-
Blood Reviews Jul 2020Myelofibrosis is classified as a 'Philadelphia-chromosome negative' clonal myeloproliferative disorder. The heterogeneity of this condition and patient population and... (Review)
Review
Myelofibrosis is classified as a 'Philadelphia-chromosome negative' clonal myeloproliferative disorder. The heterogeneity of this condition and patient population and array of often challenging clinical manifestations can frequently make therapeutic decisions challenging. Despite many advances in therapy with targeted and combination approaches, following an enhanced understanding of underlying disease pathogenesis, cure only remains achievable with allogeneic stem cell transplant. This option is often limited to a small group of younger transplant-eligible patients with more advanced disease who have both a suitable donor and no or few co-morbidities. In this article, we will discuss up-to-date disease prognostication, common clinical challenges associated with myelofibrosis and both standard and novel therapeutic approaches. Increasingly complex prognostic modelling utilises patient-specific, haematological and genomic parameters to improve the accuracy of risk assessment and predict disease progression. We will also focus on difficult clinical scenarios such as disease-associated anaemia, thrombocytopenia and extremes of age. Future and evolving therapies within this field are highly anticipated and novel JAK inhibitor and non-JAK inhibitor-based therapy will also be discussed, including the new challenge of how to switch from one JAK inhibitor therapy to another.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Management; Disease Progression; Humans; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis
PubMed: 32536371
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100715 -
Terapevticheskii Arkhiv Sep 2020Primary myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that occurs de novo, characterized by clonal proliferation of stem cells, abnormal expression of cytokines, bone... (Review)
Review
Primary myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that occurs de novo, characterized by clonal proliferation of stem cells, abnormal expression of cytokines, bone marrow fibrosis, hepatosplenomegaly as a result of extramedullary hematopoiesis, symptoms of tumor intoxication, cachexemia, peripheral blood leukoerythroblastosis, leukemic progression and low survival. Primary myelofibrosis is a chronic incurable disease. The aims of therapy: preventing progression, increasing overall survival, improving quality of life. The choice of therapeutic tactics is limited. Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only method that gives a chance for a cure. The role of mutations in a number of genes in the early identification of candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is being actively studied. The article describes the clinical case of the detection ofASXL1gene mutations in a patient with prefibrous primary myelofibrosis. The diagnosis was established on the basis of WHO criteria 2016. The examination revealed a mutation ofASXL1. Interferon alfa therapy is carried out, against the background of which clinico-hematological remission has been achieved. Despite the identified mutation, the patient is not a candidate for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the unfavorable prognostic value of theASXL1mutation, the patient is subject to active dynamic observation and aggressive therapeutic tactics when signs of disease progression appear.
Topics: Humans; Mutation; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Repressor Proteins
PubMed: 33346451
DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.07.000788 -
European Journal of Haematology Nov 2023Autoimmune myelofibrosis (AIMF) is a rare cause of bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) occurring in the presence or absence of a defined autoimmune disease (secondary or primary... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Autoimmune myelofibrosis (AIMF) is a rare cause of bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) occurring in the presence or absence of a defined autoimmune disease (secondary or primary AIMF, sAIMF/pAIMF, respectively). Unlike primary myelofibrosis (PMF), AIMF responds well to immunosuppressive therapy with a benign clinical course. Diagnostic criteria for AIMF in opposition to PMF have been lacking, though recent work has helped better characterise molecular and pathological features of AIMF, improving diagnostic precision.
METHODS
Using a modern clinical and pathophysiological understanding of AIMF, we apply scoping review methodology and rigorous case-criteria to retrospectively analyse the case literature. We examine its patient-population, describing patient-associated factors, presentation, bone marrow pathology, genetics, treatment and outcomes.
