-
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2021The interest and competitiveness in sports for persons with disabilities has increased significantly in the recent years, creating a demand for technological tools... (Review)
Review
The interest and competitiveness in sports for persons with disabilities has increased significantly in the recent years, creating a demand for technological tools supporting practice. Wearable sensors offer non-invasive, portable and overall convenient ways to monitor sports practice. This systematic review aims at providing current evidence on the application of wearable sensors in sports for persons with disability. A search for articles published in English before May 2020 was performed on Scopus, Web-Of-Science, PubMed and EBSCO databases, searching titles, abstracts and keywords with a search string involving terms regarding wearable sensors, sports and disability. After full paper screening, 39 studies were included. Inertial and EMG sensors were the most commonly adopted wearable technologies, while wheelchair sports were the most investigated. Four main target applications of wearable sensors relevant to sports for people with disability were identified and discussed: athlete classification, injury prevention, performance characterization for training optimization and equipment customization. The collected evidence provides an overview on the application of wearable sensors in sports for persons with disability, providing useful indication for researchers, coaches and trainers. Several gaps in the different target applications are highlighted altogether with recommendation on future directions.
Topics: Athletes; Disabled Persons; Humans; Monitoring, Physiologic; Sports; Wearable Electronic Devices
PubMed: 33799941
DOI: 10.3390/s21051858 -
Psychiatria Danubina Dec 2023Children with disabilities (CWDs) are often excluded from scientific research, but no precise data are available on their participation in Clinical Trials. The aim of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Children with disabilities (CWDs) are often excluded from scientific research, but no precise data are available on their participation in Clinical Trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates of exclusion of CWDs from recent medical research.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The protocol of the study was designed according to Prisma-ScR guidelines. All completed interventional Clinical Trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov between 2010 and 2020 related to the Leading 10 Level 3 causes of global Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for both sexes combined for all ages of the updated Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 were analysed. The exclusion criteria were considered explicit if related to the following categories: disability, physical impairment, cognitive impairment, behavioural or psychiatric disorders, language and communication impairment, sensory impairment. Any generic or poorly specified exclusion criteria or statements that left wide discretion to researchers were considered "implicit exclusion criteria". We assessed the appropriateness of explicit exclusion criteria in relation to the primary objectives of the trials and labelled them as "absolute", "relative", or "questionable".
RESULTS
The trials selected according to the inclusion criteria of the scoping review were 328; 166 (50.6%) were pediatric-only studies, and 162 (49.4%) trials comprising subjects of all ages. Explicit exclusion criteria were found in 82 trials (25%) and the disability category most frequently excluded was "Behavioural or psychiatric disorders" present in 46 trials (56.1%). Explicit exclusion criteria were considered "relative" in over 90% of the selected studies. Implicit exclusion criteria were present in 153 trials (46.6%) and the number and percentage of studies with at least one explicit or implicit exclusion criterion were 193 and 58.8% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights a high rate of exclusion of CWDs from medical research and the need for an inclusive approach that comprises the study design and any necessary adaptations for specific needs.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Child; Disabled Children; Biomedical Research; Cognitive Dysfunction; Research Design
PubMed: 37994056
DOI: No ID Found -
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2022Personal mastery is a psychological resource recognized as a domain of quality of life that helps individuals cope with life strains. Despite its relevance, there is a... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Personal mastery is a psychological resource recognized as a domain of quality of life that helps individuals cope with life strains. Despite its relevance, there is a lack surrounding the relationship between mobility disability and personal mastery. This study aimed to investigate the influence of personal mastery on mobility disability among older adults and identify the mechanisms that underlie this influence.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted by searching four databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Virtual Health Library of the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information) using combinations of the following words: mastery, personal mastery, self-control, mobility, disability, older adults, older people, and aging. We summarized and analyzed the findings of cross-sectional and longitudinal/prospective studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were included. There was high heterogeneity in how the studies had assessed mobility disability. Although a majority of the studies had used the Pearlin's Self-Mastery Scale (PSMS) to assess personal mastery, there were variations in the number of response anchors and scoring strategies that were used. Nevertheless, findings revealed that personal mastery influences mobility disability by acting as a protective resource against adverse outcomes among older adults. The authors of the reviewed articles had provided physiological and behavioral explanations for their findings.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher level of personal mastery can protect older adults from mobility disability, because it confers a sense of personal control, which in turn promotes positive physiological functioning and health behaviors. This knowledge contributes to the maintenance of physical functioning in old age.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disabled Persons; Humans; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35714474
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104750 -
PloS One 2022Existing evidence indicates that prevalence of violence against women with disability is elevated compared to women without disability. We conducted a scoping review...
