-
Frontiers in Oncology 2020Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of IHC- p16INK4a...
Feasibility of Immunohistochemical p16 Staining in the Diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of IHC- p16INK4a (p16) as an alternative modality for diagnosing HPV infection. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IHC-p16 staining. A total of 30 studies involving 2,963 patients were included from 2007 to 2019. The combined sensitivity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.91); positive likelihood ratio (LR), 6.80 (95% CI: 5.63-8.21); negative LR, 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07-0.16); diagnostic odds ratio, 85.98 (95% CI: 55.57-133.03); and area under the curve value, 0.9550. Subgroup analysis showed that the IHC-p16 test was more consistent with the hybridization (ISH) test and has greater diagnostic value for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnostic efficacy of IHC-p16 varied among countries. In conclusion, IHC-p16 has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HPV infection in HNSCC. The consistency of IHC-p16 findings with those of ISH indicate that their combination can be used to improve the specificity of diagnosis.
PubMed: 33324540
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.524928 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Apr 2022The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) capture tumor heterogeneity at the gene-expression level. Currently, a restricted number of molecular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) capture tumor heterogeneity at the gene-expression level. Currently, a restricted number of molecular features are used to guide treatment for CRC. We summarize the evidence on the clinical value of the CMSs.
METHODS
We systematically identified studies in Medline and Embase that evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in CRC patients. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed on prognostic data. Predictive data were summarized.
RESULTS
In local disease, CMS4 tumors were associated with worse overall survival (OS) compared with CMS1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.27 to 8.47) and CMS2 cancers (HR = 2.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.93 to 3.50). In metastatic disease, CMS1 consistently had worse survival than CMS2-4 (OS HR range = 0.33-0.55; progression-free survival HR range = 0.53-0.89). Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III CRC was most beneficial for OS in CMS2 and CMS3 (HR range = 0.16-0.45) and not effective in CMS4 tumors. In metastatic CMS4 cancers, an irinotecan-based regimen improved outcome compared with oxaliplatin (HR range = 0.31-0.72). The addition of bevacizumab seemed beneficial in CMS1, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy improved outcome for KRAS wild-type CMS2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The CMS classification holds clear potential for clinical use in predicting both prognosis and response to systemic therapy, which seems to be independent of the classifier used. Prospective studies are warranted to support implementation of the CMS taxonomy in clinical practice.
Topics: Bevacizumab; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Oxaliplatin; Prognosis
PubMed: 34077519
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab106 -
Cancers May 2024Modern advanced radiotherapy techniques have improved the precision and accuracy of radiotherapy delivery, with resulting plans being highly personalised based on... (Review)
Review
Modern advanced radiotherapy techniques have improved the precision and accuracy of radiotherapy delivery, with resulting plans being highly personalised based on individual anatomy. Adaptation for individual tumour biology remains elusive. There is an unmet need for biomarkers of intrinsic radiosensitivity that can predict tumour response to radiation to facilitate individualised decision-making, dosing and treatment planning. Over the last few decades, the use of high throughput molecular biology technologies has led to an explosion of newly discovered cancer biomarkers. Gene expression signatures are now used routinely in clinic to aid decision-making regarding adjuvant systemic therapy. They have great potential as radiotherapy biomarkers. A previous systematic review published in 2015 reported only five studies of signatures evaluated for their ability to predict radiotherapy benefits in clinical cohorts. This updated systematic review encompasses the expanded number of studies reported in the last decade. An additional 27 studies were identified. In total, 22 distinct signatures were recognised (5 pre-2015, 17 post-2015). Seventeen signatures were 'radiosensitivity' signatures and five were breast cancer prognostic signatures aiming to identify patients at an increased risk of local recurrence and therefore were more likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation. Most signatures (15/22) had not progressed beyond the discovery phase of development, with no suitable validated clinical-grade assay for application. Very few signatures (4/17 'radiosensitivity' signatures) had undergone any laboratory-based biological validation of their ability to predict tumour radiosensitivity. No signatures have been assessed prospectively in a phase III biomarker-led trial to date and none are recommended for routine use in clinical guidelines. A phase III prospective evaluation is ongoing for two breast cancer prognostic signatures. The most promising radiosensitivity signature remains the radiosensitivity index (RSI), which is used to calculate a genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD). There is an ongoing phase II prospective biomarker-led study of RSI/GARD in triple negative breast cancer. The results of these trials are eagerly anticipated over the coming years. Future work in this area should focus on (1) robust biological validation; (2) building biobanks alongside large radiotherapy randomised controlled trials with dose variance (to demonstrate an interaction between radiosensitivity signature and dose); (3) a validation of clinical-grade cost-effective assays that are deliverable within current healthcare infrastructure; and (4) an integration with biomarkers of other determinants of radiation response.
