-
Journal of Investigative Medicine : the... Dec 2017The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the risk of postoperative bleeding and efficacy of heparin for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The risk of postoperative hemorrhage and efficacy of heparin for preventing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in adult patients undergoing neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the risk of postoperative bleeding and efficacy of heparin for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in adult patients undergoing neurosurgery. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were searched until October 31, 2016, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies that assessed the rates of postoperative hemorrhage, DVT, PE, and mortality in adult patients undergoing neurosurgery. Nine eligible studies (five RCTs, four retrospective studies) including 874 patients treated with either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and 1033 patients in control group (placebo with or without compression device) were analyzed. The overall analysis revealed that there was an increase in the risk of postoperative hemorrhage in patients who received heparin (pooled OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.72, p=0.046) compared with no treatment group. The risk of postoperative hemorrhage was more significant if only RCTs were included in analysis. Heparin prophylaxis was associated with a decrease in the risk of DVT (pooled OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.65, p<0.001) and PE (pooled OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.73, p=0.011) but it did not affect the rate of mortality. In conclusion, heparin increased the rate of postoperative bleeding, decreased the risk of DVT, PE and venous thromboembolic event (VTE) but it did not affect the mortality of patients undergoing neurosurgery. For the heparin prophylaxis, the trade-off between the risk of postoperative bleeding and benefit of prophylaxis against VTEs requires further investigation.
Topics: Adult; Heparin; Humans; Middle Aged; Neurosurgery; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Publication Bias; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 28747317
DOI: 10.1136/jim-2016-000235 -
Journal of Ultrasonography Nov 2021Duplication of the femoral vein is an important anatomical variation of the venous anatomy which has been shown to have an impact on the diagnosis of deep venous...
Duplication of the femoral vein is an important anatomical variation of the venous anatomy which has been shown to have an impact on the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis by compression ultrasonography. The presence of duplication may result in false negative findings while evaluating for deep venous thrombosis, with serious consequences such as pulmonary embolism and death. This metaanalysis aims to determine the pooled prevalence of duplicated femoral veins. A systematic search was conducted through the major databases PubMed, Hinari, Embase and Medline to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Appropriate data were extracted and pooled into a random-effects metaanalysis using MetaXL software. The primary and secondary outcomes of the study included the pooled prevalence of duplicated femoral veins and the prevalence of bilaterally duplicated femoral veins, respectively. A total of 11 studies ( = 3,682 limbs) were included. The overall pooled prevalence of duplicated femoral veins was 19.7% (95% CI 11-30). There was a significant difference in prevalence between cadaveric studies (2%, 95% CI 1-4) and imaging studies (25%, 95% CI 17-34). Duplication of the femoral vein is a common variation in the lower limbs. Routine watch-out should be practiced especially when performing lower limb Doppler studies in cases of deep venous thrombosis in order to avoid misdiagnosis and improve diagnostic accuracy.
PubMed: 34970444
DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0054 -
Europace : European Pacing,... May 2012Left atrial (LA) enlargement is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is controversial whether dilated atrium can predict post-ablation AF recurrence. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Association between left atrial size and atrial fibrillation recurrence after single circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
AIMS
Left atrial (LA) enlargement is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is controversial whether dilated atrium can predict post-ablation AF recurrence. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the association between LA diameter and AF recurrence after single circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) and explore the potential mechanism.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Electronic databases and bibliographies of retrieved studies were searched. The anteroposterior diameters of LA were available in all included studies, which were measured at end-systole by M-mode transthoracic echocardiography. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the duration of follow-up. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effect or fixed-effect model, depending on statistical heterogeneity. Twenty-two studies with a total of 3750 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The summary WMD of LA diameter between patients with and without recurrence was 1.87 mm (95% CI 1.26-2.48, P< 0.001). Meta-regression analysis of the 22 studies indicated that study design, duration of follow-up, and measurement of asymptomatic recurrences were significant sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the difference in LA diameter between patients with and without recurrences persisted regardless of the duration of follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Dilated LA significantly increases the risk of AF recurrence after single CPVI. This is especially applicable to the patients with long-term follow-up.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiomegaly; Catheter Ablation; Heart Atria; Humans; Pulmonary Veins; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 22117033
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur364 -
Journal of Arrhythmia Jun 2020This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the latest evidence on the use of renal denervation (RDN) + pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared to PVI alone...
