-
Viruses Nov 2022Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) are currently used as the most effective therapy in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections.... (Review)
Review
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) are currently used as the most effective therapy in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Raltegravir (RAL) and Elvitegravir (EVG), the first generation of INSTIs used successfully in clinical treatment, are susceptible to the emergence of viral resistance and have a high rate of cross-resistance. To counteract these resistant mutants, second-generation INSTI drugs have been developed: Dolutegravir (DTG), Cabotegravir (CAB), and Bictegravir (BIC). However, HIV is also able to develop resistance mechanisms against the second-generation of INSTIs. This review describes the mode of action of INSTIs and then summarizes and evaluates some typical resistance mutations, such as substitution and insertion mutations. The role of unintegrated viral DNA is also discussed as a new pathway involved in conferring resistance to INSTIs. This allows us to have a more detailed understanding of HIV resistance to these inhibitors, which may contribute to the development of new INSTIs in the future.
Topics: Humans; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Raltegravir Potassium; HIV Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Mutation; Integrases; HIV Integrase; Drug Resistance, Viral
PubMed: 36560595
DOI: 10.3390/v14122591 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Sep 2022Data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in pregnancy as... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in pregnancy as compared with other ART regimens commonly used in the United States and Europe, particularly when initiated before conception, are limited.
METHODS
We conducted a study involving pregnancies in persons with HIV-1 infection in the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study whose initial ART in pregnancy included dolutegravir, atazanavir-ritonavir, darunavir-ritonavir, oral rilpivirine, raltegravir, or elvitegravir-cobicistat. Viral suppression at delivery and the risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, and being small for gestational age were compared between each non-dolutegravir-based ART regimen and dolutegravir-based ART. Supplementary analyses that included participants in the Swiss Mother and Child HIV Cohort Study were conducted to improve the precision of our results.
RESULTS
Of the pregnancies in the study, 120 were in participants who received dolutegravir, 464 in those who received atazanavir-ritonavir, 185 in those who received darunavir-ritonavir, 243 in those who received rilpivirine, 86 in those who received raltegravir, and 159 in those who received elvitegravir-cobicistat. The median age at conception was 29 years; 51% of the pregnancies were in participants who started ART before conception. Viral suppression was present at delivery in 96.7% of the pregnancies in participants who received dolutegravir; corresponding percentages were 84.0% for atazanavir-ritonavir, 89.2% for raltegravir, and 89.8% for elvitegravir-cobicistat (adjusted risk differences vs. dolutegravir, -13.0 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -17.0 to -6.1], -17.0 percentage points [95% CI, -27.0 to -2.4], and -7.0 percentage points [95% CI, -13.3 to -0.0], respectively). The observed risks of preterm birth were 13.6 to 17.6%. Adjusted risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, or being small for gestational age did not differ substantially between non-dolutegravir-based ART and dolutegravir. Results of supplementary analyses were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
Atazanavir-ritonavir and raltegravir were associated with less frequent viral suppression at delivery than dolutegravir. No clear differences in adverse birth outcomes were observed with dolutegravir-based ART as compared with non-dolutegravir-based ART, although samples were small. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others.).
Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cobicistat; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Pyridones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Rilpivirine; Ritonavir; United States
PubMed: 36053505
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200600 -
Journal of the International AIDS... Nov 2022Globally about 1.7 million children were living with HIV in 2020. Two integrase strand transfer inhibitors, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are increasingly used in... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Globally about 1.7 million children were living with HIV in 2020. Two integrase strand transfer inhibitors, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are increasingly used in children. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir and raltegravir in children and adolescents living with HIV, aged 0-19 years.
METHODS
Sources included MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, abstracts from key conferences and reference list searching. Observational studies and clinical trials published January 2009-March 2021 were eligible. Outcomes included efficacy/effectiveness (CD4 counts and viral load) and/or safety outcomes (mortality, grade 3/4 adverse events and treatment discontinuation) through 6 months or more post-treatment initiation. Risk of bias was assessed using previously published tools appropriate for the study design. Narrative syntheses were conducted.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In total, 3626 abstracts and 371 papers were screened. Eleven studies, including 2330 children/adolescents, reported data on dolutegravir: one randomized controlled trial (RCT; low risk of bias), one single-arm trial (unclear risk of bias) and nine cohort studies (three low risk of bias, two unclear risk and four high risk). Ten studies, including 649 children/adolescents receiving raltegravir, were identified: one RCT (low risk of bias), one single-arm trial (low risk of bias) and eight cohort studies (four low risk of bias, three unclear risk and one high risk). Viral suppression levels in children/adolescents at 12 months were high (>70%) in most studies assessing dolutegravir (mostly second- or subsequent-line, or mixed treatment lines), and varied from 42% (5/12) to 83% (44/53) at 12 months in studies assessing raltegravir (mostly second- or subsequent-line). Across all studies assessing dolutegravir or raltegravir, grade 3/4 adverse events (clinical and/or laboratory) were reported in 0-50% of subjects, few resulted in discontinuation, few were drug related and no deaths were attributed to either drug.
