-
Annals of Vascular Diseases Jun 2024Lymphedema is caused by dysfunction of the lymphatic system. It is divided into primary edema with no apparent cause and secondary edema with an exogenous cause. The... (Review)
Review
Lymphedema is caused by dysfunction of the lymphatic system. It is divided into primary edema with no apparent cause and secondary edema with an exogenous cause. The main symptoms are edema and heaviness, skin changes such as skin hardening, lymphocysts, lymphorrhoea, papillomas, and recurrent cellulitis. They are often irreversible and progressive, thus greatly reducing quality of life of the patients. Diagnosis is made by image examinations that can evaluate lymphatic flow and functions such as lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green fluorescence lymphangiography. Linear pattern and dermal backflow are the main findings. Conservative treatment consists of four components: compression therapy with elastic garments, exercise therapy, manual lymphatic drainage, and skin care, which is called complex physical therapy (CPT). Although CPT has become the gold standard of treatment, with evidence of efficacy reported in terms of volume reduction, maintenance, and prevention of cellulitis, it is a symptomatic treatment and does not improve impaired lymphatic flow. On the other hand, surgical treatment, such as lymphaticovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transplantation, can create new lymphatic flow and improve lymphatic dysfunctions. Although these techniques are expected to be effective in volume reduction, cellulitis prevention, and improving quality of life, there is a need for more studies with a higher level of evidence in the future. In Japan, lymphedema is treated with a combination of conservative and surgical therapies, but lymphedema is intractable and few cases are completely cured. Therefore, how to improve the outcome of treatment is an important issue to be addressed in the future. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2023; 32: 141-146.).
PubMed: 38919315
DOI: 10.3400/avd.ra.24-00011 -
Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina,... Jun 2024Melasma, a chronic acquired skin pigmentation disorder, is characterized by the presence of irregular-edged brown to gray-brown patches with a symmetrical distribution,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
The effectiveness and safety of 3% tranexamic acid cream vs. 4% hydroquinone cream for mixed-type melasma in skin of color: a double-blind, split-face, randomized controlled trial.
INTRODUCTION
Melasma, a chronic acquired skin pigmentation disorder, is characterized by the presence of irregular-edged brown to gray-brown patches with a symmetrical distribution, primarily on sun-exposed areas such as the face. Topical hydroquinone (HQ) is the gold standard for melasma treatment but has numerous side effects. This study assesses the effectiveness of topical tranexamic acid (TA) as an alternative for melasma treatment.
METHODS
In a double-blind, split-face, randomized controlled trial involving 20 subjects, the effectiveness of 3% TA versus 4% HQ cream was evaluated over 8 weeks. The modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI), melanin index, erythema index, and side effects were assessed. Subjective improvement was measured using the patient global assessment (PtGA).
RESULTS
A significant decline in the mMASI score was observed at weeks 4 and 8 in both groups compared to baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in PtGA scores between the 3% TA group and the 4% HQ group.
CONCLUSIONS
Topical 3% TA is as effective and safe as 4% HQ for treating melasma in the Indonesian population, with potential advantages in terms of side-effect profiles.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Administration, Cutaneous; Double-Blind Method; Hydroquinones; Melanosis; Severity of Illness Index; Skin Cream; Tranexamic Acid; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38918942
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Pediatrics Jun 2024Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a serious illness that affects preterm newborns, and delayed antibiotic initiation may increase the risk of adverse outcomes.
BACKGROUND
Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a serious illness that affects preterm newborns, and delayed antibiotic initiation may increase the risk of adverse outcomes.
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to examine the present time of antibiotic administration in preterm infants with suspected EOS and the factors that contribute to delayed antibiotic initiation.
METHODS
In this retrospective study in China, a total of 82 early preterm infants with suspected EOS between December 2021 and March 2023 were included. The study utilized a linear regression analytical approach to identify independent factors that contribute to delayed antibiotic administration.
RESULTS
The mean gestational age and birth weight of the study population were 29.1 ± 1.4 weeks and 1265.7 ± 176.8 g, respectively. The median time of initial antibiotic administration was 3.8 (3.1-5.0) hours. Linear regression revealed that severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (β = 0.07, P = 0.013), penicillin skin test (PST) timing (β = 0.06, P < 0.001) and medical order timing (β = 0.04, P = 0.017) were significantly associated with the initial timing of antibiotic administration.