Efficacy and safety of renal denervation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation and hypertension-Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
INTRODUCTION
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the latest evidence on the use of renal denervation (RDN) + pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared to PVI alone for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) with hypertension.
METHODS
A systematic literature search from several electronic databases was performed up until January 2020. The primary outcome was AF recurrence defined as AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 seconds at 12-month follow-up and the secondary outcome was procedure-related complications.
RESULTS
There were 568 subjects from five studies. AF recurrence was 90/280 (32.1%) in the RDN + PVI group and 142/274 (51.8%) in the PVI group. RDN + PVI was associated with a lower incidence of AF recurrence (RR 0.62 [0.51, 076], < .001; : 0%). Pooled analysis of HR showed that RDN + PVI was associated with reduced AF recurrence (HR 0.51 [0.38, 0.70], < .001; : 0%). Complications were 7/241 (2.9%) in the RDN + PVI group and 8/237 (3.4%) in the PVI group. The rate of complications between the groups was similar (RR 0.87 [0.33, 2.29], = .77; : 0%). In the subgroup analysis of paroxysmal AF, RDN + PVI was shown to reduce AF recurrence (RR 0.64 [0.49, 0.82], < .001; : 0% and HR 0.56 [0.38, 0.82], = .003; : 0%) compared to PVI alone. RDN + PVI has a moderate certainty of evidence in the reducing AF recurrence with an absolute reduction of 197 fewer per 1000 (from 254 fewer to 124 fewer).
CONCLUSION
RDN in addition to PVI, is associated with reduced 12-month AF recurrence and similar procedure-related complications compared to PVI alone.
PubMed: 32528562
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12353 -
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2023The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of very-high-power short-duration (VHPSD) ablation (70-90 W/4-7 s) with conventional ablation (30-40...
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of very-high-power short-duration (VHPSD) ablation (70-90 W/4-7 s) with conventional ablation (30-40 W/>20 s, 50 W/7-11 s) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with AF. A total of 13 studies were included in this analysis (1,527 patients). AF recurrence occurred in 14% (95% CI [11-18%]) of the VHPSD group. VHPSD was associated with lower AF recurrence (OR 0.65; 95% CI [0.48-0.89]; p=0.006) compared with the conventional ablation group. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI had a similar rate of AF recurrence (16% versus 10%) compared with PVI alone. Procedure and ablation durations were significantly shorter in the VHPSD group with a mean differences of -14.4 minutes (p=0.017) and -14.1 minutes (p<0.001), respectively. Complications occurred in 6% (95% CI [3-9%]) of the VHPSD group, and the rate was similar between the two groups (OR 1.03; 95% CI [0.60-1.80]; p=0.498). VHPSD ablation resulted in less AF recurrence and a shorter procedure time. Additional ablation beyond PVI alone in VHPSD may not provide additional benefits.
PubMed: 38173799
DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.19 -
Haematologica May 2005The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning the efficacy and safety of medical or surgical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning the efficacy and safety of medical or surgical treatments of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
DESIGN AND METHODS
A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane (CENTRAL) database to identify all randomized trials that evaluated the effect of surgical or medical treatment in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with SVT of the legs.
RESULTS
Five studies were included. Pooling of the data was not possible due to the heterogeneity among the studies. Moreover, three studies had major methodological drawbacks limiting the clinical applicability of the results. One of the remaining (pilot) studies showed a non-significant trend in favor of high- compared to low-dose unfractionated heparin for the prevention of VTE. The last remaining study showed a non-significant trend in favor of short-term treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) as compared to placebo shortly after treatment with respect to VTE, but the apparent benefit disappeared after three months of follow-up. Active treatment of SVT reduced the incidences of SVT extension or recurrence.
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with a therapeutic or prophylactic dose of LMWH or a NSAID reduces the incidence of SVT extension or recurrence, but not VTE. More RCT are needed before any evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of SVT for the prevention of VTE can be given. With the present lack of solid evidence we would suggest treating patients with at least intermediate doses of LMWH.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Follow-Up Studies; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Incidence; Ligation; Pilot Projects; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Research Design; Stockings, Compression; Thrombophlebitis; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 15921382
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Mar 2009DVT or pulmonary embolism may occur in almost 2 in 1000 people each year, with up to 25% of those having a recurrence. Around 5-15% of people with untreated DVT may die... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
DVT or pulmonary embolism may occur in almost 2 in 1000 people each year, with up to 25% of those having a recurrence. Around 5-15% of people with untreated DVT may die from pulmonary embolism. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis include immobility, surgery (particularly orthopaedic), malignancy, pregnancy, older age, and inherited or acquired prothrombotic clotting disorders.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for: proximal deep vein thrombosis; isolated calf deep vein thrombosis; and pulmonary embolism? What are the effects of computerised decision support on oral anticoagulation management? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to September 2007 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 40 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: anticoagulation, compression stockings, low molecular weight heparin (short and long term, once or twice daily, home treatment), oral anticoagulants (short and long term, high intensity, abrupt discontinuation, computerised decision support), prolonged duration of anticoagulation, thrombolysis, vena cava filters, and warfarin.
