-
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Aug 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis directly compares joint replacement (JR) and trapeziectomy techniques to provide an update as to which surgical intervention is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis directly compares joint replacement (JR) and trapeziectomy techniques to provide an update as to which surgical intervention is superior for first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) joint osteoarthritis.
METHODS
In August 2020, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that compared these two techniques for the treatment of CMC-1 joint osteoarthritis (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020189728). Primary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH (QDASH) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Secondary outcomes, such as total complication, dislocation and revision surgery rates, were also measured.
RESULTS
From 1909 studies identified, 14 studies (1005 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis found that post-operative QDASH scores were lower for patients in the JR group (five studies, p = 0.0004). Similarly, significantly better postoperative key pinch strength in favour of JR was noted (three studies, p = 0.001). However, pain (VAS) scores were similar between the two groups (five studies, p = 0.21). Moreover, JR techniques had significantly greater odds of overall complications (12 studies; OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.13-3.96, p = 0.02) and significantly greater odds of revision surgery (9 studies; OR 5.14; 95% CI 2.06-12.81, p = 0.0004).
CONCLUSION
Overall, based on very low- to moderate-quality evidence, JR treatments may result in better function with less disability with comparable pain (VAS) scores; however, JR has greater odds of complications and greater odds of requiring revision surgery. More robust RCTs that compare JR and TRAP with standardised outcome measures and long-term follow-up would add to the overall quality of evidence.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement; Carpometacarpal Joints; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Thumb; Trapezium Bone
PubMed: 34244850
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03070-5 -
Clinical Rheumatology Nov 2014Hand exercises are often part of the treatment of hand rheumatoid arthritis; however, it is still unclear whether and what type of exercises is effective in the... (Review)
Review
Hand exercises are often part of the treatment of hand rheumatoid arthritis; however, it is still unclear whether and what type of exercises is effective in the treatment of this condition. Therefore, a systematic review into the effectiveness of hand exercises in the treatment of hand rheumatoid arthritis has been performed. Studies were identified in the literature databases by predefined search criteria. The eight included studies are peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2014. Hand exercises differed between studies, but always included resistance and/or active range of motion exercises. Grip strength in various grip types (power grip, key pinch, precision pinch and tripod pinch) was found to improve by hand exercise therapy without having adverse effects on pain or disease activity. Adaptations in the range of motion in response to hand exercise therapy were less pronounced. There appears to be some transfer from the improvements on the body functioning level to the level of daily functioning, with the largest improvements found on grip ability. With regard to the intervention content, there was some evidence in favour of a longer therapy duration and a higher therapy intensity. No conclusions could be drawn on the effectiveness of the different types of exercises. Collectively, the studies indicate that hand exercises may have positive effects on strength and some aspects of daily functioning without aggravating disease activity or pain, although caution should be taken for subjects in the exacerbation period.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Exercise Therapy; Hand; Hand Strength; Humans; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24952308
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-014-2691-2 -
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine :... Jul 2013Rupture of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is a frequent injury of the hand. When untreated, this injury may lead to decreased pinch strength, pain, instability, and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
OBJECTIVES
Rupture of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is a frequent injury of the hand. When untreated, this injury may lead to decreased pinch strength, pain, instability, and osteoarthritis. There is currently no consensus on treatment of acute or chronic UCL injuries. Our primary purpose was to compare nonoperative treatment with surgical repair and surgical reconstruction of thumb UCL injuries. A secondary purpose was to compare graft choice and surgical technique for reconstruction.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical outcome studies after nonoperative or operative treatment of thumb UCL injuries, with a minimum of 2 years mean follow-up, were included. Pain, range of motion, key-pinch strength, and stability testing were used as outcome measures.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen articles were included and analyzed (293 thumbs). All but 2 were level IV evidence. Mean Quality Appraisal Tool score was 13.1 (55% overall rating study methodological quality). Thirty-two thumbs were treated nonoperatively and 261 operatively. Mean subject age was 33.9 years. There were 200 acute injuries and 93 chronic injuries. Mean study follow-up was 42.8 months. Nonoperative treatment often failed, necessitating surgery. Acute UCL repair and autograft UCL reconstruction for chronic injury led to excellent clinical outcomes, without a significant difference between the 2 groups. After significant delay to treatment or even failed nonoperative treatment, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved, without a difference between initially treating the injury surgically. Complications after surgery were rare.
