-
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological... 2023Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare... (Review)
Review
Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare chronic diseases. MG and LEMS have an autoimmune-mediated etiology, while CMS are genetic disorders. A (strain dependent) muscle weakness due to neuromuscular transmission disorder is a common feature. Generalized MG requires increasingly differentiated therapeutic strategies that consider the enormous therapeutic developments of recent years. To include the newest therapy recommendations, a comprehensive update of the available German-language guideline 'Diagnostics and therapy of myasthenic syndromes' has been published by the German Neurological society with the aid of an interdisciplinary expert panel. This paper is an adapted translation of the updated and partly newly developed treatment guideline. It defines the rapid achievement of complete disease control in myasthenic patients as a central treatment goal. The use of standard therapies, as well as modern immunotherapeutics, is subject to a staged regimen that takes into account autoantibody status and disease activity. With the advent of modern, fast-acting immunomodulators, disease activity assessment has become pivotal and requires evaluation of the clinical course, including severity and required therapies. Applying MG-specific scores and classifications such as Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America allows differentiation between mild/moderate and (highly) active (including refractory) disease. Therapy decisions must consider age, thymic pathology, antibody status, and disease activity. Glucocorticosteroids and the classical immunosuppressants (primarily azathioprine) are the basic immunotherapeutics to treat mild/moderate to (highly) active generalized MG/young MG and ocular MG. Thymectomy is indicated as a treatment for thymoma-associated MG and generalized MG with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive status. In (highly) active generalized MG, complement inhibitors (currently eculizumab and ravulizumab) or neonatal Fc receptor modulators (currently efgartigimod) are recommended for AChR-Ab-positive status and rituximab for muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-Ab-positive status. Specific treatment for myasthenic crises requires plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or IVIG. Specific aspects of ocular, juvenile, and congenital myasthenia are highlighted. The guideline will be further developed based on new study results for other immunomodulators and biomarkers that aid the accurate measurement of disease activity.
PubMed: 38152089
DOI: 10.1177/17562864231213240 -
JAMA Jun 2023Autoimmune disorders can affect various organs and if refractory, can be life threatening. Recently, CD19-targeting-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells were...
IMPORTANCE
Autoimmune disorders can affect various organs and if refractory, can be life threatening. Recently, CD19-targeting-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells were efficacious as an immune suppressive agent in 6 patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and in 1 patient with antisynthetase syndrome.
OBJECTIVE
To test the safety and efficacy of CD19-targeting CAR T cells in a patient with severe antisynthetase syndrome, a complex autoimmune disorder with evidence for B- and T-cell involvement.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This case report describes a patient with antisynthetase syndrome with progressive myositis and interstitial lung disease refractory to available therapies (including rituximab and azathioprine), who was treated with CD19-targeting CAR T cells in June 2022 at University Hospital Tübingen in Tübingen, Germany, with the last follow-up in February 2023. Mycophenolate mofetil was added to the treatment to cotarget CD8+ T cells, hypothesized to contribute to disease activity.
EXPOSURE
Prior to treatment with CD19-targeting CAR T cells, the patient received conditioning therapy with fludarabine (25 mg/m2 [5 days before until 3 days before]) and cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2 [3 days before]) followed by infusion of CAR T cells (1.23×106/kg [manufactured by transduction of autologous T cells with a CD19 lentiviral vector and amplification in the CliniMACS Prodigy system]) and mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/d) 35 days after CD19-targeting CAR T-cell infusion.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The patient's response to therapy was followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the thigh muscle, Physician Global Assessment, functional muscle and pulmonary tests, and peripheral blood quantification of anti-Jo-1 antibody levels, lymphocyte subsets, immunoglobulins, and serological muscle enzymes.
RESULTS
Rapid clinical improvement was observed after CD19-targeting CAR T-cell infusion. Eight months after treatment, the patient's scores on the Physician Global Assessment and muscle and pulmonary function tests improved, and there were no detectable signs of myositis on magnetic resonance imaging. Serological muscle enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine kinase, and lactate dehydrogenase), CD8+ T-cell subsets, and inflammatory cytokine secretion in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (interferon gamma, interleukin 1 [IL-1], IL-6, and IL-13) were all normalized. Further, there was a reduction in anti-Jo-1 antibody levels and a partial recovery of IgA (to 67% of normal value), IgG (to 87%), and IgM (to 58%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
CD19-targeting CAR T cells directed against B cells and plasmablasts deeply reset B-cell immunity. Together with mycophenolate mofetil, CD19-targeting CAR T cells may break pathologic B-cell, as well as T-cell responses, inducing remission in refractory antisynthetase syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Antigens, CD19; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Mycophenolic Acid; Myositis; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Cyclophosphamide; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 37367976
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.8753 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Jul 2023Following induction of remission with rituximab in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) relapse rates are high, especially in patients with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance of remission for patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and relapsing disease: an international randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE
Following induction of remission with rituximab in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) relapse rates are high, especially in patients with history of relapse. Relapses are associated with increased exposure to immunosuppressive medications, the accrual of damage and increased morbidity and mortality. The RITAZAREM trial compared the efficacy of repeat-dose rituximab to daily oral azathioprine for prevention of relapse in patients with relapsing AAV in whom remission was reinduced with rituximab.
METHODS
RITAZAREM was an international randomised controlled, open-label, superiority trial that recruited 188 patients at the time of an AAV relapse from 29 centres in seven countries between April 2013 and November 2016. All patients received rituximab and glucocorticoids to reinduce remission. Patients achieving remission by 4 months were randomised to receive rituximab intravenously (1000 mg every 4 months, through month 20) (85 patients) or azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day, tapered after month 24) (85 patients) and followed for a minimum of 36 months. The primary outcome was time to disease relapse (either major or minor relapse).
