-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022To investigate the risk of preterm birth in women with a placenta previa or a low-lying placenta for different cut-offs of gestational age and to evaluate preventive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the risk of preterm birth in women with a placenta previa or a low-lying placenta for different cut-offs of gestational age and to evaluate preventive interventions.
SEARCH AND METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, WHO-ICTRP and clinicaltrials.gov were searched until December 2021. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies assessing preterm birth in women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta with a placental edge within 2 cm of the internal os in the second or third trimester were eligible for inclusion. Pooled proportions and odds ratios for the risk of preterm birth before 37, 34, 32 and 28 weeks of gestation were calculated. Additionally, the results of the evaluation of preventive interventions for preterm birth in these women are described.
RESULTS
In total, 34 studies were included, 24 reporting on preterm birth and 9 on preventive interventions. The pooled proportions were 46% (95% CI [39 - 53%]), 17% (95% CI [11 - 25%]), 10% (95% CI [7 - 13%]) and 2% (95% CI [1 - 3%]), regarding preterm birth <37, <34, <32 and <28 weeks in women with placenta previa. For low-lying placentas the risk of preterm birth was 30% (95% CI [19 - 43%]) and 1% (95% CI [0 - 6%]) before 37 and 34 weeks, respectively. Women with a placenta previa were more likely to have a preterm birth compared to women with a low-lying placenta or women without a placenta previa for all gestational ages. The studies about preventive interventions all showed potential prolongation of pregnancy with the use of intramuscular progesterone, intramuscular progesterone + cerclage or pessary.
CONCLUSIONS
Both women with a placenta previa and a low-lying placenta have an increased risk of preterm birth. This increased risk is consistent across all severities of preterm birth between 28-37 weeks of gestation. Women with placenta previa have a higher risk of preterm birth than women with a low-lying placenta have. Cervical cerclage, pessary and intramuscular progesterone all might have benefit for both women with placenta previa and low-lying placenta, but data in this population are lacking and inconsistent, so that solid conclusions about their effectiveness cannot be drawn.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019123675.
Topics: Cervix Uteri; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Progesterone
PubMed: 36120450
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.921220 -
Biomedicines Feb 2022This study aimed to assess the relationship between placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PASD) and endometriosis. The relationships among pregnancy, assisted reproductive... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to assess the relationship between placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PASD) and endometriosis. The relationships among pregnancy, assisted reproductive technology (ART), placenta previa, ART-conceived pregnancy and PASD were also determined. A systematic literature review was conducted using multiple computerized databases. Forty-eight studies (1990-2021) met the inclusion criteria. According to the adjusted pooled analysis ( = 3), endometriosis was associated with an increased prevalence of PASD (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.96-5.87). In the included studies, the ART rate ranged from 18.2% to 37.2% for women with endometriosis. According to the adjusted pooled analysis, women who used ART were more likely to have placenta previa ( = 13: adjusted OR 2.96, 95%CI, 2.43-3.60) and PASD ( = 4: adjusted OR 3.54, 95%CI 1.86-6.76) than those who did not use ART. According to the sensitivity analysis using an unadjusted analysis accounting for the type of ART, frozen embryo transfer (ET) was associated with an increased risk of PASD ( = 4: OR 2.79, 95%CI, 1.22-6.37) compared to fresh ET. Endometriosis may be associated with an increased rate of PASD. Women with placenta previa complicated with endometriosis who conceived using frozen ET may be a high risk for PASD.
PubMed: 35203599
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020390 -
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and... Apr 2022To compare and evaluate the validity of the existing risk prediction models for severe postpartum hemorrhage (SPPH) in patients with placenta previa.
Systematic external evaluation of four preoperative risk prediction models for severe postpartum hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa: A multicenter retrospective study.