INTRODUCTION
Existing evidence indicates that prevalence of violence against women with disability is elevated compared to women without disability. We conducted a scoping review with a focus on measurement to assess the forms of measurement and study design utilized to explore the intersection of violence against women with disabilities, and to identify strengths and limitations in current approaches to measuring violence against women with disabilities. This scoping review is designed to inform current debates and discussions regarding how to generate evidence concerning violence against women with disabilities.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We conducted systematic searches of the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, PILOTS, ERIC, Social Work Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Social Services Abstracts, ProQuest Criminal Justice, and Dissertations & Theses Global, and conducted structured searches of national statistics and surveys and grey literature available on-line. We identified 174 manuscripts or reports for inclusion. n = 113 manuscripts or reports utilized acts-specific measurement of violence. In terms of measurement of disability, we found that amongst the included manuscripts and reports, n = 75 utilized measures of functioning limitations (n = 20 of these were Washington Group questions), n = 15 utilized a single question approach and n = 67 defined participants in the research as having a disability based on a diagnosis or self-report of a health condition or impairment.
DISCUSSION
This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of measurement of violence against women with disabilities and measurement of violence within disability-focused research. We identified several important gaps in the evidence, including lack of sex and disability disaggregation, limited evidence concerning adaptation of data collection methods to ensure accessibility of research activities for women with disabilities, and limited evidence concerning differential relationships between types of disability and violence exposure. This scoping review provides directions for sub-analyses of the included studies and further research to address gaps in evidence.
Topics: Disabled Persons; Female; Humans; Prevalence; Violence
PubMed: 35100320
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263020 -
Journal of Intellectual Disability... Jan 2024Sleep problems are regularly reported in people with intellectual disabilities. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in studies comparing sleep in people with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Sleep problems are regularly reported in people with intellectual disabilities. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in studies comparing sleep in people with intellectual disabilities to control participants, with an increase in the use of validated, objective measures. Emerging patterns of differences in sleep time and sleep quality warrant pooled investigation.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted across three databases (Ovid Embase, PsycInfo and Medline) and returned all papers comparing sleep in people with intellectual disabilities to a control group, published since the last meta-analysis on the topic. A quality framework was employed to rate the risk of bias across studies. Separate meta-analyses of sleep duration and sleep quality were conducted. Subgrouping compared findings for those studies with participants with genetic syndromes or neurodevelopmental conditions and those with heterogeneous intellectual disability.
RESULTS
Thirteen new papers were identified and combined with those from the previous meta-analysis to provide 34 papers in total. Quality of studies was generally rated highly, though sampling provided risk of bias and adaptive functioning was rarely measured. People with intellectual disability associated with genetic syndromes or neurodevelopmental conditions sleep for shorter time periods (standardised mean difference = .26) and experience worse sleep quality (standardised mean difference = .68) than their peers. People with intellectual disability of heterogeneous origin show no difference in sleep time but have poorer sleep quality. There was some evidence that age moderated these effects.
CONCLUSIONS
People with intellectual disability have poorer sleep than those without. Subtle patterns suggest that aetiology of intellectual disability moderates the topography of these difficulties, with further work needed to differentiate common and distinct mechanisms across groups.
Topics: Humans; Intellectual Disability; Sleep; Neurodevelopmental Disorders
PubMed: 37857569
DOI: 10.1111/jir.13093 -
Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly :... Apr 2022This systematic review aimed to identify nutritional interventions and supplements that improve the performance for wheelchair athletes. Intervention trials involving... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aimed to identify nutritional interventions and supplements that improve the performance for wheelchair athletes. Intervention trials involving high-performance wheelchair athletes were analyzed, including those that comprised a nutritional intervention, defined as any intervention related to food, beverages, and supplementation aiming at evaluating the performance of wheelchair athletes. Of the included studies, four evaluated caffeine supplementation, of which one also evaluated sodium citrate supplementation; two studies evaluated vitamin D supplementation; one study assessed creatine monohydrate supplementation; and one assessed carbohydrate supplementation. Most studies were conducted on athletes with spinal cord injury. Athletes who consumed caffeine exhibited an improvement in performance, but this finding is not strong enough to become a recommendation.
Topics: Athletes; Athletic Performance; Caffeine; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Para-Athletes
PubMed: 34758458
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.2020-0241 -
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Mar 2022Most of the current literature around amputation focuses on lower extremity amputation or engineering aspects of prosthetic devices. There is a need to more clearly... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Most of the current literature around amputation focuses on lower extremity amputation or engineering aspects of prosthetic devices. There is a need to more clearly understand neurobehavioral mechanisms related to upper extremity amputation and how such mechanisms might influence recovery and utilization of prostheses.
OBJECTIVE
This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the current literature on adult traumatic upper limb amputation in regard to recovery and functional outcomes and how neuroplasticity might influence these findings.
METHODS
We identified appropriate articles using Academic Search Complete EBSCO, OVID Medline, and Cochrane databases. The resulting articles were then exported, screened, and reviewed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
RESULTS
Eleven (11) studies met the study criteria. Of these studies, 7 focused on sensory involvement, 3 focused on neuroplastic changes post-amputation related to functional impact, and 1 study focused on motor control and learning post-amputation. Overall, these studies revealed an incomplete understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in motor rehabilitation in the central and peripheral nervous systems, while also demonstrating the value of an individualized approach to neurorehabilitation in upper limb loss.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a gap in our understanding of the role of neurorehabilitation following amputation. Overall, focused rehabilitation parameters, demographic information, and clarity around central and peripheral neural mechanisms are needed in future research to address neurobehavioral mechanisms to promote functional recovery following traumatic upper extremity amputation.
