-
Head and Neck Pathology Mar 2022This review article provides a brief overview of the new WHO classification by adopting a question-answer model to highlight the spectrum of head and neck neuroendocrine... (Review)
Review
Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
This review article provides a brief overview of the new WHO classification by adopting a question-answer model to highlight the spectrum of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms which includes epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas) arising from upper aerodigestive tract and salivary glands, and special neuroendocrine neoplasms including middle ear neuroendocrine tumors (MeNET), ectopic or invasive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET; formerly known as pituitary adenoma) and Merkel cell carcinoma as well as non-epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (paragangliomas). The new WHO classification follows the IARC/WHO nomenclature framework and restricts the diagnostic term of neuroendocrine carcinoma to poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. In this classification, well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms are termed as neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and are graded as G1 NET (no necrosis and < 2 mitoses per 2 mm; Ki67 < 20%), G2 NET (necrosis or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm, and Ki67 < 20%) and G3 NET (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm or Ki67 > 20%, and absence of poorly differentiated cytomorphology). Neuroendocrine carcinomas (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm, Ki67 > 20%, and often associated with a Ki67 > 55%) are further subtyped based on cytomorphological characteristics as small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Unlike neuroendocrine carcinomas, head and neck NETs typically show no aberrant p53 expression or loss of RB reactivity. Ectopic or invasive PitNETs are subtyped using pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, ER-alpha), hormones and keratins (e.g., CAM5.2). The new classification emphasizes a strict correlation of morphology and immunohistochemical findings in the accurate diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. A particular emphasis on the role of biomarkers in the confirmation of the neuroendocrine nature of a neoplasm and in the distinction of various neuroendocrine neoplasms is provided by reviewing ancillary tools that are available to pathologists in the diagnostic workup of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms. Furthermore, the role of molecular immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic workup of head and neck paragangliomas is discussed. The unmet needs in the field of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms are also discussed in this article. The new WHO classification is an important step forward to ensure accurate diagnosis that will also form the basis of ongoing research in this field.
Topics: Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Ki-67 Antigen; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Paraganglioma; Pituitary Neoplasms; World Health Organization
PubMed: 35312985
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-022-01435-8 -
Oral Oncology Aug 2020Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common malignancy of the head and neck region. OSCC has a relatively low survival rate and the incidence of the disease is... (Review)
Review
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common malignancy of the head and neck region. OSCC has a relatively low survival rate and the incidence of the disease is increasing in some geographic areas. Staging and grading of OSCC are established prerequisites for management, as they influence risk stratification and are the first step toward personalized treatment. The current AJCC/UICC TNM staging (8th edition, 2017) of OSCC has included significant modifications through the incorporation of depth of invasion in the T stage and extracapsular spread/extranodal extension in the N stage. Further modifications for AJCC 8 have been suggested. On the other hand, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (4th edition, 2017) still endorses a simple, differentiation-based histopathologic grading system of OSCC (despite its low prognostic value) and ignores factors such as tumor growth pattern and dissociation, stromal reactions (desmoplasia, local immune response), and tumor-stroma ratio. The various controversies and possible developments of the current staging and grading criteria of OSCC are briefly discussed in this update together with possible applications of artificial intelligence in the context of screening and risk stratification.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Male; Mouth Neoplasms; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis
PubMed: 32446214
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104799 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2021Thermal and chemical ablation are minimally invasive procedures that avoid removal of the thyroid gland and target symptomatic nodules directly. Internationally,... (Review)
Review
Thermal and chemical ablation are minimally invasive procedures that avoid removal of the thyroid gland and target symptomatic nodules directly. Internationally, Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is among one of the most widely used thermal ablative techniques, and is gaining traction in North America. Surgery remains the standard of care for most thyroid cancer, and in the right clinical setting, Active Surveillance (AS) can be a reasonable option for low risk disease. Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as an alternative option for patients deemed high risk for surgery, or for those patients who wish to receive a more active treatment approach compared to AS. Herein, we review the literature on the safety and efficacy of RFA for treating benign non-functioning thyroid nodules, autonomously functioning thyroid nodules, primary small low risk thyroid cancer (namely papillary thyroid cancer) as well as recurrent thyroid cancer.
Topics: Catheter Ablation; History, 21st Century; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Radiofrequency Ablation; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Neoplasms; Thyroid Nodule; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34248853
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.698689 -
Danish Medical Journal Oct 2020Although acute otitis media (AOM) is a very frequent illness in children, it remains unclear to what extent children with AOM benefit from antibiotics (ABX). This...
