-
JAMA Apr 2023In patients with coronary artery disease, some guidelines recommend initial statin treatment with high-intensity statins to achieve at least a 50% reduction in... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
In patients with coronary artery disease, some guidelines recommend initial statin treatment with high-intensity statins to achieve at least a 50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). An alternative approach is to begin with moderate-intensity statins and titrate to a specific LDL-C goal. These alternatives have not been compared head-to-head in a clinical trial involving patients with known coronary artery disease.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether a treat-to-target strategy is noninferior to a strategy of high-intensity statins for long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial in patients with a coronary disease diagnosis treated at 12 centers in South Korea (enrollment: September 9, 2016, through November 27, 2019; final follow-up: October 26, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the LDL-C target strategy, with an LDL-C level between 50 and 70 mg/dL as the target, or high-intensity statin treatment, which consisted of rosuvastatin, 20 mg, or atorvastatin, 40 mg.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary end point was a 3-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization with a noninferiority margin of 3.0 percentage points.
RESULTS
Among 4400 patients, 4341 patients (98.7%) completed the trial (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.9] years; 1228 females [27.9%]). In the treat-to-target group (n = 2200), which had 6449 person-years of follow-up, moderate-intensity and high-intensity dosing were used in 43% and 54%, respectively. The mean (SD) LDL-C level for 3 years was 69.1 (17.8) mg/dL in the treat-to-target group and 68.4 (20.1) mg/dL in the high-intensity statin group (n = 2200) (P = .21, compared with the treat-to-target group). The primary end point occurred in 177 patients (8.1%) in the treat-to-target group and 190 patients (8.7%) in the high-intensity statin group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points [upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 1.1 percentage points]; P < .001 for noninferiority).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among patients with coronary artery disease, a treat-to-target LDL-C strategy of 50 to 70 mg/dL as the goal was noninferior to a high-intensity statin therapy for the 3-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the suitability of a treat-to-target strategy that may allow a tailored approach with consideration for individual variability in drug response to statin therapy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02579499.
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary Artery Disease; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Hyperlipoproteinemias; Male; Middle Aged; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Atorvastatin
PubMed: 36877807
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.2487 -
JAMA Neurology Nov 2018Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a trauma-associated condition commonly found in elderly patients. Surgery is currently the treatment of choice, but it carries a... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a trauma-associated condition commonly found in elderly patients. Surgery is currently the treatment of choice, but it carries a significant risk of recurrence and death. Nonsurgical treatments remain limited and ineffective. Our recent studies suggest that atorvastatin reduces hematomas and improves the clinical outcomes of patients with CSDH.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of atorvastatin to nonsurgically treat patients with CSDH.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
The Effect of Atorvastatin on Chronic Subdural Hematoma (ATOCH) randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial was conducted in multiple centers in China from February 2014 to November 2015. For this trial, we approached 254 patients with CSDH who received a diagnosis via a computed tomography scan; of these, 200 (78.7%) were enrolled because 23 patients (9.1%) refused to participate and 31 (12.2%) were disqualified.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg of atorvastatin or placebo daily for 8 weeks and were followed up for an additional 16 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was change in hematoma volume (HV) by computed tomography after 8 weeks of treatment. The secondary outcomes included HV measured at the 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks and neurological function that was evaluated using the Markwalder grading scale/Glasgow Coma Scale and the Barthel Index at the 8th week.
