-
Andrology Mar 2021The impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) on male fertility and associated reproductive outcomes has not been clarified. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) on male fertility and associated reproductive outcomes has not been clarified.
OBJECTIVES
To elucidate the prevalence of seminal HPV infection and assess the associated effects on seminal parameters, male infertility, and reproductive outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases. Studies published until November 2019 were included. HPV prevalence, risk of infertility, seminal parameters, and reproductive outcomes were evaluated among the general population and infertile men.
RESULTS
Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of seminal HPV infection is significantly higher in infertile compared to the general population (20.9% versus 8.2%). A significant association between seminal HPV infection and male infertility (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.87-5.84), even when adjusting for female infertility (OR 3.02, 95% CI = 2.11-4.33) was founded. In addition, HPV infection is related to a significant decrease in progressive motility (DM -10.35, IC -13.75, -6.96), a low sperm morphology score (DM -2.46, 95% CI -3.83, -1.08), and a significant increase in the sperm DNA fragmentation index (7.24, 95% CI 4.44.10.03) compared with HPV-negative patients. It was also observed an increased risk of miscarriage (OR 5.13, 95% CI 2.40,10.94), and a reduced chance of ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.33, IC 95% 0.13,0,82) in patients undergoing ART with seminal HPV infection.
DISCUSSION
Infertile men have a higher prevalence of seminal HPV infection compared to the general population, regardless of the HPV genotype detected.
CONCLUSIONS
HPV in semen may have an impact in sperm quality and reproductive outcomes. Additional well-designed studies are warranted to improve the quality of evidence.
Topics: Alphapapillomavirus; Condylomata Acuminata; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Papillomavirus Infections; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Reproduction; Semen; Sperm Motility
PubMed: 33220146
DOI: 10.1111/andr.12948 -
Vaccines Jun 2023Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related diseases are highly prevalent in men worldwide, comprising external anogenital condyloma, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), penile... (Review)
Review
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related diseases are highly prevalent in men worldwide, comprising external anogenital condyloma, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. There is exceptionally low vaccine coverage in the male population. Only 4% of men were fully vaccinated, worldwide, as of 2019. The aim of this review is to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on male disease. Three databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus) and Clinical Trials.gov were searched. We included thirteen studies, eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and five cohorts, comprising a total of 14,239 participants. Regarding anal disease, seven studies reported HPV vaccine efficacy ranging from 91.1% to 93.1% against AIN1, and ranging from 89.6% to 91.7% against AIN2|3 and anal cancer. Five studies showed an efficacy against genital condyloma of 89.9% in HPV-naïve males, varying between 66.7% and 67.2% in intention-to-treat populations. Studies reporting no efficacy have included older participants. These results support vaccination of young men previously infected, beyond HPV-naïve males. The evidence quality was moderate to low for most outcomes, namely genital diseases. RCTs are needed to assess the efficacy of HPV vaccination on male oropharyngeal cancer.
PubMed: 37376472
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061083 -
Revue D'epidemiologie Et de Sante... Oct 2022This systematic review aims to determine the epidemiological profile, etiology and risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, cost-effectiveness, survival, and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aims to determine the epidemiological profile, etiology and risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, cost-effectiveness, survival, and quality of life related to cervical cancer in Morocco.
METHODS
This study was conducted according to the recommendations of the "preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis." The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, Web of Science data bases were used, as was Google Scholar for the grey literature. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42021235241).