CONCLUSIONS
This review has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of both acute and chronic UCL injury, without any significant difference between repair and reconstruction for acute and chronic injury, respectively.
Topics: Arthroplasty; Autografts; Collateral Ligaments; Hand Injuries; Humans
PubMed: 23615487
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318289c6ff -
ARP Rheumatology Jul 2022Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling condition. Current treatments do not have a significant impact on symptom relief or disease...
PURPOSE
Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling condition. Current treatments do not have a significant impact on symptom relief or disease progression and the benefit of visco-supplementation remains uncertain. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injection in rhizarthrosis.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature addressing the efficacy of HA on pain reduction, functional capacity or pinch strength in patients with rhizarthrosis was performed. Pain at rest, functional capacity and pinch strength were assessed at baseline, 4th, 12th and 24th weeks Results: Sixteen trials were included with a total of 587 patients treated with HA injections (9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 5 single-arm studies and 2 non-randomized comparative trials). Despite important heterogeneity among trials, HA injections lead to a reduction in pain at rest (decrease of 0.65-3.5 points and 0.8-4.03 points on Visual Analogue Score after 4th and 24th weeks respectively, compared to baseline). Regarding disability, as assessed by functional scales, all studies reported improvement on functionality. An increase in pinch strength of 0.1-1.4 kg and 0.4-2kg was also reported at 4th and 24th weeks respectively.
CONCLUSION
HA injections can be a valid therapeutic option inducing remission of pain with improvement of functionality and strength in patients suffering from TMC joint AO.
PubMed: 36056925
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Hand Therapy : Official... 2023Paraffin bath therapy is noninvasive and is widely used in various hand diseases. Paraffin bath therapy is easy to use, has fewer side effects, and can be applied to...
BACKGROUND
Paraffin bath therapy is noninvasive and is widely used in various hand diseases. Paraffin bath therapy is easy to use, has fewer side effects, and can be applied to various diseases with different etiologies. However, there are few large-scale studies of paraffin bath therapy, and there is insufficient evidence of its efficacy.
PURPOSE
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of paraffin bath therapy for pain relief and functional improvement in various hand diseases through a meta-analysis.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
METHODS
We searched for studies using PubMed and Embase. Eligible studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) patients with any diseases of the hand; (2) comparison between paraffin bath therapy and no paraffin bath therapy; and (3) sufficient data on changes in the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, pulp-to-pulp pinch strength, or Austrian Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand index before and after paraffin bath therapy. Forest plots were drawn to visualize the overall effect. Jadad scale score, I statistics, and subgroup analyses were used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS
A total of five studies included 153 patients who were treated and 142 who were not treated with paraffin bath therapy. The VAS were measured in all 295 patients included in the study, while the AUSCAN index was measured in the 105 patients with osteoarthritis. Paraffin bath therapy significantly reduced the VAS scores (mean difference [MD], -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.93 to -0.60). In osteoarthritis, paraffin bath therapy significantly improved grip and pinch strength (MD -2.53; 95% CI 0.71-4.34; MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.83) and reduced the VAS and AUSCAN scores (MD -2.61; 95% CI -3.07 to -2.14; MD -5.02; 95% CI -8.95 to -1.09).
DISCUSSION
Paraffin bath therapy significantly reduced the VAS and AUSCAN scores, and improved grip and pinch strength in patients with various hand diseases.
CONCLUSIONS
Paraffin bath therapy is effective for alleviating pain and improving function in hand diseases, thereby improving quality of life. However, owing to the small number of patients included in the study and its heterogeneity, a further large-scale, well-structured study is needed.