Topics: Adult; Amputation, Surgical; Amputees; Artificial Limbs; Humans; Lower Extremity; Neurological Rehabilitation; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 34967259
DOI: 10.1177/15459683211070277 -
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Dec 2021Corticosteroid injection and dry needling have been used in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, but it is unclear which intervention is the most effective. The... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Corticosteroid injection and dry needling have been used in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, but it is unclear which intervention is the most effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of corticosteroid injection and dry needling for musculoskeletal conditions at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched up to 31 October 2021. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of dry needling compared to corticosteroid injection in patients over 18 years with a musculoskeletal condition were included in the review. The studies had to report pain and/or disability as outcome. Risk of bias was assessed by using the revised Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2.0). Quality of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS
Six studies were included (n = 384 participants). Four musculoskeletal conditions were investigated. There is very low-quality evidence that CSI is superior to DN for reducing heel pain (plantar fasciitis) and lateral elbow pain at short- and medium-term follow-up, but not for myofascial pain and greater trochanteric pain. There is very low-quality evidence that DN is more effective than CSI at long-term follow-up for reducing pain in people with plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis. Very low-certainty evidence shows that there is no difference between DN and CSI for disability at short-term follow-up. One study showed that CSI is superior to DN at medium-term follow-up and another observed that DN is superior to CSI for reducing disability at long-term.
CONCLUSIONS
There are no differences between DN and CSI in pain or disability for myofascial pain and greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Very-low certainty evidence suggests that CSI is superior to DN at shorter follow-up periods, whereas DN seems to be more effective than CSI at longer follow-up durations for improving pain in plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis. Large RCTs with higher methodological quality are needed in order to draw more incisive conclusions.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020148650.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Disabled Persons; Dry Needling; Humans; Musculoskeletal Pain; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 34857021
DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00408-y -
British Journal of Sports Medicine Dec 2021To investigate prevalence, incidence and profile of musculoskeletal injuries in para athletes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate prevalence, incidence and profile of musculoskeletal injuries in para athletes.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES
Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, SPORTSDiscus, CINAHL and hand searching.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies were considered if they reported prevalence or incidence of musculoskeletal injuries in para athletes. Study selection, data extraction and analysis followed the protocol. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the prevalence and incidence rate among studies and subgroup analyses investigated whether methodological quality and sample size of the studies influenced on the estimated injury prevalence and incidence. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system determined the strength of evidence.
RESULTS
Forty-two studies were included. The prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries was 40.8% (95% CI 32.5% to 49.8%). Because of imprecision, indirectness and inconsistency, the strength of evidence was very low quality. The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries was 14.3 injuries per 1000 athlete-days (95% CI 11.9 to 16.8). The strength of evidence was low quality because of imprecision and indirectness. The subgroup analyses revealed that the sample size influenced on estimated injury prevalence and methodological quality influenced on estimated incidence. Injuries were more prevalent in the shoulder, for non-ambulant para athletes, and in the lower limbs, for ambulant para athletes.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
Para athletes show high prevalence and incidence of musculoskeletal injuries. Current very low-quality and low-quality evidence suggests that future high-quality studies with systematic data collection, larger sample size and specificities of para athletes are likely to change estimates of injury prevalence and incidence in para athletes.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020147982.
Topics: Athletes; Athletic Injuries; Humans; Incidence; Para-Athletes; Prevalence
PubMed: 33229444
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102823 -
International Journal of Environmental... Nov 2021To systematically review interventions aimed at improving employment participation of people with psychosocial disability, autism, and intellectual disability. We... (Review)
Review
To systematically review interventions aimed at improving employment participation of people with psychosocial disability, autism, and intellectual disability. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, ERIC, and ERC for studies published from 2010 to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at increasing participation in open/competitive or non-competitive employment were eligible for inclusion. We included studies with adults with psychosocial disability autism and/or intellectual disability. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias II Tool. Data were qualitatively synthesized. Our review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020219192). We included 26 RCTs: 23 targeted people with psychosocial disabilities ( = 2465), 3 included people with autism ( = 214), and none included people with intellectual disability. Risk of bias was high in 8 studies, moderate for 18, and low for none. There was evidence for a beneficial effect of Individual Placement and Support compared to control conditions in 10/11 studies. Among young adults with autism, there was some evidence for the benefit of Project SEARCH and ASD supports on open employment. Gaps in the availability of high-quality evidence remain, undermining comparability and investment decisions in vocational interventions. Future studies should focus on improving quality and consistent measurement, especially for interventions targeting people with autism and/or intellectual disability.
Topics: Autistic Disorder; Disabled Persons; Employment; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Young Adult
PubMed: 34831840
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212083