RESULTS
Fifty studies were selected. The mean age was 49.31 ±6.3 years. HPV infection prevalence ranged from 13.30% to 76%, with a peak in HIV-positive women. Acceptability of the HPV vaccine was higher among parents (35% and 82%) than among adolescents (16.9% to 46.6%). Knowledge of the vaccine and its price are two key factors related to vaccine acceptability among parents. This systematic review highlights that the fact that few eligible women (not more than 11%) were participating in the cervical cancer screening program. Moroccan women's level of knowledge and awareness regarding cervical cancer screening was low, negatively impacting their use of such screening tools, as illustrated by the high percentage (mean 76.32% ± 17.21) of women who had never been screened for cervical cancer. Treatment was the most significant component of the global care budget (95.87%), with an annual cost of $13,027,609. Five-year overall survival ranged from 41.3% to 73.6%, with higher survival rates for patients diagnosed at an earlier stage (77.3-85% for stage I). Lastly, low quality of life was observed in women with tumors at an advanced stage who had received brachytherapy and lacked social support.
CONCLUSIONS
Subjects that require further investigation include Moroccan women's knowledge, attitudes, and awareness, especially among those at high risk of developing cervical cancer, and its impact on their quality of life and survival.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Early Detection of Cancer; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Morocco; Papillomavirus Infections; Papillomavirus Vaccines; Quality of Life; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 35927117
DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.05.008 -
Cancer Reports (Hoboken, N.J.) Aug 2021Lung cancer has emerged as a global public health problem and is the most common cause of cancer deaths by absolute cases globally. Besides tobacco, smoke infectious... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Lung cancer has emerged as a global public health problem and is the most common cause of cancer deaths by absolute cases globally. Besides tobacco, smoke infectious diseases such as human papillomavirus (HPV) might be involved in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. However, data are inconsistent due to differences in study design and HPV detection methods.
AIM
A systematic meta-analysis was performed to examine the presence of HPV-infection with lung cancer.
METHODS AND RESULTS
All studies in all languages were considered for the search concepts "lung cancer" and "HPV" if data specific to HPV prevalence in lung cancer tissue were given. This included Journal articles as well as abstracts and conference reports. As detection method, only HPV PCR results from fresh frozen and paraffin-embedded tissue were included. Five bibliographic databases and three registers of clinical trials including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through February 2020. A total 4298 publications were identified, and 78 publications were selected, resulting in 9385 included lung cancer patients. A meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies with n = 2504 patients showed a weighted overall prevalence difference of 22% (95% CI: 12%-33%; P < .001) and a weighted overall 4.7-fold (95% CI: 2.7-8.4; P < .001) increase of HPV prevalence in lung cancer patients compared to controls. Overall, HPV prevalence amounted to 13.5% being highest in Asia (16.6%), followed by America (12.8%), and Europe (7.0%). A higher HPV prevalence was found in squamous cell carcinoma (17.9%) compared to adenocarcinoma (P < .01) with significant differences in geographic patterns. HPV genotypes 16 and 18 were the most prevalent high-risk genotypes identified.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our review provides convincing evidence that HPV infection increases the risk of developing lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Alphapapillomavirus; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Case-Control Studies; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Papillomavirus Infections; Prevalence
PubMed: 33624444
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1350 -
Vaccines Sep 2023In 2006, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was approved for use as an effective intervention for reducing the risk of developing cervical cancer; however, its... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
In 2006, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was approved for use as an effective intervention for reducing the risk of developing cervical cancer; however, its successful implementation is dependent on acceptability. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the reasons that favor or do not favor the acceptability of HPV vaccines.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-summary of qualitative research on 16 databases. A total of 32 articles that considered the perspectives of vaccine users, their parents, and the professionals who care for them were reviewed. Synthesis was conducted as described by Sandelowski and Barroso.
RESULTS
We used inductive and deductive methods to obtain a total of 22 dimensions, out of which three issues stood out that should be considered to improve acceptability and are formed by three groups of study, namely, information about the vaccine, fears and side effects, and sexuality associated with the vaccine.
CONCLUSIONS
Acceptability, as well as adherence to HPV vaccination, is a complex concept. This review highlights the perspectives of the three sets of actors involved in the process (i.e., users, parents, and professionals) and views these factors in relation to acceptability as a guide for new interventions.