CONCLUSIONS
There is an evident delay in antibiotic administration in preterm infants with suspected EOS in our unit. Severe RDS, PST postponement and delayed medical orders were found to be associated with the delayed use of antibiotics, which will be helpful for quality improvement efforts in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Retrospective Studies; Infant, Premature; Female; Male; Time-to-Treatment; Neonatal Sepsis; Quality Improvement; China; Linear Models
PubMed: 38918783
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04887-9 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Jun 2024Capecitabine has been widely prescribed to treat various cancers. The hand foot syndrome (HFS) is the most troublesome adverse effect. Urea cream has been pre-emptively... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A Randomized Single-Blinded Phase II Trial Comparing Efficacy and Quality of Life of Topical Aloe Vera Gel Plus Urea Cream Versus Urea Cream Alone for Prevention of Hand Foot Syndrome in Cancer Patients Receiving Capecitabine.
INTRODUCTION
Capecitabine has been widely prescribed to treat various cancers. The hand foot syndrome (HFS) is the most troublesome adverse effect. Urea cream has been pre-emptively co-prescribed, even though its efficacy is doubtful. Aloe vera gel with urea cream might potentiate each other. This trial was intended to prove the efficacy of this combination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The investigators conducted a randomized single-blinded phase II study. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the combination of aloe vera gel and 10% urea cream (n = 30), the experimental A+U arm and 10% urea cream alone (n = 31), the U arm. The sample size was calculated to have 90% power to show the significant 20% reduction in the incidence of HFS grade 2-3 of the combination therapy with alpha level = 0.05. Both the CTCAE criteria version 5 and the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were assessed to determine the severity of HFS and quality of life, respectively.
RESULTS
Most of the participants had rectal cancer (A+U: 43.3%; U: 41.9%). In the A+U group, 86.7% had grade 0-1 HFS and 13.3% had grade 2-3 HFS. In the U group, 64.5% had grade 0-1 HFS and 35.5% had grade 2-3 HFS (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.045). Grade 2-3 HFS was significantly lower in the combination group.
CONCLUSION
Combination of aloe vera gel and 10% urea cream ameliorated the severity of HFS in participants taking capecitabine; however, no significant difference in DLQI between the groups was demonstrated.
Topics: Humans; Capecitabine; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Hand-Foot Syndrome; Urea; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Single-Blind Method; Plant Preparations; Prognosis; Follow-Up Studies; Adult; Administration, Topical; Aged; Neoplasms; Skin Cream; Aloe
PubMed: 38918684
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.6.2203 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jun 2024Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected disease caused by Leishmania parasites. The oral drug miltefosine is effective, but there is a growing problem of drug...
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected disease caused by Leishmania parasites. The oral drug miltefosine is effective, but there is a growing problem of drug resistance, which has led to increasing treatment failure rates and relapse of infections. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines a light source and a photoactive drug to promote cell death by oxidative stress. Although PDT is effective against several pathogens, its use against drug-resistant Leishmania parasites remains unexplored. Herein, we investigated the potential of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) as wearable light sources, which would enable at-home use or ambulatory treatment of CL. We also assessed its impact on combating miltefosine resistance in Leishmania amazonensis-induced CL in mice. The in vitro activity of OLEDs combined with 1,9-dimethyl-methylene blue (DMMB) (OLED-PDT) was evaluated against wild-type and miltefosine-resistant L. amazonensis strains in promastigote (EC = 0.034 μM for both strains) and amastigote forms (EC = 0.052 μM and 0.077 μM, respectively). Cytotoxicity in macrophages and fibroblasts was also evaluated. In vivo, we investigated the potential of OLED-PDT in combination with miltefosine using different protocols. Our results demonstrate that OLED-PDT is effective in killing both strains of L. amazonensis by increasing reactive oxygen species and stimulating nitric oxide production. Moreover, OLED-PDT showed great antileishmanial activity in vivo, allowing the reduction of miltefosine dose by half in infected mice using a light dose of 7.8 J/cm and 15 μM DMMB concentration. In conclusion, OLED-PDT emerges as a new avenue for at-home care and allows a combination therapy to overcome drug resistance in cutaneous leishmaniasis.
