-
Frontiers in Global Women's Health 2023The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends treatment and management of gestational diabetes (GD) through lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise, and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends treatment and management of gestational diabetes (GD) through lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise, and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) to inform timely treatment decisions. To expand the evidence base of WHO's guideline on self-care interventions, we conducted a systematic review of SMBG among pregnant individuals with GD.
SETTING
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, and EMBASE for publications through November 2020 comparing SMBG with clinic-based monitoring during antenatal care (ANC) globally.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES
We extracted data using standardized forms and summarized maternal and newborn findings using random effects meta-analysis in GRADE evidence tables. We also reviewed studies on values, preferences, and costs of SMBG.
RESULTS
We identified 6 studies examining SMBG compared to routine ANC care, 5 studies on values and preferences, and 1 study on costs. Nearly all were conducted in Europe and North America. Moderate-certainty evidence from 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that SMBG as part of a package of interventions for GD treatment was associated with lower rates of preeclampsia, lower mean birthweight, fewer infants born large for gestational age, fewer infants with macrosomia, and lower rates of shoulder dystocia. There was no difference between groups in self-efficacy, preterm birth, C-section, mental health, stillbirth, or respiratory distress. No studies measured placenta previa, long-term complications, device-related issues, or social harms. Most end-users supported SMBG, motivated by health benefits, convenience, ease of use, and increased confidence. Health workers acknowledged SMBG's convenience but were wary of technical problems. One study found SMBG by pregnant individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with decreased costs for hospital admission and length of stay.
CONCLUSION
SMBG during pregnancy is feasible and acceptable, and when combined in a package of GD interventions, is generally associated with improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, research from resource-limited settings is needed.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021233862.
PubMed: 37293246
DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1006041 -
Human Fertility (Cambridge, England) Dec 2023The objective of our meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of intrauterine hematoma (IUH) on obstetric and pregnancy outcomes of assisted reproductive technology... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The objective of our meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of intrauterine hematoma (IUH) on obstetric and pregnancy outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies. Four electronic databases were searched up to December 2021 to find studies reporting relevant outcomes of ART pregnancies with IUH. Dichotomous data were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. A total of six observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our data suggested that IUH in pregnancies achieved by ART are not associated with increased risks of miscarriage, low birth weight, placenta previa, or premature rupture of membranes. Similar birthweight was noted between the two groups. However, IUH was associated with significantly shorter gestational age at delivery (GA) as well as higher risks of preterm birth. Subgroup analyses have found that the presence of retroplacental haematoma was associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. IUH may be associated with decreased GA and an increased risk of preterm birth. Therefore, Women diagnosed with IUH should be offered increased surveillance during the course of their pregnancy.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Premature Birth; Abortion, Spontaneous; Pregnancy Outcome; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Hematoma; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37257490
DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2023.2213448 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Aug 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess clinical characteristics related to pathologically proven placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess clinical characteristics related to pathologically proven placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Web of Science was performed from inception to September 7, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The primary outcomes were invasive placenta (including increta or percreta), blood loss, hysterectomy, and antenatal diagnosis. In addition, maternal age, assisted reproductive technology, previous cesarean delivery, and previous uterine procedures were investigated as potential risk factors. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the clinical presentation of pathologically diagnosed PAS without placenta previa.
METHODS
Study screening was conducted after duplicates were identified and removed. The quality of each study and the publication bias were assessed. Forest plots and I statistics were calculated for each study outcome for each group. The main analysis was a random-effects analysis.
RESULTS
Among 2598 studies that were initially retrieved, 5 were included in the review. With the exception of 1 study, 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa was associated with less risk of invasive placenta (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.37), blood loss (mean difference, -1.19; 95% confidence interval, -2.09 to -0.28) and hysterectomy (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.53), and more difficult to diagnose prenatally (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.45) than placenta accreta spectrum with placenta previa. In addition, assisted reproductive technology and a previous uterine procedure were strong risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa, whhereas previous cesarean delivery was a strong risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum with placenta previa.
CONCLUSION
The differences in clinical aspects of placenta accreta spectrum with and without placenta previa need to be understood.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Retrospective Studies; Placenta Previa; Hysterectomy; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37211089
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101027 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2023To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
DATA SOURCES
Screening of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, other bases from inception to February 2022 using the keywords related to placenta accreta, increta, percreta, morbidly adherent placenta, and preoperative ultrasound diagnosis.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All available studies- whether were prospective or retrospective- including cohort, case control and cross sectional that involved prenatal diagnosis of PAS using 2D or 3D ultrasound with subsequent pathological confirmation postnatal were included. Fifty-four studies included 5307 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PAS was confirmed in 2025 of them.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Extracted data included settings of the study, study type, sample size, participants characteristics and their inclusion and exclusion criteria, Type and site of placenta previa, Type and timing of imaging technique (2D, and 3D), severity of PAS, sensitivity and specificity of individual ultrasound criteria and overall sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS
The overall sensitivity was 0.8703, specificity was 0.8634 with -0.2348 negative correlation between them. The estimate of Odd ratio, negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 34.225, 0.155 and 4.990 respectively. The overall estimates of loss of retroplacental clear zone sensitivity and specificity were 0.820 and 0.898 respectively with 0.129 negative correlation. The overall estimates of myometrial thinning, loss of retroplacental clear zone, the presence of bridging vessels, placental lacunae, bladder wall interruption, exophytic mass, and uterovesical hypervascularity sensitivities were 0.763, 0.780, 0.659, 0.785, 0.455, 0.218 and 0.513 while specificities were 0.890, 0.884, 0.928, 0.809, 0.975, 0.865 and 0.994 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of PAS among women with low lying or placenta previa with previous cesarean section scars is high and recommended in all suspected cases.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Number CRD42021267501.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 37189095
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05675-6 -
Human Reproduction Update Sep 2023The number of frozen embryo transfers (FET) has increased dramatically over the past decade. Based on current evidence, there is no difference in pregnancy rates when... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The number of frozen embryo transfers (FET) has increased dramatically over the past decade. Based on current evidence, there is no difference in pregnancy rates when natural cycle FET (NC-FET) is compared to artificial cycle FET (AC-FET) in subfertile women. However, NC-FET seems to be associated with lower risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with AC-FET cycles. Currently, there is no consensus about whether NC-FET needs to be combined with luteal phase support (LPS) or not. The question of how to prepare the endometrium for FET has now gained even more importance and taken the dimension of safety into account as it should not simply be reduced to the basic question of effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
The objective of this project was to determine whether NC-FET, with or without LPS, decreases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with AC-FET.
SEARCH METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. A literature search was performed using the following databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE from inception to 10 October 2022. Observational studies, including cohort studies, and registries comparing obstetric and neonatal outcomes between singleton pregnancies after NC-FET and those after AC-FET were sought. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs), pooled risk differences (RDs), pooled adjusted ORs, and prevalence estimates with 95% CI using a random effect model, while heterogeneity was assessed by the I2.
OUTCOMES
The conducted search identified 2436 studies, 890 duplicates were removed and 1546 studies were screened. Thirty studies (NC-FET n = 56 445; AC-FET n = 57 231) were included, 19 of which used LPS in NC-FET. Birthweight was lower following NC-FET versus AC-FET (mean difference 26.35 g; 95% CI 11.61-41.08, I2 = 63%). Furthermore NC-FET compared to AC-FET resulted in a lower risk of large for gestational age (OR 0.88, 95% 0.83-0.94, I2 = 54%), macrosomia (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93, I2 = 68%), low birthweight (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.85, I2 = 41%), early pregnancy loss (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.86, I2 = 70%), preterm birth (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.75-0.85, I2 = 20%), very preterm birth (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.84, I2 = 0%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.65, I2 = 61%), pre-eclampsia (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.42-0.60, I2 = 44%), placenta previa (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, I2 = 0%), and postpartum hemorrhage (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.38-0.48, I2 = 53%). Stratified analyses on LPS use in NC-FET suggested that, compared to AC-FET, NC-FET with LPS decreased preterm birth risk, while NC-FET without LPS did not (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.81). LPS use did not modify the other outcomes. Heterogeneity varied from low to high, while quality of the evidence was very low to moderate.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
This study confirms that NC-FET decreases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with AC-FET. We estimate that for each adverse outcome, use of NC-FET may prevent 4 to 22 cases per 1000 women. Consequently, NC-FET should be the preferred treatment in women with ovulatory cycles undergoing FET. Based on very low quality of evidence, the risk of preterm birth be decreased when LPS is used in NC-FET compared to AC-FET. However, because of many uncertainties-the major being the debate about efficacy of the use of LPS-future research is needed on efficacy and safety of LPS and no recommendation can be made about the use of LPS.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Birth Weight; Premature Birth; Luteal Phase; Lipopolysaccharides; Cryopreservation; Embryo Transfer; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37172270
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad011 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but studies with larger sample sizes are few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search in July 2022 using the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, and finally, 32 studies (N = 3812) were included. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of placenta-related disorders, including placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and retained placenta. We also included other obstetric and neonatal outcomes like postpartum hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, oligohydramnios, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrauterine growth restriction. The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in studies with a control group, but otherwise as prevalence (%) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
The overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 58.97% and 45.56%, respectively. The prevalence of placenta previa differed in pregnant women who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with those who did not (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.28-8.36). In studies without a comparative group, the pooled rate of placenta accreta was 7% (95% CI, 4-11) in 20 studies; placenta increta was 1% (95% CI, 0-4) in 5 studies; a retained placenta was 11% (95% CI, 5-24) in 5 studies; postpartum hemorrhage was 12% (95% CI, 8-18) in 12 studies; ectopic pregnancy was 1% (95% CI, 0-2) in 13 studies; oligohydramnios was 3% (95% CI, 1-6) in 3 studies; intrauterine growth restriction was 3% (95% CI, 1-8) in 3 studies; gestational hypertension was 5% (95% CI, 2-11) in 4 studies; and diabetes mellitus was 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in 3 studies.
DISCUSSION
Due to the paucity of good quality comparative data, the question of whether there is an increased prevalence of obstetric and neonatal complications in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with the general population remains unanswered. The findings from this review will provide a basis for more well-designed studies in the future.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=364021, identifier [CRD42022364021].
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Placenta, Retained; Oligohydramnios; Placenta; Pregnancy, Ectopic
PubMed: 37033233
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1126740 -
Reproduction & Fertility Jan 2023Endometriosis is a chronic and debilitating condition which can affect the entire reproductive life course of women with a potentially detrimental effect on pregnancy.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
ABSTRACT
Endometriosis is a chronic and debilitating condition which can affect the entire reproductive life course of women with a potentially detrimental effect on pregnancy. Pregnancy (and increasing parity) can affect endometriosis by modulating disease severity and suppressing symptoms. Multiparous women could be less likely to suffer from endometriosis-related pregnancy complications than primiparous women. We aimed to systematically review the evidence examining the role of parity in the relationship between pregnancy outcomes and endometriosis. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed from inception to May 2022. We searched for experimental and observational studies. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to assess the quality of evidence with the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool incorporated. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Primiparous women with endometriosis had almost double the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.50-2.63, P < 0.001) compared to multiparous women with endometriosis. Primiparous women with endometriosis were at significantly increased risk of preterm delivery, caesarean delivery, and placenta praevia compared to primiparous women without endometriosis. There were no significant differences in outcomes when multiparous women with endometriosis were compared to multiparous women without endometriosis. There is limited evidence to suggest that primiparous women with endometriosis may be at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to multiparous women. The modulatory role of parity in the pathophysiology of endometriosis and its impact on pregnancy outcomes should be investigated.
LAY SUMMARY
Endometriosis can adversely affect pregnancy and cause complications that can affect both mother and baby. The severity and symptoms of endometriosis are lessened in pregnancy and with increasing births. Women who have previously given birth could experience fewer pregnancy complications than women giving birth for the first time. We reviewed the literature to compare pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis by whether they had given birth before or not. Our review included 11 studies. More women with endometriosis giving birth for the first time had blood pressure disorders in pregnancy than women with endometriosis who had given birth before. First-time mothers with endometriosis tended to have a baby born early, caesarean delivery, and an abnormally located placenta compared to those without endometriosis. This study supports the theory that women with endometriosis in their first pregnancy are at higher risk of complications and may benefit from additional monitoring.
Topics: Animals; Pregnancy; Female; Parity; Endometriosis; Pregnancy Outcome; Parturition; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 36821517
DOI: 10.1530/RAF-22-0070 -
The Journal of Obstetrics and... May 2023To objectively assess the quality of the published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the management of pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To objectively assess the quality of the published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the management of pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)disorders.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were searched. The following aspects related to the management of pregnancies with suspected PAS disorders were evaluated: risk factors for PAS, prenatal diagnosis, role of interventional radiology and ureteral stenting, and optimal surgical management. The assessment of risk of bias and quality assessment of the CPGs were performed using the (AGREE II) tool (Brouwers et al., 2010). To define a CPG as of good quality we adopted a cut-off score >60%.