PubMed: 37766161
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091486 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Jan 2023Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of cervical cancer and a suspected agent for ovarian and endometrial cancers in women. It is associated with adverse... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of cervical cancer and a suspected agent for ovarian and endometrial cancers in women. It is associated with adverse outcomes during pregnancy. To date, there is no estimate of the prevalence of HPV infection in pregnant women at the regional and global levels. This study evaluated the global prevalence of HPV infection based on all observational studies that had reported the prevalence of HPV among pregnant women between January 1980 and December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and SciELO databases. We utilised a random-effect model to determine the global prevalence and related risk factors of HPV infection. Between-studies heterogeneity was assessed using I statistic. Moreover, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were employed to assess the source of heterogeneity and the relationship between HPV prevalence and socio-demographic factors, respectively. Among 144 eligible studies comprising 189 datasets, the overall prevalence rates of HPV at the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated as 30.38% (26.88%-33.99%), 17.81% (9.81%-27.46%), 32.1% (25.09%-39.67%), 2.26% (0.1%-8.08%) and 25.5% (23.3%-27.8%) in cervico-vaginal, placenta, serum, amniotic fluid and urine samples, respectively. The highest prevalence rates were estimated for countries in the African region, while countries in the European and Eastern Mediterranean regions showed the lowest prevalence rates. HPV-16 and -18 were the most prevalent isolated strains. The pregnant women living with HIV and those with pregnancy disorders had significantly higher prevalence rates than general pregnant women (p < 0.05). The younger ages for first intercourse and pregnancy, multiple lifetime sexual partners, and lower education levels were primary risk factors for HPV infection. In conclusion, although the overall HPV prevalence varied markedly based on sampling sites and geographical locations, the highest prevalence rates were observed in less-developed countries. Our findings imply that implementing behavioural and therapeutic interventions as well as vaccination programs are crucial to prevent and reduce the current burden of HPV infection among pregnant women.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Pregnant Women; Papillomavirus Infections; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Papillomaviridae; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 35678261
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2374 -
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance Apr 2022Despite the high risks associated with human papillomavirus (HPV), the HPV vaccination rate of men is far lower than women. Most previous review studies have focused on... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite the high risks associated with human papillomavirus (HPV), the HPV vaccination rate of men is far lower than women. Most previous review studies have focused on female vaccination and related affecting factors. However, previous studies have reported that the factors affecting HPV vaccination differ by gender.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this review was to identify the factors affecting HPV vaccine initiation in men through a systematic review approach.
METHODS
A literature review was conducted across 3 central electronic databases for relevant articles. A total of 30 articles published between 2013 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in this study.
RESULTS
In total, 50 factors affecting HPV vaccination in men were identified, including 13 sociodemographic factors and social structure factors, 12 belief-related variables, 4 family factors, 4 community factors, 14 variables related to needs, and 3 environmental factors.
CONCLUSIONS
To increase HPV vaccination rates in men, strategies targeting young males and their families should consider frequent visits to or contact with health care providers so that health care professionals can provide recommendations for HPV vaccination.
Topics: Alphapapillomavirus; Female; Health Personnel; Humans; Male; Papillomavirus Infections; Papillomavirus Vaccines; Vaccination
PubMed: 35471242
DOI: 10.2196/34070 -
Molecular Oral Microbiology Aug 2023Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) is the most common head-and-neck malignancy. Importantly, we are experiencing an alarming rise in the incidence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) is the most common head-and-neck malignancy. Importantly, we are experiencing an alarming rise in the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) globally. Oncogenic viruses, human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), are known to be co-associated with OSCC and OPSCC cases. However, the reported incidence of HPV and EBV co-infection in OSCCs and OPSCCs globally is unknown. To address this, we performed a formal meta-analysis and systematic review on published studies that report the detection of both EBV and HPV in OSCCs and OPSCCs. Our analysis revealed 18 relevant studies out of a total of 1820 cases (1181 from the oral cavity and 639 from the oropharynx). Overall, HPV and EBV co-infection was found in 11.9% of OSCC and OPSCC cases combined (95% CI: 8%-14.1%). Based on anatomical subsite, dual positivity estimates were 10.5% (95% CI: 6.7%-15.1%) for OSCC and 14.2% (95% CI: 9.1%-21.3%) for OPSCC. The highest dual positivity rates described were in European countries: for OSCC 34.7% (95% CI: 25.9%-44.6%) in Sweden and for OPSCC, 23.4% (95% CI: 16.9%-31.5%) in Poland. Given these substantive prevalence rates, the value of detecting dual infection in the diagnosis and prognosis of these cancers deserves careful longitudinal studies, as do implications for cancer prevention and therapy. We further proposed molecular mechanisms that could explain how HPV and EBV could co-contribute to the aetiology of OSCCs and OPSCCs.
