-
Urologia Internationalis 2014There has been a large body of research on obesity and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) that has been published recently. However, the epidemiological evidence for such... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There has been a large body of research on obesity and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) that has been published recently. However, the epidemiological evidence for such an association has not been consistent. This may be attributed to the nature of case-control and retrospective studies, which generally are more prone to biases. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of prospective cohort studies to assess the association between obesity and the risk of PCa incidence and death.
METHODS
A search of the PubMed database and references of published studies (from inception until March 2013) was conducted. Twenty-three eligible studies were identified and included in the systematic review.
RESULTS
The evidence from the prospective cohort studies linking obesity with PCa incidence has not been consistent. However, cumulative data is compelling for a strong positive association between obesity and fatal PCa.
CONCLUSIONS
Obesity is a significant diet-related risk factor for fatal PCa. Further well-constructed, large cohort studies on the potential association between obesity and PCa, as well as on underlying mechanisms, are needed.
Topics: Humans; Incidence; Male; Obesity; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 23942223
DOI: 10.1159/000351325 -
World Journal of Urology Oct 2021The value of Histoscanning™ (HS) in prostate cancer (PCa) imaging is much debated, although it has been used in clinical practice for more than 10 years now. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
The value of Histoscanning™ (HS) in prostate cancer (PCa) imaging is much debated, although it has been used in clinical practice for more than 10 years now.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the data on HS from various PCa diagnostic perspectives to determine its potential.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a systematic search using 2 databases (Medline and Scopus) on the query "Histoscan*". The primary endpoint was HS accuracy. The secondary endpoints were: correlation of lesion volume by HS and histology, ability of HS to predict extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion.
RESULTS
HS improved cancer detection rate "per core", OR = 16.37 (95% CI 13.2; 20.3), p < 0.0001, I = 98% and "per patient", OR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.51; 2.21), p < 0.0001, I = 95%. The pooled accuracy was markedly low: sensitivity - 0.2 (95% CI 0.19-0.21), specificity - 0.12 (0.11-0.13), AUC 0.12. 8 of 10 studiers showed no additional value for HS. The pooled accuracy with histology after RP was relatively better, yet still very low: sensitivity - 0.56 (95% CI 0.5-0.63), specificity - 0.23 (0.18-0.28), AUC 0.4. 9 of 12 studies did not show any benefit of HS.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis does not see the incremental value in comparing prostate Histoscanning with conventional TRUS in prostate cancer screening and targeted biopsy. HS proved to be slightly more accurate in predicting extracapsular extension on RP, but the available data does not allow us to draw any conclusions on its effectiveness in practice. Histoscanning is a modification of ultrasound for prostate cancer visualization. The available data suggest its low accuracy in screening and detecting of prostate cancer.
Topics: Biopsy, Large-Core Needle; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Odds Ratio; Prostatic Neoplasms; Seminal Vesicles; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tumor Burden; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 33825986
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03684-8 -
European Urology Apr 2016Exercise could be beneficial for prostate cancer survivors. However, no systematic review across cancer stages and treatment types addressing potential benefits and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Exercise could be beneficial for prostate cancer survivors. However, no systematic review across cancer stages and treatment types addressing potential benefits and harms exists to date.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effects of exercise on cancer-specific quality of life and adverse events in prostate cancer trials.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro. We also searched grey literature databases, including trial registers. Searches were from database inception to March 2015. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for meta-analysis.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We included 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1574 men with prostate cancer. Follow-up varied from 8 wk to 12 mo. RCTs involved men with stage I-IV cancers. A high risk of bias was frequently due to problematic intervention adherence. Seven trials involving 912 men measured cancer-specific quality of life. Pooling of the data from these seven trials revealed no significant effect on this outcome (SMD 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08 to 0.34, median follow-up 12 wk). Sensitivity analysis of studies that were judged to be of high quality indicated a moderate positive effect estimate (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.08-0.58; median follow-up 12 wk). Similar beneficial effects were seen for cancer-specific fatigue, submaximal fitness, and lower body strength. We found no evidence of benefit for disease progression, cardiovascular health, or sexual function. There were no deaths attributable to exercise interventions. Other serious adverse events (eg, myocardial infarction) were equivalent to those seen in controls.
CONCLUSIONS
These results support the hypothesis that exercise interventions improve cancer-specific quality of life, cancer-specific fatigue, submaximal fitness, and lower body strength.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This review shows that exercise/physical activity interventions can improve quality of life, fatigue, fitness, and function for men with prostate cancer.
