-
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology... Mar 2022PURPOSE Paracentesis is commonly performed in interventional radiology practice, and large volume paracentesis (LVP) using wall suction can take up to an hour to...
PURPOSE Paracentesis is commonly performed in interventional radiology practice, and large volume paracentesis (LVP) using wall suction can take up to an hour to complete, placing significant stress on room and resource time. As the number of LVP procedures performed by Interventional Radiologists continue to increase, this study was undertaken to analyze the impact of the RenovaRP® Paracentesis Management System (GI Supply) on procedure time and patient satisfaction. METHODS Between March 9, 2020 and May 29, 2020, procedural data and patient satisfaction was collected as part of a practice quality improvement project and retrospectively analyzed on 39 sequential paracenteses performed with wall suction prior to acquiring the RenovaRP® system and subsequently on 42 paracenteses performed with use of the device. RESULTS A substantially higher fluid flow rate was found using the RenovaRP® system compared to wall suction, 237.2 mL/min vs. 108.6 mL/min (P < .001). This resulted in a significant decrease in procedure room time from 53 min to 31 min (P < .001). There was associated improvement in the patient experience during paracentesis. CONCLUSION The RenovaRP® decreases procedure time for LVP with improvement in the patient experience during paracentesis.
Topics: Ascites; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Paracentesis; Retrospective Studies; Suction
PubMed: 35548901
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2022.20991 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... Oct 2020Paracentesis is a common and well accepted technique for its diagnostic-therapeutic profitability. This procedure is considered rapid, minimally invasive and safe, but...
Paracentesis is a common and well accepted technique for its diagnostic-therapeutic profitability. This procedure is considered rapid, minimally invasive and safe, but we must not forget that it can lead to severe complications. In this letter we present two patients with hemorrhagic complications following paracentesis. Both cases were treated by percutaneous transarterial embolization. Likewise, in the absence of consensus on the prevention of complications and on their optimal management, we make some recommendations.
Topics: Embolization, Therapeutic; Humans; Paracentesis
PubMed: 32954781
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6914/2020 -
Federal Practitioner : For the Health... Mar 2022Patients needing large-volume paracenteses (LVPs) can occupy inpatient hospital beds and unnecessarily use inpatient resources.
BACKGROUND
Patients needing large-volume paracenteses (LVPs) can occupy inpatient hospital beds and unnecessarily use inpatient resources.
METHODS
We describe an outpatient paracentesis clinic that was part of a quality assurance initiative at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System in Pennsylvania. A retrospective review was conducted that included patient age, sex, etiology of ascites, amount of ascites removed, time of the procedure, complications, and results of ascites cell count and cultures abstracted from the electronic health record.
RESULTS
Over 74 months, 506 paracenteses were performed on 82 patients. The mean volume removed was 7.9 L, and the mean time of the procedure was 33.3 minutes. There were 5 episodes of postprocedure hypotension that required admission for 3 patients. One episode of abdominal wall hematoma occurred that required admission. Two patients developed incarceration of an umbilical hernia after the paracentesis; both required surgical repair. Without the clinic, almost all the 506 outpatient LVPs we performed would have resulted in a hospital admission.
CONCLUSION
An outpatient paracentesis clinic run by academic hospitalists can safely and quickly remove large volumes of ascites and minimize hospitalizations.
PubMed: 35444390
DOI: 10.12788/fp.0235 -
United European Gastroenterology Journal Jun 2020Albumin is currently employed as a plasma expander to prevent and treat specific complications of cirrhosis with ascites, such as the prevention of paracentesis-induced... (Review)
Review
Albumin is currently employed as a plasma expander to prevent and treat specific complications of cirrhosis with ascites, such as the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction and renal dysfunction induced by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of acute kidney injury and hepatorenal syndrome. Recently, evidence has shown that long-term albumin administration in patients with decompensated cirrhosis reduces mortality and incidence of complications, eases the management of ascites, is cost effective, and has a good safety profile.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Ascites; Chronic Disease; Diuretics; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hepatorenal Syndrome; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Leukocyte Count; Liver Cirrhosis; Paracentesis; Peritonitis; Serum Albumin, Human; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32213034
DOI: 10.1177/2050640620910339 -
Respiratory Medicine May 2022Roughly 150,000 malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are diagnosed in the United States each year. The majority of cases are caused by lung and breast cancer, and since MPE... (Review)
Review
Roughly 150,000 malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are diagnosed in the United States each year. The majority of cases are caused by lung and breast cancer, and since MPE represents advanced disease, the prognosis is generally poor. In this article we review the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and prognosis of MPE. We then discuss the approach to diagnosis of MPE including the role of imaging, pleural fluid analysis, and medical thoracoscopy. Current management strategies for symptomatic MPE include repeated thoracentesis for patients with very limited life expectancy as well as more definitive procedures such as chemical pleurodesis, tunneled indwelling pleural catheters, and novel combined approaches. The choice of intervention is guided by the efficacy, local expertise, and risk, as well as patient factors and preferences.
Topics: Drainage; Humans; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Pleurodesis; Thoracentesis; Thoracoscopy
PubMed: 35287006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106802 -
European Respiratory Review : An... Dec 2022Thoracentesis and thoracoscopy are used to diagnose malignant pleural effusions (MPE). Data on how sensitivity varies with tumour type is limited. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Thoracentesis and thoracoscopy are used to diagnose malignant pleural effusions (MPE). Data on how sensitivity varies with tumour type is limited.
METHODS
Systematic review using PubMed was performed through August 2020 to determine the sensitivity of thoracentesis and thoracoscopy for MPE secondary to malignancy, by cancer type, and complication rates. Tests to identify sources of heterogeneity were performed. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 and National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. Publication bias was tested using funnel plots.