PubMed: 38917757
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116881 -
Acta Dermato-venereologica Jun 2024This retrospective study investigates the efficacy of 2 treatment regimens, pregabalin alone versus pregabalin combined with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
This retrospective study investigates the efficacy of 2 treatment regimens, pregabalin alone versus pregabalin combined with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine cream, in reducing itch in patients with brachioradial pruritus at a tertiary care center. Electronic medical records of 64 brachioradial pruritus patients seen at the University of Miami Itch Center were analyzed. A significant reduction in itch scores was seen with both treatments, with no significant difference between the groups. A small number of patients experienced adverse effects, including drowsiness and weight gain with pregabalin and skin irritation with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine cream. Ultimately, our findings underscore the potential of utilizing combined therapy for difficult-to-treat brachioradial pruritus cases and implementing individualized approaches for managing neuropathic pruritus. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to establish optimal treatment protocols.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Pruritus; Female; Male; Tertiary Care Centers; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Amitriptyline; Lidocaine; Ketamine; Pregabalin; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Adult; Antipruritics; Florida; Skin Cream; Administration, Cutaneous; Electronic Health Records
PubMed: 38916180
DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40246 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International May 2024Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have -limited survival and few treatment options. We studied whether mistletoe extract (ME), in addition to comprehensive... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have -limited survival and few treatment options. We studied whether mistletoe extract (ME), in addition to comprehensive oncological treatment and palliative care, prolongs overall survival (OS) and -improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
METHODS
The double-blind, placebo-controlled MISTRAL trial was conducted in Swedish oncology centers. The main inclusion criteria were advanced exocrine pancreatic cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. The subjects were randomly assigned to ME (n=143) or placebo (n=147) and were stratified by study site and by eligibility (yes/no) for palliative chemotherapy (June 2016-December 2021). ME or placebo was injected subcutaneously three times a week for nine months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); one of the secondary endpoints was the HRQoL dimension global health/QoL (EORTC-QLQ-C30), as assessed at seven time points over nine months. Trial registration: EudraCT 2014-004552-64, NCT02948309.
RESULTS
No statistically significant benefit of adding ME to standard treatment was seen with respect to either OS or global health/QoL. The adjusted hazard ratio for OS was 1.13 [0.89; 1.44], with a median survival time of 7.8 and 8.3 months for ME and placebo, respectively. The figures for the HRQoL dimension "global health/QoL" were similar in the two groups (p=0.86). The number, severity, and outcome of the reported adverse events were similar as well, except for more common local skin reactions at ME injection sites (66% vs. 1%).
CONCLUSION
ME is unlikely to have a clinically significant effect on OS or the HRQoL dimension global health/QoL when administered in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in addition to comprehensive cancer care.
PubMed: 38915151
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0080 -
BMC Primary Care Jun 2024Teledermatology is the practice of dermatology through communication technologies. The aim of this study is to analyze its implementation in a Spanish health area during...
INTRODUCTION
Teledermatology is the practice of dermatology through communication technologies. The aim of this study is to analyze its implementation in a Spanish health area during its first two years.
METHODS
Cross-sectional descriptive study. It included interconsultations between dermatologists and family physicians in the Salamanca Health Area (Spain) after the implementation of the non-face-to-face modality over a period of two consecutive years. A total of 25,424 consultations were performed (20,912 face-to-face and 4,512 non-face-to-face); 1000 were selected by random sampling, half of each modality.
MAIN MEASURES
referral rate, response time and resolution time, type of pathology, diagnostic concordance, and quality of consultation.
