-
Annals of Vascular Surgery May 2024Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms over the last 2 decades. Endograft technology and...
BACKGROUND
Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms over the last 2 decades. Endograft technology and treatment of complications like endoleaks, graft migration, or graft occlusion developed over time. However, sometimes open surgical conversion maybe required. Our aim was to analyze the indications, the technical aspects and outcomes in patients who underwent open conversion after EVAR with different types and generations of endografts.
METHODS
This retrospective single-center study reviewed all patients who underwent EVAR from 2004 to 2020. Open surgical conversions >1 month post EVAR were identified. Conversions for graft infection were excluded. Indications for conversion and operative technique were analyzed. Primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were re-interventions and follow-up mortality.
RESULTS
During 2004 and 2020, 443 consecutive EVARs were performed, and 28 patients required open surgical conversion, with an additional 3 referred from other hospitals (N = 31). The median age was 75 (range 58-93); 94% were male. Conversion was performed after a median time of 55 months (range 16-209). Twenty patients underwent elective and 11 emergency conversion. Indications for open conversion were graft migration, respectively, disease progression with endoleak type Ia and/or Ib in 52% (16/31) and sac expansion due to endoleak type II in 26% (8/31). Of the 31 patients, 17 (55%) had at least one previous endovascular re-intervention. All patients met the device-specific instructions for use for each implanted endograft. In-hospital intervention rate was 16% (5/31). Thirty-day mortality rate was 3% (1/31) with one patient died due to multiorgan failure after rupture with complete endograft replacement. Five patients (16%) died during follow-up. Mid-term follow-up was 47.5 months (range 24-203) with estimated cumulative survival rates of 97%, 89%, and 84%, at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Late open conversion remains a valuable treatment option and can be performed safely in elective and emergency setting with a low early mortality. Lifelong surveillance and prompt intervention when necessary are essential in ensuring optimal outcomes after EVAR and preventing the need for emergent conversions.
PubMed: 38810725
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.02.028 -
British Journal of Cardiac Nursing Oct 2023Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a condition in which the abdominal aorta becomes enlarged, posing a risk of rupture and life-threatening haemorrhage. Abdominal aortic...
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a condition in which the abdominal aorta becomes enlarged, posing a risk of rupture and life-threatening haemorrhage. Abdominal aortic aneurysm accounts for a substantial number of fatalities worldwide, with mortality rates of up to 80 percent. Abdominal aortic aneurysms are often asymptomatic and are frequently discovered incidentally during tests for unrelated conditions. Surgery is required for aneurysms exceeding 5.5cm in men and 5cm in women, but post-surgical complications such as intra-abdominal adhesions, limb ischaemia and renal failure are common. There is some evidence showing that exercise, including prehabilitation, may be effective in improving patient outcomes post-surgery. However, there is a dearth of literature that has synthesised existing evidence related to the effectiveness of prehabilitation on patient outcomes post-surgery, and which has expanded upon its implications for clinical practise. This commentary aims to critically appraise the most recent Cochrane review in this area, and expand upon these findings to inform clinical practice.
PubMed: 38808305
DOI: 10.12968/bjca.2023.0078 -
European Heart Journal. Case Reports May 2024
Branch retinal artery occlusion with non-obstructive general angioscopy confirmed puff-chandelier rupture releasing cholesterol crystals in the aortic arch: a case report.
PubMed: 38807941
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae238 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Apr 2024Open abdomen therapy (OAT) is commonly used to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). This... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Increasing Use of Prophylactic Open Abdomen Therapy With Vacuum Assisted Wound Closure and Mesh Mediated Fascial Traction After Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
OBJECTIVE
Open abdomen therapy (OAT) is commonly used to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of OAT after rAAA from 2006 to 2021. Investigating data on resuscitation fluid, weight gain, and cumulative fluid balance could provide a more systematic approach to determining the timing of safe abdominal closure.
METHODS
This was a single centre observational cohort study. The study included all patients treated for rAAA followed by OAT from October 2006 to December 2021.
RESULTS
Seventy-two of the 244 patients who underwent surgery for rAAA received OAT. The mean age was 72 ± 7.85 years, and most were male (n = 61, 85%). The most frequent comorbidities were cardiac disease (n = 31, 43%) and hypertension (n = 31, 43%). Fifty-two patients (72%) received prophylactic OAT, and 20 received OAT for ACS (28%). There was a 25% mortality rate in the prophylactic OAT group compared with the 50% mortality in those who received OAT for ACS (p = .042). The 58 (81%) patients who survived until closure had a median of 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 9, 16.5) days of OAT and 5 (IQR 4, 7) dressing changes. There was one case of colocutaneous fistula and two cases of graft infection. All 58 patients underwent successful abdominal closure, with 55 (95%) undergoing delayed primary closure. In hospital survival was 85%. Treatment trends over time showed the increased use of prophylactic OAT (p ≤ .001) and fewer ACS cases (p = .03) assessed by Fisher's exact test. In multivariable regression analysis fluid overload and weight reduction predicted 26% of variability in time to closure.
CONCLUSION
Prophylactic OAT after rAAA can be performed safely, with a high rate of delayed primary closure even after long term treatment.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Male; Aged; Female; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Aortic Rupture; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension; Surgical Mesh; Aged, 80 and over; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Traction; Time Factors; Middle Aged; Open Abdomen Techniques; Risk Factors; Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Fasciotomy; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38805011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.10.032 -
Cureus Apr 2024We sought to determine whether there is a relationship between the fluoroscopic working angle used to achieve a co-planar view during the deployment of the prosthesis...
BACKGROUND
We sought to determine whether there is a relationship between the fluoroscopic working angle used to achieve a co-planar view during the deployment of the prosthesis during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and rates of complications, including paravalvular leaks, complete heart block, annular rupture, stroke, valve embolization, discharge to a skilled nursing facility and death within thirty days.
METHODS
All patients undergoing TAVI at our institution from 2015 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Images were reviewed to determine the fluoroscopic working angle during deployment, and medical records were used to determine the incidence and type of complication. A multilayer perceptron was employed to evaluate the predictive ability of the fluoroscopic working angle during deployment on complications of one-day and 30-day paravalvular leak, 30-day mortality, the need for a new pacemaker, discharge to a skilled nursing facility, stroke and the requirement for emergency intervention.
RESULTS
Eight hundred and thirty-four patients were included in the study. Fluoroscopic working angle had excellent predictive value for stroke (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.812), one-day (AUROC 0.850), and 30-day paravalvular leak (AUROC 0.801). However, feature importance and scaled weighting analysis indicated that only a working angle in the left anterior oblique/cranial quadrant was informative for the development of an outcome of interest specific to a working angle quadrant (30-day paravalvular leak).
CONCLUSION
Fluoroscopic working angle may be a useful way to further refine well-established risk calculi during TAVI.
PubMed: 38803728
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59144 -
Cureus Apr 2024Abdominal aortic aneurysm, characterized by a persistent dilation exceeding 3 cm or 50% of the aortic diameter, poses a substantial risk, particularly in males over 65....
Abdominal aortic aneurysm, characterized by a persistent dilation exceeding 3 cm or 50% of the aortic diameter, poses a substantial risk, particularly in males over 65. Despite its potentially asymptomatic nature, early detection is imperative due to the elevated mortality rates, reaching 90% following rupture. The presented case involves a 60-year-old male with progressively worsening abdominal pain, a history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and smoking. Initial examinations were inconclusive, requiring advanced imaging that revealed a large aneurysmal dilation. Therapeutic measures included endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), highlighting the significance of timely intervention. Despite elective surgery risks, mortality rates decrease significantly when the aneurysm diameter surpasses 43 mm. This report stresses the need for primary care physicians to conduct thorough screenings, recognize risk factors, and facilitate prompt referrals for advanced imaging. The case's pivotal lesson lies in the comprehensive management of abdominal aortic aneurysm, showcasing the potential for life-saving interventions and the critical role of early detection in mitigating the severe consequences associated with its rupture.
PubMed: 38800210
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58894 -
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports 2024Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is nowadays the preferred option to manage descending thoracic aorta diseases. However, despite feasibility and safety of the...
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is nowadays the preferred option to manage descending thoracic aorta diseases. However, despite feasibility and safety of the procedures, several complications may occur. We report the case of an 83-year-old female patient with inadvertent iliac rupture occurred during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. To limit massive bleeding, considering the patient's comorbidities contraindicating open surgical repair and the morphology of the arterial injury (circumferential rupture of the artery from its origin), we chose to perform a homolateral hypogastric and common iliac artery embolization and an aorto-uniliac balloon expandable stent graft deployment from the distal aorta to the contralateral common iliac artery. A femoro-femoral crossover bypass graft was performed to restore both lower limbs perfusion. Final angiography documented correct positioning and regular patency of the implanted grafts and bypass with no blood loss from the right iliac vessels. Despite careful preoperative assessment, iliac artery injury can represent a challenging complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair, particularly in the setting of inadequate iliac diameter, calcification and vessel tortuosity, or when large-caliber introducers are required. The hybrid approach we describe is a valid and effective solution to minimize blood loss and avoid major consequences in the management of iatrogenic iliac artery rupture during endovascular procedures.
PubMed: 38784242
DOI: 10.1177/2050313X241236328 -
Scientific Reports May 2024The present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous treatment of aortic coarctation using self-expandable uncovered Nitinol stents. We conducted a...
