-
European Urology Oncology Jun 2021Management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is guided in part by accurate clinical staging. The role of imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and... (Review)
Review
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
CONTEXT
Management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is guided in part by accurate clinical staging. The role of imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), in initial staging remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the studies of MRI and/or PET/CT in the staging of newly diagnosed PCa with respect to tumor (T), nodal (N), and metastatic (M) staging (TNM staging).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and Web of Science databases between 2012 and 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 139 studies (83 on T, 47 on N, and 24 on M status) were included. Ninety-nine (71%) were retrospective, 39 (28%) were prospective, and one was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Most studies on T staging examined MRI, while PET/CT was used primarily for N and M staging. Sensitivity for the detection of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node invasion ranged widely. When imaging was incorporated into existing risk tools, gain in accuracy was observed in some studies, although these findings have not been replicated. For M staging, most favorable results were reported for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, which demonstrated significantly better performance than conventional imaging.
CONCLUSIONS
A variety of studies on modern imaging techniques for TNM staging in newly diagnosed PCa exist. For T and N staging, reported sensitivity of imaging modalities such as MRI or PET/CT varied widely due to data heterogeneity, small sample size, and low event rates resulting in large confidence intervals and a high level of uncertainty. Therefore, uniformity in data presentation and standardization on this topic are needed. The most promising technique for M staging, which was evaluated recently in an RCT, is PSMA-PET/CT.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We performed a systematic review of currently available imaging modalities to stage newly diagnosed prostate cancer. With respect to local tumor and lymph node assessment, performance of imaging ranged widely. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed favorable results for the detection of distant metastases.
Topics: Humans; Lymph Nodes; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neoplasm Staging; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33272865
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.002 -
European Urology Jan 2016The process of care for patients with prostate cancer is subject to different degrees of uncertainty. Patients and clinicians could, therefore, greatly benefit from... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
The process of care for patients with prostate cancer is subject to different degrees of uncertainty. Patients and clinicians could, therefore, greatly benefit from improved prognostic instruments. One emerging tool is the cell cycle progression (CCP) score.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review assesses evidence on the value of the CCP instrument in prostate cancer treatment by reviewing current publications and integrating the results via a meta-analysis.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a review of Medline and Embase in April 2014, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Unpublished studies were retrieved from the 2013-2014 proceedings of major conferences in the field. Sixteen publications were selected for inclusion.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The results show that use of the CCP score is better than existing assessments at elucidating the aggressive potential of prostate cancer in an individual. The pooled hazard ratio for biochemical recurrence per 1-unit increase in the CCP score was 1.88 in a univariate model and 1.63 in a multivariate model. Four studies showed that CCP testing can impact the decisions of physicians regarding treatment, and potentially lead to a decrease in surgical interventions for low-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS
This review offers a comprehensive overview of existing evidence on CCP testing, and provides clinicians, patients, and policy makers with a strong summary measure of its prognostic validity and clinical utility. It will be important to develop economic studies to measure the impact of such technology on health care systems.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this paper, we review current evidence related to the cell cycle progression (CCP) score for patients with prostate cancer. We found good evidence suggesting that use of the CCP score improves prognosis, and can be a valuable tool for clinicians in treating patients. The economic benefits are yet to be studied.
Topics: Cell Cycle; Genes, cdc; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; RNA, Messenger
PubMed: 25481455
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.038 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2016Cryosurgery (CS) has been used on patients with clinically localized PCa for more than 10 years. However, clinical studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cryosurgery (CS) has been used on patients with clinically localized PCa for more than 10 years. However, clinical studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety have reported conflicting results. This systematic assessment was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of CS compared with those of radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP), respectively. All controlled trials comparing CS with RT or RP and single-arm studies reporting results of CS therapy were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Ten publications from seven trials, with totally 1252 patients, were included in the meta-analysis, which revealed no significant differences in comparisons of CS vs RT and CS vs RP for overall survival and disease specific survival. However, a significantly lower disease-free survival could be observed for CS than RP. Moreover, a systematic review of literature focusing on comparative data of databases and materials of single-arm trials revealed satisfactory survival results in both primary and salvage CS. Our results showed that cryosurgery would be a relatively effective method for clinically localized prostate cancer with survival results comparable to radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. However, the large percentage of complications caused by cryosurgery should be carefully monitored.
