-
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency... Dec 2022Integrase inhibitors have been associated with excess gestational weight gain that may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). This post hoc analysis of NICHD P1081... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Integrase inhibitors have been associated with excess gestational weight gain that may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). This post hoc analysis of NICHD P1081 compared antepartum changes in weight and body mass index (BMI) in pregnant women initiating raltegravir- or efavirenz-based combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) and examined associations between rates of weight gain and APOs.
SETTING
NICHD P1081 enrolled antiretroviral-naive pregnant women living with HIV in the second and third trimester in Brazil, Tanzania, South Africa, Thailand, Argentina, and the United States.
METHODS
Two hundred eighty-one women enrolled between 20 and 31 gestational weeks were randomized to raltegravir- or efavirenz-based cART and followed for ≥4 weeks. A low rate of weight gain was defined as <0.18 kg/wk and high as >0.59 kg/wk. We compared weight gain and BMI increase between treatment arms using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between weight gain and APOs.
RESULTS
Raltegravir-based cART was associated with significantly higher antepartum weight gain (median 0.36 kg/wk versus 0.29 kg/wk, P = 0.01) and BMI increase (median 0.14 kg/m 2 /wk versus 0.11 kg/m 2 /wk, P = 0.01) compared with efavirenz-based treatment. Women on raltegravir had less low weight gain (18% versus 36%) and more high weight gain (21% versus 12%) ( P = 0.001). Women with low weight gain were more likely than those with normal weight gain to have small for gestational age infants or a composite of APOs.
CONCLUSIONS
A raltegravir-based antiretroviral regimen was associated with significantly higher antepartum rate of weight gain and BMI increase compared with efavirenz-based treatment in antiretroviral-naive pregnant women.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; United States; Raltegravir Potassium; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.); HIV Infections; Integrase Inhibitors; Weight Gain
PubMed: 36049477
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003081 -
AIDS Research and Therapy Jan 2022Raltegravir (RAL) has favorable tolerability and safety profile, with few and manageable drug interactions. The use of RAL 1200 mg once daily (qd) for first-line...
BACKGROUND
Raltegravir (RAL) has favorable tolerability and safety profile, with few and manageable drug interactions. The use of RAL 1200 mg once daily (qd) for first-line therapy is well established. We assessed efficacy and safety of RAL 1200 mg qd, as part of triple combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), for maintenance strategy.
METHODS
The QDISS trial (NCT03195452) was a 48-week multicenter, single-arm, open-label study designed to evaluate the ability of 2 NRTIs + RAL 1200 mg qd to maintain virological suppression in HIV-1 infected subjects on a stable cART with 2 NRTIs and a third agent for at least 6 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 24, by the FDA snapshot algorithm.
RESULTS
Of 100 participants 91% maintained viral suppression (95% CI: 83.6-95.8) at week 24 and 89% (81.2-94.4) at week 48. At week 24, there was one virological failure, without emergence of resistance-associated mutation and 10 participants had discontinued, 4 because of adverse events (AEs). Over 48 weeks, 7 AEs of grade 3-4 were reported, one possibly study-drug related (spontaneous abortion). BMI remained stable regardless of previous therapy or baseline BMI category. Over 48 weeks, total cholesterol (p = 0.023) and LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.009) decreased, lifestyle and ease subscale significantly improved (p = 0.04). The quality of life and Patients Reported Outcomes (PROs) also improved at W12 (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION
RAL 1200 mg qd as part of a maintenance triple therapy showed a high efficacy in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected subjects, with good safety profile and improved lipid profile and patient reported outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical trials.gov NCT03195452 and EudraCT 2016-003702-13.
Topics: Adult; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; HIV-1; Humans; Quality of Life; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load
PubMed: 35033092
DOI: 10.1186/s12981-022-00428-5 -
The Lancet. HIV Jun 2016For second-line antiretroviral therapy, WHO recommends a boosted protease inhibitor plus nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). However,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
For second-line antiretroviral therapy, WHO recommends a boosted protease inhibitor plus nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). However, concerns about toxicity and cross-resistance motivated a search for regimens that do not contain NRTIs. We aimed to assess whether boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir would be non-inferior to boosted lopinavir plus NRTIs for virological suppression in resource-limited settings.