RESULTS
One hundred ninety-six patients received treatment (169 men [86.2%]; median [SD] age, 63.6 [14.2] years). The baseline HV and clinical presentations were similar between patients who were taking atorvastatin (98 [50%]) and the placebo (98 [50%]). After 8 weeks, the HV reduction in patients who were taking atorvastatin was 12.55 mL more than those taking the placebo (95% CI, 0.9-23.9 mL; P = .003). Forty-five patients (45.9%) who were taking atorvastatin significantly improved their neurological function, but only 28 (28.6%) who were taking the placebo did, resulting in an adjusted odds ratio of 1.957 for clinical improvements (95% CI, 1.07-3.58; P = .03). Eleven patients (11.2%) who were taking atorvastatin and 23 (23.5%) who were taking the placebo underwent surgery during the trial for an enlarging hematoma and/or a deteriorating clinical condition (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.92; P = .03). No significant adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Atorvastatin may be a safe and efficacious nonsurgical alternative for treating patients with CSDH.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02024373.
Topics: Aged; Atorvastatin; China; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care
PubMed: 30073290
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2030 -
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness... Mar 2023To summarize the evidence in terms of efficacy and safety of head-to-head studies of high-intensity statins regardless of the underlying population. A systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To summarize the evidence in terms of efficacy and safety of head-to-head studies of high-intensity statins regardless of the underlying population. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the effect sizes in randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared high-intensity statins. Based on 44 articles, similar effectiveness was observed across the statins in reducing LDL levels from baseline. All statins were observed to have similar adverse drug reactions (ADRs), although higher dosages were associated with more ADRs. Based on a pooled quantitative analysis of atorvastatin 80 mg versus rosuvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin was statistically more effective in reducing LDL. This review further confirms that high-intensity statins reduce LDL by ≥50%, favoring rosuvastatin over atorvastatin. Additional data are needed to confirm the clinical significance on cardiovascular outcomes using real-world studies.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Atorvastatin; Cohort Studies
PubMed: 36847307
DOI: 10.57264/cer-2022-0163 -
Journal of Neuroinflammation Aug 2017Neuroinflammation is an important secondary injury mechanism that has dual beneficial and detrimental roles in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI)....
BACKGROUND
Neuroinflammation is an important secondary injury mechanism that has dual beneficial and detrimental roles in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Compelling data indicate that statins, a group of lipid-lowering drugs, also have extensive immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties. Among statins, atorvastatin has been demonstrated as a neuroprotective agent in experimental TBI; however, there is a lack of evidence regarding its effects on neuroinflammation during the acute phase of TBI. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of atorvastatin therapy on modulating the immune reaction, and to explore the possible involvement of peripheral leukocyte invasion and microglia/macrophage polarization in the acute period post-TBI.
METHODS
C57BL/6 mice were subjected to TBI using a controlled cortical impact (CCI) device. Either atorvastatin or vehicle saline was administered orally starting 1 h post-TBI for three consecutive days. Short-term neurological deficits were evaluated using the modified neurological severity score (mNSS) and Rota-rod. Brain-invading leukocyte subpopulations were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Markers of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglia/macrophages were then determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and flow cytometry. Neuronal apoptosis was identified by double staining of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining and immunofluorescence labeling for neuronal nuclei (NeuN).
RESULTS
Acute treatment with atorvastatin at doses of 1 mg/kg/day significantly reduced neuronal apoptosis and improved behavioral deficits. Invasions of T cells, neutrophils and natural killer (NK) cells were attenuated profoundly after atorvastatin therapy, as was the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-6) and chemokines (RANTES and IP-10). Notably, atorvastatin treatment significantly increased the proportion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in both the peripheral spleen and brain, and at the same time, increased their main effector cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β1. We also found that atorvastatin significantly attenuated total microglia/macrophage activation but augmented the M2/M1 ratio by both inhibiting M1 polarization and enhancing M2 polarization.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data demonstrated that acute atorvastatin administration could modulate post-TBI neuroinflammation effectively, via a mechanism that involves altering peripheral leukocyte invasion and the alternative polarization of microglia/macrophages.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Atorvastatin; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Disease Models, Animal; Immunologic Factors; Inflammation Mediators; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL
PubMed: 28835272
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-017-0934-2 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Feb 2021To establish the effect of statins on muscle symptoms in people who had previously reported muscle symptoms when taking statins. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To establish the effect of statins on muscle symptoms in people who had previously reported muscle symptoms when taking statins.
