-
Cureus May 2024Hypertension is a globally prevalent condition, and low adherence to antihypertensive therapy is considered one of the main causes of poor blood pressure (BP) control.... (Review)
Review
Hypertension is a globally prevalent condition, and low adherence to antihypertensive therapy is considered one of the main causes of poor blood pressure (BP) control. Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is a complex issue that can arise from various factors; however, gaining an understanding of this provides key targets for intervention strategies. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current status and recent developments regarding our understanding of the determinants of patients' adherence to antihypertensives. A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and "Índex das Revistas Médicas Portuguesas", which included studies published between 2017 and 2021 following the PICOS model: (P) Adult patients with the diagnosis of primary hypertension, using at least one antihypertensive agent; (I) all interventions on both pharmacological and non-pharmacological level; (C) patient's adherence against their non-adherence; (O) changes in adherence to the therapeutic plan; and (S) any study design (except review articles) written in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. Articles were reviewed by two researchers and their quality was assessed. Subsequently, determinants were classified according to their consistent or inconsistent association with adherence or non-adherence. Only 45 of the 635 reports identified met the inclusion criteria. Adherence was consistently associated with patient satisfaction with communication, patient-provider relationship, their treatment, and use of eHealth and mHealth strategies; a patient's mental and physical health, including depression, cognitive impairment, frailty, and disability, previous hospitalization, occurrence of vital events; drug treatment type and appearance; and unwillingness due to health literacy, self-efficacy, and both implicit and explicit attitudes towards treatment. There were discrepancies regarding the association of other factors to adherence, but these inconsistent factors should also be taken into account. In conclusion, the barriers to adherence are varied and often interconnected between socioeconomic, patient, therapy, condition, and healthcare system levels. Healthcare teams should invest in studying patients' non-adherence motives and tailoring interventions to individual levels, by using a multifaceted approach to assess adherence. Further research is needed to analyze the impact of implicit attitudes, the use of new technological approaches, and the influence of factors that are inconsistently associated with non-adherence, to understand their potential in implementing adherence strategies.
PubMed: 38826951
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59532 -
Experimental Gerontology Aug 2024Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is common in older adults with hypertension. Antihypertensive treatment (AHT) prevents cardio- and cerebrovascular events. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is common in older adults with hypertension. Antihypertensive treatment (AHT) prevents cardio- and cerebrovascular events. However, physicians are concerned to cause OH, making them hesitant to initiate or augment AHT in older adults with hypertension.
METHODS
We systematically researched electronic databases for trials with older participants (≥65 years) with hypertension and OH assessment after initiating, discontinuing, or augmenting AHT. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analyses on OH prevalence and postural blood pressure (BP) drop were performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies (26,695 participants) met inclusion criteria, of which fifteen could be included in the meta-analyses. OH prevalence decreased after AHT initiation or augmentation (risk ratio 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.21-0.72; I = 47 %; p < 0.01), n = 6 studies), but also after AHT discontinuation (risk ratio 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.28-0.55; I = 0 %; p < 0.01), n = 2 studies). Postural BP drop did not change after initiation or augmentation of AHT (mean difference 1.07 (95 % CI = -0.49-2.64; I = 92 %; p = 0.18), n = 11 studies). The main reason for ten studies not to be included in the meta-analyses was absence of baseline OH data. Most of these studies reported OH incidences between 0 and 2 %. Studies were heterogeneous in OH assessment methods (postural change, timing of BP measurements, and OH definition). Risk of bias was moderate to serious in twenty studies.
CONCLUSION
Results suggest that AHT initiation or augmentation decreases OH prevalence, implying that the risk of inducing OH may be overestimated in current AHT decision-making in older adults. However, the overall low level of evidence and the finding that AHT discontinuation reduces OH prevalence limit firm conclusions at present and highlight an important research gap. Future AHT trials in older adults should measure OH in a standardized protocol, adhering to consensus guidelines to overcome these limitations.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Hypertension; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Prevalence
PubMed: 38772447
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112461 -
Kardiologiia Apr 2024The article discusses current issues of the treatment of arterial hypertension. According to presented data, so-called therapeutic nihilism is becoming one of the main... (Review)
Review
The article discusses current issues of the treatment of arterial hypertension. According to presented data, so-called therapeutic nihilism is becoming one of the main barriers to achieving target blood pressure (BP). This nihilism is that despite evidence of the effectiveness of achieving lower BP values, practitioners do not intensify antihypertensive therapy sufficiently to achieve such values. The article specially addresses new criteria for the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy, which reflect the therapy sustainability. The most commonly used indicator is the duration of the period, during which systolic BP remains in the therapeutic range. The prognostic significance of such indicators is discussed. In these conditions, it is very important to use the most effective antihypertensive drugs for initial antihypertensive therapy, including as a part of combination therapy. This tactic provides more frequent achievement of BP goals without the need for dose adjustment. In this regard, a systematic review was performed, which included sufficiently large randomized studies of the antihypertensive effectiveness of azilsartan medoxomil. This systematic review will provide comprehensive information on a possible role of using the angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan as a basic drug for the treatment of a wide range of patients with high BP. Most of the studies included in the systematic review assessed the effectiveness of combination therapy including azilsartan.