PubMed: 36914488
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.10.005 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jan 2013Arthritis at the proximal interphalangeal joint can be a disabling chronic condition. Silicone arthroplasty is a common surgical treatment option to provide pain relief... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Arthritis at the proximal interphalangeal joint can be a disabling chronic condition. Silicone arthroplasty is a common surgical treatment option to provide pain relief and maintain joint mobility. Pyrocarbon implants are gaining popularity as an alternative to silicone prostheses. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the outcomes of silicone and pyrocarbon arthroplasties for patients with proximal interphalangeal joint arthritis.
METHODS
A computerized search was conducted to identify studies evaluating outcomes of silicone and pyrocarbon arthroplasties. The data extracted were patient demographics, pain relief, range of motion, grip and pinch strength, costs, quality of life, and complications.
RESULTS
Thirty-five relevant citations were identified. Available data showed that both arthroplasties offered satisfactory pain relief. The implants also provided similar postoperative weighted mean arcs of motion, with a value of 37.4 ± 13.6 degrees for silicone and 44.8 ± 16.8 degrees for pyrocarbon. There were comparable results in grip and pinch strengths as well. No studies were identified that performed an economic analysis of arthroplasty. Six studies assessed quality-of-life outcomes after pyrocarbon surgery, and results were mixed. The rates of revision and salvage procedures performed secondary to complications were higher after pyrocarbon arthroplasty.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available low level of evidence, pyrocarbon arthroplasty does not demonstrate clear superiority over silicone implants. In fact, there is concern about the complication rates of these implants. Future studies should focus on more rigorous study designs using validated quality-of-life scales and economic evaluations before widespread adoption of this new implant.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, IV.
Topics: Arthritis; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger; Biocompatible Materials; Carbon; Finger Joint; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Silicones; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23271522
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729f27 -
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Mar 2018Surgical and conservative methods have been reported by various studies for high rates of fracture union and subsequent regain of function among patients with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Surgical versus Conservative Treatments for Acute Undisplaced or Minimally-Displaced Scaphoid Fractures.
BACKGROUND
Surgical and conservative methods have been reported by various studies for high rates of fracture union and subsequent regain of function among patients with undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures. Hence, this study aims to analyze the best available evidence to comprehend the relative benefits and risks of these therapeutic options.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature from different databases and search engines was performed with strict eligibility criteria to obtain the highest quality of evidence. All randomized controlled trials delineating the outcomes of surgical versus conservative treatments for acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures were included and then evaluated using scoring tools: Cochrane risk of bias tool and PEDro scale. Data were pooled using random-effects models with standard mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous variables.
RESULTS
The search yielded 339 potentially related articles, further trimmed down to eight studies based on the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that surgical treatment resulted in significantly better functional outcomes than conservative treatment. Furthermore, surgery resulted in the prevention of delayed union of fractures and reduction of time needed to return to work.
CONCLUSIONS
While four studies reported advantages of surgical treatment, evidence was insufficient to provide a definitive conclusion that surgery is a better option. Due to the significant limitations with respect to certain variables, the superiority of one method to the other could not be established.
Topics: Conservative Treatment; Fracture Healing; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Pinch Strength; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function; Return to Work; Scaphoid Bone; Time Factors
PubMed: 29564049
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.1.64 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery... Apr 2022Unconstrained pyrocarbon and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to silicone implants...