PubMed: 38792019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101942 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2021Medical staff represent the largest group of workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). Chronic exposure to low-dose IR may result in DNA damage and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Medical staff represent the largest group of workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). Chronic exposure to low-dose IR may result in DNA damage and genotoxicity associated with increased risk of cancer. This review aims to identify the genotoxicity biomarkers that are the most elevated in IR-exposed vs. unexposed health workers. A systematic review of the literature was performed to retrieve relevant studies with various biomarkers of genotoxicity. Subsequent meta-analyses produced a pooled effect size for several endpoints. The search procedure yielded 65 studies. Chromosome aberrations (CA) and micronuclei (MN) frequencies were significantly different between IR-exposed and unexposed workers (θ = 3.19, 95% CI 1.46-4.93; and θ = 1.41, 95% CI 0.97-1.86, for total aberrant cells and MN frequencies, respectively), which was not the case for ring chromosomes and nucleoplasmic bridges. Although less frequently used, stable translocations, sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) and comet assay endpoints were also statistically different between IR-exposed and unexposed workers. This review confirms the relevance of CA and MN as genotoxicity biomarkers that are consistently elevated in IR-exposed vs. unexposed workers. Other endpoints are strong candidates but require further studies to validate their usefulness. The integration of the identified biomarkers in future prospective epidemiological studies is encouraged.
Topics: Biomarkers; Chromosome Aberrations; DNA Damage; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Health Personnel; Humans; Occupational Exposure; Radiation, Ionizing
PubMed: 34299125
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147504 -
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Jul 2024HtrA1, HtrA2, HtrA3 and HtrA4 appear to be involved in the development of pathologies such as cancer. This systematic review reports the results of a literature search...
PURPOSE
HtrA1, HtrA2, HtrA3 and HtrA4 appear to be involved in the development of pathologies such as cancer. This systematic review reports the results of a literature search performed to compare the expression of HtrA family genes and proteins in cancer versus non-cancer tissues and cell lines, assess relationships between HtrA expression and cancer clinical features in cancer, and analyse the molecular mechanism, by which HtrA family affects cancer.
METHODS
The literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA statement among four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus).
RESULTS
A total of 38 articles met the inclusion criteria and involved the expression of HtrA family members and concerned the effect of HtrA expression on cancer and metastasis development or on the factor that influences it. Additionally, 31 reports were retrieved manually. Most articles highlighted that HtrA1 and HtrA3 exhibited tumour suppressor activity, while HtrA2 was associated with tumour growth and metastasis. There were too few studies to clearly define the role of the HtrA4 protease in tumours.
CONCLUSION
Although the expression of serine proteases of the HtrA family was dependent on tumour type, stage and the presence of metastases, most articles indicated that HtrA1 and HtrA3 expression in tumours was downregulated compared with healthy tissue or cell lines. The expression of HtrA2 was completely study dependent. The limited number of studies on HtrA4 expression made it impossible to draw conclusions about differences in expression between healthy and tumour tissue. The conclusions drawn from the study suggest that HtrA1 and HtrA3 act as tumour suppressors.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; High-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase 1; Serine Endopeptidases; High-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase 2; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Mitochondrial Proteins
PubMed: 38717523
DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00712-2 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Nov 2021Esophageal and gastric malignancies are associated with poor prognosis, in part due to development of recurrences or metastases after curative treatment. The...
