-
The Laryngoscope Feb 2024Endoscopic ear surgery is no longer a promising technique, but a well-established one. This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty based on... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopic ear surgery is no longer a promising technique, but a well-established one. This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty based on current literature evidence, in terms of their efficacy and safety characteristics.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted a systematic literature search of four medical databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov), focusing on randomized controlled or observational studies comparing microscopic to endoscopic tympanoplasty.
REVIEW METHODS
Data related to the efficacy and safety of each technique were extracted. Outcome data were summarized using pooled mean differences or pooled odds ratio along with their 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was estimated, by using the ROBINS-I and RoB-II assessment tools, while the overall quality of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE working group.
RESULTS
Thirty-three studies, with 2646 patients in total, were included in the meta-analysis. Success rate was evaluated by estimating tympanic graft failure (pooled mean difference:-0.23; 95% CI: -0.61, 0.14, I = 33.42%), and air-bone gap improvement (pooled mean difference:-0.05; 95% CI:-0.23, 0.13, I = 52.69%), resulting in comparable outcomes for the two techniques. A statistically significant difference favoring the endoscopic technique was detected regarding postoperative wound infection (OR: -1.72; 95% CI: -3.39, -0.04, I = 0%), dysgeusia (OR: -1.47; 95% CI: -2.47, -0.47, I = 0%), otitis externa development (OR: -1.96; 95% CI: -3.23, -0.69, I = 0%), auricular numbness (OR: -2.56; 95% CI: -3.93, -1.19, I = 0%), as well as surgical duration (OR: -1.86; 95% CI: -2.70, -1.02, I = 43.95%), when compared to the postauricular microscopic approach.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic tympanoplasty is an innovative alternative to the microscopic technique, resulting in commensurate outcomes regarding success rate. Furthermore, it offers superior results concerning postoperative complications, while it presents a significant reduction in the duration of surgery, mainly when it is compared to the postauricular microscopic approach.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
NA Laryngoscope, 2024.
PubMed: 38415937
DOI: 10.1002/lary.31365 -
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and... Dec 2023Diabetes mellitus is one of the risk factors for malignant otitis externa. There are very few studies on the disease in Africa and there is a need to pool the prior...
Diabetes mellitus is one of the risk factors for malignant otitis externa. There are very few studies on the disease in Africa and there is a need to pool the prior studies to highlight the characteristics of the disease. The study type is a systematic review and the PRISMA guidelines were followed. Using the appropriate terms, relevant medical databases were systematically searched. Thirty-two studies met the eligibility criteria with a total sample size of 848, who were mainly elderly. Diabetes mellitus was present in 94% of the participants. Average duration of diabetes diagnosis in the participants was 12.4 years. The pooled HbA1c was 9.8%. The most common symptoms were otalgia (96.1%), otorrhoea (75.8%) and hearing loss (56.1%). was the most common isolate (72%). Fluoroquinolones and the 3rd-generation cephalosporins were the preferred antibiotics. The pooled cure rate from antimicrobial usage was 76.2%. In addition to medications, 24.6% of the affected individuals required debridement. About 1.6% of the participants died from malignant otitis externa. Malignant otitis externa is associated with poorly controlled diabetes. Pseudomonas is the most common cause and a significant proportion gets cured with prolonged antibiotherapy.
PubMed: 37974885
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03939-3 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Feb 2024Necrotising otitis externa is a serious infection with minimal evidence underpinning its management. This review aims to synthesise published evidence of antimicrobial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Necrotising otitis externa is a serious infection with minimal evidence underpinning its management. This review aims to synthesise published evidence of antimicrobial therapies and their outcomes in necrotising otitis externa.
METHODS
The review was PROSPERO registered (CRD42022353244) and conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses ('PRISMA') guidelines. A robust search strategy filtered 28 manuscripts into the final review. Antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcome data were extracted and analysed.
RESULTS
Published studies are heterogeneous, with high risk of bias and low certainty. Reporting of outcomes is poor and extremely variable. First-line therapy is most commonly in-patient (95 per cent) empiric fluoroquinolone (68 per cent) delivered intravenously (82 per cent). The lack of granular data and poor outcome reporting mean it is impossible to correlate treatment strategies with clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Robust, consistent outcome reporting with reference to treatments administered is mandatory, to inform clinical management and optimise future research. Optimal antimicrobial choices and treatment strategies require clarification through prospective clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Otitis Externa; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Prospective Studies; Anti-Infective Agents
PubMed: 37767726
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215123001664 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Nov 2023Otitis externa is a condition causing inflammation of the outer ear canal, which presents with itching, discharge and pain. Most cases of acute otitis externa are caused... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Otitis externa is a condition causing inflammation of the outer ear canal, which presents with itching, discharge and pain. Most cases of acute otitis externa are caused by bacterial infection and are thus treated with antibiotics. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials aims to assess the effectiveness of topical non-antibiotic treatments compared to topical antibiotic treatment for the treatment of acute otitis externa.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis databases searched: Cochrane Library including ClinicalTrials.gov; MEDLINE; World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Web of Science to identify randomised clinical trials evaluating topical antibiotics and topical non-antibiotic agents in adults and children with acute otitis externa. Non-antibiotic therapeutics for comparison with topical antibiotics included antiseptics, steroids, non-pharmaceuticals and astringents.