Topics: Humans; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Papillomavirus Infections; Coinfection; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 37014754
DOI: 10.1111/omi.12412 -
BMJ Open Oct 2023We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of therapeutic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of therapeutic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus and CENTRAL Cochrane were searched up to 31 January 2022.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Phase II/III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies reporting the efficacy of therapeutic vaccines to achieve regression of CIN 2/3 lesions were included. Studies evaluating only safety and side effects of the vaccine were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two independent reviewers extracted data and evaluated study quality. A random-effect model was used to pool the proportions of regression and/or HPV clearance.
RESULTS
12 trials met the inclusion criteria. Out of 734 women (all studies considered) receiving therapeutic HPV vaccine for CIN 2/3, 414 regressed to normal/CIN 1 with an overall proportion of regression of 0.54 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.69) for vaccinated group; 166 women (from five RCTs) receiving placebo only achieving a pooled normal/CIN 1 regression of 0.27 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.34). When including only the five two-arm studies, the regression proportion for the 410 vaccine group participants was higher than that of the 166 control group participants (relative risk (RR) 1.52; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.04). The pooled proportion of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) clearance was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.52) in the vaccine group (six studies with a total of 357 participants) and 0.17 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.26) in the control group (three RCTs with a total of 104 participants). Based on these three RCTs, the hrHPV clearance was significantly higher in the vaccinated group (250 participants) compared with the control group (RR 2.03; 95% CI 1.30 to 3.16). Similar results were found regarding HPV 16/18 clearance. No significant unsolicited adverse events have been consistently reported.
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of the therapeutic vaccines in the treatment of CIN 2/3 was modest. Implementation issues such as feasibility, acceptability, adoption and cost-effectiveness need to be further studied.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022307418.
Topics: Female; Humans; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Papillomavirus Vaccines; Papillomavirus Infections; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; Papillomaviridae; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
PubMed: 37879679
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069616 -
Infectious Agents and Cancer Jan 2022The possible association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and bladder cancer has been controversial. Older findings suggest a significant association between the virus and...
BACKGROUND
The possible association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and bladder cancer has been controversial. Older findings suggest a significant association between the virus and bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the data from the last ten years to estimate the prevalence of the virus in bladder cancer patients and to assess the association between the virus and cancer.
METHOD
A search of major databases was conducted to retrieve published English language studies between January 2011 and March 2021. In the present study overall prevalence of the virus in bladder cancer patients was estimated along with the prevalence of subgroups. Also, the possible associations between the prevalence of the virus and bladder cancer and the possible impact of variables in the geographical area and the type of sample were measured by comprehensive meta-analysis software (V2.2, BIOSTAT).
RESULTS
Unlike previous studies, despite the relatively high prevalence of the virus [pooled prevalence: 14.3% (95% CI 8.9-22.2%)] no significant association was found between HPV and bladder cancer (OR 2.077, 95% CI 0.940-4.587). No significant association was found between geographical area (except Asia) and type of sample with bladder cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the significant prevalence, despite the insignificance of the association between virus and cancer, it seems that more studies with case-control design are needed to elucidate this association.
PubMed: 35062986
DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00415-5