-
European Archives of... Jan 2021Stapes surgery is the gold standard surgical treatment nowadays for otosclerosis. Several controversies on the procedure have been reported; surgical techniques for most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Stapes surgery is the gold standard surgical treatment nowadays for otosclerosis. Several controversies on the procedure have been reported; surgical techniques for most favorable outcomes are still on discussion. The objective of this study is to present an update of evidence-based medicine concerning the utilization of lasers and drilling for footplate fenestration during stapedotomy surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Publications in English in the last 5 years were searched in the PubMed/MEDLINE database and were systematically reviewed. A total of three articles were included according to the inclusion criteria, obtaining a total of 1531 patients managed surgically for otosclerosis, using laser or drill for footplate fenestration. Data were systematically extracted and hearing results were compared in a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
For the drill group, a total of 978 patients were retrieved and data were obtained as follows: mean age was 50 years old; the female proportion was 62%; mean preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) of 28 dB; mean postoperative ABG of 8 dB; mean ABG improvement of 20 dB; an ABG closure rate to < 10 dB of 74%. For the laser group, a total of 553 patients were retrieved, data were obtained as follows: mean age was 47 years old; the female proportion was 63%; preoperative ABG of 26 dB; postoperative ABG of 8 dB; mean ABG improvement of 18 dB; an ABG closure rate to < 10 dB of 72%.
CONCLUSION
The results from this study reveal that in regard to postoperative hearing results, surgical outcomes are comparable, and there is no statistically significant difference between the utilization of drills and lasers as a surgical instrument for the fenestration of the stapes footplate during stapedotomy surgery.
Topics: Audiometry, Pure-Tone; Bone Conduction; Female; Fenestration, Labyrinth; Hearing; Humans; Lasers; Middle Aged; Otosclerosis; Retrospective Studies; Stapes; Stapes Surgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32535861
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06117-1 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Oct 2018To compare post-operative audiometric outcomes for the two prevailing surgical approaches for isolated malleus and/or incus fixation: ossicular mobilisation with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare post-operative audiometric outcomes for the two prevailing surgical approaches for isolated malleus and/or incus fixation: ossicular mobilisation with preservation of the ossicular chain, and disruption and reconstruction of the ossicular chain.
METHODS
A search was conducted, in December 2016, of PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature articles written in English. Papers presenting original data regarding post-operative audiometric outcomes in patients who underwent surgical treatment for malleus and/or incus fixation with a mobile and intact stapes were included. A risk of bias assessment was performed on the 14 selected papers and a tier system was developed. Meta-analysis was accomplished by comparing pooled rates of surgical success by chi-square test and calculating odds ratios by logistical regression. Analysis was performed using Revman5 and R software.Results and conclusionAnalysis of the literature revealed no differences in audiometric outcomes between ossicular chain mobilisation and ossicular chain reconstruction in patients with isolated malleus and/or incus fixation. A large, prospective study comparing both short- and long-term hearing results for ossicular chain mobilisation and ossicular chain reconstruction in this population may identify whether a difference in outcomes exists between the two approaches.
Topics: Audiometry, Pure-Tone; Ear Ossicles; Ear, Middle; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hearing; Humans; Incus; Malleus; Stapes Surgery; Tympanoplasty
PubMed: 30289092
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215118001494 -
Acta Oto-laryngologica Jul 2018The objective of this study is to compare hearing improvements in the air-bone gap (ABG) after type III tympanoplasties, comparing between incus transposition (IT) and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to compare hearing improvements in the air-bone gap (ABG) after type III tympanoplasties, comparing between incus transposition (IT) and partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Publications in English were searched in PUBMED database and were systematically reviewed. A total of 14 articles were included, obtaining 1055 patients, 614 for the IT group and 441 for the PORP group. Preoperative ABG, postoperative ABG, dB gain and ABG closure rate were compared.
RESULTS
IT group: preoperative ABG of 31.74 dB (SD 10.51); postoperative ABG of 18.97 dB (SD 10.6); dB gain of 12.76 dB (SD 14.97); and ABG closure rate of 64.48%. PORP group: preoperative ABG of 28.02 dB (SD 10.47); postoperative ABG of 16.27 dB (SD 10.45); dB gain of 11.75 (SD 15.02); and ABG closure rate of 71.32%. No significant statistical difference was found in dB mean gain between groups (p > .05), although a difference was found in the ABG closure rate between groups favouring PORP series (p < .05).