AIM
To compare and evaluate the validity of the existing risk prediction models for severe postpartum hemorrhage (SPPH) in patients with placenta previa.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature review to collect the existing risk prediction models for SPPH in patients with placenta previa, and recruited patients with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section in Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) and 4 cooperative hospitals from January 2018 to June 2021. We defined SPPH as total blood loss ≥1500 mL or transfusion packed red blood cell ≥4 U. The risk of SPPH of each patient was predicted by the collected models, respectively. Then we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, coincidence rate (CCR), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and drawn the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve of each model.
RESULTS
This external cohort contained 1172 patients of whom 284 patients (24.23%) experienced SPPH, and 4 risk prediction models were collected in this study. After evaluated by this external cohort, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, CCR, PPV and NPV of the four models ranged from 0.644 to 0.755, 38.38% to 86.31%, 42.75% to 86.49%, 56.23% to 74.83%, 38.68% to 47.60%, 81.15% to 87.45%, respectively. The model established by Kim JW et al. had the highest sensitivity, NPV, AUC and net benefit, the model established by Lee JY et al. had the highest specificity, CCR and PPV.
CONCLUSIONS
The four prediction models showed moderate predictive performance, the discrimination indicators and benefit indicators of each model were not simultaneously ideal in this population. The prediction models should be further optimized to improve the discrimination ability and benefit, and prospective external validation studies should also be carried out before they are applied to clinical practice.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35151929
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102333 -
Ginekologia Polska Sep 2021This study aimed at assessing the adverse outcomes of pregnancy in women with endometriosis.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed at assessing the adverse outcomes of pregnancy in women with endometriosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Cochrane, Embase and PubMed databases were searched for identifying the required studies published before June 2019. Meta-analyses of relative risk (RR) were performed under the random-effects model to estimate the risk of selected adverse outcomes of pregnancy in females with endometriosis.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies (53,141 women with and 2,355,923 women without endometriosis data) were selected for meta-analysis. Endometriosis bearing females had a significantly higher risk placenta previa (RR 3.92 [95% CI 2.48-6.20]), miscarriage (RR 1.31 [95% CI 1.06-1.61), gestational hypertension (RR 1.30 [95% CI 1.02-1.65]), cesarean section (RR 1.48 [95% CI 1.33-1.65]) and preeclampsia (RR 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.28]). The incidence of placental abruption was not statistically significant between the groups (RR 3.62 [95% CI [0.99-13.28]).
CONCLUSIONS
Women suffering from endometriosis are at higher risks of miscarriage, preterm birth, gestational hypertension, placenta previa, cesarean section, and preeclampsia.
PubMed: 34541648
DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0081 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2021This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring the relationship between prior UAE and obstetric complications through a meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic literature review through March 31, 2021, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines and determined the effect of prior UAE for PPH on the rate of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), PPH, placenta previa, hysterectomy, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and preterm birth (PTB). Twenty-three retrospective studies (2003-2021) met the inclusion criteria. They included 483 pregnancies with prior UAE and 320,703 pregnancies without prior UAE. The cumulative results of all women with prior UAE indicated that the rates of obstetric complications PAS, hysterectomy, and PPH were 16.3% (34/208), 6.5% (28/432), and 24.0% (115/480), respectively. According to the patient background-matched analysis based on the presence of prior PPH, women with prior UAE were associated with higher rates of PAS (odds ratio [OR] 20.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.27-132.41) and PPH (OR 5.32, 95% CI 1.40-20.16) but not with higher rates of hysterectomy (OR 8.93, 95% CI 0.43-187.06), placenta previa (OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.35-15.22), FGR (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.28-188.69), or PTB (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.74-12.14), compared with those who did not undergo prior UAE. Prior UAE for PPH may be a significant risk factor for PAS and PPH during subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, at the time of delivery, clinicians should be more attentive to PAS and PPH when women have undergone prior UAE. Since the number of women included in the patient background-matched study was limited, further investigations are warranted to confirm the results of this study.