Topics: Humans; Oxadiazoles; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination
PubMed: 38742517
DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2024.4.n2646 -
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular... May 2024Hypertension (HTN) is a co-morbidity that is commonly associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unclear whether... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Hypertension (HTN) is a co-morbidity that is commonly associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unclear whether treatment of hypertension in HFpEF patients is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes.
AIM
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of anti-hypertensive medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF.
METHODS
We performed a database search for studies reporting on the association of anti-hypertensive medications with cardiovascular outcomes and safety endpoints in patients with HFpEF. The databases searched include OVID Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints include cardiovascular (CV) mortality, worsening heart failure (HF), CV hospitalization, composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hyperkalemia, worsening renal function, and hypotension.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies with 14062 HFpEF participants (7010 treated with medical therapy versus 7052 treated with placebo) met inclusion criteria. Use of anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower all-cause mortality, CV mortality or CV hospitalization compared to treatment with placebo (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.35; p = 0.9, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.06; p = 0.19, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.12; p = 0.83, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03; p = 0.11). Anti-hypertensive medications were not associated with lower risk of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.07-3.73; p = 0.5). Use of anti-hypertensive medications was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of MACE (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
While treatment with anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, their use may be associated with reduce risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF regardless of whether they have HTN. Additional high quality studies are required to clarify this association and determine the effect based on specific classes of medications.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Antihypertensive Agents; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Hypertension; Aged; Female; Risk Assessment; Male; Risk Factors; Ventricular Function, Left; Middle Aged; Blood Pressure; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 38740725
DOI: 10.1007/s40292-024-00646-0 -
Medicine May 2024Heart failure is a common and severe condition, often complicated by diastolic dysfunction. Current standard therapies such as ACEIs and ARBs have limited efficacy in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Heart failure is a common and severe condition, often complicated by diastolic dysfunction. Current standard therapies such as ACEIs and ARBs have limited efficacy in managing diastolic function. Sacubitril/Valsartan, an emerging therapy, warrants rigorous investigation to elucidate its impact on diastolic function in heart failure patients.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and utilized the PICO schema. Searches were performed on 4 databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library-without temporal restrictions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly defined, and quality assessments were conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Both fixed-effects and random-effects models were used for statistical analysis, depending on inter-study heterogeneity assessed by I2 statistics and Chi-square tests.
RESULTS
Out of 1129 identified publications, 8 studies met the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. These studies consisted of both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies and featured diverse global populations. Significant reductions were found in the echocardiographic parameter E/e' ratio and LAVi upon treatment with Sacubitril/Valsartan compared to standard therapies, with mean differences of -1.38 and -4.62, respectively, both with P values < .01.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrates that Sacubitril/Valsartan significantly improves diastolic function parameters in heart failure patients compared to standard treatments. These findings underscore the potential benefits of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the management of heart failure, particularly for patients with diastolic dysfunction.
Topics: Humans; Valsartan; Aminobutyrates; Drug Combinations; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Tetrazoles; Diastole
PubMed: 38728489
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037965 -
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) Jul 2024Increased arterial stiffness and pulse wave velocity (PWV) of the aorta and large arteries impose adverse hemodynamic effects on the heart and other organs.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Increased arterial stiffness and pulse wave velocity (PWV) of the aorta and large arteries impose adverse hemodynamic effects on the heart and other organs. Antihypertensive treatment reduces PWV, but it is unknown whether this results from an unloading of stiffer elements in the arterial wall or is due to an alternate functional or structural change that might differ according to class of antihypertensive drug.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of different antihypertensive drug classes and duration of treatment on PWV with and without adjustment for change in mean arterial blood pressure (BP; study 1) and compared this to the change in PWV after an acute change in transmural pressure, simulating an acute change in BP (study 2).