CONCLUSION
An improvement in hearing results was observed within both groups after type III tympanoplasty. There is no difference in decibels gained between both ossiculoplasty materials, but a better closure rate (%) was observed in the PORP group.
Topics: Hearing; Humans; Incus; Ossicular Replacement; Tympanoplasty
PubMed: 29355069
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1425901 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Oct 2017To describe and discuss otologic manifestations of Larsen syndrome, based on a case report and a systematic review of the literature. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To describe and discuss otologic manifestations of Larsen syndrome, based on a case report and a systematic review of the literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a PubMED database search, and we selected studies reporting otolaryngologic manifestations secondary to Larsen syndrome. The selected articles were read in full, and three researchers independently extracted data from the studies. In parallel, we report the case of a 14-year-old patient who had hearing loss secondary to Larsen syndrome.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies met our selection criteria. Seven studies reported hearing loss in patients with Larsen syndrome (4 had conductive hearing loss and 3 had mixed hearing loss). The conductive hearing loss may be secondary to ossicular malformations and/or middle ear effusions. Other causes for conductive hearing loss are mesenchymal remnants in the middle ear, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and cleft palate. Surgical management of the hearing loss is possible in selected cases, although the surgical and anesthetic risks should be considered. Hearing aids seem to be safe and effective treatment options for the hearing loss secondary to Larsen syndrome.
CONCLUSION
Although rare, patients with Larsen syndrome may have hearing loss. The most frequent type of deficit is conductive, either secondary to malformation of the ossicles or middle ear effusion. Possible surgical correction of these abnormalities should be weighed against the anesthetic risks of these patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Child, Preschool; Ear, Middle; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss; Humans; Male; Osteochondrodysplasias; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 28964299
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.020 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Aug 2017Objective To systematically review the anatomy of the ossicular chain. Data Sources Google Scholar, PubMed, and otologic textbooks. Review Methods A systematic... (Review)
Review
Objective To systematically review the anatomy of the ossicular chain. Data Sources Google Scholar, PubMed, and otologic textbooks. Review Methods A systematic literature search was performed on January 26, 2015. Search terms used to discover articles consisted of combinations of 2 keywords. One keyword from both groups was used: [ ossicular, ossicle, malleus, incus, stapes] and [ morphology, morphometric, anatomy, variation, physiology], yielding more than 50,000 hits. Articles were then screened by title and abstract if they did not contain information relevant to human ossicular chain anatomy. In addition to this search, references of selected articles were studied as well as suggested relevant articles from publication databases. Standard otologic textbooks were screened using the search criteria. Results Thirty-three sources were selected for use in this review. From these studies, data on the composition, physiology, morphology, and morphometrics were acquired. In addition, any correlations or lack of correlations between features of the ossicular chain and other features of the ossicular chain or patient were noted, with bilateral symmetry between ossicles being the only important correlation reported. Conclusion There was significant variation in all dimensions of each ossicle between individuals, given that degree of variation, custom fitting, or custom manufacturing of prostheses for each patient could optimize prosthesis fit. From published data, an accurate 3-dimensional model of the malleus, incus, and stapes can be created, which can then be further modified for each patient's individual anatomy.
Topics: Ear Ossicles; Humans; Ossicular Prosthesis; Prosthesis Design; Strategic Planning
PubMed: 28463590
DOI: 10.1177/0194599817701717 -
JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck... Nov 2015Physicians should ideally be able to provide patients with chronic otitis media and/or cholesteatoma specific information about postoperative hearing outcome, based on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Physicians should ideally be able to provide patients with chronic otitis media and/or cholesteatoma specific information about postoperative hearing outcome, based on their level of preoperative ossicular chain damage (OCD).
OBJECTIVE
To identify the influence of preoperative OCD on hearing outcomes in patients after chronic otitis media and/or cholesteatoma surgery.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for available evidence, without any constraints, on December 13, 2014, for articles published between January 1, 1975, and December 13, 2014.
STUDY SELECTION
We reviewed the literature for articles assessing the prognostic value of OCD on postoperative hearing outcome (air-bone gap [ABG] in decibels), using Austin-Kartush criteria or independent OCD classification systems. We assessed relevance and validity using a self-designed critical appraisal tool based on the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool.