DESIGN
Series of randomised, placebo controlled n-of-1 trials.
SETTING
Primary care across 50 sites in the United Kingdom, December 2016 to April 2018.
PARTICIPANTS
200 participants who had recently stopped or were considering stopping treatment with statins because of muscle symptoms.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were randomised to a sequence of six double blinded treatment periods (two months each) of atorvastatin 20 mg daily or placebo.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
At the end of each treatment period, participants rated their muscle symptoms on a visual analogue scale (0-10). The primary analysis compared symptom scores in the statin and placebo periods.
RESULTS
151 participants provided symptoms scores for at least one statin period and one placebo period and were included in the primary analysis. Overall, no difference in muscle symptom scores was found between the statin and placebo periods (mean difference statin minus placebo -0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.36 to 0.14; P=0.40)). Withdrawals because of intolerable muscle symptoms were 18 participants (9%) during a statin period and 13 (7%) during a placebo period. Two thirds of those completing the trial reported restarting long term treatment with statins.
CONCLUSIONS
No overall effect of atorvastatin 20 mg on muscle symptoms compared with placebo was found in participants who had previously reported severe muscle symptoms when taking statins. Most people completing the trial intended to restart treatment with statins. N-of-1 trials can assess drug effects at the group level and guide individual treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN30952488, EUDRACT 2016-000141-31, NCT02781064.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atorvastatin; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Muscular Diseases; Primary Health Care; Symptom Assessment; United Kingdom
PubMed: 33627334
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n135 -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2021Atorvastatin ester (Ate) is a structural trim of atorvastatin that can regulate hyperlipidemia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lipid-lowering effect of...
Atorvastatin ester (Ate) is a structural trim of atorvastatin that can regulate hyperlipidemia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lipid-lowering effect of Ate. Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were fed a high-fat diet for seven months and used as a hyperlipidemia model. The lipid level and liver function of the hyperlipidemia rats were studied by the levels of TG, TC, LDL, HDL, ALT, and AST in serum after intragastric administration with different doses of Ate. HE staining was used to observe the pathological changes of the rat liver and gastrocnemius muscle. The lipid deposits in the liver of rats were observed by staining with ORO. The genes in the rat liver were sequenced by RNA-sequencing. The results of the RNA-sequencing were further examined by qRT-PCR and western blotting. Biochemical test results indicated that Ate could obviously improve the metabolic disorder and reduce both the ALT and AST levels in serum of the hyperlipidemia rats. Pathological results showed that Ate could improve HFD-induced lipid deposition and had no muscle toxicity. The RNA-sequencing results suggested that Ate affected liver lipid metabolism and cholesterol, metabolism in the hyperlipidemia-model rats may vary via the PPAR-signaling pathway. The western blotting and qRT-PCR results demonstrated the Ate-regulated lipid metabolism in the hyperlipidemia model through the PPAR-signaling pathway and HMGCR expression. In brief, Ate can significantly regulate the blood lipid level of the model rats, which may be achieved by regulating the PPAR-signaling pathway and HMGCR gene expression.
Topics: Animals; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Body Weight; Diet, High-Fat; Gene Expression Regulation; Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA Reductases; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hyperlipidemias; Lipid Metabolism; Liver; Male; PPAR gamma; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Signal Transduction; Rats
PubMed: 34681767
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011107 -
Journal of the American College of... Sep 2021Most people who begin statins abandon them, most commonly because of side effects. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Most people who begin statins abandon them, most commonly because of side effects.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to assess daily symptom scores on statin, placebo, and no treatment in participants who had abandoned statins.
METHODS
Participants received 12 1-month medication bottles, 4 containing atorvastatin 20 mg, 4 placebo, and 4 empty. We measured daily symptom intensity for each using an app (scale 1-100). We also measured the "nocebo" ratio: the ratio of symptoms induced by taking statin that was also induced by taking placebo.