The present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous treatment of aortic coarctation using self-expandable uncovered Nitinol stents. We conducted a retrospective clinical data review of all patients with aortic coarctation and treated with self-expandable uncovered Nitinol stents at our institution between 2009 and 2019. The gradient pressure across the coarctation site was measured using aortography. Follow-up echocardiography and computed tomography angiography were performed to assess possible stent complications. A total of 127 stents were successfully implanted in 125 patients (64.8% males) with a mean age of 35.36 ± 11.9 years. The gradient across the coarctation site decreased significantly from 67.48 ± 14.79 to 5.04 ± 3.01 mmHg (P < 0.001) after self-expandable stent implantation. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased significantly from 175.53 ± 15.99 to 147.22 ± 12.83 mmHg (P < 0.001) after self-expandable stenting. There were no major technical or clinical complications, including balloon rupture, aneurysmal formation, infection, secondary stent migration, thrombosis, death during the procedure, and in-hospital mortality. On a mean follow-up of 48 ± 23.6 months (12-120 months), the gradient [from 59.43 ± 15.42 to 3.72 ± 1.38 mmHg (P < 0.001)] and SBP [from 175.53 ± 15.99 to 127.99 ± 7.82 mmHg (P < 0.001)] decreased significantly. There was no mortality, aneurysmal formation in the stent site, dislocation, or aortic re-stenosis requiring intervention during mid-term follow-up. Treatment of aortic coarctation using a self-expandable uncovered nitinol stent is safe and effective with promising mid-term outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Coarctation; Male; Female; Adult; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Middle Aged; Self Expandable Metallic Stents; Alloys; Stents; Computed Tomography Angiography; Young Adult; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 38783056
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62607-w -
The British Journal of Surgery May 2024Information on the predictive determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture from CT angiography are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanical...
BACKGROUND
Information on the predictive determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture from CT angiography are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanical parameters in abdominal aortic aneurysms and their association with risk of subsequent rupture.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, the digital radiological archive was searched for 363 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. All patients who underwent at least one CT angiography examination before aneurysm rupture were included. CT angiography results were analysed to determine maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, and biomechanical parameters (peak wall stress and peak wall rupture index). In the primary survival analysis, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms less than 70 mm were considered. Sensitivity analyses including control patients and abdominal aortic aneurysms of all sizes were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 67 patients who underwent 109 CT angiography examinations before aneurysm rupture were identified. The majority were men (47, 70%) and the median age at the time of CTA examination was 77 (71-83) years. The median maximum aneurysm diameter was 56 (interquartile range 46-65) mm and the median time to rupture was 2.13 (interquartile range 0.64-4.72) years. In univariable analysis, maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, peak wall stress, and peak wall rupture index were all associated with risk of rupture. Women had an increased HR for rupture when adjusted for maximum aneurysm diameter or aneurysm volume (HR 2.16, 95% c.i. 1.23 to 3.78 (P = 0.007) and HR 1.92, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 3.50 (P = 0.033) respectively). In multivariable analysis, the peak wall rupture index was associated with risk of rupture. The HR for peak wall rupture index was 1.05 (95% c.i. 1.03 to 1.08) per % (P < 0.001) when adjusted for maximum aneurysm diameter and 1.05 (95% c.i. 1.02 to 1.08) per % (P < 0.001) when adjusted for aneurysm volume.
CONCLUSION
Biomechanical factors appear to be important in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Women are at increased risk of rupture when adjustments are made for maximum aneurysm diameter alone.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Female; Male; Computed Tomography Angiography; Aged, 80 and over; Risk Factors; Sex Factors
PubMed: 38782730
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae125 -
Journal of the American Heart... Jun 2024Saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are considered to be at higher risk of rupture than fusiform AAAs, but not much is known about the extent of this risk.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Saccular and Fusiform Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Treated With Endovascular Repair Differ in Presentation and Treatment Threshold: Analyses Using a National Clinical Database in Japan.
BACKGROUND
Saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are considered to be at higher risk of rupture than fusiform AAAs, but not much is known about the extent of this risk. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the rupture presentation between fusiform and saccular AAAs.
METHODS AND RESULTS
This is a retrospective cohort study on 27 290 patients who underwent primary endovascular repair for a degenerative AAA between 2016 and 2019, and who were registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan. At operation for nonruptured case, the aneurysm diameter was significantly smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (median, 44.0 versus 51.0 mm; <0.001). Similarly, aneurysm diameter at rupture was significantly smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (median, 55.6 versus 68.0 mm; <0.001). The likelihood of repair for rupture was significantly higher in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs in the 40- to 54-mm diameter range, in which saccular morphology was found to be an independent risk factor for rupture against fusiform morphology by adjusting for sex and aneurysm diameter (odds ratio, 2.54 [95% CI, 1.75-3.69]). In addition, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the cutoff diameter to predict rupture was smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (50.5 and 59.5 mm, respectively) based on the Youden index.
CONCLUSIONS
Saccular AAAs presented at smaller diameters than fusiform AAAs in patients with ruptured AAAs treated with endovascular aortic repair, which supports the idea that saccular AAAs should be treated at smaller diameters.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Male; Japan; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Aortic Rupture; Databases, Factual; Risk Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Treatment Outcome; Risk Assessment; Middle Aged
PubMed: 38780177
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032715