-
The Journal of Hospital Infection Jun 2024The optimal duration of therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PSA-BSI) is unknown, with prolonged therapy frequently favored due to severity of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
The optimal duration of therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PSA-BSI) is unknown, with prolonged therapy frequently favored due to severity of infection, patient complexity, risk of multi-drug resistance, and high mortality. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with head-to-head comparison of short versus prolonged therapy for PSA-BSI. A comprehensive search including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was performed. We pooled risk ratios using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and performed subgroup analysis of outcomes including all-cause mortality, recurrent infection, and composite of these outcomes among patients receiving short versus prolonged therapy for PSA-BSI. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I-index. Risk of bias for cohort studies was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Of the 908 identified studies, six were included in the systematic review and five studies with head-to-head comparison of treatment duration were assessed in the meta-analysis, totalling 1746 patients. No significant difference in propensity score-weighted composite outcome (30-day all-cause mortality or recurrent infection) was noted between patients receiving short or prolonged therapy, with a pooled RR risk ratio of 0.80 (95% CI confidence interval 0.51-1.25, P=0.32; I = 0%). Additionally, duration of therapy did not impact individual outcomes of 30-day all-cause mortality or recurrent/persistent infection. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that short duration of antimicrobial therapy may have similar efficacy to prolonged treatment for PSA-BSI. Future randomized trials will be necessary to definitively determine optimal management of PSA bacteraemia.
Topics: Humans; Pseudomonas Infections; Bacteremia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Treatment Outcome; Duration of Therapy; Survival Analysis; Time Factors
PubMed: 38685414
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.04.007 -
Revista Espanola de Quimioterapia :... Aug 2021The aim of the study is to identify risk factors associated to infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant...
[A systematic review and expert's analysis of risk factors of infections in adults due to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii in Spain].
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study is to identify risk factors associated to infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in adult patients through a systematic literature review, classify them according to their importance and provide recommendations by experts in the Spanish context.
METHODS
We developed a systematic literature review to identify risk factors associated to CRPA or CRAB infections and they were evaluated and discussed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts.
RESULTS
There were included 29 studies for P. aeruginosa and 23 for A. baumannii out of 593 identified through systematic literature review. We identified 38 risk factors for P. aeruginosa and 36 for A. baumannii. After risk factor evaluation by the panel of experts, results for CRPA were: 11 important, 10 slightly important and 15 unimportant risk factors; and for CRAB were: 9 important, 5 slightly important and 19 unimportant risk factors. For both pathogens, previous use of antibiotics and hospitalization were important risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS
We could identify the main risk factors associated to CRPA and CRAB through literature review. There is a need for developing additional studies with higher levels of evidence to identify sooner and better infected patients through associated risk factors.
Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas Infections; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Risk Factors; Spain
PubMed: 33913312
DOI: 10.37201/req/034.2021 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... May 2023To present a systematic review and critical analysis of clinical studies for necrotising otitis externa (NOE), with the aim of informing best practice for diagnosis and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To present a systematic review and critical analysis of clinical studies for necrotising otitis externa (NOE), with the aim of informing best practice for diagnosis and management.
DESIGN
Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from database inception until 30 April 2021 for all clinical articles on NOE. The review was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020128957) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
Seventy articles, including 2274 patients were included in the final synthesis. Seventy-three percent were retrospective case series; the remainder were of low methodological quality. Case definitions varied widely. Median patient age was 69.2 years; 68% were male, 84% had diabetes and 10% had no reported immunosuppressive risk factor. Otalgia was almost universal (96%), with granulation (69%) and oedema (76%) the commonest signs reported. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in 62%, but a range of bacterial and fungal pathogens were reported and 14% grew no organism. Optimal imaging modality for diagnosis or follow-up was unclear. Median antimicrobial therapy duration was 7.2 weeks, with no definitive evidence for optimal regimens. Twenty-one percent had surgery with widely variable timing, indication, or procedure. One-year disease-specific mortality was 2%; treatment failure and relapse rates were 22% and 7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
There is a lack of robust, high-quality data to support best practice for diagnosis and management for this neglected condition. A minimum set of reporting requirements is proposed for future studies. A consensus case definition is urgently needed to facilitate high-quality research.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Female; Otitis Externa; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36759416
