-
American Journal of Hematology May 2023Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied... (Review)
Review
DISEASE OVERVIEW
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations; additional features include bone marrow reticulin/collagen fibrosis, aberrant inflammatory cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, risk of leukemic progression, and shortened survival.
DIAGNOSIS
Bone marrow examination with cytogenetic and mutation studies provides integrated diagnostic information; presence of JAK2, CALR or MPL mutation is expected but not required.
NEW CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The International Consensus Classification distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic essential thrombocythemia (ET) in its presentation. Approximately 15% of patients with ET or polycythemia vera (PV) might progress into post-ET/PV MF.
MUTATIONS
SRSF2, ASXL1, and U2AF1-Q157 mutations predict inferior survival in PMF; RAS/CBL mutations predict resistance to ruxolitinib therapy. Type 1/like CALR mutation is associated with superior survival.
KARYOTYPE
Very high-risk abnormalities include -7, inv (3), i(17q), +21, +19, 12p- and 11q-. Favorable risk abnormalities include normal karyotype or isolated +9, 13q-, 20q-, 1q abnormalities and loss of Y chromosome.
RISK STRATIFICATION
Contemporary prognostic systems include GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (MIPSSv2; mutation-and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype; MIPSSv2 includes, in addition, clinical risk factors.
RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY
Observation alone is advised for MIPSSv2 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is the preferred treatment of choice for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0-13%), as well as in carefully selected patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%). Drug therapy in MF is currently palliative and targets anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. JAK2 INHIBITORS: Ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib are FDA approved and respectfully utilized in patients failing treatment with hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib, or with platelet count <50 × 10 (9)/L. Momelotinib is another JAK2 inhibitor that is poised for approval sometime in 2023 and has shown erythropoietic benefits, in addition to affecting spleen and symptom responses.
OTHER TREATMENT MODALITIES
Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for non-hepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.
NEW DIRECTIONS
New agents, alone or in combination with ruxolitinib, are currently under clinical trial investigation (ClinicalTrials.gov) and preliminary results were presented at the 2022 ASH annual meeting and highlighted in the current review.
Topics: Humans; Primary Myelofibrosis; Splenomegaly; Polycythemia Vera; Pyrazoles; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Mutation; Janus Kinase 2
PubMed: 36680511
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26857 -
American Journal of Hematology Jan 2021Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied... (Review)
Review
DISEASE OVERVIEW
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations. Additional disease features include bone marrow reticulin/collagen fibrosis, aberrant inflammatory cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.
DIAGNOSIS
Bone marrow morphology is the primary basis for diagnosis. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in around 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis; these mutations are also prevalent in the closely related MPNs, namely polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The 2016 World Health Organization classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation. Furthermore, approximately 15% of patients with ET or PV might progress into a PMF-like phenotype (post-ET/PV MF) during their clinical course.
ADVERSE MUTATIONS
SRSF2, ASXL1, and U2AF1-Q157 mutations predict inferior survival in PMF, independent of each other and other risk factors. RAS/CBL mutations predicted resistance to ruxolitinib therapy.
ADVERSE KARYOTYPE
Very high risk abnormalities include -7, inv (3), i(17q), +21, +19, 12p-, and 11q-.
RISK STRATIFICATION
Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (MIPSSv2; mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSSv2 includes, in addition, clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSSv2 five risk categories.
RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY
Observation alone is advised for MIPSSv2 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is the preferred treatment for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0%-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. In non-transplant candidates, conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide, and danazol; for symptomatic splenomegaly, hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib; and for constitutional symptoms, ruxolitinib. Fedratinib, another JAK2 inhibitor, has now been FDA-approved for use in ruxolitinib failures. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for non-hepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.