CONCLUSIONS
These reassuring findings suggest that dolutegravir and raltegravir are effective and safe as preferred regimens in children and adolescents living with HIV. With the rollout of dolutegravir in paediatric populations already underway, it is critical that data are collected on safety and effectiveness in infants, children and adolescents, including on longer-term outcomes, such as weight and metabolic changes.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Raltegravir Potassium; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
PubMed: 36377082
DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25970 -
Life Sciences Nov 2022To assess the potential direct effects of the integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INsTIs) dolutegravir, bictegravir, and raltegravir, drugs used as treatment for...
AIMS
To assess the potential direct effects of the integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INsTIs) dolutegravir, bictegravir, and raltegravir, drugs used as treatment for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH), on human adipose cells.
MAIN METHODS
Drugs were added to the differentiation medium of human Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS) adipose cells and morphological adipogenesis was monitored for 10 days. Also, adipocytes were exposed to drugs following differentiation (day 14). The gene expression levels of selected adipogenesis markers, adipocyte metabolism markers, adipokines, and cytokines were determined by quantitative-reverse transcription polymerase-chain reaction. The release of adiponectin and leptin into the culture medium was measured using specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and release of interleukin-6 and chemokine (CC motif) ligand-2 using Multiplex assays.
KEY FINDINGS
Overall morphological adipogenesis was unaltered by INsTIs. The expression of adipogenesis marker genes (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-Ɣ and lipoprotein lipase) was slightly reduced in dolutegravir-treated differentiating adipocytes. Bictegravir repressed gene expression and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in differentiating adipocytes. Dolutegravir and raltegravir increased interleukin-6 gene expression, but only dolutegravir increased interleukin-6 release. Dolutegravir repressed adiponectin expression and release in differentiating adipocytes and had a similar but milder effect on leptin. Drug treatment of mature adipocytes reduced adiponectin gene expression in response to dolutegravir.
SIGNIFICANCE
The INsTIs studied do not have a significant effect on human adipose cell differentiation but exert distinct effects on gene expression and secretion of adipokines and cytokines. These findings will help understand and manage the effects of INsTI-containing treatments on body weight and metabolic dysregulation in PLWH.
Topics: Adipocytes; Adipokines; Adiponectin; Amides; Cytokines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inflammation; Integrases; Interleukin-6; Leptin; Ligands; Lipoprotein Lipase; Oxazines; Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 36096241
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120948 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Sep 2020Bictegravir, cabotegravir, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, and raltegravir are members of the latest class of antiretrovirals available to treat human immunodeficiency virus... (Review)
Review
Bictegravir, cabotegravir, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, and raltegravir are members of the latest class of antiretrovirals available to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the integrase strand transfer inhibitors. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors are potent inhibitors of the HIV integrase enzyme with IC values in the low nanogram per milliliter range and they retain antiviral activity against strains of HIV with acquired resistance to other classes of antiretrovirals. Each of the integrase strand transfer inhibitors have unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, influencing their role in clinical use in specific subsets of patients. Cabotegravir, approved for use in Canada but not yet by the US Food and Drug Administration, is formulated in both oral and intramuscular formulations; the latter of which has shown efficacy as a long-acting extended-release formulation. Cabotegravir, raltegravir, and dolutegravir have minimal drug-drug interaction profiles, as their metabolism has minimal cytochrome P450 involvement. Conversely, elvitegravir metabolism occurs primarily via cytochrome P450 3A4 and requires pharmacokinetic boosting to achieve systemic exposures amenable to once-daily dosing. Bictegravir metabolism has similar contributions from both cytochrome P450 3A4 and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1. Bictegravir, dolutegravir, and raltegravir are recommended components of initial regimens for most people with HIV in the US adult and adolescent HIV treatment guidelines. This review summarizes and compares the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor agents, and describes specific pharmacokinetic considerations for persons with hepatic impairment, renal dysfunction, pregnancy, and co-infections.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Pregnancy; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 32462541
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-020-00898-8 -
Journal of the International AIDS... Jul 2020As integrase inhibitors become available in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they offer the potential to expand extremely limited treatment options available to...
INTRODUCTION
As integrase inhibitors become available in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they offer the potential to expand extremely limited treatment options available to children and adolescents. In LMICs, only small numbers have used raltegravir, primarily as part of third-line regimens. Using data from the IeDEA global consortium, we aimed to describe the characteristics of children on raltegravir-containing regimens and their outcomes.