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14041 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 2013Our objective was to examine the evidence of in vitro synergy of polymyxin-carbapenem combination therapy against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). A systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Our objective was to examine the evidence of in vitro synergy of polymyxin-carbapenem combination therapy against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. All studies examining in vitro interactions of antibiotic combinations consisting of any carbapenem with colistin or polymyxin B against any GNB were used. A broad search was conducted with no language, date, or publication status restrictions. Synergy rates, defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration index of ≤0.5 or a >2-log reduction in CFU, were pooled separately for time-kill, checkerboard, and Etest methods in a mixed-effect meta-analysis of rates. We examined whether the synergy rate depended on the testing method, type of antibiotic, bacteria, and resistance to carbapenems. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown. Thirty-nine published studies and 15 conference proceeding were included, reporting on 246 different tests on 1,054 bacterial isolates. In time-kill studies, combination therapy showed synergy rates of 77% (95% CI, 64 to 87%) for Acinetobacter baumannii, 44% (95% CI, 30 to 59%) for Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 50% (95% CI, 30 to 69%) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with low antagonism rates for all. Doripenem showed high synergy rates for all three bacteria. For A. baumannii, meropenem was more synergistic than imipenem, whereas for P. aeruginosa the opposite was true. Checkerboard and Etest studies generally reported lower synergy rates than time-kill studies. The use of combination therapy led to less resistance development in vitro. The combination of a carbapenem with a polymyxin against GNB, especially A. baumannii, is supported in vitro by high synergy rates, with low antagonism and less resistance development. These findings should be examined in clinical studies.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Drug Synergism; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Polymyxins
PubMed: 23917322
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01230-13 -
Oman Medical Journal Mar 2023Eye infections can be caused by several microorganisms and the most common causative bacterial agents are staphylococci, streptococci, and This study aimed to estimate... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Eye infections can be caused by several microorganisms and the most common causative bacterial agents are staphylococci, streptococci, and This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of viridans group streptococci, and as the cause of ocular infections in Iran.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search on the studies published by Iranian authors from January 2000 to December 2020 in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Eligible studies were selected according to the defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Statistical heterogeneity between and within groups was estimated by the Q-statistic and I index. The funnel plots, Duval and Tweedie trim, and fill methods were obtained to evaluate the evidence of publication bias.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. According to the meta-analysis results, the prevalence of was 19.1% (95% CI: 12.5-28.1). It was estimated 6.9% (95% CI: 4.4-10.6), 6.7% (95% CI: 4.6-9.6), and 3.3% (95% CI: 1.8-5.8) for and viridans streptococci, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
. is the prevalent bacterial agents responsible for eye-associated infections in Iran.
PubMed: 37132006
DOI: 10.5001/omj.2023.22 -
Pharmacotherapy Jul 2022Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hospital- and ventilator-acquired... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hospital- and ventilator-acquired bacterial pneumonia and complicated urinary tract infections. However, there is potential for cefiderocol utility for a variety of other infections. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify literature examining the safety and efficacy of cefiderocol for off-label indications.
METHODS
The PRISMA guidelines were utilized for reporting. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, from inception to September 2021. Manuscripts describing cefiderocol off-label use in clinical settings were included. Exclusion criteria were studies focused on labeled indications, animal studies, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic studies, in vitro or laboratory studies, and manuscripts in languages other than English or Arabic. Each stage of review utilized two independent investigators, with conflicts resolved and critical appraisal performed. Data regarding presentation, clinical course, and infection characteristics were extracted and descriptively analyzed.
RESULTS
The search identified a total of 985 records, narrowed to a final set of 27 studies. Among studies included were 18 (66.7%) case reports, 8 (29.6%) case series, and 1 (3.7%) phase 3 clinical trial. Cefiderocol was most frequently used off-label for bacteremia/sepsis with or without an identified source in 51 (67.1%) out of a total of 76 included patients. Among case series/reports with available data, 43 of 53 patients (81.1%) received combination antibiotic therapy. The most common pathogens identified included multi/extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and/or Acinetobacter baumannii. Various clinical end points were reported, while microbiological end points were reported in 18 (66.7%) studies. Cefiderocol-related side effects were uncommon and rarely use-limiting.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review depicts relative clinical effectiveness of off-label cefiderocol, most commonly for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii infections as combination antibiotic therapy. Further study is needed to elucidate the safety and efficacy of cefiderocol across an expanded set of patients and indications.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Off-Label Use; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Urinary Tract Infections; Cefiderocol
PubMed: 35611627
DOI: 10.1002/phar.2704 -
Cureus Jun 2023There has been increased use of cefepime due to concerns about the nephrotoxic effects of the combined use of vancomycin and Zosyn. However, cefepime is associated with... (Review)
Review
There has been increased use of cefepime due to concerns about the nephrotoxic effects of the combined use of vancomycin and Zosyn. However, cefepime is associated with neurotoxicity. We conducted a systematic review using online data to explore the trend of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity over the last 10 years. Forty-six articles met our inclusion criteria, including 73 cases of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity. We noticed a steady increase in the reports of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity, from one case in 2013 to 11 cases in 2022. Individuals aged 65 and older accounted for most cefepime-induced neurotoxicity cases (52%). The top three indications for cefepime administration included bone and joint infections (25%), urinary tract infections (22.7%), and pneumonia (22.7%). Most patients with renal impairment have never had a renal adjustment of their cefepime dosage (either 2 g 12 hours a day or 2 g eight hours a day). Most cases of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity occurred between days two and five (n=29, 71%), while most resolution occurred between days one and five (n=29, 85%). While cefepime continues to be a popularly used and effective antibiotic against gram-negative bacteria like , its dosage needs to be adjusted in patients with renal impairment to avoid neurotoxicity.