RESULTS
A total of 83 studies involving 6200 subjects were identified. For all drug classes combined, the reduction of PWV was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46-0.83) m/s per 10 mm Hg reduction in mean arterial BP, a change similar to that induced by an acute change in transmural pressure in a group of hypertensive subjects. When adjusted for change in mean arterial BP, the reduction in PWV after treatment with beta-blockers or diuretics was less than that after treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor antagonists or calcium channel antagonists.
CONCLUSIONS
Reduction in PWV after antihypertensive treatment is largely explained by the reduction in BP, but there are some BP-independent effects. These might increase over time and contribute to better outcomes over the long term, but this remains to be demonstrated in long-term clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Pulse Wave Analysis; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Vascular Stiffness; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 38721709
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22436 -
International Journal of Cardiology.... Jun 2024Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi), namely axitinib, are commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in patients with cancer; however, this...
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi), namely axitinib, are commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in patients with cancer; however, this medication has a significant cardiovascular side effect profile, such as high-grade hypertension. We performed this updated meta-analysis of RCTs to compile cardiovascular adverse events, such as all-grade and high-grade (>3) hypertension, the risk for thrombosis (DVT and PE), and peripheral edema. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase from inception until October 2023 for studies using axitinib to treat various cancers. Trials with patients randomly allocated for VEGFRi drug therapy with axitinib and reported all-grade hypertension as an outcome were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager to calculate pooled proportions of odds ratios (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model, Mantel-Haenszel method. A total of 8 RCTs and 2502 patients were included in the review. Compared with the placebo group, the VEGFRi (Axitinib) therapy group was associated with a higher risk of all-grade and high-grade hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue. Furthermore, there was no increased risk of thromboembolism (DVT/PE) or hypothyroidism. However, a lower risk of peripheral edema was noted between the two groups. Screening for patients with preexisting hypertension, identifying risk factors for cardiovascular diseases before the initiation of VEGFRi therapy, and careful monitoring of high-risk patients during VEGFRi therapy, as well as prompt treatment with antihypertensive drugs, will help mitigate the adverse effects. Further evaluation using prospective designs is required to study the clinical significance and develop mitigation strategies.
PubMed: 38715853
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101415 -
Journal of Glaucoma Jul 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that the PreserFlo Microshunt glaucoma drainage device significantly reduces intraocular pressure in primary open... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PRCIS
This systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that the PreserFlo Microshunt glaucoma drainage device significantly reduces intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma patients at 12 months postinsertion.
PURPOSE
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PF-MS) on intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 months has been conducted.
METHOD
The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of open angle glaucoma, PF-MS insertion, and examination of IOP over time. Meta-analyses were conducted on the primary outcome of IOP and the secondary outcome of glaucoma medication regime. Adverse events were also noted.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were identified for inclusion in the meta-analyses, of which none had a high risk of bias. The meta-analyses found a significant mean reduction in IOP of 9.07 mm Hg (95% CI: 7.88-10.25; P <0.0001) and a significant mean reduction in mean glaucoma medication requirement of 2.37 medications (95% CI: 2.15-2.60; P <0.0001). Hypotony and hyphaema are common early complications.
CONCLUSIONS
The PF-MS device significantly reduced both IOP and glaucoma medication requirement at 12 months postinsertion in individuals with open angle glaucoma without a significant adverse event burden. Further research is required to determine the economic and environmental effects of widely implementing the PF-MS device into clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Intraocular Pressure; Glaucoma Drainage Implants; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome; Antihypertensive Agents
PubMed: 38709184
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002419 -
Medicine May 2024The efficacy and safety of different oral ginkgo-based Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) regimens for hypertension patients were analyzed based on the network... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy and safety of ginkgo-based Chinese patent medicines in patients with hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
The efficacy and safety of different oral ginkgo-based Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) regimens for hypertension patients were analyzed based on the network meta-analysis of the frequency framework.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database to gather data on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of 8 ginkgo biloba oral preparations for the treatment of hypertension. The trials included in the analysis were conducted from the inception of the databases up to September 2023. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the RoB 2.0 evaluation tool, and a reticulated meta-analysis was conducted using STATA MP 14 software. The RCTs included in this study were published studies and therefore did not require ethics committee review or patient consent.