RESULTS
The annual referral rate was 42.9/1000 inhabitants (35.3 face-to-face and 7.6 non-face- to-face). The rate of face-to-face referrals was higher in urban areas (37.1) and the rate of non- face-to-face referrals in rural areas (10.4). The response time for non-face-to-face consultations was 2.4 ± 12.7 days and 56 ± 34.8 days for face-to-face consultations (p < 0.001). The resolution rate for non-face-to-face consultations was 44%. Diagnostic concordance, assessed by the kappa index, was 0.527 for face-to-face consultations and 0.564 for non-face-to-face consultations. Greater compliance with the quality criteria in the non-attendance consultations.
CONCLUSIONS
Teledermatology appears to be an efficient tool in the resolution of dermatological problems, with a rapid, effective, and higher quality response for attention to skin pathologies.
REGISTRY
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05625295. Registered on 21 November 2022 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT05625295).
Topics: Humans; Spain; Dermatology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Male; Female; Adult; Middle Aged; Referral and Consultation; Telemedicine; Skin Diseases; Health Services Accessibility; Remote Consultation; Aged; Adolescent; Young Adult; Child
PubMed: 38914974
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02479-1 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that negatively impacts on patient's life. A holistic approach integrating well-being assessment could improve disease management....
Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that negatively impacts on patient's life. A holistic approach integrating well-being assessment could improve disease management. Since a consensus definition of well-being in psoriasis is not available, we aim to achieve a multidisciplinary consensus on well-being definition and its components. A literature review and consultation with psoriasis patients facilitated the design of a two-round Delphi questionnaire targeting healthcare professionals and psoriasis patients. A total of 261 panellists (65.1% patients with psoriasis, 34.9% healthcare professionals) agreed on the dimensions and components that should integrate the concept of well-being: emotional dimension (78.9%) [stress (83.9%), mood disturbance (85.1%), body image (83.9%), stigma/shame (75.1%), self-esteem (77.4%) and coping/resilience (81.2%)], physical dimension (82.0%) [sleep quality (81.6%), pain/discomfort (80.8%), itching (83.5%), extracutaneous manifestations (82.8%), lesions in visible areas (84.3%), lesions in functional areas (85.8%), and sex life (78.2%)], social dimension (79.5%) [social relationships (80.8%), leisure/recreational activities (80.3%), support from family/friends (76.6%) and work/academic life (76.5%)], and satisfaction with disease management (78.5%) [treatment (78.2%), information received (75.6%) and medical care provided by the dermatologist (80.1%)]. This well-being definition reflects patients' needs and concerns. Therefore, addressing them in psoriasis will optimise management, contributing to better outcomes and restoring normalcy to the patient's life.
Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Health Personnel; Delphi Technique; Female; Male; Surveys and Questionnaires; Consensus; Adult; Quality of Life; Middle Aged; Self Concept
PubMed: 38914574
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64738-6 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Dec 2024This noninterventional, cross-sectional survey estimated the prevalence and consequences of residual disease in apremilast-treated US adults with moderate to severe...
This noninterventional, cross-sectional survey estimated the prevalence and consequences of residual disease in apremilast-treated US adults with moderate to severe psoriasis. Residual disease was defined as experiencing moderate, severe, or very severe psoriasis over the past week or having ≥3% body surface area affected, despite treatment. Factors associated with residual disease and its effects on flare-ups, humanistic burden, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) were evaluated. Of the 344 apremilast users (mean age, 44.9 years; female, 65.4%), 174 (50.6%) had residual disease. It was more prevalent in Black versus White participants (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.6-12.2), those receiving apremilast for ≥1 versus <1 year (OR, 16.5; 95% CI, 7.9-34.4), those reporting ≥2 versus 0 to 1 flare-ups during the past 3 months (OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 5.0-20.1), and those with ≥4 versus 1 to 3 body regions affected at time of survey (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 3.8-19.8). Participants with versus without residual disease self-reported more psoriasis flare-ups over the past 3 months (mean, 4.7 vs 0.9; < .001) and more anxiety (89.7% vs 50.0%; < .001) and depression (69.0% vs 23.6%; < .001) over the past 30 days. Generally, participants with versus without residual disease also had significantly more comorbidities and greater HCRU.
Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide; Female; Male; Cross-Sectional Studies; Adult; Middle Aged; United States; Prevalence; Severity of Illness Index; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Surveys and Questionnaires; Symptom Flare Up
PubMed: 38914422
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2366532