Topics: Animals; Databases, Factual; Emotions; Thromboembolism; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration
PubMed: 19445761
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis :... Mar 2006Diagnosing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy is challenging. Many of the common diagnostic tests, including compression ultrasonography... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Diagnosing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy is challenging. Many of the common diagnostic tests, including compression ultrasonography (CUS), ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (VQ scan) and helical computed tomography (hCT) that have been extensively investigated in non-pregnant patients, have not been appropriately validated in pregnancy. Extrapolating results of diagnostic studies of DVT and PE in non-pregnant patients to those who are pregnant may not be correct because during pregnancy, physiologic and anatomic changes may affect diagnostic test results, presentation and natural history of VTE.
METHODS
We performed a systematic analysis of published studies addressing accurate diagnostic testing for DVT and PE in pregnancy to determine the accuracy of these tests in pregnancy.
RESULTS
Our initial search yielded 530 articles of which four remained for inclusion, three studies investigating diagnostic testing in patients with a clinical suspicion of DVT or PE and one study in patients with a clinical suspicion of PE.
CONCLUSIONS
From our systematic analysis of published studies investigating diagnostic testing for a clinical suspicion of DVT in pregnancy we conclude that; (i) two studies support withholding anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with a clinical suspicion of DVT and normal results on serial IPG (impedance plethysmography), however, IPG is no longer used; (ii) one study demonstrated that a normal CUS at presentation combined with a normal D-dimer test or an abnormal D-dimer test combined with normal serial CUS appears promising for safely excluding DVT in pregnant patients, but too few patients were included in this pilot-study to draw firm conclusions; and (iii) one study investigated pregnant patients with a clinical suspicion of PE and this study concluded that in patients with normal or non-diagnostic VQ scans, withholding anticoagulant therapy might be safe, but this needs confirmation in larger studies. Recommendations on diagnostic testing of pregnant patients with a clinically suspected DVT or PE are provided.
Topics: Female; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Embolism; Tomography, Spiral Computed; Ultrasonography; Venous Thrombosis; Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio
PubMed: 16405518
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01779.x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2018Hospitalised patients are at increased risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower limb and pelvic veins, on a background of prolonged immobilisation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hospitalised patients are at increased risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower limb and pelvic veins, on a background of prolonged immobilisation associated with their medical or surgical illness. Patients with DVT are at increased risk of developing a pulmonary embolism (PE). The use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) in hospitalised patients has been proposed to decrease the risk of DVT. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2000, and last updated in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of graduated compression stockings in preventing deep vein thrombosis in various groups of hospitalised patients.