DATA EXTRACTION
Characteristics of study populations and postoperative ABGs in decibels were extracted from all included studies by 4 authors (E.F.B., M.N.G., N.J.K., A.S.H.J.L.).
RESULTS
The tested hypothesis was formulated before data collection. Primary study outcome was defined as postoperative adult hearing outcomes after COM and/or cholesteatoma surgery defined as mean postoperative ABG. Our search yielded 5661 articles. Nine articles with high relevance were included. Pooled results of studies using the Austin-Kartush criteria showed a significant (P < .001) difference in mean ABG in favor of group B, when comparing group B (patients with malleus present, stapes absent; 11.1 [95% CI, 10.3-11.8] dB) to group C (patients with malleus absent, stapes present; 15.7 [95% CI, 14.6-16.7] dB) and group B to group D (patients with malleus absent, stapes absent; 16.5 [95% CI, 15.2-17.9] dB). Three studies using independent OCD classification criteria found no influence of stapes structure (intact stapes suprastructure, 13.5 [95% CI, 10.3-16.7], 15.1 [95% CI, 11.8-18.3], and 21.9 [95% CI, 15.0-28.8] dB vs absent stapes structure, 12.8 [95% CI, 9.5-16.1], 19.5 [95% CI, 14.9-24.1], and 30.2 [95% CI, 24.7-35.8] dB) on postoperative ABG. One study reported a significant (P = .04) difference in mean ABG between patients with present (18.9 [95% CI, 15.7-22.1] dB) and absent (24.4 [95% CI, 20.2-28.6] dB) malleus.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Pooled results of Austin-Kartush studies showed that in patients with COM, with or without cholesteatoma, the malleus status is a significant predictor of postoperative hearing outcome, independent of the stapes condition. Studies reporting on individual ossicle status supported this finding by showing that only malleus condition influenced postoperative hearing outcome. These findings are based on level IV evidence, which indicates the need for future high-level evidence studies.
Topics: Bone Conduction; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Chronic Disease; Ear Ossicles; Hearing Loss, Conductive; Humans; Otitis Media
PubMed: 26502037
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2269 -
The Laryngoscope Jun 2016For many years, the therapeutic approach for conductive and/or mixed hearing loss has consisted of middle ear surgery with replacement of defect ossicles, and if... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS
For many years, the therapeutic approach for conductive and/or mixed hearing loss has consisted of middle ear surgery with replacement of defect ossicles, and if possible the application of a hearing aid. Advances in technology have led to the introduction of electronmagnetic active implantable devices such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB). With its various coupling techniques for different pathophysiological situations in the middle ear, the VSB offers greater improvement in the hearing performance of affected persons.
DATA SOURCE
PubMed, OvidSP (MEDLINE), EMBASE (DIMDI), the National Institue for Health research (NIHR) Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (including the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Health Technology Assessment), and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify articles published between January 2006 and April 2014 that evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the VSB in comparison to no intervention, bone conduction hearing implants (BCHI), and middle ear surgery plus hearing aids for adults and children with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
METHODS
Study selection and data extraction was carried out by multiple reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence (2011); and a checklist available from the Evidence Analysis Library, Academy of Nutrition and Diabetics.
RESULTS
Thirty-six publications were identified: 19 on VSB outcomes in 294 individuals, 13 on BCHI outcomes in 666 individuals, and four on middle ear surgery plus hearing aid outcomes in 43 individuals. Two systematic reviews were also identified. Heterogeneous outcome measures made it difficult to summarize data. In general, the VSB proved to be safe and effective when compared to no intervention and BCHI, and provided more and consistent hearing gain compared to middle ear surgery plus conventional hearing aids.
CONCLUSION
As demonstrated in the literature, the VSB as an active device offers an effective alternative for patients with various middle ear pathologies, particularly with mixed hearing loss and failed previous tympanoplasties when classical ossiculoplasty could not provide enough functional gain. This new strategy in hearing rehabilitation has led to an improved quality of hearing and life. Laryngoscope, 126:1451-1457, 2016.
Topics: Bone Conduction; Equipment Design; Hearing; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss, Conductive; Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural; Humans; Magnets; Ossicular Prosthesis; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26468033
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25670