-
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience 2019Studies of alexia and agraphia have played historically important roles in efforts to understand the relation between brain and behavior. In the second half of the 19th... (Review)
Review
Studies of alexia and agraphia have played historically important roles in efforts to understand the relation between brain and behavior. In the second half of the 19th century, works by Paul Broca and Carl Wernicke led to the concept of delimited cortical centers in the left cerebral hemisphere concerned with discrete aspects of spoken and written language. These specialized centers were linked by white matter pathways. Charlton Bastian, Jean-Martin Charcot, Sigmund Exner, and Jules Dejerine championed center-pathway models of reading and writing. Dejerine played a dominant role, rejecting the idea of a left frontal lobe center that mediated writing and proposing a unique, specialized role for the left angular gyrus in both reading and writing. In 1891 and 1892, he detailed the symptoms of alexia and agraphia that resulted from injury to the left angular gyrus and from the isolation of the left angular gyrus from visual input required for reading. During the early 20th century, his work and that of other so-called diagram makers was confronted and largely discredited by Pierre Marie, joined later by Henry Head and Kurt Goldstein. In the 1960s, the center-pathway model was resurrected and refined by Norman Geschwind. He drew upon foundational works of Dejerine, Hugo Liepmann, and others to describe syndromes resulting from cortical disconnections and, in doing so, helped to establish a framework for the modern discipline of behavioral neurology.
Topics: Agraphia; Dyslexia; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; Humans; Neurology; Research
PubMed: 31220840
DOI: 10.1159/000494951 -
International Journal of Language &... Nov 2020Every language has certain specific idiosyncrasies in its writing system. Cross-linguistic analyses of alexias and agraphias are fundamental to understand commonalities...
BACKGROUND
Every language has certain specific idiosyncrasies in its writing system. Cross-linguistic analyses of alexias and agraphias are fundamental to understand commonalities and differences in the brain organization of written language. Few reports of alexias and agraphias in the Spanish language are currently available.
AIMS
To analyse the clinical manifestations of alexias and agraphias in Spanish, and the effect of demographic variables.
METHODS & PROCEDURES
Spanish versions of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) and Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) were used for language assessment. Lesion localization was obtained by using computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The final sample included 200 patients: 195 (97.5%) right-handed and five (2.5%) left-handed; 119 men and 81 women with a mean age of 57.37 years (SD = 15.56), education of 13.52 years (SD = 4.08), and mean time post-onset of 6.58 months (SD = 12.94). Using the WAB, four quotients were calculated: aphasia quotient (AQ), reading-writing quotient (RWQ), language quotient (LQ) and cortical quotient (CQ).
OUTCOMES & RESULTS
The types of aphasia were: global = 11 patients (5.5%), Broca = 31 (15.5%), Wernicke = 30 (15.0%), conduction = 22 (11.0%), transcortical sensory = 17 (8.5%), transcortical motor = 3 (1.5%), amnesic or anomic = 54 (27.0%) and mixed non-fluent = 32 (16.0%). The degree of oral and written language impairment differed across the various aphasia types. Most severe reading and writing difficulties were found in global, mixed non-fluent and transcortical motor aphasia; fewer difficulties were observed in amnesic, Broca and conduction aphasia. The severity of the written language impairments paralleled the severity of the oral language disturbances. Age negatively, while schooling positively, correlated with the scores in reading and writing tests. No effect of sex and time since onset was found.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS
In Spanish-speaking aphasia patients, difficulties in reading and writing are similar to oral language difficulties. This similarity of performance is mostly based on severity rather than the participants' patterns of errors. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject There is limited information about alexia and agraphia in Spanish. What this paper adds to existing knowledge An extensive study with a large sample of patients. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The study contributes to the clinical management of patients with reading and writing disturbances.
Topics: Agraphia; Brain; Chile; Databases, Factual; Dyslexia, Acquired; Female; Humans; Language; Language Tests; Linguistics; Male; Middle Aged; Reading; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32735061
DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12566 -
Neurology India 2022
Topics: Humans; Alexia, Pure; Agraphia; Reading
PubMed: 36352656
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.359157 -
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience 2019The kanji and kana (or kanji vs. kana) problem in the Japanese language denotes the dissociation between kanji (morphograms) and kana (phonograms) in... (Review)
Review
The kanji and kana (or kanji vs. kana) problem in the Japanese language denotes the dissociation between kanji (morphograms) and kana (phonograms) in reading/comprehension and writing. Since paragraphia of kana in a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was first reported in 1893, kanji-kana dissociation has been the central topic in Japanese aphasiology. Recent advancements in lesion-to-symptom analyses and functional imaging studies have identified some areas whose damage causes dissociative disturbances of reading or writing between kanji and kana. That is, (1) angular alexia with agraphia causes kanji agraphia; alexia of kana with an angular gyrus lesion is the result of a damage to the middle occipital gyrus; (2) alexia with agraphia for kanji is caused by a posterior inferior temporal cortex (mid-fusiform/inferior temporal gyri; visual word form area) lesion, whereas pure agraphia for kanji is caused by a posterior middle temporal gyrus lesion; and (3) pure alexia, particularly for kanji, results from a mid-fusiform gyrus lesion (Brodmann's Area [BA] 37), whereas pure alexia for kana results from a posterior fusiform/inferior occipital gyri lesion (BA 18/19).