NEW DIRECTIONS
A number of new agents, alone or in combination with ruxolitinib, are currently under investigation for MF treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov); preliminary results from some of these clinical trials were presented at the 2020 ASH annual meeting and highlighted in the current document.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Mutation; Primary Myelofibrosis; Risk Assessment; Survival Rate
PubMed: 33197049
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26050 -
Blood Apr 2023The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety... (Review)
Review
The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety of blood cell alterations, and a tendency to develop vascular complications and blast phase. Diagnosis requires assessing complete cell blood counts, bone marrow morphology, deep genetic evaluations, and disease history. Driver molecular events consist of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations, whereas about 8% to 10% of MF are "triple-negative." Additional myeloid-gene variants are described in roughly 80% of patients. Currently available clinical-based and integrated clinical/molecular-based scoring systems predict the survival of patients with MF and are applied for conventional treatment decision-making, indication to stem cell transplant (SCT) and allocation in clinical trials. Standard treatment consists of anemia-oriented therapies, hydroxyurea, and JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. Overall, spleen volume reduction of 35% or greater at week 24 can be achieved by 42% of ruxolitinib-, 47% of fedratinib-, 19% of pacritinib-, and 27% of momelotinib-treated patients. Now, it is time to move towards new paradigms for evaluating efficacy like disease modification, that we intend as a robust and unequivocal effect on disease biology and/or on patient survival. The growing number of clinical trials potentially pave the way for new strategies in patients with MF. Translational studies of some molecules showed an early effect on bone marrow fibrosis and on variant allele frequencies of myeloid genes. SCT is still the only curative option, however, it is associated with relevant challenges. This review focuses on the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of MF.
Topics: Humans; Primary Myelofibrosis; Pyrazoles; Nitriles; Janus Kinase 2
PubMed: 36416738
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022017423 -
British Journal of Haematology Oct 2020Myelofibrosis is an enigmatic myeloproliferative neoplasm, despite noteworthy strides in understanding its genetic underpinnings. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR... (Review)
Review
Myelofibrosis is an enigmatic myeloproliferative neoplasm, despite noteworthy strides in understanding its genetic underpinnings. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR or MPL in 90% of patients mediate constitutive JAK-STAT signaling which, in concert with epigenetic alterations (ASXL1, DNMT3A, SRSF2, EZH2, IDH1/2 mutations), play a fundamental role in disease pathogenesis. Aberrant immature megakaryocytes are a quintessential feature, exhibiting reduced GATA1 protein expression and secreting a plethora of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 ß, TGF-ß), growth factors (b-FGF, PDGF, VEGF) in addition to extra cellular matrix components (fibronectin, laminin, collagens). The ensuing disrupted interactions amongst the megakaryocytes, osteoblasts, endothelium, stromal cells and myofibroblasts within the bone marrow culminate in the development of fibrosis and osteosclerosis. Presently, prognostic assessment tools for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are centered on genetics, with incorporation of cytogenetic and molecular information into the mutation-enhanced (MIPSS 70-plus version 2.0) and genetically-inspired (GIPSS) prognostic scoring systems. Both models illustrate substantial clinical heterogeneity in PMF and serve as the crux for risk-adapted therapeutic decisions. A major challenge remains the dearth of disease-modifying drugs, whereas allogeneic transplant offers the chance of long-term remission for some patients. Our review serves to synopsise current appreciation of the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis together with emerging management strategies.
Topics: Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Mutation; Myofibroblasts; Primary Myelofibrosis
PubMed: 32196650
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16576 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Jun 2022Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, debilitating constitutional symptoms and bone marrow failure. Disease-related anemia is... (Review)
Review
Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, debilitating constitutional symptoms and bone marrow failure. Disease-related anemia is common and associated with an inferior quality of life and survival. Unfortunately, few therapies exist to improve hemoglobin in myelofibrosis patients. Momelotinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that also antagonizes ACVR1, leading to downregulation of hepcidin expression and increased availability of iron for erythropoiesis. In clinical testing, momelotinib has demonstrated a unique ability to improve hemoglobin and reduce transfusion burden in myelofibrosis patients with baseline anemia, while producing reductions in spleen size and symptom burden. This review explores the preclinical rationale, clinical trial data and future role of momelotinib in the evolving therapeutic landscape of myelofibrosis.