RESULTS
Seventeen trials were eligible for inclusion, with 10 combined in meta-analysis. Data could be pooled comparing antiseptic and steroid monotherapies with topical antibiotic agents. There were no significant differences in cure rates in any pairwise comparisons. Individually, the majority of studies favoured topical antiseptics or steroids over antibiotics, however these differences were not significant when pooled in meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Antiseptic, steroid and antibiotic monotherapies are all effective for the management of acute otitis externa. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that topical antiseptic or steroid agents are superior or inferior to topical antibiotics.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Otitis Externa; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Inflammation; Acute Disease; Steroids
PubMed: 37550850
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14084 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... May 2023To present a systematic review and critical analysis of clinical studies for necrotising otitis externa (NOE), with the aim of informing best practice for diagnosis and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To present a systematic review and critical analysis of clinical studies for necrotising otitis externa (NOE), with the aim of informing best practice for diagnosis and management.
DESIGN
Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from database inception until 30 April 2021 for all clinical articles on NOE. The review was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020128957) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
Seventy articles, including 2274 patients were included in the final synthesis. Seventy-three percent were retrospective case series; the remainder were of low methodological quality. Case definitions varied widely. Median patient age was 69.2 years; 68% were male, 84% had diabetes and 10% had no reported immunosuppressive risk factor. Otalgia was almost universal (96%), with granulation (69%) and oedema (76%) the commonest signs reported. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in 62%, but a range of bacterial and fungal pathogens were reported and 14% grew no organism. Optimal imaging modality for diagnosis or follow-up was unclear. Median antimicrobial therapy duration was 7.2 weeks, with no definitive evidence for optimal regimens. Twenty-one percent had surgery with widely variable timing, indication, or procedure. One-year disease-specific mortality was 2%; treatment failure and relapse rates were 22% and 7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
There is a lack of robust, high-quality data to support best practice for diagnosis and management for this neglected condition. A minimum set of reporting requirements is proposed for future studies. A consensus case definition is urgently needed to facilitate high-quality research.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Female; Otitis Externa; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36759416
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14041 -
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2023To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Necrotizing Otitis Externa (NOE) based on radiologic studies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Necrotizing Otitis Externa (NOE) based on radiologic studies.
METHODS
The PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were searched. True-positive and false-negative results were extracted for each study. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
RESULTS
The included studies contained data on 37 studies diagnosed with NOE. The sensitivity of gallium-67, technetium-99m, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was 0.9378 (0.7688-0.9856), 0.9699 (0.8839-0.9927), and 0.9417 (0.6968-0.9913), respectively. For Computed Tomography (CT), the positive criteria consisted of bony erosion alone and bony erosion plus any soft tissue abnormality. The sensitivity of CT based only on bony erosion was 0.7062 (0.5954-0.7971); it was higher 0.9572 (0.9000-0.9823) when based on bony erosion plus any soft tissue abnormality.
CONCLUSION
The diagnostic sensitivity of technetium-99m, gallium-67, and MRI was favorable. On CT, the presence of bony erosion may be a useful diagnostic marker of NOE, but the diagnostic sensitivity will be even higher if the criterion of any soft tissue abnormality is also included; however, care should be taken when interpreting the results. Our study demonstrates the potential utility of radiology studies for diagnosing NOE, but their lack of specificity must be considered, and standardized anatomic criteria are still needed.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
2A.
Topics: Humans; Otitis Externa; Technetium; Positron-Emission Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 34799270
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.011 -
Polish Journal of Radiology 2021To assess differentiating features between bacterial, , and skull base osteomyelitis (SBO) with regard to clinical presentation and imaging appearances.
PURPOSE
To assess differentiating features between bacterial, , and skull base osteomyelitis (SBO) with regard to clinical presentation and imaging appearances.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A literature search was performed in April 2020 for studies on SBO with a minimum sample size of 10 patients. Studies that reported presenting symptoms, cross-sectional imaging findings, complications, and mortality were included in the analysis. The quality of included articles was tested using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. A data extraction form was used to retrieve relevant parameters from each of the articles.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles were included in the final analysis. Diabetes mellitus was the most common predisposing factor (12.5-91.0%). Presenting complaints in all bacterial SBO studies were otogenic, while fungal SBO patients had nasal/ocular complaints. Rates of mortality and surgical intervention in the fungal group were 50-100% and 50%, respectively, as compared to the bacterial group - 7-87% and 10%, respectively. On imaging, the site of initial infection in bacterial SBO was the external auditory canal, while in fungal SBO it was the paranasal sinus. The incidence of orbital extension was < 5% in bacterial and 44-70% in fungal SBO, among which had rates of 65-70%. Bone erosion was less extensive in bacterial SBO, and the patterns differed. The highest incidence of vascular involvement and non-enhancing lesions (23-36%) was seen in showed highest sino-cranial extension (52-55%) and homogenous bright enhancement.
