-
Life Sciences Nov 2022To assess the potential direct effects of the integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INsTIs) dolutegravir, bictegravir, and raltegravir, drugs used as treatment for...
AIMS
To assess the potential direct effects of the integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INsTIs) dolutegravir, bictegravir, and raltegravir, drugs used as treatment for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH), on human adipose cells.
MAIN METHODS
Drugs were added to the differentiation medium of human Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS) adipose cells and morphological adipogenesis was monitored for 10 days. Also, adipocytes were exposed to drugs following differentiation (day 14). The gene expression levels of selected adipogenesis markers, adipocyte metabolism markers, adipokines, and cytokines were determined by quantitative-reverse transcription polymerase-chain reaction. The release of adiponectin and leptin into the culture medium was measured using specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and release of interleukin-6 and chemokine (CC motif) ligand-2 using Multiplex assays.
KEY FINDINGS
Overall morphological adipogenesis was unaltered by INsTIs. The expression of adipogenesis marker genes (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-Ɣ and lipoprotein lipase) was slightly reduced in dolutegravir-treated differentiating adipocytes. Bictegravir repressed gene expression and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in differentiating adipocytes. Dolutegravir and raltegravir increased interleukin-6 gene expression, but only dolutegravir increased interleukin-6 release. Dolutegravir repressed adiponectin expression and release in differentiating adipocytes and had a similar but milder effect on leptin. Drug treatment of mature adipocytes reduced adiponectin gene expression in response to dolutegravir.
SIGNIFICANCE
The INsTIs studied do not have a significant effect on human adipose cell differentiation but exert distinct effects on gene expression and secretion of adipokines and cytokines. These findings will help understand and manage the effects of INsTI-containing treatments on body weight and metabolic dysregulation in PLWH.
Topics: Adipocytes; Adipokines; Adiponectin; Amides; Cytokines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inflammation; Integrases; Interleukin-6; Leptin; Ligands; Lipoprotein Lipase; Oxazines; Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 36096241
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120948 -
Viruses Nov 2022Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) are currently used as the most effective therapy in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections.... (Review)
Review
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) are currently used as the most effective therapy in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Raltegravir (RAL) and Elvitegravir (EVG), the first generation of INSTIs used successfully in clinical treatment, are susceptible to the emergence of viral resistance and have a high rate of cross-resistance. To counteract these resistant mutants, second-generation INSTI drugs have been developed: Dolutegravir (DTG), Cabotegravir (CAB), and Bictegravir (BIC). However, HIV is also able to develop resistance mechanisms against the second-generation of INSTIs. This review describes the mode of action of INSTIs and then summarizes and evaluates some typical resistance mutations, such as substitution and insertion mutations. The role of unintegrated viral DNA is also discussed as a new pathway involved in conferring resistance to INSTIs. This allows us to have a more detailed understanding of HIV resistance to these inhibitors, which may contribute to the development of new INSTIs in the future.
Topics: Humans; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Raltegravir Potassium; HIV Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Mutation; Integrases; HIV Integrase; Drug Resistance, Viral
PubMed: 36560595
DOI: 10.3390/v14122591 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Sep 2022Data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in pregnancy as... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in pregnancy as compared with other ART regimens commonly used in the United States and Europe, particularly when initiated before conception, are limited.
METHODS
We conducted a study involving pregnancies in persons with HIV-1 infection in the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study whose initial ART in pregnancy included dolutegravir, atazanavir-ritonavir, darunavir-ritonavir, oral rilpivirine, raltegravir, or elvitegravir-cobicistat. Viral suppression at delivery and the risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, and being small for gestational age were compared between each non-dolutegravir-based ART regimen and dolutegravir-based ART. Supplementary analyses that included participants in the Swiss Mother and Child HIV Cohort Study were conducted to improve the precision of our results.