RESULTS
Rituximab was superior to azathioprine in preventing relapse: HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.61, p<0.001. 19/85 (22%) patients in the rituximab group and 31/85 (36%) in the azathioprine group experienced at least one serious adverse event during the treatment period. There were no differences in rates of hypogammaglobulinaemia or infection between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Following induction of remission with rituximab, fixed-interval, repeat-dose rituximab was superior to azathioprine for preventing disease relapse in patients with AAV with a prior history of relapse.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT01697267; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier.
Topics: Humans; Azathioprine; Rituximab; Immunosuppressive Agents; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Cyclophosphamide; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic
PubMed: 36958796
DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223559 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Jul 2023Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases is characterized by extreme heterogeneity with a variable clinical course. Renal... (Review)
Review
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases is characterized by extreme heterogeneity with a variable clinical course. Renal involvement may be observed and affects the outcome. Hydroxychloroquine should be administered to every lupus patient irrespective of organ involvement. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy includes corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment, flares occur and broad immunosuppression is accompanied by multiple side effects. Flare occurrence, target organ involvement, side effects of broad immunosuppression and increased knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in SLE pathogenesis as well as the availability of biologic agents has led to the application of biologic agents in SLE management. Biologic agents targeting various pathogenetic paths have been applied. B cell targeting agents have been used successfully. Belimumab, a B cell targeting agent, has been approved for the treatment of SLE. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 targeting agent is also used in SLE. Anifrolumab, an interferon I receptor-targeting agent has beneficial effects on SLE. In conclusion, biologic treatment is applied in SLE and should be further evaluated with the aim of a good treatment response and a significant improvement in quality of life.
PubMed: 37511872
DOI: 10.3390/life13071496 -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... Dec 2023Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition with multiple systemic treatments and uncertainty regarding their comparative impact on AD outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition with multiple systemic treatments and uncertainty regarding their comparative impact on AD outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD systemic treatments.
METHODS
For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and GREAT databases from inception to November 29, 2022, for randomized trials addressing systemic treatments and phototherapy for AD. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e5sna).
RESULTS
The 149 included trials (28,686 patients with moderate-to-severe AD) evaluated 75 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, high-dose upadacitinib was among the most effective for 5 of 6 patient-important outcomes; high-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib were among the most effective for 2 outcomes. These Janus kinase inhibitors were among the most harmful in increasing adverse events. With high-certainty evidence, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab were of intermediate effectiveness and among the safest, modestly increasing conjunctivitis. Low-dose baricitinib was among the least effective. Efficacy and safety of azathioprine, oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, phototherapy, and many novel agents are less certain.
CONCLUSIONS
Among individuals with moderate-to-severe AD, high-certainty evidence demonstrates that high-dose upadacitinib is among the most effective in addressing multiple patient-important outcomes, but also is among the most harmful. High-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib are effective, but also among the most harmful. Dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab are of intermediate effectiveness and have favorable safety.
Topics: Humans; Dermatitis, Atopic; Network Meta-Analysis; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Eczema; Asthma; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37678577
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.029 -
Journal of Ayub Medical College,... 2023A multi-organ granulomatous disease with characteristic lung manifestations, sarcoidosis generally responds well to glucocorticoid therapy but 10% of cases are...
A multi-organ granulomatous disease with characteristic lung manifestations, sarcoidosis generally responds well to glucocorticoid therapy but 10% of cases are refractory necessitating immunosuppressive therapy. A 58-year-old lady presented with a dry cough and progressively worsening shortness of breath for the last 12 months. On investigation, her ESR was raised but cultures, malignancy screen and TB quantiferon were negative. HRCT chest demonstrated multiple pulmonary nodules with hilar lymphadenopathy and CT guided biopsy revealed non-caseating granuloma. She was diagnosed with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis and started on oral steroids with minimal improvement. Azathioprine was added but due to gastric intolerance switched to methotrexate. Her disease however continued to worsen and infliximab was started but she developed a severe allergic reaction. She was then started on mycophenolate mofetil but her chest imaging continued to worsen. After failing prednisone, azathioprine, methotrexate, infliximab and mycophenolate mofetil, the patient was started on rituximab.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Methotrexate; Infliximab; Mycophenolic Acid; Azathioprine; Sarcoidosis; Granuloma
PubMed: 38404097
DOI: No ID Found -
Clinical and Translational... Aug 2023Drug induced acute pancreatitis is a difficult diagnosis for clinicians. We previously published an "Evidence-Based Classification System" on Drug-Induced Acute...
INTRODUCTION
Drug induced acute pancreatitis is a difficult diagnosis for clinicians. We previously published an "Evidence-Based Classification System" on Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis widely used by clinicians to assist in the identification of drugs. Unfortunately, this prior analysis based only on published case reports has been misunderstood. The prior review did not include studies with higher evidentiary value, such as randomized trials, case-control studies, and/or pharmacoepidemiologic studies. The use of the prior classification system has led to many patients being inappropriately labeled as having drug-induced acute pancreatitis. We now propose a "Revised" Evidence- Based Classification System for the purpose of determining which drugs cause acute pancreatitis based on the Grading of Recommendations, Development, and Evaluation criteria.
METHODS
A search of the English Language literature was performed to identify all case reports with medication and/or drug induced acute pancreatitis. We divided the drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis into four groups based on the quality of evidence as defined by GRADE quality parameters.
RESULTS
Although 141 drugs were identified in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis, only 106 drugs published in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis were high quality case reports. Only 3 drugs had evidence as causing acute pancreatitis from randomized controlled clinical trials, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine.
DISCUSSION
The vast majority of drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis in the literature have low or very low quality of evidence supporting those claims.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatitis; Acute Disease; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 37440319
DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000621