Topics: Anemia; Benzamides; Humans; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Nitriles; Primary Myelofibrosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35603634
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0276 -
Cells Apr 2021Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, bone marrow fibrosis, and a propensity towards transformation to... (Review)
Review
Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, bone marrow fibrosis, and a propensity towards transformation to acute leukemia. JAK inhibitors are the only approved therapy for myelofibrosis and have been successful in reducing spleen and symptom burden. However, they do not significantly impact disease progression and many patients are ineligible due to coexisting cytopenias. Patients who are refractory to JAK inhibition also have a dismal survival. Therefore, non-JAK inhibitor-based therapies are being explored in pre-clinical and clinical settings. In this review, we discuss novel treatments in development for myelofibrosis with targets outside of the JAK-STAT pathway. We focus on the mechanism, preclinical rationale, and available clinical efficacy and safety information of relevant agents including those that target apoptosis (navitoclax, KRT-232, LCL-161, imetelstat), epigenetic modulation (CPI-0610, bomedemstat), the bone marrow microenvironment (PRM-151, AVID-200, alisertib), signal transduction pathways (parsaclisib), and miscellaneous agents (tagraxofusp. luspatercept). We also provide commentary on the future of therapeutic development in myelofibrosis.
Topics: Apoptosis; Epigenesis, Genetic; Humans; Janus Kinases; Primary Myelofibrosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 33925695
DOI: 10.3390/cells10051034 -
Journal of Hematology & Oncology Jan 2022The suite of marked anemia benefits that momelotinib has consistently conferred on myelofibrosis (MF) patients stem from its unique inhibitory activity on the... (Review)
Review
The suite of marked anemia benefits that momelotinib has consistently conferred on myelofibrosis (MF) patients stem from its unique inhibitory activity on the BMP6/ACVR1/SMAD and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathways, resulting in decreased hepcidin (master iron regulator) expression, higher serum iron and hemoglobin levels, and restored erythropoiesis. Clinical data on momelotinib from the phase 2 and the two phase 3 SIMPLIFY trials consistently demonstrated high rates of sustained transfusion-independence. In a recent phase 2 translational study, 41% of the patients achieved transfusion independence for ≥ 12 weeks. In the phase 3 trials SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2, 17% more JAK inhibitor-naïve patients and two-fold more JAK inhibitor-treated patients achieved or maintained transfusion independence with momelotinib versus ruxolitinib and best available therapy (89% ruxolitinib), respectively. Anemia is present in approximately a third of MF patients at diagnosis, eventually developing in nearly all patients. The need for red blood cell transfusions is an independent adverse risk factor for both overall survival and leukemic transformation. Presently, FDA-approved medications to address anemia are lacking. Momelotinib is one of the prime candidates to durably address the critical unmet needs of MF patients with moderate/severe anemia. Importantly, momelotinib may have overall survival benefits in frontline and second-line MF patients. MOMENTUM is an international registration-track phase 3 trial further assessing momelotinib's unique constellation of anemia and other benefits in second-line MF patients; the results of the MOMENTUM trial are keenly awaited and may lead to regulatory approval of momelotinib.