RESULTS
Of the pregnancies in the study, 120 were in participants who received dolutegravir, 464 in those who received atazanavir-ritonavir, 185 in those who received darunavir-ritonavir, 243 in those who received rilpivirine, 86 in those who received raltegravir, and 159 in those who received elvitegravir-cobicistat. The median age at conception was 29 years; 51% of the pregnancies were in participants who started ART before conception. Viral suppression was present at delivery in 96.7% of the pregnancies in participants who received dolutegravir; corresponding percentages were 84.0% for atazanavir-ritonavir, 89.2% for raltegravir, and 89.8% for elvitegravir-cobicistat (adjusted risk differences vs. dolutegravir, -13.0 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -17.0 to -6.1], -17.0 percentage points [95% CI, -27.0 to -2.4], and -7.0 percentage points [95% CI, -13.3 to -0.0], respectively). The observed risks of preterm birth were 13.6 to 17.6%. Adjusted risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, or being small for gestational age did not differ substantially between non-dolutegravir-based ART and dolutegravir. Results of supplementary analyses were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
Atazanavir-ritonavir and raltegravir were associated with less frequent viral suppression at delivery than dolutegravir. No clear differences in adverse birth outcomes were observed with dolutegravir-based ART as compared with non-dolutegravir-based ART, although samples were small. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others.).
Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cobicistat; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Pyridones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Rilpivirine; Ritonavir; United States
PubMed: 36053505
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200600 -
Journal of the International AIDS... Nov 2022Globally about 1.7 million children were living with HIV in 2020. Two integrase strand transfer inhibitors, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are increasingly used in... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Globally about 1.7 million children were living with HIV in 2020. Two integrase strand transfer inhibitors, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are increasingly used in children. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir and raltegravir in children and adolescents living with HIV, aged 0-19 years.
METHODS
Sources included MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, abstracts from key conferences and reference list searching. Observational studies and clinical trials published January 2009-March 2021 were eligible. Outcomes included efficacy/effectiveness (CD4 counts and viral load) and/or safety outcomes (mortality, grade 3/4 adverse events and treatment discontinuation) through 6 months or more post-treatment initiation. Risk of bias was assessed using previously published tools appropriate for the study design. Narrative syntheses were conducted.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In total, 3626 abstracts and 371 papers were screened. Eleven studies, including 2330 children/adolescents, reported data on dolutegravir: one randomized controlled trial (RCT; low risk of bias), one single-arm trial (unclear risk of bias) and nine cohort studies (three low risk of bias, two unclear risk and four high risk). Ten studies, including 649 children/adolescents receiving raltegravir, were identified: one RCT (low risk of bias), one single-arm trial (low risk of bias) and eight cohort studies (four low risk of bias, three unclear risk and one high risk). Viral suppression levels in children/adolescents at 12 months were high (>70%) in most studies assessing dolutegravir (mostly second- or subsequent-line, or mixed treatment lines), and varied from 42% (5/12) to 83% (44/53) at 12 months in studies assessing raltegravir (mostly second- or subsequent-line). Across all studies assessing dolutegravir or raltegravir, grade 3/4 adverse events (clinical and/or laboratory) were reported in 0-50% of subjects, few resulted in discontinuation, few were drug related and no deaths were attributed to either drug.
CONCLUSIONS
These reassuring findings suggest that dolutegravir and raltegravir are effective and safe as preferred regimens in children and adolescents living with HIV. With the rollout of dolutegravir in paediatric populations already underway, it is critical that data are collected on safety and effectiveness in infants, children and adolescents, including on longer-term outcomes, such as weight and metabolic changes.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Raltegravir Potassium; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
PubMed: 36377082
DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25970 -
Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS Sep 2012The purpose of this study is to review recent and relevant pharmacology data for three HIV integrase inhibitors: raltegravir (marketed), dolutegravir, and elvitegravir... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The purpose of this study is to review recent and relevant pharmacology data for three HIV integrase inhibitors: raltegravir (marketed), dolutegravir, and elvitegravir (both in phase III drug development).
RECENT FINDINGS
Data from January 2011 to April 2012 were evaluated. These data better characterized integrase inhibitor pharmacokinetics, assessed dosing regimens, and investigated previously undescribed drug-drug interactions. Due to formulation challenges, raltegravir inter-patient and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability is high. Twice-daily 400 mg dosing has been shown to be clinically superior to 800 mg once-daily dosing. A pediatric formulation of raltegravir with less variable pharmacokinetics and greater bioavailability was US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)-approved in December 2011. Cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir, and the second-generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir, have lower pharmacokinetic variability and are dosed once daily. Dolutegravir drug interactions are similar to raltegravir, whereas boosted elvitegravir participates in additional CYP3A-mediated interactions.