METHODS
We included data from 1994 to 2017 from children (age <18 years), from East and Southern Africa, Asia and South America, who received cART regimens containing raltegravir for ≥90 days. We describe their characteristics at raltegravir start, and their immunological and virological outcomes.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In total, 62 children were included, with median age at raltegravir initiation of 14.3 years (IQR 11.2 to 15.8) and median CD4 count of 276 cells/µL (IQR 68 to 494). Among 40 (65%) with drug resistance testing prior to raltegravir, 71% were resistant to at least one protease inhibitor (PI), and 32% had high-level resistance to at least one drug class. Most (n = 50; 81%) received raltegravir as part of third-line cART following PI-based regimens, and were on regimens containing four or more drugs (n = 47, 76%). By database closure, median duration on raltegravir was 2.0 years (IQR 0.8 to 3.0), 1 (1.6%) patient had died, 6 (9.7%) were lost to follow-up and 21 (34%) had discontinued raltegravir. Among 15 patients reporting reasons for stopping raltegravir, six discontinued because it was no longer available. Within one year of starting raltegravir, among 53 patients with VL measures, 40 (75%) had VL < 1000 copies/mL, and among 54 with a reported CD4 count, 45 (83%) and 36 (67%) were ≥350 and ≥500 cells/µL, respectively, with median CD4 count increasing to 517.5 cells/µL (IQR 288 to 810).
CONCLUSIONS
Among children in LMICs, the initial use of raltegravir has been primarily for post PI-based cART. We found good virological and immunological outcomes despite frequent prior triple-class failure and high levels of drug resistance. Both access to raltegravir and long-term adherence to regimens with large pill-burdens remain challenging. Policies which promote earlier access to new drugs and simplify daily regimens for children and adolescents in LMICs are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Africa, Southern; Asia; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Poverty; Raltegravir Potassium; South America; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load
PubMed: 32722897
DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25580 -
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2021Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a persistent global challenge, impacting 38 million people worldwide. Antiretrovirals (ARVs) including tenofovir (TFV),...
INTRODUCTION
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a persistent global challenge, impacting 38 million people worldwide. Antiretrovirals (ARVs) including tenofovir (TFV), raltegravir (RAL), and dapivirine (DAP) have been developed to prevent and treat HIV-1 via different mechanisms of action. In parallel, a promising biological candidate, griffithsin (GRFT), has demonstrated outstanding preclinical safety and potency against HIV-1. While ARV co-administration has been shown to enhance virus inhibition, synergistic interactions between ARVs and the oxidation-resistant variant of GRFT (Q-GRFT) have not yet been explored. Here, we co-administered Q-GRFT with TFV, RAL, and DAP, in free and encapsulated forms, to identify unique protein-drug synergies.
METHODS
Nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized using a single or double-emulsion technique and release from each formulation was assessed in simulated vaginal fluid. Next, each ARV, in free and encapsulated forms, was co-administered with Q-GRFT or Q-GRFT NPs to evaluate the impact of co-administration in HIV-1 pseudovirus assays, and the combination indices were calculated to identify synergistic interactions. Using the most synergistic formulations, we investigated the effect of agent incorporation in NP-fiber composites on release properties. Finally, NP safety was assessed in vitro using MTT assay.
RESULTS
All active agents were encapsulated in NPs with desirable encapsulation efficiency (15-100%), providing ~20% release over 2 weeks. The co-administration of free Q-GRFT with each free ARV resulted in strong synergistic interactions, relative to each agent alone. Similarly, Q-GRFT NP and ARV NP co-administration resulted in synergy across all formulations, with the most potent interactions between encapsulated Q-GRFT and DAP. Furthermore, the incorporation of Q-GRFT and DAP in NP-fiber composites resulted in burst release of DAP and Q-GRFT with a second phase of Q-GRFT release. Finally, all NP formulations exhibited safety in vitro.
CONCLUSIONS
This work suggests that Q-GRFT and ARV co-administration in free or encapsulated forms may improve efficacy in achieving prophylaxis.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Cell Death; Cell Line; Drug Compounding; Drug Liberation; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Lectins; Nanoparticles; Particle Size; Plant Lectins; Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer; Pyrimidines; Raltegravir Potassium; Recombinant Proteins; Tenofovir
PubMed: 33623382
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S287310 -
HIV Medicine Sep 2021Persistent inflammation and immune activation are associated with lymph node fibrosis and end-organ diseases in treatment-suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH). We... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Persistent inflammation and immune activation are associated with lymph node fibrosis and end-organ diseases in treatment-suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH). We investigated the effect of switching to raltegravir and/or adding losartan on lymphoid tissue fibrosis and on the inflammatory/immune-activation mediators in treated HIV patients.
METHODS
Chronic HIV-infected patients treated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (2NRTI) and one non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) during at least 48 weeks were randomized to four groups (n = 48): 2NRTI + efavirenz (EFV), 2NRTI + EFV + losartan, 2NRTI + raltegravir and 2NRTI + raltegravir + losartan for 48 weeks. Tonsillar biopsy and peripheral blood markers of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte activation and senescence, monocyte activation and soluble markers of inflammation were determined at baseline and at week 48 and compared between groups.