Esophageal and gastric malignancies are associated with poor prognosis, in part due to development of recurrences or metastases after curative treatment. The transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) pathway might play a role in the development of treatment resistance. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of preclinical studies investigating the role of TGF-β in esophageal and gastric malignancies. We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE for eligible preclinical studies describing the effect of TGF-β or TGF-β inhibition on hallmarks of cancer, such as proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and immune evasion. In total, 2107 records were screened and 45 articles were included, using mouse models and 45 different cell lines. TGF-β failed to induce apoptosis in twelve of sixteen tested cell lines. TGF-β could either decrease (five cell lines) or increase proliferation (seven cell lines) in gastric cancer cells, but had no effect in esophageal cancer cells. In all esophageal and all but two gastric cancer cell lines, TGF-β increased migratory, adhesive and invasive capacities. In vivo studies showed increased metastasis in response to TGF-β treatment. Additionally, TGF-β was shown to induce vascular endothelial growth factor production and differentiation of cancer-associated fibroblasts and regulatory T-cells. In conclusion, we found that TGF-β enhances hallmarks of cancer in most gastric and esophageal cancer cell lines, but not in all. Therefore, targeting the TGF-β pathway could be an attractive strategy in patients with gastric or esophageal cancer, but additional clinical trials are needed to define patient groups who would benefit most.
Topics: Animals; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Mice; Stomach Neoplasms; Transforming Growth Factor beta
PubMed: 34536730
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102285 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Oct 2020Surgery and chemoradiotherapy can potentially cure esophageal and gastric cancer patients, although they may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Surgery and chemoradiotherapy can potentially cure esophageal and gastric cancer patients, although they may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to systemically review and meta-analyze literature to determine the effect of curative treatments on HRQoL in esophageal and gastric cancer.- A systematic search was performed identifying studies assessing HRQoL. Meta-analyses were performed on baseline and subsequent time-points.- From the 6067 articles retrieved, 49 studies were included (61 % low quality). Meta-analyses showed short-term HRQoL differences between esophageal cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (nC(R)T), or surgery alone (p < 0.001), with better HRQoL with nC(R)T and surgery compared to dCRT. Over the course of 12 months, no HRQoL difference was identified between treatments in esophageal cancer (p = 0.633). Esophagectomy, but not gastrectomy, resulted in a clinically relevant decline in HRQoL. No long-term HRQoL differences were identified between curative treatments in esophageal and gastric cancer. More high-quality HRQoL studies are warranted.
Topics: Chemoradiotherapy; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Humans; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 32818901
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103069 -
International Journal of Radiation... Mar 2023The Lyman model is one of the most used radiobiological models for calculation of normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP). Since its introduction in 1985, many...
PURPOSE
The Lyman model is one of the most used radiobiological models for calculation of normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP). Since its introduction in 1985, many authors have published parameter values for the model based on clinical data of different radiotherapeutic situations. This study attempted to collect the entirety of radiobiological parameter sets published to date and provide an overview of the data basis for different variations of the model. Furthermore, it sought to compare the parameter values and calculated NTCPs for selected endpoints with sufficient data available.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
A systematic literature analysis was performed, searching for publications that provided parameters for the different variations of the Lyman model in the Medline database using PubMed. Parameter sets were grouped into 13 toxicity-related endpoint groups. For 3 selected endpoint groups (≤25% reduction of saliva 12 months after irradiation of the parotid, symptomatic pneumonitis after irradiation of the lung, and bleeding of grade 2 or less after irradiation of the rectum), parameter values were compared and differences in calculated NTCP values were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 509 parameter sets from 130 publications were identified. Considerable heterogeneities were detected regarding the number of parameters available for different radio-oncological situations. Furthermore, for the 3 selected endpoints, large differences in published parameter values were found. These translated into great variations of calculated NTCPs, with maximum ranges of 35.2% to 93.4% for the saliva endpoint, of 39.4% to 90.4% for the pneumonitis endpoint, and of 5.4% to 99.3% for the rectal bleeding endpoint.