RESULTS
Nine CPGs were included. Specific risk factors for referral were assessed by 44.4% (4/9) of CPGs, mainly consisting in the presence of placenta previa and a prior cesarean delivery or uterine surgery. About 55.6% of CPGs (5/9) suggested ultrasound assessment of women with risk factors for PAS in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and 33.3% (3/9) recommended magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 88.9% (8/9) of CPGs recommended cesarean delivery at 34-37 weeks of gestation. There was not generally consensus on the use of interventional radiology and ureteral stenting before surgery for PAS. Finally, hysterectomy was the recommend surgical approach by 77.8% (7/9) of the included CPGs.
CONCLUSION
Most of the published CPGs on PAS are generally of good quality. There was general agreement among the different CPGs on PAS as a regard as risk stratification, timing at diagnosis and delivery but not on the indication for MRI, use of interventional radiology and ureteral stenting.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Prenatal Diagnosis; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Retrospective Studies; Placenta; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 36796351
DOI: 10.1111/jog.15544 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Apr 2023This study aimed to identify trends in pregnancy outcomes, especially delivery mode, among pregnant patients older than 45 years. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to identify trends in pregnancy outcomes, especially delivery mode, among pregnant patients older than 45 years.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The primary outcomes were cesarean delivery and assisted delivery. The secondary outcomes were preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm birth. The inclusion criteria were studies examining the relationship between older age pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, studies that compared pregnancy outcomes at maternal age ≥45 years and <45 years, and at least one of the primary and secondary pregnancy outcomes were included.
METHODS
Study screening was performed after duplicates were identified and removed. The quality of each study and publication bias were assessed. Forest plots and I statistics were calculated for each study outcome for each group. The main analysis was a random-effects analysis. The inverse variance method was used to integrate the results if studies had an adjusted analysis.
RESULTS
Among 4209 studies initially retrieved, 24 were included in this review. All studies were retrospective, observational studies. Pregnant patients aged ≥45 years had a significantly higher cesarean delivery rate (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 2.50-3.30; I=97%) than those aged <45 years. However, the emergency cesarean delivery rate was lower in older pregnant patients (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.79; I=79%). Pregnancy in older individuals was associated with a lower assisted delivery rate than pregnancy in younger individuals (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.97; I=48%). Preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm birth were more likely to occur in pregnant patients aged ≥45 years than in those aged <45 years. Adjusted pooled analyses showed trends similar to those in the unadjusted pooled analyses.
CONCLUSION
Adverse pregnancy outcomes, typically cesarean delivery, were more likely to occur in older (≥45 years) pregnant patients than in younger pregnant patients. However, the assisted delivery rate was lower in older pregnant patients.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Aged; Pregnancy Outcome; Maternal Age; Diabetes, Gestational; Premature Birth; Abruptio Placentae; Pre-Eclampsia; Retrospective Studies; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Placenta
PubMed: 36739911
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100885 -
Biomedicines Jan 2023Vasa previa carries a high risk of severe fetal morbidity and mortality due to fetal hemorrhage caused by damage to unprotected fetal cord vessels upon membrane rupture.... (Review)
Review
Vasa previa carries a high risk of severe fetal morbidity and mortality due to fetal hemorrhage caused by damage to unprotected fetal cord vessels upon membrane rupture. Vasa previa is generally classified into types I and II. However, some cases are difficult to classify, and some studies have proposed a type III classification. This study aimed to review the current evidence on type III vasa previa. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 11 articles (2011-2022) were included. A systematic review showed that type III vasa previa accounts for 5.7% of vasa previa cases. Thirteen women with type III vasa previa were examined at a patient-level analysis. The median age was 35 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.5-38) years, and approximately 45% were assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies. The median gestational week of delivery was 36 (IQR 34-37) weeks; the antenatal detection rate was 84.6%, and no cases reported neonatal death. The characteristics and obstetric outcomes (rate of ART, antenatal diagnosis, emergent cesarean delivery, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal mortality) were compared between types I and III vasa previa, and all outcomes of interest were similar. The current evidence on type III vasa previa is scanty, and further studies are warranted.
PubMed: 36672661
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010152