SUMMARY
Raltegravir's potent antiretroviral activity has resulted in widespread use in both treatment-naïve and experienced patients. Dolutegravir and cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir have some pharmacokinetic advantages. Pharmacokinetic data in special populations (pregnancy, pediatrics) to optimize dosing are still required.
Topics: HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; United States
PubMed: 22789987
DOI: 10.1097/COH.0b013e328356e91c -
European Journal of Medical Research Nov 2009To review all currently published drug-drug interaction studies with the HIV-integrase inhibitor raltegravir. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review all currently published drug-drug interaction studies with the HIV-integrase inhibitor raltegravir.
METHODS
A PubMed search was conducted for all published reports up to August 1, 2009 as well as a review of updated European and US Prescriber's Information (EMEA and FDA) and abstracts from recent international scientific meetings.
RESULTS
A total of 14 drug-drug interaction studies were found. Due to the relatively broad therapeutic range of raltegravir almost all co-administered agents can safely be combined with raltegravir, with the exception of rifampin in which a doubling of the raltegravir dose to 800 mg BD is currently recommended.
CONCLUSIONS
Raltegravir is not without drug-drug interactions but due to the lack of an effect on CYP450 or UGT by raltegravir and the broad therapeutic range of raltegravir itself, this agent can safely combined with almost all tested agents.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antiviral Agents; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Omeprazole; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Rifampin
PubMed: 19959412
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-s3-17 -
European Journal of Medical Research Nov 2009Raltegravir is the first integrase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV infection based on the superior efficacy it showed compared to optimized backbone therapy... (Review)
Review
Raltegravir is the first integrase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV infection based on the superior efficacy it showed compared to optimized backbone therapy alone in patients harboring multidrug resistant viruses. Studies on naive patients showed comparable efficacy of raltegravir and efavirenz and just recently the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved raltegravir for the use in naive patients based on the favorable results of the international double-blind phase III STARTMRK trial. Additional interesting findings were the faster, and not yet explained, decay of HIV-1 RNA and the higher CD4+ cells increase in the raltegravir group as compared to the efavirenz group. Raltegravir is generally well tolerated and adverse events were generally similar in raltegravir and comparator arms throughout all studies. When compared to efavirenz, patients on raltegravir showed less incidence of central nervous system-related adverse events. In studies on experienced patients higher incidence of cancers was found in the raltegravir arm: a relationship with the drug was, however not confirmed in a recent review considering all raltegravir studies. Raltegravir also showed a safe lipid profile especially in naive patients, finding that renders the drug attractive for patients with other cardiovascular risk factors. All this characteristics in association with its specific mechanism of action, make raltegravir an interesting drug for naive patients and a large use in this type of patients is predictable. Only time and experience, however, will tell us whether raltegravir will maintain its promises in the long run.
Topics: HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; RNA, Viral; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 19959413
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-s3-22 -
AIDS (London, England) Aug 2017To compare the frequency and risk factors of toxicity-related treatment discontinuations between raltegravir and dolutegravir.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the frequency and risk factors of toxicity-related treatment discontinuations between raltegravir and dolutegravir.
DESIGN
Prospective cohort study.
METHODS
All antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and ART-experienced HIV-infected individuals from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study who initiated raltegravir or dolutegravir between 2006 and 2015 were investigated concerning treatment modification within the first year.
RESULTS
Of 4041 patients initiating ART containing raltegravir (n = 2091) or dolutegravir (n = 1950), 568 patients discontinued ART during the first year, corresponding to a rate of 15.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.5-16.9] discontinuations per 100 patient-years. Only 10 patients on raltegravir (0.5%) and two patients on dolutegravir (0.1%) demonstrated virologic failure. The main reason for ART discontinuation was convenience expressed as patient's wish, physician's decision, or treatment simplification (n = 302). Toxicity occurred in 4.3% of patients treated with raltegravir and 3.6% with dolutegravir, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the only independent risk factor for discontinuing ART because of toxicity was female sex (hazard ratio 1.98, 95% CI 1.45-2.71, P < 0.001).Neuropsychiatric complaints were the most commonly reported toxic adverse events and more frequent in the dolutegravir (n = 33, 1.7%) compared with the raltegravir group (n = 13, 0.6%). Risk of discontinuation for neurotoxicity was lower for raltegravir than for dolutegravir in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.037).