PubMed: 37503476
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40980 -
Journal of Global Antimicrobial... Sep 2019This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current prevalence and trends over the past 10 years of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) antimicrobial resistance. Two... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current prevalence and trends over the past 10 years of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) antimicrobial resistance. Two researches independently searched two national (ULAKBİM, Türk Medline) and two international databases (PubMed, Web of Science) to identify studies on P. aeruginosa resistance to antimicrobials from 2007 to 2017.
METHODS
Homogeneity across studies was assessed using Cochrane guidelines, and total variability due to between-study variations was reflected in the I index. A random effects model was developed to estimate the antimicrobial resistance rates and their corresponding 95% CI. Pooled antibiotic resistance rates between 2007-2011 and 2012-2016 were compared to calculate the change in antibiotic resistance over time. Electronic searches with MeSH terms and text words identified 1017 papers. After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 45 articles were selected.
RESULTS
Pooled resistance prevalence of P. aeruginosa to piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin and colistin were 33.9%, 38.6%, 35.6%, 30.1%, 28.0%, 30.7%, 28.2%, 17.8%, 15.7% and 2.2%, respectively. The resistance rates of piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin and colistin significantly increased in the second 5 years (P<0.05); however, gentamicin, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin resistance rates significantly decreased (P<0.05). Comparing the resistance rates between the isolates of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and non-ICU patients, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam resistance in ICU isolates were significantly higher than non-ICU (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that antibiotic resistance is high in P. aeruginosa and the trends in antimicrobial resistance continue to increase, mainly in carbapenems and penicillins, in Turkey.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Prevalence; Pseudomonas Infections; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Turkey
PubMed: 30753904
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.01.032 -
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and... Jul 2022Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are frequent causes of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care unit (ICU) and thus considered a public health threat. Until... (Review)
Review
Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are frequent causes of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care unit (ICU) and thus considered a public health threat. Until now, the best available therapies consist of combinations of preexisting or new antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors (either new or preexisting). Several mechanisms of resistance, especially those mediated by metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), are responsible for the inefficacy of these treatments, leaving an unmet medical need. Intravenous cefiderocol has been recently approved by the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and nosocomial pneumonia due to Gram-negative, when limited therapeutical options are available. In addition, its ability to hijack bacterial iron uptake mechanisms makes cefiderocol stable against the whole Ambler β-lactamase inhibitors and increases the in vitro efficacy against Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., Enterobacterales spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii). Trials have already demonstrated their non-inferiority to comparators. In 2021, ESCMID guidelines released a conditional recommendation supporting the use of cefiderocol against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and against Acinetobacter baumannii. This review provides the opinion of experts about the general management of empiric treatment of patients with sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit and detects the proper place in therapy of cefiderocol considering recent evidence sought through a systematic search.
PubMed: 37386663
DOI: 10.1186/s44158-022-00062-7 -
Cureus Mar 2022The prevalence, incidence, and characteristics of bacterial infections in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are not well understood... (Review)
Review
The prevalence, incidence, and characteristics of bacterial infections in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are not well understood and have been raised as an important knowledge gap. Therefore, our study focused on the most common opportunistic infections/secondary infections/superinfections in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Eligible studies were identified using PubMed/Medline since inception to June 25, 2021. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was seen to pool the studies, and the result was reported as inverse variance and the corresponding 95% confidence interval. We screened 701 articles comprising 22 cohort studies which were included for analysis. The pooled prevalence of opportunistic infections/secondary infections/superinfections was 16% in COVID-19 patients. The highest prevalence of secondary infections was observed among viruses at 33%, followed by bacteria at 16%, fungi at 6%, and 25% among the miscellaneous group/wrong outcome. Opportunistic infections are more prevalent in critically ill patients. The isolated pathogens included Epstein-Barr virus, , , , , and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Large-scale studies are required to better identify opportunistic/secondary/superinfections in COVID-19 patients.
PubMed: 35505698
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23687