvastatin, 6% with placebo; P = .26). The number of serious related adverse events was low and similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among patients with lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, atorvastatin reduced the incidence of cardiac dysfunction. This finding may support the use of atorvastatin in patients with lymphoma at high risk of cardiac dysfunction due to anthracycline use.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02943590.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Atorvastatin; Double-Blind Method; Heart Failure; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Cardiovascular Agents; Lymphoma; Heart Diseases; Follow-Up Studies; Male; Adult; Aged
PubMed: 37552303
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.11887 -
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular... Sep 2023Anthracyclines can cause cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). We aimed to assess whether statins prevent decline in left ventricular ejection fraction... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Anthracyclines can cause cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). We aimed to assess whether statins prevent decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in anthracycline-treated patients at increased risk for CTRCD.
METHODS
In this multicenter double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, patients with cancer at increased risk of anthracycline-related CTRCD (per ASCO guidelines) were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 40 mg or placebo once-daily. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed before and within 4 weeks after anthracyclines. Blood biomarkers were measured at every cycle. The primary outcome was post-anthracycline LVEF, adjusted for baseline. CTRCD was defined as a fall in LVEF by >10% to <53%. Secondary endpoints included left ventricular (LV) volumes, CTRCD, CMR tissue characterization, high sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP).
RESULTS
We randomized 112 patients (56.9 ± 13.6 years, 87 female, and 73 with breast cancer): 54 to atorvastatin and 58 to placebo. Post-anthracycline CMR was performed 22 (13-27) days from last anthracycline dose. Post-anthracycline LVEF did not differ between the atorvastatin and placebo groups (57.3 ± 5.8% and 55.9 ± 7.4%, respectively) when adjusted for baseline LVEF (P = 0.34). There were no significant between-group differences in post-anthracycline LV end-diastolic (P = 0.20) or end-systolic volume (P = 0.12), CMR myocardial edema and/or fibrosis (P = 0.06-0.47), or peak hsTnI (P ≥ 0.99) and BNP (P = 0.23). CTRCD incidence was similar (4% versus 4%, P ≥ 0.99). There was no difference in adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients at increased risk of CTRCD, primary prevention with atorvastatin during anthracycline therapy did not ameliorate early LVEF decline, LV remodeling, CTRCD, change in serum cardiac biomarkers, or CMR myocardial tissue changes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT03186404.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anthracyclines; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Cardiotoxicity; Stroke Volume; Atorvastatin; Ventricular Function, Left; Heart Diseases; Breast Neoplasms; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Biomarkers
PubMed: 37120736
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad031 -
Journal of Atherosclerosis and... Nov 2023The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world...
AIMS
The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017).
METHODS
Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal <120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal <70 mg/dL).
RESULTS
The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Cholesterol, LDL; Goals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Japan; Treatment Outcome; Ezetimibe; Atherosclerosis; Anticholesteremic Agents
PubMed: 36928267
DOI: 10.5551/jat.63940 -
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Oct 2023It is clear from epidemiological studies that patients at high and very-high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) risk do not reach lipid... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
It is clear from epidemiological studies that patients at high and very-high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) risk do not reach lipid guideline-recommended targets. Thus, fixed-dose combinations of statins/ezetimibe, bempedoic acid/ezetimibe and statins/fibrates may represent a further armamentarium in the field of lipid-lowering approaches in these individuals.
RECENT FINDINGS
The combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe is not inferior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. Drug discontinuation or dose reduction is inferior with fixed-dose combination. The fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe is superior to bempedoic acid in monotherapy in lowering LDL-C and in reducing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. The combination fenofibrate with atorvastatin is superior to monotherapies in lowering triglycerides. Lipid-lowering fixed-dose combinations may guarantee a higher therapy adherence, representing a better approach to control plasma lipids and thus ameliorate ASCVD burden. Additional studies will define the advantages on cardiovascular outcomes in high and very high-risk patients.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Cholesterol, LDL; Ezetimibe; Dyslipidemias; Drug Therapy, Combination; Atherosclerosis; Anticholesteremic Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37715044
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-023-01142-x -
Cancer Communications (London, England) Dec 2023Metabolism reprogramming plays a vital role in glioblastoma (GBM) progression and recurrence by producing enough energy for highly proliferating tumor cells. In...