SEARCH METHODS
For this review the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and trials registries on 21 March 2017; and the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL Ebsco, AMED Ovid , and trials registries on 12 June 2018.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving GCS alone, or GCS used on a background of any other DVT prophylactic method. We combined results from both of these groups of trials.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors (AS, MD) assessed potentially eligible trials for inclusion. One review author (AS) extracted the data, which a second review author (MD) cross-checked and authenticated. Two review authors (AS, MD) assessed the methodological quality of trials with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with the senior review author (TL). For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the Peto odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval. We pooled data using a fixed-effect model. We used the GRADE system to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes assessed in this review.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 20 RCTs involving a total of 1681 individual participants and 1172 individual legs (2853 analytic units). Of these 20 trials, 10 included patients undergoing general surgery; six included patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery; three individual trials included patients undergoing neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, and gynaecological surgery, respectively; and only one trial included medical patients. Graduated compression stockings were applied on the day before surgery or on the day of surgery and were worn up until discharge or until the participants were fully mobile. In the majority of the included studies DVT was identified by the radioactive I uptake test. Duration of follow-up ranged from seven to 14 days. The included studies were at an overall low risk of bias.We were able to pool the data from 20 studies reporting the incidence of DVT. In the GCS group, 134 of 1445 units developed DVT (9%) in comparison to the control group (without GCS), in which 290 of 1408 units developed DVT (21%). The Peto odds ratio (OR) was 0.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 0.43; 20 studies; 2853 units; high-quality evidence), showing an overall effect favouring treatment with GCS (P < 0.001).Based on results from eight included studies, the incidence of proximal DVT was 7 of 517 (1%) units in the GCS group and 28 of 518 (5%) units in the control group. The Peto OR was 0.26 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.53; 8 studies; 1035 units; moderate-quality evidence) with an overall effect favouring treatment with GCS (P < 0.001). Combining results from five studies, all based on surgical patients, the incidence of PE was 5 of 283 (2%) participants in the GCS group and 14 of 286 (5%) in the control group. The Peto OR was 0.38 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.96; 5 studies; 569 participants; low-quality evidence) with an overall effect favouring treatment with GCS (P = 0.04). We downgraded the quality of the evidence for proximal DVT and PE due to low event rate (imprecision) and lack of routine screening for PE (inconsistency).We carried out subgroup analysis by speciality (surgical or medical patients). Combining results from 19 trials focusing on surgical patients, 134 of 1365 (9.8%) units developed DVT in the GCS group compared to 282 of 1328 (21.2%) units in the control group. The Peto OR was 0.35 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.44; high-quality evidence), with an overall effect favouring treatment with GCS (P < 0.001). Based on results from seven included studies, the incidence of proximal DVT was 7 of 437 units (1.6%) in the GCS group and 28 of 438 (6.4%) in the control group. The Peto OR was 0.26 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.53; 875 units; moderate-quality evidence) with an overall effect favouring treatment with GCS (P < 0.001). We downgraded the evidence for proximal DVT due to low event rate (imprecision).Based on the results from one trial focusing on medical patients admitted following acute myocardial infarction, 0 of 80 (0%) legs developed DVT in the GCS group and 8 of 80 (10%) legs developed DVT in the control group. The Peto OR was 0.12 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.51; low-quality evidence) with an overall effect favouring treatment with GCS (P = 0.004). None of the medical patients in either group developed a proximal DVT, and the incidence of PE was not reported.Limited data were available to accurately assess the incidence of adverse effects and complications with the use of GCS as these were not routinely quantitatively reported in the included studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is high-quality evidence that GCS are effective in reducing the risk of DVT in hospitalised patients who have undergone general and orthopaedic surgery, with or without other methods of background thromboprophylaxis, where clinically appropriate. There is moderate-quality evidence that GCS probably reduce the risk of proximal DVT, and low-quality evidence that GCS may reduce the risk of PE. However, there remains a paucity of evidence to assess the effectiveness of GCS in diminishing the risk of DVT in medical patients.
Topics: Hospitalization; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stockings, Compression; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 30390397
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001484.pub4 -
Frontiers in Physiology 2018Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is a routine ablation strategy of atrial fibrillation (AF). The adenosine test can be used to unmask dormant conduction...
Clinical Implications of Unmasking Dormant Conduction After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation Using Adenosine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is a routine ablation strategy of atrial fibrillation (AF). The adenosine test can be used to unmask dormant conduction (DC) of pulmonary veins after CPVI, thereby demonstrating possible pulmonary vein re-connection and the need for further ablation. However, whether adenosine test could help improve the long term successful rate of CPVI is still controversial. This systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the clinical utility of the adenosine test. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library database were searched through July 2016 to identify relevant studies using the keywords "dormant pulmonary vein conduction," "adenosine test," "circumferential pulmonary vein isolation," and "atrial fibrillation." A random-effects model was used to compare pooled outcomes and tested for heterogeneity. A total of 17 studies including 5,169 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. Two groups of comparisons were classified: (1) Long-term successful rate in those AF patients underwent CPVI with and without adenosine test [Group A (+) and Group A (-)]; (2) Long-term successful rate in those patients who had adenosine test with and without dormant conduction [Group DC (+) and Group DC (-)]. The overall meta-analysis showed that no significant difference can be observed between Group A (+) and Group A (-) (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.19; = 0.16; I = 66%) and between Group DC (+) and Group DC (-) (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.91-1.12; = 0.88; I = 60%). Pooled meta-analysis suggested adenosine test may not improve long-term successful rate in AF patients underwent CPVI. Furthermore, AF recurrence may not be decreased by eliminating DC provoked by adenosine, even though adenosine test was applied after CPVI.
PubMed: 30705634
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01861