RESULTS
Meta-analyses for sensitivity of thoracentesis for MPE secondary to malignancy, mesothelioma and lung and breast cancer included 29, eight, 12 and nine studies, respectively. Pooled sensitivities were 0.643 (95% CI 0.592-0.692), 0.451 (95% CI 0.249-0.661), 0.738 (95% CI 0.659-0.836) and 0.820 (95% CI 0.700-0.917), respectively. For sensitivity of thoracoscopy for MPE secondary to malignancy and mesothelioma, 41 and 15 studies were included, respectively. Pooled sensitivities were 0.929 (95% CI 0.905-0.95) and 0.915 (95% CI 0.871-0.952), respectively. Pooled complication rates of thoracentesis and thoracoscopy were 0.041 (95% CI 0.025-0.051) and 0.040 (95% CI 0.029-0.052), respectively. Heterogeneity was significant for all meta-analyses. Funnel plots were asymmetric.
INTERPRETATION
Sensitivity of thoracentesis varied significantly per cancer type. Pooled complication rates were low. Awareness of how sensitivity of thoracentesis changes across cancers can improve decision-making when MPE is suspected.
Topics: Humans; Thoracentesis; Retrospective Studies; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Thoracoscopy
PubMed: 36543349
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0053-2022 -
Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) Oct 2019
Topics: Drainage; Humans; Pericardiocentesis; Pericardium; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Punctures
PubMed: 31622998
DOI: 10.1055/a-0863-8903 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Jan 2021The prevalence of people in Denmark descending from areas with a high prevalence of haemoglobinopathies is approximately one tenth and increasing. Since 1995, the Danish... (Review)
Review
The prevalence of people in Denmark descending from areas with a high prevalence of haemoglobinopathies is approximately one tenth and increasing. Since 1995, the Danish Health Authority has recommended haemoglobinopathy screening of pregnant women with ethnic roots outside Northern Europe. Partners of pregnant haemoglobinopathy carriers are also tested. Carrier state in both parents leads to genetic counselling, and prenatal diagnostics of the foetus (chorionic villus biopsy or amniocentesis) is offered, which can lead to abortion and/or preimplantation genetic screening for future pregnancies, as discussed in this review.
Topics: Amniocentesis; Denmark; Europe; Female; Hemoglobinopathies; Humans; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis
PubMed: 33491643
DOI: No ID Found -
Ultraschall in Der Medizin (Stuttgart,... Jun 2023Diagnostic puncture (amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, and fetal blood sampling) is an essential part of prenatal diagnostics and the only established and... (Review)
Review
Diagnostic puncture (amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, and fetal blood sampling) is an essential part of prenatal diagnostics and the only established and sufficiently scientifically evaluated possibility of diagnosing genetic diseases from pregnancy-specific cells. The number of diagnostic punctures in Germany, as in other countries, has fallen significantly. This is largely due to the introduction of first-trimester screening with further detailed ultrasound examination of the fetus and the analysis of cf-DNA (cell-free DNA) from maternal blood (noninvasive prenatal test - NIPT). On the other hand, knowledge about the incidence and appearance of genetic diseases has increased. The development of modern molecular genetic techniques (microarray and exome analysis) makes a differentiated investigation of these diseases increasingly possible. The requirements for education and counseling regarding these complex correlations have thus increased. The studies performed in recent years make it clear that diagnostic puncture performed in expert centers is associated with a low risk of complications. In particular, the procedure-related miscarriage risk hardly differs from the background risk for spontaneous abortion. In 2013, the Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) published recommendations on diagnostic puncture in prenatal medicine 1. The developments described above and new findings in recent years make it necessary to revise and reformulate these recommendations. The aim of this review is to compile important and current facts regarding prenatal medical puncture (including technique, complications, genetic examinations). It is intended to provide basic, comprehensive, and up-to-date information on diagnostic puncture in prenatal medicine. It replaces the publication from 2013 1.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Prenatal Diagnosis; Amniocentesis; Chorionic Villi Sampling; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Genetic Testing
PubMed: 36882109
DOI: 10.1055/a-2014-4505 -
BMJ Open Aug 2021To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) when... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) when compared with conventional 'step-up' strategy based on percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Database were electronically searched to collect cohort studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 25 July 2020. Studies related to comparing APD with conventional 'step-up' strategy based on PCD were included.
OUTCOMES
The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were the rate of organ dysfunction, infectious complications, hospitalisation expenses and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS
Five cohort studies and three RCTs were included in the analysis. Compared with the conventional 'step-up' method, pooled results suggested APD significantly decreased all-cause mortality during hospitalisation (cohort studies: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.89 and p=0.02), length of hospital stay (cohort studies: standard mean difference (SMD) -0.31, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.10 and p=0.005; RCTs: SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.26 and p<0.001) and hospitalisation expenses (cohort studies: SMD -2.49, 95% CI -4.46 to -0.51 and p<0.001; RCTs: SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.44 and p<0.001). There was no evidence to prove that APD was associated with a higher incidence of infectious complications. However, the incidence of organ dysfunction between cohort studies and RCTs subgroup slightly differed (cohort studies: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.28 and p=0.22; RCTs: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.98 and p=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that early application of APD in patients with AP is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, expenses during hospitalisation and the length of stay compared with the 'step-up' strategy without significantly increasing the risk of infectious complications. These results must be interpreted with caution because of the limited number of included studies as well as a larger dependence on observational trials.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020168537.
Topics: Drainage; Hospitalization; Humans; Length of Stay; Pancreatitis; Paracentesis
PubMed: 34373293
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045031