METHODS
A5273 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study at 15 AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) research sites in nine resource-limited countries (three sites each in India and South Africa, two each in Malawi and Peru, and one each in Brazil, Kenya, Tanzania, Thailand, and Zimbabwe). Adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations of at least 1000 copies per mL after at least 24 weeks on a regimen based on a non-NRTI inhibitor were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (100 mg ritonavir, 400 mg lopinavir) plus 400 mg raltegravir twice a day (raltegravir group) or to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus two or three NRTIs selected from an algorithm (eg, zidovudine after failure with tenofovir and vice versa; NRTI group). Randomised group assignment was done with a computer algorithm concealed to site personnel, and stratified by HIV-1 RNA viral load, CD4 cell count, and intention to use zidovudine, with the groups balanced by each site. The primary endpoint was time to confirmed virological failure (two measurements of HIV-1 RNA viral load >400 copies per mL) at or after week 24 in the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferiority (10% margin) was assessed by comparing the cumulative probability of virological failure by 48 weeks. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01352715.
FINDINGS
Between March 13, 2012, and Oct 2, 2013, we randomly assigned 515 participants: 260 to the raltegravir group and 255 to the NRTI group; two participants in the raltegravir group and one in the NRTI group were excluded from analyses because of ineligibility. By the end of follow-up (October, 2014), 96 participants had virological failure (46 in the raltegravir group and 50 in the NRTI group). By 48 weeks, the cumulative probability of virological failure was 10·3% (95% CI 6·5-14·0) in the raltegravir group and 12·4% (8·3-16·5) in the NRTI group, with a weighted difference of -3·4% (-8·4 to 1·5), indicating that raltegravir was non-inferior, but not superior, to NRTIs. 62 (24%) participants in the raltegravir group and 81 (32%) in the NRTI group had grade 3 or higher adverse events; 19 (7%) and 29 (11%), respectively, had serious adverse events. Three participants in each group died, all from HIV-related causes.
INTERPRETATION
In settings with extensive NRTI resistance but no available resistance testing, our data support WHO's recommendation for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus NRTI for second-line antiretroviral therapy. Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir is an appropriate alternative, especially if NRTI use is limited by toxicity.
FUNDING
National Institutes of Health.
Topics: Adult; Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Brazil; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Health Resources; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; India; Lopinavir; Malawi; Male; Medically Underserved Area; Peru; RNA, Viral; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Thailand; Viral Load
PubMed: 27240787
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30011-X -
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases Jun 2021In patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis, antiretroviral therapy options are limited due to drug-drug interactions with rifampicin. A previous phase 2 trial... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Standard dose raltegravir or efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis (ANRS 12 300 Reflate TB 2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND
In patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis, antiretroviral therapy options are limited due to drug-drug interactions with rifampicin. A previous phase 2 trial indicated that raltegravir 400 mg twice a day or efavirenz 600 mg once a day might have similar virological efficacy in patients given rifampicin. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the non-inferiority of raltegravir to efavirenz.
METHODS
We did a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial at six sites in Côte d'Ivoire, Brazil, France, Mozambique, and Vietnam. We included antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive adults (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed HIV-1 infection and bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed tuberculosis who had initiated rifampicin-containing tuberculosis treatment within the past 8 weeks. Using computerised random numbers, we randomly assigned participants (1:1; stratified by country) to receive raltegravir 400 mg twice daily or efavirenz 600 mg once daily, both in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with virological suppression at week 48 (defined as plasma HIV RNA concentration <50 copies per mL). The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 12%. The primary outcome was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients (excluding two patients with HIV-2 infection and one patient with HIV-1 RNA concentration of <50 copies per mL at inclusion), and the on-treatment population, which included all patients in the intention-to-treat population who initiated treatment and were continuing allocated treatment at week 48, and patients who had discontinued allocated treatment due to death or virological failure. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment regimen. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02273765.
FINDINGS
Between Sept 28, 2015, and Jan 5, 2018, 460 participants were randomly assigned to raltegravir (n=230) or efavirenz (n=230), of whom 457 patients (230 patients in the raltegravir group; 227 patients in the efavirenz group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and 410 (206 patients in the raltegravir group; 204 patients in the efavirenz group) in the on-treatment analysis. At baseline, the median CD4 count was 103 cells per μL and median plasma HIV RNA concentration was 5·5 log copies per mL (IQR 5·0-5·8). 310 (68%) of 457 participants had bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis. In the intention-to-treat population, at week 48, 140 (61%) of 230 participants in the raltegravir group and 150 (66%) of 227 patients in the efavirenz had achieved virological suppression (between-group difference -5·2% [95% CI -14·0 to 3·6]), thus raltegravir did not meet the predefined criterion for non-inferiority. The most frequent adverse events were HIV-associated non-AIDS illnesses (eight [3%] of 229 patients in the raltegravir group; 21 [9%] of 230 patients in the efavirenz group) and AIDS-defining illnesses (ten [4%] patients in the raltegravir group; 13 [6%] patients in the efavirenz group). 58 (25%) of 229 patients in raltegravir group and 66 (29%) of 230 patients in the efavirenz group had grade 3 or 4 adverse events. 26 (6%) of 457 patients died during follow-up: 14 in the efavirenz group and 12 in the raltegravir group.