RESULTS
A total of 60 participants were randomized and 49 completed the 12-month protocol. Mean symptom score was 8.0 (95% CI: 4.7-11.3) in no-tablet months. It was higher in statin months (16.3; 95% CI: 13.0-19.6; P < 0.001), but also in placebo months (15.4; 95% CI: 12.1-18.7; P < 0.001), with no difference between the 2 (P = 0.388). The corresponding nocebo ratio was 0.90. In the individual-patient daily data, neither symptom intensity on starting (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.98-1.06; P = 0.28) nor extent of symptom relief on stopping (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.98-1.05; P = 0.48) distinguished between statin and placebo. Stopping was no more frequent for statin than placebo (P = 0.173), and subsequent symptom relief was similar between statin and placebo. At 6 months after the trial, 30 of 60 (50%) participants were back taking statins.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of symptoms caused by statin tablets were nocebo. Clinicians should not interpret symptom intensity or timing of symptom onset or offset (on starting or stopping statin tablets) as indicating pharmacological causation, because the pattern is identical for placebo. (Self-Assessment Method for Statin Side-effects Or Nocebo [SAMSON]; NCT02668016).
Topics: Aged; Atorvastatin; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Nocebo Effect
PubMed: 34531021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.022 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2020Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease. People with asthma have inflammation of their airways that causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness and...
BACKGROUND
Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease. People with asthma have inflammation of their airways that causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness and chest tightness, with or without a cough. Statins possess multiple therapeutic effects, including lowering lipid levels in the blood. Statins are reported to have a potential role as an adjunct treatment in asthma. However, comprehensive evidence of the benefits and harms of using statins is required to facilitate decision making.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of statins as an adjunct therapy for asthma in adults and children.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched for studies in the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid SP and Embase Ovid SP, from their inception dates We handsearched the proceedings of major respiratory conferences. We also searched clinical trials registries for completed, ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews to identify additional studies. The search is current to 7 February 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel-group design that assessed statins for at least 12 weeks' duration. We considered all participants with a clinical diagnosis of asthma to be eligible, regardless of age, sex, disease severity and previous or current treatment. We planned to include studies reported as full text, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened and selected the studies, extracted outcome data and intervention characteristics from included studies, and assessed risk of bias according to standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We resolved any disagreement through discussion.
MAIN RESULTS
We found only one trial involving a total of 60 people living with asthma. The trial compared the effect of atorvastatin with a placebo (dummy treatment containing lactose) in treating people with chronic asthma. The trial did not report data for the primary outcomes or adverse events. There was uncertainty about the relative effect on forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the atorvastatin group compared with the placebo group. The study did not report serious adverse effects for the interventions. The included study had internal discrepancies in its reported data.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence was of very low certainty, so we are unable to draw conclusions about the effectiveness and safety of statins to treat asthma. High-quality RCTs are needed to assess the effect of statins on people with asthma. Well-designed multicentre trials with larger samples and longer duration of treatment are required, which assess outcomes such as adverse events, hospital utilisation and costs, to provide better quality evidence. Future studies that include subgroups of obese people with asthma are also required.
Topics: Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Atorvastatin; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
PubMed: 32668027
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013268.pub2 -
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular... 2022Abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy (RT) often results in small intestinal injury, such as apoptosis of epithelial cells and shortening of the villi. Atorvastatin, a...
Abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy (RT) often results in small intestinal injury, such as apoptosis of epithelial cells and shortening of the villi. Atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, has many biological effects including cholesterol reduction, protection from cell damage, and autophagy activation. To reduce the extent of radiotherapy- (RT-) induced enteritis, we investigated the protective effects of atorvastatin against RT-induced damage of the intestinal tract. In this study, C57BL/6 mice were randomly distributed into the following groups ( = 8 per group): (1) control group: mice were fed water only, (2) atorvastatin group (Ator): mice were administered atorvastatin, (3) irradiation group (IR): mice received abdominal RT, (4) Ator+IR group: mice received abdominal RT following atorvastatin administration, and (5) Ator+IR+3-MA group: abdominal RT following atorvastatin and 3-methyladenine (an autophagy inhibitor) administration. Based on the assessment of modified Chiu's injury score and villus/crypt ratio, we found that atorvastatin administration significantly reduced intestinal mucosal damage induced by RT. Atorvastatin treatment reduced apoptosis (cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase), DNA damage (H2AX and 53BP1), oxidative stress (OS, 4-hydroxynonenal), inflammatory molecules (phospho-NF-B p65 and TGF-), fibrosis (collagen I and collagen III), barrier leakage (claudin-2 and fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran), disintegrity (fatty acid-binding protein 2), and dysfunction (lipopolysaccharide) caused by RT in small intestinal tissue. In addition, atorvastatin upregulated the expression of autophagy-active molecules (LC3B), antioxidants (heme oxygenase 1 and thioredoxin 1), and tight junction proteins (occludin and zonula occludens 1). However, the biological functions of atorvastatin in decreasing RT-induced enteritis were reversed after the administration of 3-MA; the function of antioxidant molecules and activity of thioredoxin reductase were independent of autophagy activation. Our results indicate that atorvastatin can effectively relieve RT-induced enteritis through autophagy activation and associated biological functions, including maintaining integrity and function and decreasing apoptosis, DNA damage, inflammation, OS, and fibrosis. It also acts via its antioxidative capabilities.
Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Atorvastatin; Autophagy; Fibrosis; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL
PubMed: 36092168
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7957255 -
Clinical Therapeutics Oct 2022The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") and the cholesterol-lowering medication ezetimibe are widely used in the treatment of patients... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and Tolerability of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin Fixed-dose Combination Versus Atorvastatin Monotherapy in Hypercholesterolemia: A Phase III, Randomized, Active-controlled Study in Chinese Patients.
PURPOSE
The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") and the cholesterol-lowering medication ezetimibe are widely used in the treatment of patients with high- and very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe/atorvastatin (EZ/AS) with those of escalating doses of atorvastatin monotherapy in Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled with statin monotherapy.
METHODS
This Phase III, 12-week, randomized, double-blind study included patients aged 18 to 80 years with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled on atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d monotherapy. After a 5-week run-in period of treatment with atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d (cohorts A and B, respectively), or a bioequivalent dosage of another statin, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio within each cohort to receive EZ/AS 10/10 mg FDC (EZ10/AS10) or atorvastatin 20 mg (AS20), once daily (cohort A); or EZ/AS 10/20 mg FDC (EZ10/AS20) or atorvastatin 40 mg (AS40), once daily (cohort B). The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Tolerability was also evaluated.
FINDINGS
Of the 454 patients enrolled, 412 (90.7%) completed the study. The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was statistically greater with EZ10/AS10 treatment (n = 88) compared with AS20 monotherapy (n = 89) (treatment difference, -19.5%; 95% CI, -26.7% to -12.3%; P < 0.001). The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was statistically greater with EZ10/AS20 treatment (n = 137) compared with AS40 monotherapy (n = 140) (treatment difference, -15.9%; 95% CI, -21.0% to -10.7%; P < 0.001). The safety profile was comparable between the EZ/AS and atorvastatin groups in the two cohorts.
IMPLICATIONS
The LDL-C level at week 12 was significantly improved with both FDCs compared with escalated doses of atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg/d) in these Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled on atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d. Both FDCs were well tolerated, with no new tolerability-related findings. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20190172; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03768427.
Topics: Humans; Ezetimibe; Hypercholesterolemia; Atorvastatin; Cholesterol, LDL; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Anticholesteremic Agents; Double-Blind Method; China; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36182594
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.08.013