Topics: Anemia; Benzamides; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Primary Myelofibrosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 35045875
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01157-4 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Feb 2018Purpose To develop a prognostic system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) that integrates clinical, cytogenetic, and mutation data.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Purpose To develop a prognostic system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) that integrates clinical, cytogenetic, and mutation data. Patients and Methods The study included 805 patients with PMF age ≤ 70 years recruited from multiple Italian centers and the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), forming two independent learning and validation cohorts. A Cox multivariable model was used to select from among a list of 22 variables those that were predictive of overall survival (OS). Integrated clinical and genetic prognostic models with (MIPSS70-plus) or without (MIPSS70) cytogenetic information were developed. Results Multivariable analysis identified the following as significant risk factors for OS: hemoglobin < 100 g/L, leukocytes > 25 × 10/L, platelets < 100 × 10/L, circulating blasts ≥ 2%, bone marrow fibrosis grade ≥ 2, constitutional symptoms, absence of CALR type-1 mutation, presence of high-molecular risk mutation (ie, ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1/ 2), and presence of two or more high-molecular risk mutations. By assigning hazard ratio (HR)-weighted points to these variables, three risk categories were delineated for the MIPSS70 model; 5-year OS was 95% in low-risk, 70% in intermediate-risk, and 29% in high-risk categories, corresponding to median OS of 27.7 years (95% CI, 22 to 34 years), 7.1 years (95% CI, 6.2 to 8.1 years), and 2.3 years (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.7 years), respectively. In the MIPSS70-plus model, which included cytogenetic information, four risk categories were delineated, with 5-year OS of 91% in low-risk, 66% in intermediate-risk (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 5.2), 42% in high-risk (HR, 6.4; 95% CI, 4.1 to 10.0), and 7% very high-risk categories (HR, 17.0; 95% CI, 9.8 to 29.2). Both models remained effective after inclusion of older patients in the analysis. Conclusion MIPSS70 and MIPSS70-plus provide complementary systems of risk stratification for transplantation-age patients with PMF and integrate prognostically relevant clinical, cytogenetic, and mutation data.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cytogenetic Analysis; DNA Mutational Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Minnesota; Mutation; Phenotype; Predictive Value of Tests; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stem Cell Transplantation; Time Factors; Young Adult
PubMed: 29226763
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 -
Blood Mar 2009Therapeutic decision-making in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is becoming more challenging because of the increasing use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and new...
Therapeutic decision-making in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is becoming more challenging because of the increasing use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and new investigational drugs. To enhance this process by developing a highly discriminative prognostic system, 1054 patients consecutively diagnosed with PMF at 7 centers were studied. Overall median survival was 69 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61-76). Multivariate analysis of parameters obtained at disease diagnosis identified age greater than 65 years, presence of constitutional symptoms, hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL, leukocyte count greater than 25 x 10(9)/L, and circulating blast cells 1% or greater as predictors of shortened survival. Based on the presence of 0 (low risk), 1 (intermediate risk-1), 2 (intermediate risk-2) or greater than or equal to 3 (high risk) of these variables, 4 risk groups with no overlapping in their survival curves were delineated; respective median survivals were 135, 95, 48, and 27 months (P< .001). Compared with prior prognostic models, the new risk stratification system displayed higher predictive accuracy, replicability, and discriminating power. In 409 patients with assessable metaphases, cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with shorter survival, but their independent contribution to prognosis was restricted to patients in the intermediate-risk groups. JAK2V617F did not cluster with a specific risk group or affect survival.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cause of Death; Child; Congresses as Topic; Female; Humans; International Cooperation; Male; Middle Aged; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Research Design; Survival Analysis; Young Adult
PubMed: 18988864
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449 -
Blood Cancer Journal Jul 2018Two novel prognostic systems for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) were recently unveiled: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70... (Review)
Review
Two novel prognostic systems for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) were recently unveiled: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70 (mutation-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for transplant-age patients). GIPSS is based exclusively on genetic markers: mutations and karyotype. MIPSS70 includes mutations and clinical risk factors. In its most recent adaptation, the prognostic value of MIPSS70 has been bolstered by the inclusion of a three-tiered cytogenetic risk stratification and use of hemoglobin thresholds that are adjusted for sex and severity (MIPSS70+ version 2.0). GIPSS features four, MIPSS70 three, and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 five risk categories. MIPSS70 is most useful in the absence of cytogenetic information. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 is more comprehensive than MIPSS70 and is the preferred model in the presence of cytogenetic information. Both MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 require an online score calculator ( http://www.mipss70score.it ). GIPPS offers a lower complexity prognostic tool that reliably identifies candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplant (GIPSS high-risk disease) or long-term observation with little or no therapeutic intervention (GIPSS low-risk disease). Ultimately, we favor a step-wise prognostication approach that starts with GIPSS but also considers MIPSS70+ version 2.0 for confirming the most appropriate treatment approach for the individual patient.
Topics: Algorithms; Disease Management; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30065290
DOI: 10.1038/s41408-018-0109-0