INTERPRETATION
In patients with HIV given tuberculosis treatment, non-inferiority of raltegravir compared with efavirenz was not shown. Raltegravir was well tolerated and could be considered as an option, but only in selected patients.
FUNDING
National French Agency for AIDS Research, Ministry of Health in Brazil, Merck.
TRANSLATIONS
For the Portuguese and French translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Brazil; Coinfection; Cote d'Ivoire; Cyclopropanes; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; France; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mozambique; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Vietnam; Young Adult
PubMed: 33667406
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30869-0 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2015The objectives of this study were to investigate raltegravir transport across several blood-tissue barrier models and the potential interactions with drug efflux...
The objectives of this study were to investigate raltegravir transport across several blood-tissue barrier models and the potential interactions with drug efflux transporters. Raltegravir uptake, accumulation, and permeability were evaluated in vitro in (i) P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1), or MRP4-overexpressing MDA-MDR1 (P-gp), HEK-ABCG2, HeLa-MRP1, or HEK-MRP4 cells, respectively; (ii) cell culture systems of the human blood-brain (hCMEC/D3), mouse blood-testicular (TM4), and human blood-intestinal (Caco-2) barriers; and (iii) rat jejunum and ileum segments using an in situ single-pass intestinal perfusion model. [(3)H]Raltegravir accumulation by MDA-MDR1 (P-gp) and HEK-ABCG2-overexpressing cells was significantly enhanced in the presence of PSC833 {6-[(2S,4R,6E)-4-methyl-2-(methylamino)-3-oxo-6-octenoic acid]-7-L-valine-cyclosporine}, a P-gp inhibitor, or Ko143 [(3S,6S,12aS)-1,2,3,4,6,7,12,12a-octahydro-9-methoxy-6-(2-methylpropyl)-1,4-dioxopyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3-propanoic acid 1,1-dimethylethyl ester], a BCRP inhibitor, suggesting the inhibition of a P-gp- or BCRP-mediated efflux process, respectively. Furthermore, [(3)H]raltegravir accumulation by human cerebral microvessel endothelial hCMEC/D3 and mouse Sertoli TM4 cells was significantly increased by PSC833 and Ko143. In human intestinal Caco-2 cells grown on Transwell filters, PSC833, but not Ko143, significantly decreased the [(3)H]raltegravir efflux ratios. In rat intestinal segments, [(3)H]raltegravir in situ permeability was significantly enhanced by the concurrent administration of PSC833 and Ko143. In contrast, in the transporter inhibition assays, raltegravir (10 to 500 μM) did not increase the accumulation of substrate for P-gp (rhodamine-6G), BCRP ([(3)H]mitoxantrone), or MRP1 [2',7'-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF)] by MDA-MDR1 (P-gp)-, HEK-ABCG2-, or HeLa-MRP1-overexpressing cells, respectively. Our data suggest that raltegravir is a substrate but not an inhibitor of the drug efflux transporters P-gp and BCRP. These transporters might play a role in the restriction of raltegravir permeability across the blood-brain, blood-testicular, and blood-intestinal barriers, potentially contributing to its low tissue concentrations and/or low oral bioavailability observed in the clinic setting.
Topics: ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Blood-Brain Barrier; Caco-2 Cells; Cell Line; Humans; Ileum; Intestinal Mucosa; Jejunum; Mice; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins; Raltegravir Potassium; Rats
PubMed: 25691630
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04594-14 -
HIV Clinical Trials Oct 2018Raltegravir became the first integrase inhibitor to gain FDA approval; but with limited evidence documenting long-term risks in real world care, especially for major... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Association of raltegravir use with long-term health outcomes in HIV-infected patients: an observational post-licensure safety study in a large integrated healthcare system.
BACKGROUND
Raltegravir became the first integrase inhibitor to gain FDA approval; but with limited evidence documenting long-term risks in real world care, especially for major health outcomes of interest.
OBJECTIVE
Assess raltegravir safety in clinical practice within an integrated health system.