INTRODUCTION
Although acute otitis media (AOM) is a very frequent illness in children, it remains unclear to what extent children with AOM benefit from antibiotics (ABX). This systematic review aimed to clarify this subject by including randomised clinical trials (RCTs) from the pneumococcal vaccine era only.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search in four databases from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2019 for RCTs comparing ABX to placebo in patients with AOM. Pain was registered as the main outcome. Adverse events (AE), development of contralateral otitis media, tympanic membrane perforation, late AOM recurrence, abnormal tympanometry and time to resolution of middle ear effusion were registered as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
Six publications based on five RCTs with 1,862 patients were included. The number needed to treat (NNT) to reduce pain varied from seven (pain at day 7-10) to 28 (pain at day 2-3). The NNT for preventing contralateral otitis was ten. AE were seen in every 13th patient treated with ABX.
CONCLUSIONS
ABX appears to have a limited effect on both primary and secondary outcomes compared with placebo. A substantial number of patients experienced AE. New RCTs are needed to further clarify the effect. Ideally, RCTs could be conducted in Danish general practices in collaboration with practicing ear, nose and throat specialists to obtain large unselected populations with high rates of vaccine coverage. Until more evidence is provided, ABX should be considered among children younger than two years of age with severe symptoms of AOM, i.e. fewer and affected well-being.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Humans; Infant; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Otitis Media; Tympanic Membrane Perforation
PubMed: 33215607
DOI: No ID Found -
Acta Oto-laryngologica Feb 2022Ear canal and middle ear tumors are rare and exhibit variability in histology and clinical manifestation. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice, but...
BACKGROUND
Ear canal and middle ear tumors are rare and exhibit variability in histology and clinical manifestation. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice, but individualized approach is needed to preserve function when possible.
AIMS/OBJECTIVES
To review the management and outcome of ear canal and middle ear tumors at an academic referral center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) patient files were searched for clinically and histologically confirmed ear canal and middle ear tumors over a 14-year period. The minimum follow-up time was 2 years.
RESULTS
Eighty-seven patients with 88 tumors were identified. There were 20 (23%) benign external auditory canal (EAC), 36 (41%) benign middle ear space (MES), 29 (33%) malignant EAC, and 3 (3%) malignant MES tumors. Most (92%) tumors were managed with primary resection. Thirty-five percent of the operatively managed patients had a residual or a recurrent tumor.
CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE
EAC and MES tumors show great diagnostic and histologic heterogeneity with need for individualized investigative and treatment approaches. In benign tumors, we advocate aggressive local surgical control without sacrificing vital structures. In malignant tumors, we recommend local surgical control with or without adjunct RT.
Topics: Ear Canal; Ear Neoplasms; Ear, Middle; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35148225
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2022.2032824 -
PloS One 2021The long-term survival of uveal melanoma patients in the US is not known. We compared long-term survival estimates using relative survival, excess absolute risk (EAR),...
PURPOSE
The long-term survival of uveal melanoma patients in the US is not known. We compared long-term survival estimates using relative survival, excess absolute risk (EAR), Kaplan-Meier (KM), and competing risk analyses.
SETTING
Population based cohort study.
STUDY POPULATION
Pooled databases from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data (SEER, SEER-9+SEER-13+SEER-18).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Overall Survival (OS), Metastasis Free Survival (MFS) and relative survival, computed directly or estimated via a model fitted to excess mortality.
RESULTS
There were 10678 cases of uveal melanoma spanning a period of 42 years (1975-2016). The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 3-99). Over half the patients were still alive at the end of 2016 (53%, 5625). The KM estimates of MFS were 0.729 (0.719, 0.74), 0.648 (0.633, 0.663), and 0.616 (0.596, 0.636) at 10, 20, and 30 years, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of melanoma metastatic death at 10, 20 and 30 years were 0.241 (0.236, 0.245), 0.289 (0.283, 0.294), and 0.301 (0.295, 0.307). In the first 5 years since diagnosis of uveal melanoma, the proportion of deaths attributable to uveal melanoma were 1.3 with rapid fall after 10 years. Death due to melanoma were rare beyond 20 years. Relative survival (RS) plateaued to ~60% across 20 to 30 years. EAR parametric modeling yielded a survival probability of 57%.
CONCLUSIONS
Relative survival methods can be used to estimate long term survival of uveal melanoma patients without knowing the exact cause of death. RS and EAR provide more realistic estimates as they compare the survival to that of a normal matched population. Death due to melanoma were rare beyond 20 years with normal life expectancy reached at 25 years after primary therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cause of Death; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; SEER Program; Survival Rate; United States; Uveal Neoplasms; Young Adult
PubMed: 34003826
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250939 -
Nature Metabolism Feb 2021Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains among the most aggressive human cancers. Tumour progression and aggressiveness in SCC are largely driven by...