CONCLUSION
In this, large cohort raltegravir and dolutegravir-containing regimen demonstrated a high virologic efficacy. Drug toxicity was infrequent and discontinuation because of neuropsychiatric events within the first year of treatment was only marginal higher with dolutegravir compared with raltegravir. However, monitoring of neurotoxic side-effects of dolutegravir is important.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium; Switzerland; Withholding Treatment; Young Adult
PubMed: 28692533
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001590 -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Mar 2017Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV, with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%. Such patients are increasingly... (Review)
Review
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV, with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%. Such patients are increasingly affected by diseases associated with ageing, including cardiovascular disease and CKD, and the prevalence of risk factors such as smoking and dyslipidaemia is increased in this population. Proteinuria is also now recognized as a common finding in individuals living with HIV. While combination antiretroviral (ARV) treatments reduce CKD in the HIV-infected population overall, some ARV drugs have been shown to be nephrotoxic and associated with worsening renal function. Over the last few years, several highly efficacious new ARV agents have been introduced. This brief review will look at the novel agents dolutegravir, raltegravir, elvitegravir, cobicistat, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and atazanavir, all of which have been licensed relatively recently, and describe issues relevant to renal function, creatinine handling and potential nephrotoxicity. Given the prevalence of CKD, the wide range of possible interactions between HIV, ARV therapy, CKD and its treatments, nephrologists need to be aware of these newer agents and their possible effect on kidneys.
Topics: Adenine; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cobicistat; Creatinine; Disease Progression; HIV Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Proteinuria; Pyridones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Tenofovir
PubMed: 27190354
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw064 -
Journal of the International AIDS... Jul 2020As integrase inhibitors become available in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they offer the potential to expand extremely limited treatment options available to...
INTRODUCTION
As integrase inhibitors become available in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they offer the potential to expand extremely limited treatment options available to children and adolescents. In LMICs, only small numbers have used raltegravir, primarily as part of third-line regimens. Using data from the IeDEA global consortium, we aimed to describe the characteristics of children on raltegravir-containing regimens and their outcomes.
METHODS
We included data from 1994 to 2017 from children (age <18 years), from East and Southern Africa, Asia and South America, who received cART regimens containing raltegravir for ≥90 days. We describe their characteristics at raltegravir start, and their immunological and virological outcomes.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In total, 62 children were included, with median age at raltegravir initiation of 14.3 years (IQR 11.2 to 15.8) and median CD4 count of 276 cells/µL (IQR 68 to 494). Among 40 (65%) with drug resistance testing prior to raltegravir, 71% were resistant to at least one protease inhibitor (PI), and 32% had high-level resistance to at least one drug class. Most (n = 50; 81%) received raltegravir as part of third-line cART following PI-based regimens, and were on regimens containing four or more drugs (n = 47, 76%). By database closure, median duration on raltegravir was 2.0 years (IQR 0.8 to 3.0), 1 (1.6%) patient had died, 6 (9.7%) were lost to follow-up and 21 (34%) had discontinued raltegravir. Among 15 patients reporting reasons for stopping raltegravir, six discontinued because it was no longer available. Within one year of starting raltegravir, among 53 patients with VL measures, 40 (75%) had VL < 1000 copies/mL, and among 54 with a reported CD4 count, 45 (83%) and 36 (67%) were ≥350 and ≥500 cells/µL, respectively, with median CD4 count increasing to 517.5 cells/µL (IQR 288 to 810).
CONCLUSIONS
Among children in LMICs, the initial use of raltegravir has been primarily for post PI-based cART. We found good virological and immunological outcomes despite frequent prior triple-class failure and high levels of drug resistance. Both access to raltegravir and long-term adherence to regimens with large pill-burdens remain challenging. Policies which promote earlier access to new drugs and simplify daily regimens for children and adolescents in LMICs are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Africa, Southern; Asia; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Poverty; Raltegravir Potassium; South America; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load
PubMed: 32722897
DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25580