METHODS
We conducted a cohort study of HIV-infected adults within Kaiser Permanente California from 2005 to 2013. We compared patients initiating raltegravir during the study period with two groups; a historical cohort (started new antiretroviral regimen [ART] 2005-2007) and a concurrent cohort that did not initiate raltegravir (2007-2013). We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression to obtain hazard ratios (HR) for pre-specified incident health outcomes, employing propensity scores to adjust for potential confounding.
RESULTS
The population included 8,219 HIV-infected adults (raltegravir cohort N = 1,757; 4,798 patient-years), with greater years known HIV-infected among raltegravir patients. The raltegravir cohort had increased HR for AIDS-defining (HR 2.69 [1.53-4.71]; HR 1.85 [1.21-2.82]) and non-AIDS-defining malignancies (HR 2.26 [1.29-3.94]; HR 1.88 [1.26-2.78]) relative to both comparison cohorts. Compared to the historical cohort we found no significant difference in all-cause mortality; the raltegravir cohort experienced increased HR for all-cause mortality compared to concurrent (HR 1.53 [1.02-2.31]). Raltegravir appeared protective of lipodystrophy when compared to the historical cohort but associated with increased incidence compared to concurrent. There were no significant differences in the incidence of hepatic, skin, or cardiovascular events.
CONCLUSIONS
The potentially elevated risk for malignancy and mortality with raltegravir and residual confounding merits further investigation. We demonstrate the value of observational cohorts for monitoring post-licensure medication safety.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; California; Cohort Studies; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; HIV Infections; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30370835
DOI: 10.1080/15284336.2018.1523826 -
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and... Jul 2023People living with HIV may present co-morbidities requiring the initiation and subsequently the discontinuation of medications with inducing properties. The time to...
BACKGROUND
People living with HIV may present co-morbidities requiring the initiation and subsequently the discontinuation of medications with inducing properties. The time to reach maximal enzyme induction and to return to baseline enzyme levels has not been thoroughly characterized.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the onset and disappearance of dolutegravir [uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate] and raltegravir (UGT1A1 substrate) induction with strong and moderate inducers using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.
METHODS
The predictive performance of the PBPK model to simulate dolutegravir and raltegravir pharmacokinetics and to reproduce the strength of induction was verified using clinical drug-drug interaction studies (steady-state induction) and switch studies (residual induction). The model was considered verified when the predictions were within 2-fold of the observed data. One hundred virtual individuals (50% female) were generated to simulate the unstudied scenarios. The results were used to calculate the fold-change in CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 enzyme levels upon initiation and discontinuation of strong (rifampicin) or moderate (efavirenz or rifabutin) inducers.
RESULTS
The time for reaching maximal induction and subsequent disappearance of CYP3A4 induction was 14 days for rifampicin and efavirenz but 7 days for rifabutin. The distinct timelines for the moderate inducers relate to their different half-lives and plasma concentrations. The induction and de-induction processes were more rapid for UGT1A1.
CONCLUSIONS
Our simulations support the common practice of maintaining the adjusted dosage of a drug for another 2 weeks after stopping an inducer. Furthermore, our simulations suggest that an inducer should be administered for at least 14 days before conducting interaction studies to reach maximal induction.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Rifampin; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Raltegravir Potassium; Drug Interactions; Glucuronosyltransferase; Rifabutin
PubMed: 37278880
DOI: 10.1007/s13318-023-00833-9 -
PloS One 2019Antiretroviral agents are approved in Japan based on non-clinical and clinical data reported from overseas. Neither the long-term tolerability nor the effectiveness of... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Antiretroviral agents are approved in Japan based on non-clinical and clinical data reported from overseas. Neither the long-term tolerability nor the effectiveness of raltegravir or other integrase strand transfer inhibitors in Japan is known. This study reports on the long-term tolerability and effectiveness of raltegravir in Japanese clinical practice using data collected through approximately 9 years of post-marketing surveillance. This observational survey used data on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients initiated treatment with raltegravir between 2008 and 2017 in the HIV-related drug (HRD) cooperative survey to assess the safety and effectiveness of raltegravir in real world clinical practice. There were totally 1,303 patients prescribed raltegravir across 30 institutions; 1,293 patients and 1,178 patients were included for the safety and effectiveness analyses, respectively. The overall risk of adverse drug reaction was 17.25%, with abnormal hepatic function and hyperlipidaemia (<1.5%) having the highest proportion. Median HIV-1 RNA viral loads rapidly decreased below 40 copies/mL after 3 months of raltegravir use in treatment-naïve patients, and consistently sustained below 40 copies/mL after the start of raltegravir use in treatment-experienced patients. Among the patients who were treated for 7 years, 92.00% (95% CI: 73.97-99.02) maintained HIV-1 RNA viral load below 50 copies/mL. Additionally, CD4+ cell counts exceeded >500 cells/μL in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients after 3 years and 4 years of treatment, respectively. In Japanese HIV patients, long-term treatment with raltegravir is well-tolerated and effective at viral suppression as measured by HIV-1 RNA levels and subsequent change in CD4+ cell counts. Such benefits can be expected for not only treatment-naïve but also treatment-experienced patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; RNA, Viral; Raltegravir Potassium; Safety; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult
PubMed: 30625208
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210384 -
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency... Dec 2020HIV treatment of neonates requires identifying appropriate antiretroviral dosing regimens. Our aims were to characterize raltegravir elimination kinetics in low birth...