RESULTS
No changes in lymphoid tissue architecture were observed. Adding losartan had no impact on lymphocyte subsets. Conversely, patients who switched to raltegravir showed a higher decrease in all activated [CD4+CD38+HLA-DR+, -0.3 vs. 0.48 (P = 0.033); CD8+CD38+ HLA-DR+, -1.6 vs. 1.3 (P = 0.02)] and senescent [CD4+CD28-CD57+, -0.3 vs. 0.26 (P = 0.04); CD8+CD28-CD57+, -6.1 vs. 3.8 (P = 0.002)] T lymphocytes. In addition, the median CD4/CD8 ratio increased by 0.35 in patients in the raltegravir group vs. 0.03 in the other arms (P = 0.002). Differences between groups in monocyte subpopulations or soluble inflammation markers were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Losartan had no effect on lymphoid fibrosis or immune activation/inflammation. Conversely, switching to a regimen with raltegravir significantly decreased activated and senescent T-lymphocyte subpopulations and increased CD4/CD8 ratio in successfully treated PLWH.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Fibrosis; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Losartan; Lymphoid Tissue; Raltegravir Potassium; Viral Load
PubMed: 34288357
DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13114 -
Annals of Clinical and Translational... Oct 2021Human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) is a chronic, progressive myelopathy. A high proviral load (PVL)... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
OBJECTIVE
Human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) is a chronic, progressive myelopathy. A high proviral load (PVL) is one of the main risk factors for HAM/TSP. Recently, it was shown that raltegravir could inhibit cell-free and cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1 in vitro. Given the substantial clinical experience in human immunodeficiency virus infection and its excellent safety profile, this agent may be an attractive therapeutic option for HAM/TSP patients.
METHODS
Sixteen subjects with HAM/TSP received raltegravir 400 mg orally twice daily in an initial 6-month treatment phase, followed by a 9-month post-treatment phase. HTLV-1 PVLs were assessed using droplet digital PCR from the PBMCs every 3 months, and from the CSF at baseline, month 6, and month 15. We also evaluated the ability of raltegravir to regulate abnormal immune responses in HAM/TSP patients.
RESULTS
While a downward trend was observed in PBMC and/or CSF PVLs of some patients, raltegravir overall did not have any impact on the PVL in this HAM/TSP patient cohort. Clinically, all patients' neurological scores and objective measurements remained relatively stable, with some expected variability. Immunologic studies showed alterations in the immune profiles of a subset of patients including decreased CD4 CD25 T cells and spontaneous lymphoproliferation.
INTERPRETATION
Raltegravir was generally well tolerated in this HAM/TSP patient cohort. A subset of patients exhibited a mild decrease in PVL as well as variations in their immune profiles after taking raltegravir. These findings suggest that raltegravir may be a therapeutic option in select HAM/TSP patients.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT01867320.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Integrase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Paraparesis, Tropical Spastic; Pilot Projects; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34562313
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51437 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Jul 2021To characterize their potential use in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) we compared the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir and lamivudine in genital tissue against ex vivo... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
To characterize their potential use in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) we compared the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir and lamivudine in genital tissue against ex vivo tissue infection with HIV-1.
METHODS
Open-label trial of 36 HIV-negative females and males randomized to 7 days raltegravir 400 mg twice daily and 7 days raltegravir 400 mg+lamivudine 150 mg twice daily (after washout), or vice versa. Blood, saliva, rectal fluid, rectal tissue, vaginal fluid and vaginal tissue were sampled at baseline and on and off PrEP during a total of 12 days, for pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity via ex vivo HIV-1BaL challenge. Ex vivo infectivity was compared with baseline. The trial has been registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with the identifier NCT03205566.
RESULTS
Steady state for both drugs was reached by day 4. Dosing with raltegravir alone provided modest ex vivo HIV protection with higher drug levels in rectal tissue and vaginal tissue than in plasma on and off PrEP. Off PrEP, plasma and vaginal concentrations declined rapidly, while persisting in the rectum. On PrEP, the highest lamivudine concentrations were in the rectum, followed by vaginal tissue then plasma. Lamivudine washout was rapid in plasma, while persisting in the rectum and vagina. Raltegravir/lamivudine increased ex vivo protection on and off PrEP compared with raltegravir alone, reaching maximum protection at day 2 in rectal tissue and at day 8 in vaginal tissue.
CONCLUSIONS
Raltegravir 400 mg+lamivudine 150 mg showed high levels of ex vivo HIV protection, associated with high drug concentrations persisting after discontinuation in vaginal and rectal compartments, supporting further investigation of these agents for PrEP.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 33993302
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab136