-
Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal Jun 2024To analyze the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of unexplained conductive hearing loss (UCHL) with intact tympanic membrane. A systematic review was conducted based... (Review)
Review
To analyze the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of unexplained conductive hearing loss (UCHL) with intact tympanic membrane. A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 642 articles were retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Fifty-four research articles and 21 case reports were screened out according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis of the etiology of UCHL. Seven research articles with UCHL who underwent exploratory tympanotomy were selected for data extraction and analysis of clinical characteristics. UCHL is a common manifestation of various diseases, including congenital ossicular anomalies (COA), otosclerosis (OTS), congenital middle ear cholesteatoma (CMEC), oval window atresia, superior semicircular-canal dehiscence, congenital stapedial footplate fixation, middle ear osteoma or adenoma, congenital ossification of stapedial tendon, and so on. A total of 522 patients were included in the 7 articles; among whom OTS showed a tendency to increase with age. The main symptoms were hearing loss, followed by tinnitus, dizziness, ear fullness, ear pain, facial paralysis. A total of 87.5% to 93.0% patients with COA manifested as nonprogressive deafness that occurred since childhood, with tinnitus incidence of 15.6% to 30.2%, and 86.4% to 96.4% patients with OTS presented with progressive hearing loss, with tinnitus incidence of 60.1% to 90.9%. The diagnosis positive rate of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was 33.8% to 87.1%, and CMEC was higher than that of COA (83.3%-100% vs 28.6%-64%). All the articles reported good hearing recovery. The most common surgical complications included taste abnormalities, tinnitus, and dizziness. UCHL presents with similar clinical manifestations and poses challenges in preoperative diagnosis. Exploratory tympanotomy is the primary method for diagnosis and treatment, with good prognosis after removing the lesion and reconstructing hearing during the operation. Children can also safely undergo the surgery.
PubMed: 38895947
DOI: 10.1177/01455613241262129 -
European Archives of... Jun 2024Revision stapes surgery is a challenging procedure performed in relatively small numbers compared to other middle ear procedures. Despite numerous data on hearing... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Revision stapes surgery is a challenging procedure performed in relatively small numbers compared to other middle ear procedures. Despite numerous data on hearing results of different middle ear surgeries, the audiological standards for successful outcome of this procedure are still not clarified. On the basis of well-documented data, we wanted to determine what the expected audiological results and complications are after revision stapes surgery in order to set a realistic threshold for surgical success.
METHODS
After the protocol registration in the PROSPERO database, a systematic review was performed in multiple databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceOpen, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar) according to PRISMA guidelines. Twelve articles were reviewed according to the inclusion criteria. A total of 1032 cases were obtained for evaluation. A modified version of Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess publication quality.
RESULTS
Average air-bone gap (ABG) gain was 17.3 dB, average air conduction (AC) gain was 17.5 dB. The average postoperative air-bone gap was 11.1 dB. The postoperative ABG distribution was the following 0-10 dB: 53.3%, > 10-20 dB: 28.2%, > 20 dB: 18.5%. SNHL as a surgical complication was described in a total of 17 cases (1.6%), no equilibrium disorder was reported.
CONCLUSION
The pooled data suggest that revision stapes surgery is an effective solution after failure of previous stapes surgery. However, the results are clearly inferior to those of primary stapedotomies. Hence, we need to apply different expectations and use different standards in the indication and evaluation of this type of surgery.
PubMed: 38839701
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08741-7 -
International Archives of... Jan 2024Stapes surgery was traditionally performed with the use of microscopy either through postauricular, endaural or transcanal approaches. Endoscopic stapedectomy... (Review)
Review
Stapes surgery was traditionally performed with the use of microscopy either through postauricular, endaural or transcanal approaches. Endoscopic stapedectomy ushered a revolution as a new technique with less complications. To review the outcomes of endoscopic stapes surgery with an emphasis on intraoperative and postoperative clinical and audiological results. A literature review on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was conducted. or were the main keywords used, and we searched for studies and research published from January 2015 to October 2021. Articles on endoscopic stapes surgery were included, and qualitative and descriptive analyses of the studies and outcomes data regarding audiometric changes and postoperative complications were conducted. Articles including patients with cholesteatoma were excluded. A total of 122 studies were retrieved for qualitative and descriptive analyses and to measure the outcomes of endoscopic stapedotomy; only 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, and the rest was excluded. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in hearing improvement. The gain in air-bone gap ranged from 9 dB to 16 dB. A low rate of operative and postoperative complications was reported. Endoscopic stapes surgery appears to be a reasonable alternative to microscopic stapes surgery, with shorter operative times, low complication rate, and significant hearing improvement. The endoscopic technique enabled a better visualization and less scutum drilling, which was confirmed by all included studies.
PubMed: 38322443
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761171 -
Cureus Feb 2023Otosclerosis, also known as otospongiosis, is a primary osteodystrophy of the otic capsule of the inner ear and one of the leading causes of deafness in adults. The... (Review)
Review
Otosclerosis, also known as otospongiosis, is a primary osteodystrophy of the otic capsule of the inner ear and one of the leading causes of deafness in adults. The rationale for medical therapy for otospongiosis is to slow down and eventually stop the phase of bone resorption. Conservative treatments include sodium fluoride (NaF), bisphosphonates, and other modern medicines. A systematic review of the existing and published articles and books until April 2021 has been conducted in Medscape, Google Scholar, PubMed, and other databases using appropriate terms. According to the results of the research, the administration of NaF for a period of at least six months stabilizes hearing thresholds (HTs), improves vestibular symptoms, and delays the worsening of tinnitus. The administration of bisphosphonates for a period of at least six months showed significant percentage differences in the improvement of hearing loss, dizziness, and tinnitus remission. In the already existing double-blind studies that were evaluated, groups of patients treated with bisphosphonates for at least 24 months showed greater stabilization of the mean air and bone conduction thresholds than groups of patients treated with a placebo. The new modern medications have not yet been widely administered clinically to draw useful conclusions, although the test results of some of their use are quite encouraging.
PubMed: 36923175
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34850 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Mar 2023Juvenile Otosclerosis (JO) and Congenital Stapes Footplate Fixation (CSFF) are rare ossicular chain disorders seen in the paediatric population and present with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Juvenile Otosclerosis (JO) and Congenital Stapes Footplate Fixation (CSFF) are rare ossicular chain disorders seen in the paediatric population and present with conductive hearing loss. Ongoing controversy exists regarding the role of surgical intervention in JO and CSFF given the poorer hearing outcomes and complications when compared with surgical intervention for adult otosclerosis. The objective of this study is to assess the published data on the surgical outcomes of JO and CSFF in order to guide clinicians and counsel patients on the various medical options for these disease entities.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane was performed with inclusion criteria of children with JO or CSFF and hearing outcomes following stapes surgery. Studies identified by the search were reviewed and assessed by two independent reviewers in line with the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
464 articles were initially reviewed and 28 articles met inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 810 ears (473 and 337 cases of JO and CSFF respectively) underwent stapes surgery. Average age at time of surgery for JO and CSFF was 14.3 and 10.2 years old respectively. The mean pre-operative Air-Bone-Gap (ABG) for JO and CSFF was 31.8 ± 5.2 dB and 39.4 ± 10 dB respectively. Following stapes surgery, the mean post-operative ABG for JO and CSFF was 9.6 ± 6 dB and 19.2 ± 12.5 dB respectively. Surgical success rate (defined as ABG <10 dB) was 81% for JO and 41% for CSFF. Mean ABG gain for JO and CSFF was 24.8 dB (95% CI: 18.6-33.1) and 22.6 dB (95% CI: 18.4-27.8) respectively. The reported number of dead ears was 4/473 (0.8%) for JO and 2/337 (0.6%) for CSFF. 23 cases (2.8%) reported sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) >10 dB.
CONCLUSION
CSFF was associated with poorer hearing outcomes compared to JO, however both entities showed similar improvement in ABG post operatively. Counselling patients and their families on the surgical success rates and complications of JO or CSFF is an important part of the decision making process when deciding between a surgical option or conservative measures such as hearing aids.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Stapes; Otosclerosis; Stapes Surgery; Ear Ossicles; Hearing Loss, Conductive; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36709714
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111418 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2022Background. Otosclerosis can occur during childhood, resulting in the early onset of conductive hearing loss. The approach to a child with otosclerosis can present some... (Review)
Review
Background. Otosclerosis can occur during childhood, resulting in the early onset of conductive hearing loss. The approach to a child with otosclerosis can present some difficulties in terms of diagnosis and treatment, and the literature on juvenile otosclerosis (JO) is still relatively limited. Aim. To explore the current approaches to JO, in order to clear the management of this condition and evaluate the outcomes and the possible complications of surgical treatment. Methods. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline and Embase from January 2002 through to 30 September 2022. A total of 759 papers were identified but based on specified criteria, nine were included in this study. Results. There were 94 children affected by JO and treated by stapes surgery. According to the available data, Male: Female ratio was 1:3−4, whilst the mean ages ranged from 10 to 16.3 years at the time of stapes surgery. After stapes surgery, the target of ABG < 10 dB was achieved in most of the patients. Overall, the 4 complications were reported (4/94= 4%): stenosis of the external ear canal, deterioration of hearing, anacusis with vertigo, tinnitus. Conclusions. The heterogeneity of the available studies does not allow us to draw straight conclusions on this topic, currently. More data about the natural history of the disease in children could help in approaching the treatment correctly, and possibly in drawing guidelines. Studies with a prolonged follow-up could be helpful for assisting clinicians and families in taking the most favorable decision about treatment.
PubMed: 36421236
DOI: 10.3390/children9111787 -
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2023To compare the mean pre-operative air-bone gaps (ABG), mean post-operative ABGs, and extrusion rates between pediatric recipients of partial ossicular reconstruction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To compare the mean pre-operative air-bone gaps (ABG), mean post-operative ABGs, and extrusion rates between pediatric recipients of partial ossicular reconstruction prostheses (PORPs) and pediatric recipients of total ossicular reconstruction prostheses (TORPs) via a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A quantitative systematic review last updated on September 29, 2021 of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases was conducted for studies reporting mean post-operative ABGs or numbers of children with post-operative ABG ≤ 20 dB following PORP and TORP procedures in at least five children aged 0-18 years. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, conference abstracts, or not in English. Studies that primarily reported data on congenital aural atresia, stapedectomy/stapedotomy, congenital stapes fixation, or juvenile otosclerosis were also excluded. NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess for risk of bias. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.1 was used to perform the meta-analysis and generate forest plots.
RESULTS
Out of 648 unique abstracts retrieved, 11 papers were included in this systematic review with meta-analysis. Data from 449 children (247 TORP recipients and 202 TORP recipients) are represented among the various analyses. Data from nine studies, representing 84.2 % of all children in the systematic review, demonstrated that PORP recipients presented with a pre-operative ABG 6.30 dB less than TORP recipients (mean difference: -6.30, 95 %CI: -7.4, -5.18, p < 0.01). Data from these same children demonstrated that PORP recipients had a 1.80 dB less post-operative ABG compared to TORP recipients (mean difference: -1.80 dB, 95 %CI: -2.84, -0.77, p < 0.001). Data from seven studies, representing 49.4 % of all children in the systematic review, demonstrated that PORP recipients were more likely to have a successful closure of the post-operative ABG to ≤20 dB (OR: 2.12, 95 %CI: 1.18, 3.79, p = 0.01). In these same children, 62.5 % of PORP recipients had a post-operative ABG ≤ 20 dB and 48.3 % of TORP recipients had a post-operative ABG ≤ 20 dB. There was no difference in extrusion rates between PORP recipients compared to TORP recipients (OR: 1.08, 95 %CI: 0.31, 3.78, p = 0.90) from five studies representing 45.9 % children in the systematic review.
CONCLUSION
Children who receive a PORP have better pre-operative hearing baselines and post-operative hearing outcomes compared to those who receive TORP with similar rates of extrusion. More pediatric studies should report their mean pre- and post-operative ABGs stratifying by various material types, surgical indications, and surgical details to facilitate future meta-analyses.
Topics: Child; Humans; Ossicular Prosthesis; Ossicular Replacement; Cross-Sectional Studies; Treatment Outcome; Stapes Surgery; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36347062
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103658 -
The Laryngoscope Jun 2023To evaluate speech outcomes and facial nerve stimulation (FNS) rates in patients with far advanced otosclerosis (FAO) after cochlear implantation. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate speech outcomes and facial nerve stimulation (FNS) rates in patients with far advanced otosclerosis (FAO) after cochlear implantation.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using standardized methodology of Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if adults with FAO underwent cochlear implantation. Exclusion criteria included concurrent otologic history (e.g., Meniere's disease, superior canal dehiscence), non-English-speaking implant users, case reports, abstracts, and letters/commentaries. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the National Institute of Health Scale for case series. The primary outcome measure was speech discrimination and the secondary outcomes were rates of partial insertion and FNS.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies evaluated cochlear implantation in FAO. Due to the heterogeneity of testing methods, statistical pooling of speech discrimination was not feasible, but qualitative synthesis indicated a positive effect of implantation. Pooled rates of FNS were 18% (95% confidence interval, CI 12%-27%) and the rate of partial insertion was 10% (95% CI 7%-15%).
CONCLUSION
Cochlear implantation in FAO demonstrates significant gains in speech discrimination scores with higher rates of FNS and partial insertion. Laryngoscope, 133:1288-1296, 2023.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cochlear Implantation; Otosclerosis; Retrospective Studies; Meniere Disease; Facial Nerve; Cochlear Implants; Speech Perception; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36082830
DOI: 10.1002/lary.30386 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Aug 2022This study aimed to establish hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to establish hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched were as follows: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov . No limits were placed on language or year of publication. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
RESULTS
Searches identified 474 abstracts and 180 full texts, with 68 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and reporting outcomes in a minimum of 481 patients with at least 516 implants. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reported in five studies involving 51 patients. Intraoperative adverse events/surgical approach details and preoperative radiological assessment were reported in 46 and 38 studies, respectively. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and noncontrolled case series with small numbers of patients. Most studies were Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine grade IV.
DISCUSSION
Access to good rehabilitation support is essential to achieving the good hearing outcomes and PROMs that can be expected by 12 months after implantation in most cases. There was a significant association between the radiological severity of otosclerosis and an increase in surgical and postoperative complications. Postoperative facial nerve stimulation can occur and may require deactivation of electrodes and subsequent hearing detriment.
CONCLUSIONS
Hearing outcomes are typically good, but patients should be counseled on associated surgical complications that may compromise hearing. Modern diagnostic techniques may help to identify potentially difficult cases to aid operative planning and patient counseling. Further work is needed to characterize PROMs in this population.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Facial Nerve; Hearing; Humans; Otosclerosis
PubMed: 35861644
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003574 -
European Archives of... Dec 2022To compare the efficacy and safety characteristics of different materials used for oval window sealing during stapedotomy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and safety characteristics of different materials used for oval window sealing during stapedotomy.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Published international English literature from January 1, 2000 to December 2021 was screened, checking for studies that compared different materials utilization in patients undergoing stapedotomy surgery for otosclerosis or congenital stapes fixation. Data related to the efficacy and safety of each material were extracted. The primary outcome measure was the air-bone gap (ABG) closure after surgical intervention.
RESULTS
Six studies were included in the metanalysis. Because of the heterogeneity of the treatments adopted, we assessed the use of the fat compared to all other treatments, and the use of the gelfoam compared to all other treatments. In the former analysis (fat vs others) we did not identify differences in ABG closure between the groups (p = 0.74), with a low heterogeneity of the results (I = 28.36%; Hedge's g = 0.04, 95% CI - 0.19 0.27); similarly, we did not identify differences between the use of gelfoam and other treatments (p = 0.97), with a low heterogeneity of the results (I = 28.91%; Hedge's g = 0.00, 95% CI - 0.20 0.21).
CONCLUSIONS
Numerous options are available for oval window sealing during stapedotomy, with acceptable safety and effectiveness profiles. Based on the current data, no definitive recommendation can be made regarding the choice of one material over another, and the convenience of sealing over no sealing at all.
Topics: Humans; Stapes Surgery; Otosclerosis; Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable; Ear, Middle; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Stapes
PubMed: 35857099
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07551-z