-
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology :... Aug 2023Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are frequently used advanced cardiac imaging to diagnose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of cardiac sarcoidosis: Meta-analysis and systematic review.
AIM
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are frequently used advanced cardiac imaging to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare diagnostic parameters of FDG-PET and CMR in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from their inception to 9/30/2021 with search terms "cardiac sarcoidosis" AND "cardiac magnetic resonance imaging" AND "positronemission tomography". We extracted patient characteristics, results of the FDG-PET and CMR, and adverse outcomes from the included studies. Adverse outcomes served as a reference standard for the evaluation of FDG-PET and CMR.
RESULTS
We included 4 studies in the meta-analysis which provided adverse outcomes and all patients underwent FDG-PET and CMR. There were 237 patients, 60.3% male, and ages ranged from 50-53 years. There were 45 events in 237 patients from four studies included in the meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval-CI) and specificity (CI) of CMR in predicting an adverse event were 0.94 (0.79-0.98) and 0.49 (0.40-0.59), respectively. The pooled sensitivity (CI) and specificity (CI) of FDG-PET in predicting an adverse event were 0.51 (0.26-0.75) and 0.60 (0.35-0.81), respectively.
CONCLUSION
CMR was more sensitive but less specific than FDG-PET in predicting adverse events; however, the study population and definition of a positive test need to be considered while interpreting the results.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Cardiomyopathies; Positron-Emission Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Myocarditis; Sarcoidosis; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 36443587
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03129-8 -
International Braz J Urol : Official... 2022To explore the feasibility of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosing primary prostate cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Performance of 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of primary prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To explore the feasibility of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosing primary prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published before July 2020. The studies that used 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting primary prostate cancer, and pathological biopsy as the reference standard were included. The selecting process used preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The quality of enrolled studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
RESULTS
According to our search strategy, 9 studies were included for analysis. A total of 547 patients with primary prostate cancer and 443 lesion segments that underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were included and their pathological biopsies were compared. The results of these studies showed some differences. For instance, the lowest sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosing primary prostate cancer was 67%, while the highest sensitivity recorded was 97%.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with conventional imaging examinations, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting primary prostate cancer. At present, most of the studies that used 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer are retrospective studies. Based on its advantage of high detection rate, the use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the detection of primary prostate cancer is worthy of promotion.
Topics: Edetic Acid; Gallium Isotopes; Gallium Radioisotopes; Humans; Ligands; Male; Oligopeptides; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34003611
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0986 -
Acta Neuropathologica Communications Nov 2022Neuropathology and neuroimaging studies have identified several subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD): hippocampal sparing AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. An... (Review)
Review
Neuropathology and neuroimaging studies have identified several subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD): hippocampal sparing AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. An unresolved question is whether hippocampal sparing AD cases can present with neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) in association cortices while completely sparing the hippocampus. To address that question, we conducted a systematic review and performed original analyses on tau positron emission tomography (PET) data. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases until October 2022. We also implemented several methods for AD subtyping on tau PET to identify hippocampal sparing AD cases. Our findings show that seven out of the eight reviewed neuropathologic studies included cases at Braak stages IV or higher and therefore, could not identify hippocampal sparing cases with NFT completely sparing the hippocampus. In contrast, tau PET did identify AD participants with tracer retention in the association cortex while completely sparing the hippocampus. We conclude that tau PET can identify hippocampal sparing AD cases with NFT completely sparing the hippocampus. Based on the accumulating data, we suggest two possible pathways of tau spread: (1) a canonical pathway with early involvement of transentorhinal cortex and subsequent involvement of limbic regions and association cortices, and (2) a less common pathway that affects association cortices with limbic involvement observed at end stages of the disease or not at all.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Neurofibrillary Tangles; Positron-Emission Tomography; Hippocampus; Neuropathology; tau Proteins
PubMed: 36376963
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-022-01471-z -
European Urology Oncology Jun 2021Management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is guided in part by accurate clinical staging. The role of imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and... (Review)
Review
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
CONTEXT
Management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is guided in part by accurate clinical staging. The role of imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), in initial staging remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the studies of MRI and/or PET/CT in the staging of newly diagnosed PCa with respect to tumor (T), nodal (N), and metastatic (M) staging (TNM staging).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and Web of Science databases between 2012 and 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 139 studies (83 on T, 47 on N, and 24 on M status) were included. Ninety-nine (71%) were retrospective, 39 (28%) were prospective, and one was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Most studies on T staging examined MRI, while PET/CT was used primarily for N and M staging. Sensitivity for the detection of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node invasion ranged widely. When imaging was incorporated into existing risk tools, gain in accuracy was observed in some studies, although these findings have not been replicated. For M staging, most favorable results were reported for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, which demonstrated significantly better performance than conventional imaging.