Topics: Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Humans; Hysterectomy; Particle Size; Placenta Accreta; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Publication Bias; Risk; Uterine Artery Embolization
PubMed: 34413380
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96273-z -
Fertility and Sterility Oct 2021To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S)
Pregnancies achieved after PGT or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
INTERVENTION(S)
Systematic search of databases until December 2020 with cross-checking of references from relevant articles in English.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after PGT and IVF/ICSI, including mean birth weight, low birth weight, very low birth weight (VLBW), mean gestational age at birth, preterm birth, very preterm birth, birth defects, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), sex ratio, cesarean section, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta disorder (placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta), and preterm premature rupture of membranes.
RESULT(S)
Ultimately, a total of 785,445 participants were enrolled in this meta-analysis, and these participants were divided into a PGT group (n = 54,294) and an IVF/ICSI group (n = 731,151). The PGT pregnancies had lower rates of low birth weight (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.98), VLBW (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.81), and very preterm births (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.70) than those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies. However, the PGT group had a higher rate of the obstetric outcome of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.57). The PGT did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, such as those associated with mean birth weight, mean gestational age at birth, birth defects, IUGR, sex ratio, cesarean section, gestational diabetes mellitus, placental disorder (placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta), or preterm premature rupture of membranes. We performed subgroup analysis with only blastocyst biopsies and found that PGT with blastocyst biopsies was associated with a lower rate of VLBW (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95). The PGT with blastocyst biopsies did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis with only frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, and we found that PGT pregnancies were associated with a lower rate of VLBW (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97), a lower rate of cesarean birth (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99), a higher rate of preterm birth (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18), and a higher rate of IUGR (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.38) than those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The PGT with frozen-thawed embryo transfer did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION(S)
The pooled analysis suggested that PGT did not increase the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. The association between PGT and a higher risk of IUGR requires further investigation.
Topics: Birth Weight; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Genetic Testing; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infertility; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Preimplantation Diagnosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34373103
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.040 -
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology... Mar 2021Placenta previa describes a placenta that extends partially or completely over the internal cervical oss. Placenta previa is one of the leading causes of widespread... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Placenta previa describes a placenta that extends partially or completely over the internal cervical oss. Placenta previa is one of the leading causes of widespread postpartum hemorrhage and maternal mortality worldwide. Another cause of bleeding in pregnant women is Placenta accreta spectrum. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the effect of prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries in patients with placenta previa or placental accreta spectrum (PAS).
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, to identify and select relevant studies, the SID, MagIran, ScienceDirect, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched, using the keywords of internal iliac artery balloon, placenta, previa, balloon, accreta, increta and percreta, without a lower time limit and until 2020. The heterogeneity of the studies was examined using the I index, and subsequently a random effects model was applied. Data analysis was performed within the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2).
RESULTS
In the review of 29 articles with a total sample size of 1140 in the control group, and 1225 in the balloon occlusion group, the mean difference between the two groups was calculated in terms of Intraoperative blood loss index (mL) and it was derived as 3.21 ± 0.38; moreover, in 15 studies with a sample size of 887 in the control group, and 760 in the balloon occlusion group, the mean difference between the two groups in terms of gestation index (weeks) was found as 2.84 ± 0.49; and also with regards to hysterectomy balloon occlusion after prophylactic closure of the iliac artery, hysterectomy (%) balloon occlusion was calculated as 8.9 %, and this, in the hysterectomy control group (%) was obtained as 31.2 %; these differences were statistically significant and showed a positive effect of the intervention (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study show that the use of prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in patients with placenta previa or Placenta accreta spectrum has benefits such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, reduced hysterectomy and increased gestation (weeks), which can be considered by midwives and obstetricians.
Topics: Balloon Occlusion; Blood Loss, Surgical; Female; Humans; Iliac Artery; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy
PubMed: 33663536
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00722-3 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2021This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the evidence for the association between endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcome, including gestational... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the evidence for the association between endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcome, including gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and small for gestational age, preterm birth, placenta previa, placental abruption, cesarean section, stillbirth, postpartum hemorrhage, spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy, and spontaneous bowel perforation in pregnancy.