Topics: Chi-Square Distribution; Exercise Therapy; Fatigue; Health Status; Humans; Male; Muscle Strength; Neoplasm Staging; Odds Ratio; Physical Fitness; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26632144
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.047 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Nov 2018While a number of studies indicate tobacco smoking has a detrimental impact on survival and recurrence after a prostate cancer diagnosis, there has been no quantitative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
While a number of studies indicate tobacco smoking has a detrimental impact on survival and recurrence after a prostate cancer diagnosis, there has been no quantitative review of this literature and it is unclear whether tobacco smoking affects clinical populations differentially. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the associations between tobacco smoking and overall (OM) and prostate cancer-specific (PSM) mortality and recurrence after a prostate cancer diagnosis.
METHODS
EMBASE and ISI Web of Science were searched for English-language studies, published up to August 17, 2017, which conducted a survival analysis to estimate the association between tobacco smoking and OM, PSM and/or recurrence. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the summary hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations between tobacco smoking and the three outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results of the primary meta-analysis indicate current smokers have significantly poorer overall survival (Summary HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.69, 2.28), prostate cancer-specific survival (Summary HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.47, 2.20) and recurrence-free survival (Summary HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.28, 1.72) than never smokers. Similar results were found in population-based studies and in studies conducted in specific clinical populations.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that tobacco smoking at prostate cancer diagnosis is associated with a significantly increased risk of overall mortality, prostate-cancer specific mortality and recurrence. We recommend future studies collect more detailed information about tobacco smoking to further understanding of the association between tobacco smoking and PCa prognosis. In addition, further research should concentrate on the impact of smoking cessation post-diagnosis and post-treatment on prognosis, and the feasibility and effectiveness of smoking cessation programs.
Topics: Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Tobacco Smoking
PubMed: 30055462
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.07.001 -
Nutrition, Metabolism, and... Jul 2023Data on the association between nut consumption and prostate cancer risk are conflicting. Therefore, this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Data on the association between nut consumption and prostate cancer risk are conflicting. Therefore, this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis aimed to summarize available findings from observational studies on the associations of nut intake with risk of total, advanced, non-advanced, and fatal prostate cancers.
DATA SYNTHESIS
We searched the online databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science as well as Google Scholar using appropriate keywords to identify eligible articles up to September 2022. In total, 11 articles with a total sample size of 287,786 participants and 32,213 cases of prostate cancer were included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. By comparing the highest and lowest intake of total nuts, pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for total, advanced, non-advanced, and fatal prostate cancers were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85-1.04, P = 0.22), 1.10 (95% CI: 0.98-1.24, P = 0.12), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.85-1.11, P = 0.69), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.79-1.18, P = 0.73), respectively, which indicated non-significant inverse associations for total, non-advanced, and fatal prostate cancers and a non-significant positive association for advanced prostate cancer. In the dose-response analyses, we found no evidence of a linear or non-linear association between total nut intake and prostate cancer risk. Data on other types of nuts, including walnut, tree nuts, peanut, and peanut butter, were not sufficient for performing a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
We found no significant association between nut intake and risk of total, advanced, non-advanced, and fatal prostate cancer. Further studies are required to confirm our findings.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE
CRD42022347094.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
Not required.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Nuts; Diet; Juglans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37160404
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.04.004 -
JAMA Internal Medicine Sep 2017Despite 3 decades of study, there remains ongoing debate regarding whether vasectomy is associated with prostate cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Despite 3 decades of study, there remains ongoing debate regarding whether vasectomy is associated with prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if vasectomy is associated with prostate cancer.
DATA SOURCES
The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for studies indexed from database inception to March 21, 2017, without language restriction.
STUDY SELECTION
Cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies reporting relative effect estimates for the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two investigators performed study selection independently. Data were pooled separately by study design type using random-effects models. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was any diagnosis of prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes were high-grade, advanced, and fatal prostate cancer.