BACKGROUND
HIV treatment of neonates requires identifying appropriate antiretroviral dosing regimens. Our aims were to characterize raltegravir elimination kinetics in low birth weight (LBW) neonates after maternal dosing and to develop a pharmacokinetic model to predict raltegravir plasma concentrations for term and preterm neonates.
METHODS
Mothers living with HIV who received raltegravir during pregnancy and their LBW neonates participated in IMPAACT P1097 study. Up to 6 serial plasma samples were collected from each infant over the first 2 postnatal weeks to characterize raltegravir elimination. Safety laboratory evaluations were obtained, and infants were monitored for 6 weeks for signs of raltegravir toxicity. An integrated maternal-neonatal pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict neonatal raltegravir plasma concentrations.
RESULTS
Sixteen mothers and their 18 LBW neonates were enrolled. The median (range) raltegravir elimination half-life was 24.4 (10.1-83) hours (N = 17 neonates). No adverse events related to raltegravir in utero exposure were observed. Pharmacokinetic modeling revealed that raltegravir clearance in full-term LBW neonates was well described by allometric scaling but clearance in preterm LBW neonates was better described using slower clearance maturation kinetics. Simulations suggest receipt of the current dosing recommendations in a 34-week gestation neonate would result in plasma concentrations up to 2.5-fold higher than those observed in full-term LBW infants.
CONCLUSIONS
Modeling suggests that prematurity reduces raltegravir clearance and a modified raltegravir dosing regimen will be necessary to avoid elevated plasma raltegravir concentrations.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Female; Glucuronosyltransferase; Half-Life; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Male; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 32925360
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002492 -
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency... Aug 2018Raltegravir 1200mg (2×600mg tablets) once daily (QD) demonstrated noninferior efficacy and similar safety to raltegravir 400mg twice daily (BID) at week 48 of the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Raltegravir 1200 mg Once Daily vs 400 mg Twice Daily, With Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, for Previously Untreated HIV-1 Infection: Week 96 Results From ONCEMRK, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.
BACKGROUND
Raltegravir 1200mg (2×600mg tablets) once daily (QD) demonstrated noninferior efficacy and similar safety to raltegravir 400mg twice daily (BID) at week 48 of the ONCEMRK trial. Here, we report the week 96 results from this study.
METHODS
ONCEMRK is a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority trial comparing raltegravir 1200mg QD with raltegravir 400mg BID in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults. Participants were assigned (2:1) to raltegravir 2×600mg QD or 400mg BID, both with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) for 96 weeks. Randomization was stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA and hepatitis B/C status. Efficacy was assessed as the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies per milliliter (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot approach); the noninferiority margin was 10 percentage points.
RESULTS
Of the 797 participants who received study therapy (84.6% were men, 59.3% were white, and mean age was 35.9 years), 694 completed 96 weeks of treatment (87.6% QD; 84.4% BID), with few discontinuations because of lack of efficacy (1.1% for both groups) or adverse events (1.3% QD; 2.3% BID). At week 96, 81.5% (433/531) of QD recipients and 80.1% (213/266) of BID recipients achieved HIV-1 RNA <40 copies per milliliter (difference 1.4%, 95% confidence interval: -4.4 to 7.3). CD4 T-cell counts increased >260 cells/mm from baseline in both groups. Resistance to raltegravir was infrequent, occurring in 0.8% of each treatment group through week 96. Adverse event rates were similar for the 2 regimens.
CONCLUSIONS
In HIV-1-infected treatment-naive adults receiving FTC/TDF, raltegravir 1200mg QD demonstrated noninferior efficacy to raltegravir 400mg BID that was durable to week 96, with a safety profile similar to raltegravir 400mg BID.
Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Phosphorous Acids; Placebos; RNA, Viral; Raltegravir Potassium
PubMed: 29771789
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001723