CONCLUSIONS
A variety of studies on modern imaging techniques for TNM staging in newly diagnosed PCa exist. For T and N staging, reported sensitivity of imaging modalities such as MRI or PET/CT varied widely due to data heterogeneity, small sample size, and low event rates resulting in large confidence intervals and a high level of uncertainty. Therefore, uniformity in data presentation and standardization on this topic are needed. The most promising technique for M staging, which was evaluated recently in an RCT, is PSMA-PET/CT.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We performed a systematic review of currently available imaging modalities to stage newly diagnosed prostate cancer. With respect to local tumor and lymph node assessment, performance of imaging ranged widely. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed favorable results for the detection of distant metastases.
Topics: Humans; Lymph Nodes; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neoplasm Staging; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33272865
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.002 -
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology :... Feb 2020Recent progress in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) has enabled the targeted imaging of cardiac amyloidosis with accuracy. We performed a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recent progress in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) has enabled the targeted imaging of cardiac amyloidosis with accuracy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of cardiac amyloidosis using amyloid PET.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using key words: cardiac amyloidosis, amyloid, and PET. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Furthermore, the semiquantitative parameters of PET were evaluated to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis and discern its type [systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) vs transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR)] using the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD).
RESULTS
In total, six eligible studies with a total of 98 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.95, the specificity was 0.98, positive LR was 10.130, negative LR was 0.1, and DOR was 148.83. The semiquantitative parameters of amyloid PET showed significantly higher values for cardiac amyloidosis patients than those for controls (pooled SMD = 1.42; P < .001), and in AL than ATTR (pooled SMD = 0.96; P < .001).
CONCLUSION
Amyloid PET imaging can be a useful method for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis. The semiquantitative parameters of amyloid PET can help diagnose cardiac amyloidosis and discern its type.
Topics: Amyloid; Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial; Heart Diseases; Humans; Positron-Emission Tomography; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 30022405
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-1365-x -
Cancer Medicine Aug 2023Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
BACKGROUND
Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics-based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogeneity and assist clinicians with diagnosis, prognosis and management of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of published modelling information to evaluate the usefulness of PET radiomics in the prediction and prognosis of HNSCC patients.
METHODS
We searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from 2010 to 2021 and considered 31 studies with pre-defined inclusion criteria. We followed the CHARMS checklist for data extraction and performed quality assessment using the PROBAST tool. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of the prediction and prognostic models using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and average C-statistic, respectively.
RESULTS
Manual segmentation method followed by 40% of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV ) thresholding is a commonly used approach. The area under the receiver operating curves of externally validated prediction models ranged between 0.60-0.87, 0.65-0.86 and 0.62-0.75 for overall survival, distant metastasis and recurrence, respectively. Most studies highlighted an overall high risk of bias (outcome definition, statistical methodologies and external validation of models) and high unclear concern in terms of applicability. The meta-analysis showed the estimated pooled DOR of 6.75 (95% CI: 4.45, 10.23) for prediction models and the C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.74) for prognostic models.
CONCLUSIONS
Both prediction and prognostic models using clinical variables and PET radiomics demonstrated reliable accuracy for detecting adverse outcomes in HNSCC, suggesting the prospect of PET radiomics in clinical settings for diagnosis, prognosis and management of HNSCC patients. Future studies of prediction and prognostic models should emphasise the quality of reporting, external model validation, generalisability to real clinical scenarios and enhanced reproducibility of results.
Topics: Humans; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results; Positron-Emission Tomography; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
PubMed: 37353996
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6278 -
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology :... Dec 2023Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (Ce-CMR) and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are frequently utilized in clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of myocardial viability: meta-analysis and systematic review.