RESULTS
Fifty-three studies (16 cohort studies including 2 563 519 participants, 33 case-control studies including 44 536 participants, and 4 cross-sectional studies including 12 098 221 participants) were included. Of these, 7 cohort studies (44%), 26 case-control studies (79%), and all 4 cross-sectional studies were deemed to have a moderate to high risk of bias. Among studies deemed to have a low risk of bias, a weak association was found among cohort studies (7 studies; adjusted rate ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09; P < .001; I2 = 9%) and a similar but nonsignificant association was found among case-control studies (6 studies; adjusted odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.88-1.29; P = .54; I2 = 37%). Effect estimates were further from the null when studies with a moderate to high risk of bias were included. Associations between vasectomy and high-grade prostate cancer (6 studies; adjusted rate ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89-1.21; P = .67; I2 = 55%), advanced prostate cancer (6 studies; adjusted rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.98-1.20; P = .11; I2 = 18%), and fatal prostate cancer (5 studies; adjusted rate ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.14; P = .68; I2 = 26%) were not significant (all cohort studies). Based on these data, a 0.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.2%) absolute increase in lifetime risk of prostate cancer associated with vasectomy and a population-attributable fraction of 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.9%) were calculated.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This review found no association between vasectomy and high-grade, advanced-stage, or fatal prostate cancer. There was a weak association between vasectomy and any prostate cancer that was closer to the null with increasingly robust study design. This association is unlikely to be causal and should not preclude the use of vasectomy as a long-term contraceptive option.
Topics: Epidemiologic Studies; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Odds Ratio; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Sterilization Reversal; Vasectomy
PubMed: 28715534
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2791 -
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Jun 2024Prostate cancer (PCa), one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting men, significantly contributes to increased mortality rates worldwide. While the causative death... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Prostate cancer (PCa), one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting men, significantly contributes to increased mortality rates worldwide. While the causative death is due to advanced metastatic disease, this occurrence disproportionately impacts men of African descent compared to men of European descent. In this review, we describe potential mechanisms underlying PCa metastases disparities and current treatments for metastatic disease among these populations, differences in treatment outcomes, and survival rates, in hopes of highlighting a need to address disparities in PCa metastases.
METHODS
We reviewed existing literature using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using the following keywords: "prostate cancer metastases", "metastatic prostate cancer disparity", "metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment", "prostate cancer genetic differences and mechanisms", "genetic differences and prostate tumor microenvironment", and "men of African descent and access to clinical treatments". The inclusion criteria for literature usage were original research articles and review articles.
RESULTS
Studies indicate unique genetic signatures and molecular mechanisms such as Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), inflammation, and growth hormone signaling involved in metastatic PCa disparities. Clinical studies also demonstrate differences in treatment outcomes that are race-specific, for example, patients of African descent have a better response to enzalutamide and immunotherapy yet have less access to these drugs as compared to patients of European descent.
CONCLUSIONS
Growing evidence suggests a connection between a patient's genetic profile, the prostate tumor microenvironment, and social determinants of health that contribute to the aggressiveness of metastatic disease and treatment outcomes. With several potential pathways highlighted, the limitations in current diagnostic and therapeutic applications that target disparity in PCa metastases warrant rigorous research attention.
Topics: Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Tumor Microenvironment; Healthcare Disparities; Health Status Disparities; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
PubMed: 37046071
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00667-1 -
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine Sep 2023Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a highly expressed protein in prostate cancer (PCa) and has become an increasingly popular target for molecular imaging in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Histopathologically Validated Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT in the Primary and Secondary Staging of Prostate Cancer and the Impact of PSMA-PET/CT on Clinical Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a highly expressed protein in prostate cancer (PCa) and has become an increasingly popular target for molecular imaging in recent years. PSMA based positron-emission-tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well characterised hybrid imaging modality that combines the high sensitivity of PET with the high spatial resolution of CT imaging. The combination of these two imaging modalities provides an accurate tool for detecting and managing PCa. Several diagnostic accuracy and clinical management studies investigating the role of PSMA PET/CT in PCa have been published recently. This study aimed to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSMA PET/CT in localised, lymph node metastatic (LNM) and recurrent PCa patients and assess its impact on the clinical management of primary and recurrent PCa. Using Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy and clinical management of PSMA PET/CT were analysed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analyses were conducted using random-effects models, and meta-regression explored observed heterogeneity. Results indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA PET/CT for localised PCa were 71.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.0, 81.0) and 92.0% (95% CI: 86.0, 96.0), respectively (N = 10; n = 404 patients). Sensitivity and specificity in LNM were 57.0% (95% CI: 49.0, 64.0) and 96.0% (95% CI: 95.0, 97.0) (N = 36; n = 3,659 patients). For patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR), sensitivity was 84.0% (95% CI: 74.0, 90.0), and specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 88.0, 99.0) (N = 9; n = 818 patients). The pooled proportion of management changes in primary (N = 16; n = 1,099 patients) and recurrent (N = 40; n = 5,398 patients) PCa was 28.0% (95% CI: 23.0, 34.0) and 54.0% (95% CI: 50.0, 58.0), respectively. In conclusion, PSMA PET/CT shows moderate sensitivity and high specificity in localised and LNM disease, while the accuracy in BCR patients was high. PSMA PET/CT also had a large impact on the clinical management of PCa patients. This is the most extensive and first systematic review to include three subgroups of PCa with histologically verified diagnostic accuracy and clinical management change reported separately in primary and recurrent disease settings.