Topics: Cryosurgery; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27271239
DOI: 10.1038/srep27490 -
Histopathology Sep 2023Cribriform architecture has been recognised as an independent parameter for prostate cancer outcome. Little is yet known on the added value of individual Gleason 5... (Review)
Review
Cribriform architecture has been recognised as an independent parameter for prostate cancer outcome. Little is yet known on the added value of individual Gleason 5 growth patterns. Comedonecrosis is assigned Gleason pattern 5 and can occur in both invasive and intraductal carcinoma. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature for the prognostic value of comedonecrosis in prostate cancer. A systematic literature search of Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Google scholar was performed according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA)guidelines. After identification and screening of all relevant studies published up to July 2022, 12 manuscripts were included. Clinicopathological data were extracted and the presence of comedonecrosis in either invasive, intraductal or ductal carcinoma was associated with at least one clinical outcome measure. No meta-analysis was performed. Eight of 11 studies showed that comedonecrosis was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence and two studies with metastasis or death. The only studies using metastasis-free and disease specific-free survival as an endpoint both found comedonecrosis to be an independent prognostic parameter in multivariate analysis. The studies were all retrospective and demonstrated considerable heterogeneity with regard to clinical specimen, tumour type, grade group, correction for confounding factors and endpoints. This systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for comedonecrosis to be associated with adverse prostate cancer outcome. Study heterogeneity and lack of correction for confounding factors prohibit drawing of definitive conclusions.
Topics: Male; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Neoplasm Grading; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 37195595
DOI: 10.1111/his.14945 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Aug 2017Markers for prostate cancer (PCa) have progressed over recent years. In particular, the prostate health index (PHI) and the 4-kallikrein (4K) panel have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Health Index and 4-Kallikrein Panel Score in Predicting Overall and High-grade Prostate Cancer.
Markers for prostate cancer (PCa) have progressed over recent years. In particular, the prostate health index (PHI) and the 4-kallikrein (4K) panel have been demonstrated to improve the diagnosis of PCa. We aimed to review the diagnostic accuracy of PHI and the 4K panel for PCa detection. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Academic One File databases until July 2016. We included diagnostic accuracy studies that used PHI or 4K panel for the diagnosis of PCa or high-grade PCa. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Twenty-eight studies including 16,762 patients have been included for the analysis. The pooled data showed a sensitivity of 0.89 and 0.74 for PHI and 4K panel, respectively, for PCa detection and a pooled specificity of 0.34 and 0.60 for PHI and 4K panel, respectively. The derived area under the curve (AUC) from the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) showed an accuracy of 0.76 and 0.72 for PHI and 4K panel respectively. For high-grade PCa detection, the pooled sensitivity was 0.93 and 0.87 for PHI and 4K panel, respectively, whereas the pooled specificity was 0.34 and 0.61 for PHI and 4K panel, respectively. The derived AUC from the HSROC showed an accuracy of 0.82 and 0.81 for PHI and 4K panel, respectively. Both PHI and the 4K panel provided good diagnostic accuracy in detecting overall and high-grade PCa.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Humans; Kallikreins; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 28111174
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.022 -
World Journal of Urology Mar 2022To perform a systematic review and a retrospective cohort analysis evaluating the rates of surgical downgrading of prostate cancer (PCa) from biopsy (PBx) to radical...
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and a retrospective cohort analysis evaluating the rates of surgical downgrading of prostate cancer (PCa) from biopsy (PBx) to radical prostatectomy (RP), and their association with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in a multiethnic population.
METHODS
A systematic review of PubMed and other databases was performed. We included retrospective studies evaluating the relationship between surgical downgrading and BCR-free survival. Data regarding Gleason score (GL) downgrading were abstracted from the articles and categorized as follows: GL8-10 to GL7, GL7 to GL6, and GL 7(4 + 3) to GL7(3 + 4). We also performed a retrospective cohort review of patients who underwent RP at our institution from 2005 through 2020. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare BCR among downgraded versus non-downgraded men.