Topics: Agraphia; Brain Mapping; Diagnosis, Differential; Dyslexia; History, 20th Century; Humans; Japan; Occipital Lobe; Reading; Writing
PubMed: 31220841
DOI: 10.1159/000494952 -
Developmental Medicine and Child... Apr 2007Failure to attain handwriting competency during the school-age years often has far-reaching negative effects on both academic success and self-esteem. This complex... (Review)
Review
Failure to attain handwriting competency during the school-age years often has far-reaching negative effects on both academic success and self-esteem. This complex occupational task has many underlying component skills that may interfere with handwriting performance. Fine motor control, bilateral and visual-motor integration, motor planning, in-hand manipulation, proprioception, visual perception, sustained attention, and sensory awareness of the fingers are some of the component skills identified. Poor handwriting may be related to intrinsic factors, which refer to the child's actual handwriting capabilities, or extrinsic factors which are related to environmental or biomechanical components, or both. It is important that handwriting performance be evaluated using a valid, reliable, standardized tool combined with informal classroom observation and teacher consultation. Studies of handwriting remediation suggest that intervention is effective. There is evidence to indicate that handwriting difficulties do not resolve without intervention and affect between 10 and 30% of school-aged children. Despite the widespread use of computers, legible handwriting remains an important life skill that deserves greater attention from educators and health practitioners.
Topics: Agraphia; Brain; Child; Child, Preschool; Handwriting; Humans; Kinesthesis; Occupational Therapy; Proprioception; Psychomotor Disorders; Remedial Teaching
PubMed: 17376144
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x -
Neurologia 2020
Topics: Adult; Agraphia; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Communication; Headache; Humans; Leukocytosis; Male; Mobile Applications; Smartphone; Tendinopathy
PubMed: 29169804
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2017.08.004 -
Neurology Jul 2015
Topics: Agraphia; Female; Handwriting; Humans; Middle Aged; Recovery of Function
PubMed: 26195237
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001754 -
Rinsho Shinkeigaku = Clinical Neurology Aug 2011The author reviews the lesion localization of non-aphasic alexia and agraphia and proposes a new classification of alexia and agraphia on this basis. The newly proposed... (Review)
Review
The author reviews the lesion localization of non-aphasic alexia and agraphia and proposes a new classification of alexia and agraphia on this basis. The newly proposed alexia and agraphia are pure alexia for kana (Japanese phonograms), or more generally pure alexia for letters, caused by a lesion in the posterior occipital area (posterior fusiform/inferior occipital gyri), and pure agraphia for kanji (Japanese morphograms) caused by a lesion in the posterior middle temporal gyrus and also a lesion restricted to the angular gyrus. In addition, the anatomical lesions presumably responsible for the parietal apraxic agraphia, frontal pure agraphia and thalamic agraphia are discussed.
Topics: Agraphia; Dyslexia; Humans; Occipital Lobe; Temporal Lobe
PubMed: 21878722
DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.51.567 -
Brain and Cognition Jul 1993Twenty-one patients with right hemisphere damage were studied (11 men, 10 women; average age = 41.33; age range 19-65). Subjects were divided into two groups:...
Twenty-one patients with right hemisphere damage were studied (11 men, 10 women; average age = 41.33; age range 19-65). Subjects were divided into two groups: pre-Rolandic (6) and retro-Rolandic (15) right hemisphere damaged patients. A special writing test was given to each patient. The writing errors observed included literal substitutions, feature omissions and additions, letter omissions and additions, inability to maintain horizontal writing, inappropriate grouping and fragmentation of elements, and changes in handwriting style. Associated disorders included left-hemiparesis, visual field defects, spatial hemi-neglect, constructional apraxia, spatial alexia, and spatial acalculia. It is proposed that spatial agraphia is related to: (1) left hemi-neglect, (2) constructional deficits, (3) general spatial defects, and (4) some motor disautomatization and tendency to perseverate. In cases of right frontal damage, motor-associated deficits (iterations of features and letters) predominated, whereas in cases of posterior right hemisphere damage, spatial defects (inappropriate distribution of written material in the space, grouping of letters belonging to different words, and splitting of words) were more evident. Writing impairments are in general more noticeable in cases of retro-Rolandic damage.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Agraphia; Brain; Brain Diseases; Female; Functional Laterality; Hemiplegia; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Neuropsychological Tests; Space Perception; Visual Fields
PubMed: 8373568
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1029 -
Brain and Language Sep 1982
Topics: Adult; Agraphia; Cerebral Infarction; Dyslexia, Acquired; Female; Humans; Neuropsychological Tests; Phonetics; Pregnancy; Semantics; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 7139266
DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(82)90011-6