RESULTS
We ultimately included 46 RCTs covering 8 CPMs including ginkgo biloba tablet (GBT), GB capsule (GBC), ginkgo biloba drop (GBD), ginkgo biloba ketone ester drop, Fufangyinxing capsule, fufangyinxingtongmai oral liquid, Yinxingmihuan oral liquid, Yindanxinanotong softgel capsule (YDXNT). GBD + CT demonstrated the highest effectiveness in reducing systolic blood pressure (surface under the cumulative ranking [SUCRA] = 78.7%) and improving total effective rate (SUCRA = 86.7%). GBC + CT exhibited the greatest efficacy in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA = 92.6%). GBT + CT was identified as the most effective in lowering total cholesterol (TC) (SUCRA = 100%). Additionally, YDXNT + CT demonstrated notable improvements in triglyceride levels (SUCRA = 92.2%), Nitric oxide (NO) (SUCRA = 93.9%), and ET-1 (SUCRA = 67.5%). In terms of safety, 14 studies reported the occurrence of adverse reactions with a high degree of clinical heterogeneity, which was only qualitatively analyzed in this study.
CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS
We found that a combination of 8 ginkgo-based CPMs + CT was effective in hypertension compared with CT. The evidence showed that GBD + CT were the best in improving systolic blood pressure and total effective rate, GBC + CT improved diastolic blood pressure, GBT + CT were the most effective in improving TC, and YDXNT + CT was the most effective in improving TG, NO, and ET-1. Adverse effects were only analyzed qualitatively, and the number of adverse effects of CPMs treatment was relatively low compared to CT. In addition, the quality of the literature included in the study was low, and further validation through RCTs with larger sample sizes, higher quality, and more rigorously designed is needed.
Topics: Humans; Antihypertensive Agents; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Ginkgo biloba; Ginkgo Extract; Hypertension; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38701296
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037927 -
International Journal of Older People... May 2024The prevalence of essential hypertension contributed significantly to morbidity and mortality rates. Acupuncture-related therapies were commonly employed in hypertension... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of essential hypertension contributed significantly to morbidity and mortality rates. Acupuncture-related therapies were commonly employed in hypertension treatment. Nevertheless, a lack of conclusive evidence left uncertainties regarding the optimal strategies for managing hypertensive populations.
OBJECTIVES
Conduct a comprehensive systematic review to evaluate the existing clinical evidence about the effectiveness of acupuncture and moxibustion-related therapies in managing hypertension, by employing network meta-analysis techniques.
METHODS
A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across n of databases. This search covered studies available up to October 2022. Randomized controlled trials assessing acupuncture and moxibustion-related therapies in managing hypertension based on traditional Chinese medicine were screened. Primary outcome measures included the antihypertensive effectiveness rate, variations in blood pressure and the incorporation of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome manifestations. The review follows the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA statement.
RESULTS
We identified a total of 24 trials with 1867 patients, which evaluated the efficacy of various acupuncture-related therapies for hypertension management. Network meta-analysis showed that moxibustion and auricular point sticking combined with medication therapy had the best effect in terms of antihypertensive effective rate (medication + moxibustion + auricular pressure vs. medication = 1.29 [1.09, 1.54]; sucra = 85.9, p < .05) and hypertension symptom improvement (medication + moxibustion + auricular pressure vs. medication = -1.55 [-2.98, -0.13]; sucra = 96.1, p < .05). Acupuncture combined with moxibustion combined with medication therapy had the best effect in reducing systolic pressure (medication + moxibustion + acupuncture vs. medication = -8.50 [-10.19, -6.80]; sucra = 100, p < .05) and diastolic blood pressure (medication + moxibustion + acupuncture versus medication = -4.72 [-6.71, -2.72]; sucra = 99.71, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Network meta-analysis suggested that the combined use of moxibustion and auricular point application in conjunction with drug therapy showed the highest likelihood of being the most effective treatment in terms of antihypertensive efficiency rates and improvement in hypertension symptoms. Furthermore, the combination of acupuncture and moxibustion alongside drug treatment emerged as the most promising approach for reducing systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Limited by the methodological quality and quantity of the included studies, the results need to be interpreted with caution. It is necessary to conduct more high-quality randomized controlled trials of acupuncture-related therapies for the adjuvant treatment of hypertension in the future.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Clinicians can use acupuncture-related therapies to inform their treatment decisions and potentially incorporate acupuncture-related therapies into their hypertension management protocols.
Topics: Humans; Acupuncture Therapy; Hypertension; Network Meta-Analysis; Moxibustion; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Antihypertensive Agents
PubMed: 38701237
DOI: 10.1111/opn.12613