RESULTS
Systematic review yielded 137 abstracts; of these, 36 full-texts were reviewed, 8 of which were included in our systematic review. Despite substantial variability, all showed that GL at RP is one of the most important factors of BCR-free survival. A total of 1,484 men with PCa were analyzed from our institution. On multivariate analysis, GL7 to GL6 downgrading (HR = 0.50, p = 0.022) and GL8-10 to GL7 downgrading (HR = 0.42, p = 0.011) were associated with reduced risk of BCR when compared to men with GL7 and GL8-10 concordance, respectively. However, GL7(4 + 3) to GL7(3 + 4) downgrading was not significantly associated with reduced BCR (HR = 0.56, p = 0.12), when compared to GL7(4 + 3) concordance, although HR was similar.
CONCLUSION
Surgical downgrading at RP was associated with a reduced risk of BCR compared to GL concordant disease, and these findings have been validated within our multiethnic population. Pathologic downgrading at the time of RP may be a more useful predictor of subsequent BCR in comparison to that associated with GL concordant pathology.
Topics: Humans; Male; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prostate; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34850269
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03892-2 -
European Urology Oncology Jun 2024Active surveillance (AS) is a standard of care for patients with low-risk and selected intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Nevertheless, there is a lack of summary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Active surveillance (AS) is a standard of care for patients with low-risk and selected intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Nevertheless, there is a lack of summary evidence on how to impact disease trajectory during AS.
OBJECTIVE
To assess which interventions prevent PCa progression effectively during AS.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We queried PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies examining the impact of interventions aimed at slowing disease progression during AS. The primary endpoint was PCa progression, the definition of which must have included pathological upgrading. The secondary endpoint included treatment toxicities.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We identified 22 studies, six randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies, which analyzed the association between different interventions and PCa progression during AS. The interventions considered in the studies included 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), statins, diet, exercise, chlormadinone, fexapotide triflutate (FT), enzalutamide, coffee, vitamin D3, and PROSTVAC. We found that administration of 5-ARIs was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.72), with no increased toxicity signals. Therapies such as vitamin D3, chlormadinone, FT, and enzalutamide have shown some efficacy. However, these anticancer drugs have been associated with treatment-related adverse events in up to 88% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of 5-ARIs in PCa patients on AS is associated with longer PFS. However, for the other interventions, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions based on the weak available evidence.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Patients with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance (AS) who are treated with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have a lower risk of disease progression, with minimal adverse events. Other interventions require more studies to determine their efficacy and safety profile in men on AS.
Topics: Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Watchful Waiting; 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors
PubMed: 38277189
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.010 -
European Urology Jul 2016Radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography has changed the management of prostate cancer patients. However, new emerging radiopharmaceutical agents, like... (Review)
Review
New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
CONTEXT
Radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography has changed the management of prostate cancer patients. However, new emerging radiopharmaceutical agents, like radiolabelled prostate specific membrane antigen, and new promising hybrid imaging will begin new challenges in the diagnostic field.
OBJECTIVE
The continuous evolution in nuclear medicine has led to the improvement in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa), particularly distant metastases. New horizons have been opened for radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage therapy or for the assessment of systemic therapies. In addition, new tracers and imaging tools have been recently tested, providing important information for the management of PCa patients. Herein we discuss: (1) the available evidence in literature on radiolabelled choline PET and their recent indications, (2) the role of alternative radiopharmaceutical agents, and (3) the advantages of a recent hybrid imaging device (PET/magnetic resonance imaging) in PCa.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Data from recently published (2010-2015), original articles concerning the role of choline PET/CT, new emerging radiotracers, and a new imaging device are analysed. This review is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
In the restaging phase, the detection rate of choline PET varies between 4% and 97%, mainly depending on the site of recurrence and prostate-specific antigen levels. Both 68gallium (68Ga)-prostate specific membrane antigen and 18F-fluciclovine are shown to be more accurate in the detection of recurrent disease as compared with radiolabelled choline PET/CT. Particularly, Ga68-PSMA has a detection rate of 50% and 68%, respectively for prostate-specific antigen levels < 0.5ng/ml and 0.5-2ng/ml. Moreover, 68Ga- PSMA PET/magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a particularly higher accuracy in detecting PCa than PET/CT. New tracers, such as radiolabelled bombesin or urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, are promising, but few data in clinical practice are available today.