METHODS
We performed the literature review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), by searches in PubMed and EMBASE, until 1 November 2020 (PROSPERO ID CRD42020213999). We included peer-reviewed observational cohort studies and case-control studies and scored them according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, to assess the risk of bias and confounding.
RESULTS
39 studies were included. Women with endometriosis had an increased risk of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, placenta previa, placental abruption, cesarean section, and stillbirth, compared to women without endometriosis. These results remained unchanged in sub-analyses, including studies on spontaneous pregnancies only. Spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy and bowel perforation seemed to be associated with endometriosis; however, the studies were few and did not meet the inclusion criteria.
CONCLUSIONS
The literature shows that endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, placenta previa, placental abruption, cesarean section, and stillbirth.
PubMed: 33572322
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040667 -
BioMed Research International 2020In the past several years, there has been an increasing concern on miscarriage caused by endometriosis or adenomyosis. However, the results reported by different studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In the past several years, there has been an increasing concern on miscarriage caused by endometriosis or adenomyosis. However, the results reported by different studies remain controversial. The present study is aimed at assessing the impact of endometriosis and adenomyosis on miscarriage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for studies published from inception until February 29, 2020. The investigators included studies that evaluated miscarriage risk in pregnant women with endometriosis or adenomyosis by assisted reproductive technology (ART), or with spontaneous conception (SC). Miscarriage (<28 weeks) was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were antepartum hemorrhage (APH), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), preterm birth, low birthweight, placenta praevia, placental abruption, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Endnote was used for the study collection, and the data analyses were carried out by two authors using Review Manager version 5.2.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies, which is comprised of 697,984 women, were included in the present study. Miscarriage risk increased in women with endometriosis in SC (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.44-2.28, = 96%) compared with those without endometriosis, while women with endometriosis who underwent ART had a similar miscarriage risk, when compared to those with tubal infertility (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14, = 0%). Compared with those without adenomyosis, women with adenomyosis had an augmented miscarriage risk in ART (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.44-5.47, = 64%). Compared with those without endometriosis, women with endometriosis had higher odds of APH, PPH, preterm birth, stillbirth, and placenta praevia. No difference was observed in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight, and IUGR.
CONCLUSION
Women with endometriosis had an augmented miscarriage risk in SC and a similar miscarriage risk during ART. Adenomyosis was associated with miscarriage in pregnant women using ART.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Adenomyosis; Endometriosis; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
PubMed: 33490243
DOI: 10.1155/2020/4381346 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Feb 2021To identify and quantify risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To identify and quantify risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for English language studies with no restrictions on date or location. Studies included randomized trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of pregnant patients who developed atonic postpartum hemorrhage and reported at least one risk factor.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
Title, abstract, and full-text screening were performed using the Raayan web application. Of 1,239 records screened, 27 studies were included in this review. Adjusted or unadjusted odds ratios (ORs), relative risks, or rate ratios were recorded or calculated. For each risk factor, a qualitative synthesis of low and moderate risk of bias studies classifies the risk factor as definite, likely, unclear, or not a risk factor. For risk factors with sufficiently homogeneous definitions and reference ranges, a quantitative meta-analysis of low and moderate risk of bias studies was implemented to estimate a combined OR.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
Forty-seven potential risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage were identified in this review, of which 15 were judged definite or likely risk factors. The remaining 32 assessed risk factors showed no association with atonic postpartum hemorrhage or had conflicting or unclear evidence.
CONCLUSION
A substantial proportion of postpartum hemorrhage occurs in the absence of recognized risk factors. Many risk factors for atonic hemorrhage included in current risk-assessment tools were confirmed, with the greatest risk conferred by prior postpartum hemorrhage of any etiology, placenta previa, placental abruption, uterine rupture, and multiple gestation. Novel risk factors not currently included in risk-assessment tools included hypertension, diabetes, and ethnicity. Obesity and magnesium were not associated with atonic postpartum hemorrhage in this review.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42020157521.
Topics: Female; Humans; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Uterine Inertia
PubMed: 33417319
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004228