-
Turkish Neurosurgery 2022To evaluate all serum biomarkers in sports-related concussion injury (SRC) to determine diagnostic validity, changes with symptom severity, and return to play, as well...
AIM
To evaluate all serum biomarkers in sports-related concussion injury (SRC) to determine diagnostic validity, changes with symptom severity, and return to play, as well as detect early changes in serum concentration.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Studies were searched in various electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane databases) from their commencement to May 2021. Studies were included if athletes aged 12 years and older were diagnosed with a concussion injury and evaluated using serum biomarkers. Studies including athletes with injuries other than concussion injuries were excluded. Articles with fewer than 20 concussed athletes were excluded. There were 1782 articles identified.
RESULTS
After exclusion a total of 17 articles qualified for systematic review. S100 calcium binding protein ? (S-100?) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) showed promising results in distinguishing concussed athletes from contact sports and non-athlete controls. Most of the serum biomarkers increased within 6 hours of SRC. Serum neurofilament light protein (NFL) positively correlated with the severity of post-concussion symptoms. NFL, tau and Interleukins (IL-1 Ra and IL-6) have the potential to determine return to play.
CONCLUSION
Serum biomarker measurement is an objective tool that aids in early diagnosis and predicts the severity and prognosis of injury.
Topics: Athletic Injuries; Biomarkers; Brain Concussion; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Humans; Hydrolases; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-6; Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 14; Ubiquitins
PubMed: 35929029
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.35745-21.3 -
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 2021Women are more affected by stroke than men. This might, in part, be explained by sex differences in stroke pathophysiology. The hemostasis system is influenced by sex... (Review)
Review
Women are more affected by stroke than men. This might, in part, be explained by sex differences in stroke pathophysiology. The hemostasis system is influenced by sex hormones and associated with female risk factors for stroke, such as migraine. To systematically review possible sex differences in hemostatic related factors in patients with ischemic stroke in general, and the influence of migraine on these factors in women with ischemic stroke. We included 24 studies with data on sex differences of hemostatic factors in 7247 patients with ischemic stroke (mean age 57-72 years, 27-57% women) and 25 hemostatic related factors. Levels of several factors were higher in women compared with men; FVII:C (116% ± 30% vs. 104% ± 30%), FXI (0.14 UI/mL higher in women), PAI-1 (125.35 ± 49.37 vs. 96.67 ± 38.90 ng/mL), D-dimer (1.25 ± 0.31 vs. 0.95 ± 0.24 μg/mL), and aPS (18.7% vs. 12.0% positive). In contrast, protein-S (86.2% ± 23.0% vs. 104.7% ± 19.8% antigen) and P-selectin (48.9 ± 14.4 vs. 79.1 ± 66.7 pg/mL) were higher in men. Most factors were investigated in single studies, at different time points after stroke, and in different stroke subtypes. Only one small study reported data on migraine and hemostatic factors in women with ischemic stroke. No differences in fibrinogen, D-dimer, t-PA, and PAI-1 levels were found between women with and without migraine. Our systematic review suggests that sex differences exist in the activation of the hemostatic system in ischemic stroke. Women seem to lean more toward increased levels of procoagulant factors whereas men exhibit increased levels of coagulation inhibitors. To obtain better insight in sex-related differences in hemostatic factors, additional studies are needed to confirm these findings with special attention for different stroke phases, stroke subtypes, and not in the least women specific risk factors, such as migraine.
PubMed: 34858141
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.711604 -
BioMed Research International 2021The SARS-CoV-2 virus is the cause of the latest pandemic of the 21st century; it is responsible for the development of COVID-19. Within the multiple study models for...
BACKGROUND
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is the cause of the latest pandemic of the 21st century; it is responsible for the development of COVID-19. Within the multiple study models for both the biology and the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, the use of stem cells has been proposed because of their ability to increase the immune response and to repair tissue. Therefore, the objective of this review is to evaluate the role of stem cells against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in order to identify their potential as a study model and as a possible therapeutic source against tissue damage caused by this virus. Therefore, the following research question was established: What is the role of stem cells in the study of SARS-CoV-2 and the treatment of COVID-19?
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A search was carried out in the electronic databases of PUBMED, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. The following keywords were used: "SARS-CoV-2," "COVID-19," and "STEM CELL," plus independent search strategies with the Boolean operators "OR" and "AND." The identified reports were those whose main objective was the study of stem cells in relation to SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19. For the development of this study, the following inclusion criteria were taken into account: studies whose main objective was the study of stem cells in relation to SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 and clinical case studies, case reports, clinical trials, pilot studies, in vitro, or in vivo studies. For assessment of the risk of bias for in vitro studies, the SciRAP tool was used. The data collected for each type of study, clinical or in vitro, were analyzed with descriptive statistics using the SPSS V.22 program.
RESULTS
Of the total of studies included ( = 39), 22 corresponded to in vitro investigations and 17 to human studies (clinical cases ( = 9), case series ( = 2), pilot clinical trials ( = 5), clinical trials ( = 1)). In vitro studies that induced pluripotent stem cells were the most used ( = 12), and in clinical studies, the umbilical stem cells derived were the most reported ( = 11). The mean age of the study subjects was 58.3 years. After the application of stem cell therapy, the follow-up period was 8 days minimum and 90 days maximum. . The mechanism by which the virus enters the cell is through protein "S," located on the surface of the membrane, by recognizing the ACE2 receptor located on the target cell. The evidence that the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in stem cells indicates that stem cells from bone marrow and amniotic fluid have very little expression. This shows that stem cell has a low risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2.
CONCLUSION
The use of stem cells is a highly relevant therapeutic option. It has been shown in both in vitro studies and clinical trials that it counteracts the excessive secretion of cytokines. There are even more studies that focus on long-term follow-up; thus, the potential for major side effects can be analyzed more clearly. Finally, the ethical use of stem cells from fetal or infant origin needs to be regulated. The study was registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42021229038). The limitations of the study were because of the methodology employed, the sample was not very large, and the follow-up period of the clinical studies was relatively short.
Topics: COVID-19; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; SARS-CoV-2; Stem Cell Transplantation; Stem Cells
PubMed: 34458372
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9915927