CONCLUSIONS
Some limitations emerge from the published papers, both for radiolabelled choline PET/CT and also for new radiopharmaceutical agents. Efforts are still needed to enhance the impact of published data in the world of oncology, in particular when new radiopharmaceuticals are introduced into the clinical arena.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In the present review, the authors summarise the last evidences in clinical practice for the assessment of prostate cancer, by using nuclear medicine modalities, like positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Topics: Antigens, Surface; Carbon Radioisotopes; Carboxylic Acids; Choline; Cyclobutanes; Gallium Radioisotopes; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neoplasm Staging; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiopharmaceuticals; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Salvage Therapy
PubMed: 26850970
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.029 -
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Jun 2023The clinical behavior of prostate cancer is highly heterogeneous, with most patients diagnosed with localized disease that successfully responds to surgery or... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The clinical behavior of prostate cancer is highly heterogeneous, with most patients diagnosed with localized disease that successfully responds to surgery or radiotherapy. However, a fraction of men relapse after initial treatment because they develop drug resistance. The failure of anticancer drugs leaves resistant cancer cells to survive and proliferate, negatively affecting patient survival. Thus, drug resistance remains a significant obstacle to the effective treatment of prostate cancer patients. In this scenario, the involvement of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in intrinsic and acquired resistance have been reported in several tumors, and accumulating data suggests that their differential content can be used as diagnostic or prognostic factors. Thus, we propose a systematic study of literature to provide a snapshot of the current scenario regarding EVs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers resource in resistant prostate cancer.
METHODS
We performed the current systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines and comprehensively explored PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases to achieve the article search.
RESULTS
Thirty-three studies were included and investigated. Among all systematically reviewed EV biomarkers, we found mainly molecules with prognostic significance (61%), molecules with diagnostic relevance (18%), and molecules that serve both purposes (21%). Moreover, among all analyzed molecules isolated from EVs, proteins, mRNAs, and miRNAs emerged to be the most investigated and proposed as potential tools to diagnose or predict resistance/sensitivity to advanced PCa treatments.
DISCUSSION
Our analysis provides a snapshot of the current scenario regarding EVs as potential clinical biomarkers in resistant PCa. Nevertheless, despite many efforts, the use of EV biomarkers in PCa is currently at an early stage: none of the selected EV biomarkers goes beyond preclinical studies, and their translatability is yet far from clinical settings.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Extracellular Vesicles; Drug Resistance
PubMed: 35264776
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00521-w -
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Feb 2022The SelectMDx test is a promising biomarker that is developed based on detecting urinary messenger RNA in combination with clinical prostate cancer (PCa) risk factors.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The SelectMDx test is a promising biomarker that is developed based on detecting urinary messenger RNA in combination with clinical prostate cancer (PCa) risk factors. We aimed to compare SelectMDx and mpMRI as a diagnostic test in detecting PCa and high grade(HG)-PCa in men suspected to have PCa.
METHODS
According to PRISMA, a systematic search was performed using major web databases for studies published before September 30, 2021. Studies that compared sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of SelectMDx and/or mpMRI were included. The bivariate random model that plotted sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and likelihood ratio (LR) for PCa and HG-PCa detection was applied to compare SelectMDx, mpMRI, and combination strategies (both positive and one or both positive).
RESULTS
Seven studies comprising 1328 patients who had undergone SelectMDx and mpMRI to detect PCa were included. Regarding PCa detection, SelectMDx had a pooled sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 69.8%, PPV of 64.7%, NPV of 85%, and LRs of +2.68 to -0.27, while mpMRI had a pooled sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 73.4%, PPV of 72.4%, NPV of 83.5%, and LRs of +3.03 to -0.26. The one or both positive strategy had the highest sensitivity (96.3%), NPV (95.7%), and the lowest -LR (0.06). While the both positive strategy had the highest specificity (80.9%), the PPV (76.5%) and +LR (3.68). In the scenario of PI-RADS 3 lesions not being biopsied in case of a negative SelectMDx (n = 44), unnecessary biopsies would be reduced by 42% (44/105) while the risk of missing HG-PCa would be 9% (4/44).
CONCLUSION
The performance of SelectMDx is comparable to that of mpMRI with regards to PCa and HG-PCa detection. In addition, this biomarker could help refine the clinical decision-making regarding the necessity of a biopsy in patients suspected to has been PCa.
Topics: Biomarkers; Biopsy; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35414118
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00538-1