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains among the most aggressive human cancers. Tumour progression and aggressiveness in SCC are largely driven by tumour-propagating cells (TPCs). Aerobic glycolysis, also known as the Warburg effect, is a characteristic of many cancers; however, whether this adaptation is functionally important in SCC, and at which stage, remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the NAD-dependent histone deacetylase sirtuin 6 is a robust tumour suppressor in SCC, acting as a modulator of glycolysis in these tumours. Remarkably, rather than a late adaptation, we find enhanced glycolysis specifically in TPCs. More importantly, using single-cell RNA sequencing of TPCs, we identify a subset of TPCs with higher glycolysis and enhanced pentose phosphate pathway and glutathione metabolism, characteristics that are strongly associated with a better antioxidant response. Together, our studies uncover enhanced glycolysis as a main driver in SCC, and, more importantly, identify a subset of TPCs as the cell of origin for the Warburg effect, defining metabolism as a key feature of intra-tumour heterogeneity.
Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Disease Progression; Glutathione; Glycolysis; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Pentose Phosphate Pathway; RNA, Neoplasm; Single-Cell Analysis; Sirtuins; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
PubMed: 33619381
DOI: 10.1038/s42255-021-00350-6 -
JAMA Ophthalmology Feb 2021The extent to which uveal melanoma is cured by ocular therapy is not known.
IMPORTANCE
The extent to which uveal melanoma is cured by ocular therapy is not known.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate cured fractions (CF) of uveal melanoma using combination of institutional and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Integrative analysis of 42 years of SEER data (1975-2016) with 25 years (1993-2018) of complementary institutional data. The analysis included SEER US patients and molecularly prognosticated patients in the United States and Europe. Three SEER databases (SEER-9, SEER-13, and SEER-18) were merged. A total of 10 678 SEER cases of uveal melanoma diagnosed from 1975 to 2016 using International Classification of Disease for Oncology morphology codes 8720-8790 (for melanoma) and site codes C69.2-4 (for choroid, ciliary body, and iris) were downloaded April 16, 2019. The institutional data included 5 institutional cohorts of 788 molecularly prognosticated patients (diagnosed prior to July 2019) with 3115 person-years at risk of death and 262 observed deaths.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Excess absolute risks of death (EAR) and cured fraction (CF) indicates lifetime area under the EAR curve. These are applied to populations and subpopulations.
RESULTS
The SEER EAR, with sexes and races pooled, can be modeled as a sum of 2 waves. The first wave peaks at approximately 3 years and is negligible by 15 years, at which time the second wave peaks. Institutional data suggest that the first wave is owing to BAP1 mutant cases (204 of 355 [57.5%]; 95% CI, 52%-63%) and that the second wave is owing to BAP1 wild-type SF3B1 mutant cases (60 of 355 [17%]; 95% CI, 13%-21%). There is also a third group with a low flat EAR time course (91 of 355 [25.5%]; 95% CI, 21%-30%). The overall statistical CF of 60% is reached by approximately 25 years.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that the benefits of ocular therapy for curing uveal melanoma may be questionable because statistical cures reflect deaths of poor prognosis cases and survival of good prognosis cases. Changes in uveal melanoma patient management may be needed to improve survival.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers, Tumor; Female; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Phosphoproteins; RNA Splicing Factors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; SEER Program; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; Ubiquitin Thiolesterase; United States; Uveal Neoplasms; Young Adult
PubMed: 33355644
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5720 -
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Jan 2022Malignant tumors of the external auditory canal (EAC) are rare tumors in the head and neck. Delayed diagnosis is not uncommon because the symptoms of early tumors are... (Review)
Review
Malignant tumors of the external auditory canal (EAC) are rare tumors in the head and neck. Delayed diagnosis is not uncommon because the symptoms of early tumors are nonspecific. Various surgical and oncological treatment modalities have been reported. Decision-making depends on pathological feature and stage of the lesions, patient's general condition and preference, and physician's experience and skill. Radical surgery is widely accepted as the primary treatment of choice. Postoperative radiotherapy is used more often to improve local and regional control of the disease. Chemotherapy is usually recommended for advanced disease, residual disease, and metastasis. Prognosis is affected by multiple factors such as TNM stage, surgical margin, pathological type and differentiation of tumor, involvement of facial nerve, and so on. Although the survival rate is improved significantly over the past several decades with the development of skull base surgery, neuroradiology, anesthesiology, and oncology, it remains challenging to diagnose and treat EAC malignancies due to the rarity, the local anatomical complexity of temporal bone, and the lack of standard TNM staging system.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Ear Canal; Ear Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35167009
DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00931-3