CONCLUSIONS
Systematic analysis of the clinico-radiological parameters in each of the studies revealed differences in presentation, clinical course, extension, bone erosion, and enhancement.
PubMed: 34136049
DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2021.106470 -
Cureus Mar 2021There is a perception among ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons that oral antibiotics are over-prescribed for acute otitis externa (AOE), and the potential for topical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a perception among ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons that oral antibiotics are over-prescribed for acute otitis externa (AOE), and the potential for topical therapy as first-line treatment is not fully realized in primary care. We evaluated the prescription rate of topical and oral antibiotics for AOE in primary care and in patients referred to the ENT emergency clinic.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases between January 1990 and October 2020. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool. The outcome measures were the rate of topical and oral antibiotic prescriptions for AOE by primary care practitioners and the rate of oral antibiotic prescriptions that were not indicated.
RESULTS
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of evidence was moderate. The rate of topical antibiotic prescriptions was between 77% and 95%, and oral antibiotics varied between 6% and 30% in patients that were managed only in primary care. Patients that were referred to an ENT emergency clinic had initially been treated by primary care practitioners with topical antibiotics in 14%-60% of cases and oral antibiotics in 16%-17%. The most commonly prescribed oral antibiotics were Amoxicillin and Co-amoxiclav (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid). No study had comprehensively reviewed the indication for oral antibiotics.
CONCLUSION
The rate of topical antibiotic prescriptions for AOE was high in primary care; however, the rate was frequently suboptimal in patients attending the ENT emergency clinic. Although the rate of oral antibiotic prescriptions was relatively low, the choice of antibiotic for empirical treatment frequently did not cover the typical bacteria in AOE. There is a need for improvement in primary care prescribing of topical therapy prior to referral to the ENT emergency clinic.
PubMed: 33927951
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14149 -
European Archives of... Feb 2022Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment...
IMPORTANCE
Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively more barotrauma at great heights and depths and easily suffer from otitis externa from less hygienic circumstances.
OBJECTIVE
To assess and summarize the available evidence for the effectiveness of surgical interventions and watchful waiting policy in patients with a tympanic membrane retraction.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
The protocol for this systematic review was published at Prospero (207859). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched from inception up to September 2020 for published and unpublished studies. We included randomized trials and observational studies that investigated surgical interventions (tympanoplasty, ventilation tube insertion) and wait-and-see policy. The primary outcomes of this study were clinical remission of the tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforations and cholesteatoma development.
FINDINGS
In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 1566 patients with TMRs. We included data from 2 randomized controlled trials (76 patients) and 25 observational studies (1490 patients). Seven studies (329 patients) investigated excision of the TMR with and without ventilation tube placement, 3 studies (207 patients) investigated the wait-and-see policy and 17 studies (1030 patients) investigated tympanoplasty for the treatment of TMRs.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study provides all the studies that have been published on the surgical management and wait-and-policy for tympanic membrane retractions. No high level of evidence comparative studies has been performed. The evidence for the management of tympanic membrane retractions is heterogenous and depends on many factors such as the patient population, location and severity of the TMR and presence of other ear pathologies (e.g., perforation, risk of cholesteatoma and serous otitis media).
Topics: Humans; Middle Ear Ventilation; Otitis Media with Effusion; Tympanic Membrane; Tympanoplasty
PubMed: 33689022
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Sep 2020To assess for changes in trends of the disease process, management, and outcomes of necrotizing otitis externa (NOE) over the last decade.
OBJECTIVE
To assess for changes in trends of the disease process, management, and outcomes of necrotizing otitis externa (NOE) over the last decade.
DATA SOURCES
Articles in English, published between January 2011 and June 2019, were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Database.
STUDY SELECTION
Inclusion criteria: 1) reported evidence of NOE, 2) details on patient demographic and underlying medical disorder, 3) details on treatments, 4) documented outcomes, and 5) greater than 10 cases.
DATA EXTRACTION
Study demographics, underlying conditions, infectious etiology, treatments, signs and symptoms, and outcomes.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Ten studies, totalling 284 patients with a mean age of 67.8 years, were included. The time period of collected patient data ranged from 2000 to 2018. Temporal subgroup analysis was conducted before and after 2009. Cure rate was lower in the post-2009 group (76.0 versus 94.1%, p < 0.01) while disease-specific mortality remained stable. Increases in proportions of diabetes and culture negative results (p < 0.01) were also observed in this latter group. Rate of extensive surgery and the use of ciprofloxacin decreased (p < 0.01), while the use of ceftazidime increased in the post-2009 group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
A decrease in cure rate of NOE patients was observed in the setting of an increase in prevalence of diabetes. Various antipseudomonal agents are being used and an increase in culture negative results is seen.
Topics: Aged; Ciprofloxacin; Humans; Otitis Externa; Prevalence
PubMed: 32569149
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002723