BACKGROUND
Metabolism reprogramming plays a vital role in glioblastoma (GBM) progression and recurrence by producing enough energy for highly proliferating tumor cells. In addition, metabolic reprogramming is crucial for tumor growth and immune-escape mechanisms. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification and EGFR-vIII mutation are often detected in GBM cells, contributing to the malignant behavior. This study aimed to investigate the functional role of the EGFR pathway on fatty acid metabolism remodeling and energy generation.
METHODS
Clinical GBM specimens were selected for single-cell RNA sequencing and untargeted metabolomics analysis. A metabolism-associated RTK-fatty acid-gene signature was constructed and verified. MK-2206 and MK-803 were utilized to block the RTK pathway and mevalonate pathway induced abnormal metabolism. Energy metabolism in GBM with activated EGFR pathway was monitored. The antitumor effect of Osimertinib and Atorvastatin assisted by temozolomide (TMZ) was analyzed by an intracranial tumor model in vivo.
RESULTS
GBM with high EGFR expression had characteristics of lipid remodeling and maintaining high cholesterol levels, supported by the single-cell RNA sequencing and metabolomics of clinical GBM samples. Inhibition of the EGFR/AKT and mevalonate pathways could remodel energy metabolism by repressing the tricarboxylic acid cycle and modulating ATP production. Mechanistically, the EGFR/AKT pathway upregulated the expressions of acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 3 (ACSS3), acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 (ACSL3), and long-chain fatty acid elongation-related gene ELOVL fatty acid elongase 2 (ELOVL2) in an NF-κB-dependent manner. Moreover, inhibition of the mevalonate pathway reduced the EGFR level on the cell membranes, thereby affecting the signal transduction of the EGFR/AKT pathway. Therefore, targeting the EGFR/AKT and mevalonate pathways enhanced the antitumor effect of TMZ in GBM cells and animal models.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings not only uncovered the mechanism of metabolic reprogramming in EGFR-activated GBM but also provided a combinatorial therapeutic strategy for clinical GBM management.
Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Energy Metabolism; ErbB Receptors; Fatty Acids; Glioblastoma; Ligases; Mevalonic Acid; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Temozolomide
PubMed: 37920878
DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12502 -
Hepatology Communications Dec 2023Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension face a high risk of complications. Besides their anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, statins may reduce portal... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension face a high risk of complications. Besides their anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, statins may reduce portal pressure and thus the risk of complications and mortality. We aimed to investigate the effects of atorvastatin on hospital admissions, mortality, inflammation, and lipidomics in cirrhosis with portal hypertension.
METHODS
We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial among patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Atorvastatin (10-20 mg/d) was administered for 6 months. We measured splanchnic hemodynamics, analyzed inflammatory markers, and performed lipidomics at baseline and after 6 months.
RESULTS
Seventy-eight patients were randomized, with 38 patients allocated to atorvastatin and 40 patients to placebo. Fifty-nine patients completed 6 months of intervention. Comparisons between changes in each group were calculated. Liver-related complications and mortality were similar between the groups. The HVPG and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score did not change between groups (p=0.95 and 0.87, respectively). Atorvastatin decreased 3 of 42 inflammatory markers, CD62-L-selectin, matrix metalloproteinases-2, and TNF-α (p-values: 0.005, 0.011, and 0.023, respectively), while lipidomics was not significantly changed.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with cirrhosis, atorvastatin was safe to use, but did not reduce mortality, the risk of liver-related complications, or the HVPG. Atorvastatin induced minor anti-inflammatory effects and minor effects on lipids during a 6-month treatment period.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Atorvastatin; End Stage Liver Disease; Hypertension, Portal; Liver Cirrhosis; Severity of Illness Index; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 38051553
DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000332