RESULTS
Fifty-five studies were identified, describing 139 AIMF patients. Patients were mostly young females (~4:1 ratio female:male, median age 40.8 years) and typically presented with cytopenias. Splenomegaly was rare. sAIMF was more common than pAIMF (~3:1 ratio), and most cases responded well to immunosuppressive therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results strengthen the emerging picture of AIMF's patient population, natural history and response to treatment. Further work should continue to use reproducible diagnostic criteria, and explore AIMF's pathophysiology, response to different therapies, and sequelae over larger timescales, as well as differences between pAIMF, sAIMF and PMF.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Primary Myelofibrosis; Retrospective Studies; Bone Marrow; Autoimmune Diseases; Immunosuppression Therapy
PubMed: 37515415
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14064 -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... Apr 2018The prognosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms, including primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia varies considerably, between these... (Review)
Review
The prognosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms, including primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia varies considerably, between these disorders as well as within each diagnosis. Molecular studies have identified "driver mutations" in JAK2, MPL1, and CALR and additional somatic DNA mutations, including ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, and SRSF2, that affect prognosis differentially. Patients with mutations in CALR (type1) have a better outlook than patients with mutations in JAK2 or MPL, whereas patients without any of the driver mutations (triple negative) have the shortest life expectancy. Mutations in ASXL1, EZH2, and SRSF2 may be associated with shortened survival, and IDH mutations carry a higher risk of leukemic transformation. The combination and number of mutations are more important than a given single mutation. Mutations also appear to impact the outcome of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), currently the only treatment with curative potential. Based on available data, the best post-HCT outcome is observed with CALR mutations. Triple negativity has a negative impact. The data on JAK2 are controversial. Mutations in ASXL1 or IDH1/2 reduce the probability of progression-free survival after HCT, although the impact of ASXL1 differs between patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis. Although it is not clear to what extent HCT can overcome the risks associated with a given mutational pattern, at present, early HCT should be considered in triple-negative patients and patients with PMF who harbor mutations in ASXL1. Mutations in EZH2, SRSF2, or IDH, particularly if combined with other mutations, should also lead to consideration of HCT. Further studies are needed to validate the present observations and determine the impact of additional mutations that have been identified.
Topics: Allografts; Decision Making; Disease-Free Survival; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Mutation; Neoplasm Proteins; Primary Myelofibrosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 29128551
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.037 -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2023Myelofibrosis (MF), Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes have a broad range of clinical presentations and molecular abnormalities, making... (Review)
Review
Myelofibrosis (MF), Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes have a broad range of clinical presentations and molecular abnormalities, making their diagnosis and classification complex. This paper reviews molecular aberration, epigenetic modifications, chromosomal anomalies, and their interactions with cellular and other immune mechanisms in the manifestations of these disease spectra, clinical features, classification, and treatment modalities. The advent of new-generation sequencing has broadened the understanding of the genetic factors involved. However, while great strides have been made in the pharmacological treatment of these diseases, treatment of advanced disease remains hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Topics: Humans; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Primary Myelofibrosis; Chromosome Aberrations; Neoplasms; Mutation
PubMed: 38139212
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417383 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2022The combination of erythroblastopenia and primary myelofibrosis is very rare. We here report the unusual case of a 76-year-old Moroccan patient followed up since 2018...
The combination of erythroblastopenia and primary myelofibrosis is very rare. We here report the unusual case of a 76-year-old Moroccan patient followed up since 2018 for idiopathic erythroblastopenia, initially treated with corticotherapy and then with ciclosporin. Two years later, the patient reported bone pain with splenomegaly. Assessment including myelogram, bone marrow biopsy and molecular biology showed myelofibrosis. Etiological assessment of myelofibrosis was negative confirming its primitive nature. The patient received ruxolitinib with transfusion support. Patient´s outcome was favorable and marked by improvement of general condition, splenomegaly and transfusion rate. The association between erythroblastopenia and myeloproliferative disorder is exceptional and only a few cases have been reported in the literature.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Primary Myelofibrosis; Splenomegaly; Cyclosporine; Spleen; Bone Marrow; Red-Cell Aplasia, Pure; Bone Marrow Failure Disorders
PubMed: 36284568
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.201.32754 -
Expert Review of Hematology Jan 2020: Recent advances in the prognostic scheme and treatment of primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) have resulted in an overwhelming amount of clinical information to...
: Recent advances in the prognostic scheme and treatment of primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) have resulted in an overwhelming amount of clinical information to assimilate. The authors believe a comprehensive review that summarizes the most recent published literature, could serve as guidelines for the practicing hematologist.: The authors provide a summary of landmark articles regarding epidemiology, symptoms, and pathogenesis of disease. The authors conducted a systematic literature review to answer questions regarding differences between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and secondary myelofibrosis (SMF), appropriate use and selection of the current risk-stratification models, early versus late treatment of MF and current practices in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for MF. The authors conclude the article with their clinical opinion based on their experience and literature review. The purpose of this article is to identify current practices, address any variation, identify and investigate conflicting results and produce statements to guide decision-making.: In this section, the authors advocate for and provide examples of a standardized way of incorporating future discoveries in the pathogenesis and risk-stratification models of MF. They also discuss the importance of using only one risk-stratification model for PMF and one for SMF and their reasoning for early instead of late treatment of MF.