Unconstrained pyrocarbon and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to silicone implants and arthrodesis. This systematic review appraises their outcomes. Thirty studies comprising 1,324 joints (813 pyrocarbon, 511 MoP) were included. Mean patient age was 59 years (38-78) and mean follow-up period was 54 months (12-118). There were mean improvements of 4.5 points (2-6.9) in pain visual analogue score, 10.5° (-26 to 58) in range of motion (ROM), 3.1 kg (-4 to 7) in grip strength, 0.6 kg (-1.5 to 2) in pinch strength and 18 points (-3 to 29) in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score, with no significant differences between implant types. ROM gains deteriorated over time. Clinical complications were frequent (23%) and significantly more common with pyrocarbon, as were radiographic complications. However, most were mild-moderate and did not necessarily correlate with negative outcomes or dissatisfaction. Overall re-operation rate was 21%, and revision rate 11%, both more frequent with pyrocarbon. Most revisions were within 24 months, beyond which survival was maintained up to 10 years. Unconstrained PIP joint arthroplasty is effective in improving pain scores, active ROM, grip/pinch strength and patient-reported outcome measures, particularly in patients with osteoarthritis. Results are generally maintained at least to the medium term, although gains diminish in the longer term. Complication and early revision rates are high, particularly with pyrocarbon implants. Most patients express positive attitudes to arthroplasty, with significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures for both pyrocarbon and MoP implants. Patients with post-traumatic and inflammatory arthropathy are generally less satisfied. There is currently insufficient data to recommend one implant type over another, although the early-to-medium term results of MoP implants are promising. Prospective surveillance via small joint registries is recommended. Level III (Therapeutic).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger; Finger Joint; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35404211
DOI: 10.1142/S2424835522500266 -
JPRAS Open Mar 2024In thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) instability, laxity of the ligaments surrounding the joint leads to pain and weakness in grip and pinch strength, which predisposes the... (Review)
Review
In thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) instability, laxity of the ligaments surrounding the joint leads to pain and weakness in grip and pinch strength, which predisposes the patient to developing CMC joint arthritis. Recent advancements in joint anatomy and kinematics have led to the development of various surgical reconstructive procedures. This systematic review outlines the available ligament reconstruction techniques and their efficacy in treating nontraumatic and nonarthritic CMC instability. Additionally, we aimed to provide evidence which specific ligament reconstruction technique demonstrates the best results. Four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central) were searched for studies that reported on surgical techniques and their clinical outcomes in patients with nontraumatic and nonarthritic CMC instability. Twelve studies were analyzed for qualitative review, including nine different surgical ligament reconstruction techniques involving two hundred and thirty thumbs. All but one of the reported techniques improved postoperative pain scores and showed substantial improvement in pinch and grip strength. Complication rates varied between 0% and 25%. The included studies showed that ligament reconstruction effectively alleviated the patients' complaints regarding pain and instability, resulting in overall high patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, drawing definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of any ligament reconstruction technique remains challenging owing to the limited availability of homogeneous data in the current literature.
PubMed: 38323100
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.01.001 -
Industrial Health 2015The purpose was to systematically review the published reports for the clinical utility of quantitative objective tests commonly used for diagnosing musculoskeletal... (Review)
Review
The purpose was to systematically review the published reports for the clinical utility of quantitative objective tests commonly used for diagnosing musculoskeletal disorders in hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Two reviewers independently conducted a computerized literature search in PubMed and Scopus using predefined criteria, and relevant papers were identified. The articles were screened in several stages and considered for final inclusion. Quality of the selected papers was evaluated by a modified QUADAS tool. Relevant data were extracted as necessary. For this review, only 4 relevant studies could be identified for detailed examination. Grip strength, pinch strength, and Purdue pegboard tests were commonly used with their reported sensitivity and specificity ranging between 1.7 to 65.7% and 65.2 to 100%, 1.7 to 40% and 94 to 100%, and 44.8 to 85% and 78 to 95%, respectively. A considerable difference across the studies was observed with respect to patient and control populations, diagnostic performance and cut-off values of different tests. Overall, currently available English-language limited literature do not provide enough evidence in favour of the application of grip strength and pinch strength tests for diagnosing musculoskeletal injuries in HAVS; Purdue pegboard test seems to have some diagnostic value in evaluating impaired dexterity in HAVS.
Topics: Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Hand Strength; Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome; Humans; Motor Skills; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Pinch Strength; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 26051288
DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0221