Topics: Male; Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Gallium Radioisotopes; Neoplasm Staging
PubMed: 37005145
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.02.006 -
Innovations in imaging modalities for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review.Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica = the... Aug 2018The last decade has witnessed tremendous changes in the management of advanced and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. In the current systematic review, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The last decade has witnessed tremendous changes in the management of advanced and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. In the current systematic review, we analyze novel imaging techniques in the setting of recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), exploring available data and highlighting future exams which could enter clinical practice in the upcoming years.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
The National Library of Medicine Database was searched for relevant articles published between January 2012 and August 2017. A wide search was performed including the combination of following words: "Prostate" AND "Cancer" AND ("Metastatic" OR "Recurrent") AND "imaging" AND ("MRI" OR "PET"). The selection procedure followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) principles and is presented using a PRISMA flow chart.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Novel imaging techniques, as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whole-body MRI and Choline and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging techniques are currently revolutioning the treatment planning in patients with advanced and metastatic PCa, allowing a better characterization of the disease. Multiparametric MRI performs well in the detection of local recurrences, with sensitivity rates of 67-98% and overall diagnostic accuracy of 83-93%, depending on the type of magnetic field strength (1.5 vs. 3T). Whole body MRI instead shows a high specificity (>95%) for bone metastases. PET imaging, and in particular PSMA PET/CT, showed promising results in the detection of both local and distant recurrences, even for low PSA values (<0.5 ng/mL). Sensitivity varies from 77-98% depending on PSA value and PSA velocity.
CONCLUSIONS
Whole body-MRI, NaF PET, Choline-PET/CT and PSMA PET/CT are flourishing techniques which find great application in the field of recurrent and metastatic PCa, in the effort to reduce treatment of "PSA only" and rather focus our therapies on clinical tumor entities. Standardization is urgently needed to allow adequate comparison of results and diffusion on a large scale.
Topics: Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Recurrence; Whole Body Imaging
PubMed: 29388415
DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03059-X -
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica = the... Oct 2020The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on the role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and/or prostate-targeted therapy (PTT) in the setting of...
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on the role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and/or prostate-targeted therapy (PTT) in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The following keywords were used: ("prostate cancer" OR "prostate carcinoma" OR "prostate neoplasm" OR "prostate tumor") AND ("oligometastatic" OR "oligometastasis" OR "PSMA") AND ("surgery" OR "prostatectomy" OR "radical prostatectomy" OR "cytoreductive" OR "local treatment" OR "radiotherapy" OR "stereotactic" OR "stereotaxic") AND ("survival" OR "mortality").
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
After evaluating the selection criteria, 81 studies were evaluated for our endpoints. We included 22 studies for PTT of synchronous mPCa. There have been no randomized studies on cytoreductive prostatectomy (cRP). Four prospective studies showed that cRP was feasible but did not contribute to a positive effect on overall survival (OS). Regarding PTT-radiotherapy, two randomized controlled phase 3 trials showed that OS was improved in men with a low metastatic burden. Regarding MDT of metachronous lymph node recurrence, we included 29 retrospective studies. For MDT of oligometastases, we included 30 studies. One randomized phase 2 trial showed that androgen deprivation therapy-free survival improved with stereotactic body radiation therapy compared to that with surveillance; however, benefits on OS remain unclear.
CONCLUSIONS
We performed a comprehensive overview of the current literature on MDT and PTT. The feasibility of MDT and PTT is supported by several retrospective studies. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of high-quality trials to prove its survival benefits. Results from ongoing prospective trials data are awaited.
Topics: Humans; Male; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 32550632
DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03779-0