Topics: Allografts; Clinical Decision-Making; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Models, Biological; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Primary Myelofibrosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 31709843
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1691519 -
Hematological Oncology Feb 2021We analyzed cytogenetic data at diagnosis in 395 primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patients to evaluate any possible association between karyotype and WHO 2017 classification...
Cytogenetic study in primary myelofibrosis at diagnosis: Clinical and histological association and impact on survival according to WHO 2017 classification in an Italian multicenter series.
We analyzed cytogenetic data at diagnosis in 395 primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patients to evaluate any possible association between karyotype and WHO 2017 classification and its impact on prognosis. All the cases were diagnosed and followed at five Italian Hematological Centers between November 1983 and December 2016. An abnormal karyotype (AK) was found in 69 patients and clustered differently according to bone marrow fibrosis grade as it was found in 31 (27.0%) cases with overt fibrotic and 38 (13.6%) with pre-fibrotic PMF (p = 0.001). Sex, anemia, thrombocytopenia, circulating blasts ≥1%, higher lactate dehydrogenase, and International Prognostic Scoring System risk classes were all significantly associated with karyotype. At a median follow-up of >6 years, 101 deaths were recorded. Survival was different between AK and normal karyotype (NK) patients with an estimated median overall survival (OS) of 11.6 and 25.7 years, respectively (p = 0.0148). In conclusion, in our cohort around 20% of patients had an AK, more frequently in subjects with an advanced bone marrow fibrosis grade and clinical-laboratory features indicative of a more aggressive disease. This study shows that an AK confers a more severe clinical phenotype and impacts adversely on OS, thus representing an additional parameter to be considered in the evaluation of PMF prognosis.
Topics: Abnormal Karyotype; Aged; Bone Marrow; Cytogenetic Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Rate
PubMed: 32979286
DOI: 10.1002/hon.2808 -
Journal of the National Comprehensive... Sep 2020Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has the least favorable prognosis of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, which also include essential... (Review)
Review
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has the least favorable prognosis of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, which also include essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). However, clinical presentations and outcomes of PMF vary widely, with median overall survival ranging from years to decades. Given the heterogeneity of PMF, there has been considerable effort to develop discriminatory prognostic models to help with management decisions, particularly for the consideration of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients at higher risk. Although earlier models incorporated only clinical features in risk stratification, contemporary models increasingly use molecular and cytogenetic features, leading to more comprehensive prognostication. This article reviews the most widely adopted prognostic models used for PMF, including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS)/DIPSS+, mutation-enhanced IPSS for transplant-age patients (MIPSS70)/MIPSS70+/MIPSS70+ version 2.0, genetically inspired prognostic scoring system, and Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model in patients with post-ET/PV myelofibrosis. We also discuss newly emerging prognostic models and provide a practical approach to risk stratification in patients with PMF and post-ET/PV myelofibrosis.
Topics: Humans; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Thrombocythemia, Essential
PubMed: 32886896
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7557 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Sep 2020Splenomegaly, which may range from a few centimeters below the left costal border to massive dimensions, is one of the most characteristic features in patients with... (Review)
Review
Splenomegaly, which may range from a few centimeters below the left costal border to massive dimensions, is one of the most characteristic features in patients with advanced myelofibrosis (MF). Splenectomy may offer an effective therapeutic option for treating massive splenomegaly in patients with MF, and especially in cases of disease refractory to conventional drugs, but it is associated with a number of complications as well as substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether splenectomy should be performed before allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is also controversial, and there is a lack of prospective randomized clinical trials that assess the role of splenectomy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with MF. Although splenectomy is not routinely performed before transplantation, it may be appropriate in patients with massive splenomegaly and related symptoms, so long as the higher risk of graft failure in such cases is taken into account. This review aims to describe the efficacy, indications, and complications of splenectomy in patients with MF; and to evaluate the long-term impact of splenectomy on patient survival and risk of disease transformation.
Topics: Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Primary Myelofibrosis; Splenectomy; Transplantation Conditioning; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32482540
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.04.015