AIM
Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (Ce-CMR) and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are frequently utilized in clinical practice to assess myocardial viability. However, studies evaluating direct comparison between Ce-CMR and FDG-PET have a smaller sample size, and no clear distinction between the two imaging modalities has been defined. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing Ce-CMR and FDG-PET for the assessment of myocardial viability.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 4/20/2022 with search terms "viability" AND "heart diseases" AND "cardiac magnetic resonance imaging" AND "positron-emission tomography." We extracted patient characteristics, segment level viability assessment according to Ce-CMR and FDG-PET, and change in regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) at follow-up.
RESULTS
We included four studies in the meta-analysis which provided viability assessment with Ce-CMR and FDG-PET in all patients and change in RWMA at follow-up. There were 82 patients among the four included studies, and 585 segments were compared for viability assessment. There were 59 (72%) males, and mean age was 65 years. The sensitivity (95% confidence interval-CI) and specificity (CI) of Ce-CMR for predicting myocardial recovery were 0.88 (0.66-0.96) and 0.64 (0.49-0.77), respectively. The sensitivity (CI) and specificity (CI) of FDG-PET for predicting myocardial recovery were 0.91 (0.63-0.99) and 0.67 (0.49-0.81), respectively.
CONCLUSION
FDG-PET and Ce-CMR have comparable diagnostic parameters in myocardial viability assessment and are consistent with prior research.
Topics: Male; Humans; Aged; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Positron-Emission Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Heart; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 37758962
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-023-03377-2 -
Surgical Oncology Mar 2014The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma.
METHODS
A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET.
RESULTS
The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07-97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04-94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58-17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03-0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66-418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.
Topics: Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Melanoma; Neoplasm Staging; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prognosis; Radiopharmaceuticals; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 24556310
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002 -
Journal of Korean Medical Science Nov 2021We conducted a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 fluoroestradiol (F-18 FES) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) assessing estrogen... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
We conducted a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 fluoroestradiol (F-18 FES) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) assessing estrogen receptor expression of patients who have recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS
Two investigators and seven related experts (from the departments of nuclear medicine, hematological oncology, surgery, and evidence-based medicine) evaluated the effectiveness of F-18 FES PET/CT according to diagnostic accuracy and correlation with immunohistochemistry tests via systematic literature review, and safety according to test-related side effects. The present study was conducted in accordance with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines (SIGN), and the Cochrane, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines. The SIGN tools were used for quality assessment.
RESULTS
Of the 512 articles retrieved in the literature search, 8 were deemed to be eligible for inclusion. Results of the evaluation indicated that the F-18 FES PET/CT test was safe because patients who reported pain in the injection site in the analyzed articles are most likely to be caused by mechanical injury from needle injection not by administration of radioactive materials. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy based on data from seven studies revealed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 and 0.85, respectively.
CONCLUSION
As such, the test was evaluated to be a safe and effective and, considering the anatomical site where only invasive tests are possible, the test was deemed to have high clinical utility.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Estradiol; Female; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 34725978
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e271 -
Pharmacological Reviews Oct 2022Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation tool currently used as a treatment in multiple psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Despite its... (Review)
Review
Changing Cerebral Blood Flow, Glucose Metabolism, and Dopamine Binding Through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Positron Emission Tomography Literature.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation tool currently used as a treatment in multiple psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Despite its widespread use, we have an incomplete understanding of the way in which acute and chronic sessions of TMS affect various neural and vascular systems. This systematic review summarizes the state of our knowledge regarding the effects TMS may be having on cerebral blood flow, glucose metabolism, and neurotransmitter release. Forty-five studies were identified. Several key themes emerged: 1) TMS transiently increases cerebral blood flow in the area under the coil; 2) TMS to the prefrontal cortex increases glucose metabolism in the anterior cingulate cortex of patients with depression; and 3) TMS to the motor cortex and prefrontal cortex decreases dopamine receptor availability in the ipsilateral putamen and caudate respectively. There is, however, a paucity of literature regarding the effects TMS may have on other neurotransmitter and neuropeptide systems of interest, all of which may shed vital light on existing biologic mechanisms and future therapeutic development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation tool currently used as a treatment in multiple psychiatric and neurologic disorders. This systematic review summarizes the state of our knowledge regarding the effects TMS on cerebral blood flow, glucose metabolism, and neurotransmitter release.
Topics: Humans; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Dopamine; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Positron-Emission Tomography; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Glucose
PubMed: 36779330
DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.122.000579