CONCLUSIONS
The detected heterogeneity of the data as well as the large variations of published radiobiological parameters underline the necessity for careful interpretation when using such parameters for NTCP calculations. Appropriate selection of parameters and validation of values are essential when using the Lyman model.
Topics: Humans; Probability; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Rectum; Radiobiology
PubMed: 36029911
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.039 -
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Reviews... Aug 2020Chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are able to alter the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Understanding the effect...
BACKGROUND
Chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are able to alter the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Understanding the effect of these modalities on the TIME could aid in the development of improved treatment strategies. Our aim was to systematically review studies investigating the influence of CT, RT or CRT on different TIME markers.
METHODS
The EMBASE (Ovid) and PubMed databases were searched until January 2019 for prospective or retrospective studies investigating the dynamics of the local TIME in cancer patients (pts) treated with CT, RT or CRT, with or without targeted agents. Studies could either compare baseline and follow-up specimens - before and after treatment - or a treated versus an untreated cohort. Studies were included if they used immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry to assess the TIME.
RESULTS
In total we included 110 studies (n = 8850 pts), of which n = 89 (n = 6295 pts) compared pre-treatment to post-treatment specimens and n = 25 (n = 2555 pts) a treated versus an untreated cohort (4 studies conducted both comparisons). For several tumor types (among others; breast, cervical, esophageal, ovarian, rectal, lung mesothelioma and pancreatic cancer) remodeling of the TIME was observed, leading to a potentially more immunologically active microenvironment, including one or more of the following: an increase in CD3 or CD8 lymphocytes, a decrease in FOXP3 Tregs and increased PD-L1 expression. Both CT and CRT were able to immunologically alter the TIME.
CONCLUSION
The TIME of several tumor types is significantly altered after conventional therapy creating opportunities for concurrent or sequential immunotherapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials as Topic; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Immunotherapy; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 32540465
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188386 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Sep 2021Despite multimodality treatment for curatively-treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), prognosis remains dismal. The benefit of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy...
INTRODUCTION
Despite multimodality treatment for curatively-treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), prognosis remains dismal. The benefit of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy for advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2) positive GEA has been established in the ToGA trial. However, it remains unclear if HER2 inhibition might also be beneficial in the curative setting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the role of HER2 inhibitors for the curative treatment of GEA.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify clinical trials investigating HER2 inhibition for the curative treatment of GEA. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE methodology.
RESULTS
From the 1825 studies retrieved, 17 were included (seven published articles; three published conference abstracts; seven ongoing studies). From the published studies, eight studies investigated single-agent HER2 inhibition. Four studies had a nonrandomized design, and two were randomized controlled trials. Two published studies were assessed as high-quality. The addition of single-agent HER2 inhibition to chemo(radio)therapy showed a pathological complete response rate (pCR) of 22.2% (range, 9.6-25%) and dual HER2 inhibition of 34.5% (34-35%). Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 51.0% (40-71%) with single-agent and 70.0% (70-70%) with dual HER2 therapy.
DISCUSSION
Dual-agent HER2 inhibition showed promising pCR rates and DFS. Given the limited additional toxicity of the addition of HER2 targeting agents and the potential benefit of dual-targeting, further investigation is required in a phase III randomized clinical trial. Next steps include combining checkpoint inhibitors and HER2 blockade given the suggested synergism, as well as investigating new anti-HER2 agents.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Stomach Neoplasms; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 34171733
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102249