-
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Jun 2024Osteoarthritis (OA) is a source of significant limitations for individuals, health systems, and economies. The most common complications of OA are often associated with...
OBJECTIVE
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a source of significant limitations for individuals, health systems, and economies. The most common complications of OA are often associated with risk factors related to chronic diseases, cardiovascular disease, and depression. In this article, a new kind of staple is proposed, designed to provide better strength when subjected to bending and torque loads.
METHODS
This innovative staple has been numerically tested and compared to a MEMOFIX staple by Smith + Nephew, in order to evaluate its mechanical behavior. The radius and ulna were fixed at the lower extremity, while the distal interphalangeal of the little finger was loaded with a bending load of 50 N and a torque moment of 500 N/mm.
RESULTS
For the bending load, a maximum value of stress of 120 MPa in the traditional staple, while 90 MPa are registered in the innovative one. The torsional load produces a value of 107 MPa in the traditional staple and 85 MPa in the innovative one.
CONCLUSION
Computational simulations showed the biomechanical performance of a new type of nitinol staple compared with a traditional one. This staple is designed with an elliptical shape in order to support different kinds of loads. Our results confirm an optimal mechanical behavior, compared to the traditional staple, in terms of the evaluated Equivalent Von Mises stress; also the contact force exerted by the innovative staple was increased.
PubMed: 38855509
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769091 -
Foot & Ankle International Jun 2024Operative management of midfoot Charcot arthropathy often involves an extended midfoot arthrodesis with intramedullary bolts for fixation, a method called "beaming."...
BACKGROUND
Operative management of midfoot Charcot arthropathy often involves an extended midfoot arthrodesis with intramedullary bolts for fixation, a method called "beaming." Recently intramedullary nails have been introduced for the same indication, presumably providing stronger fixation. This study compares midfoot fusion nails to bolts with regard to stiffness and compressive ability. Additionally, we assessed how the addition of a subtalar fusion affects the construct.
METHODS
Medial column fusions were performed on 10 matched cadaver foot specimens with either a midfoot fusion nail or bolt. Specimens underwent cyclical compression loading, and displacement was measured. Separately, compressive forces produced were compared between the 2 fixation constructs using a synthetic bone block model. Lastly, another 10 matched specimens with midfoot fusion nails were evaluated with or without subtalar fusions.
RESULTS
No differences in were found in comparing matched specimens between nail vs bolt or comparing nail only without subtalar fusion (STF) vs nail with STF. The compressive force produced by the nail specimens was significantly and substantially greater than the bolted specimens (751.7 vs 139.0 N, = .01). The accumulated height drop at the midfoot after cycling was 0.5 mm more in the nail group than in the bolt group (1.72 vs 1.22 mm, = .008). The nail with STF group had greater initial height drop at the midfoot than the nail-only group (0.68 vs 0.34 mm, = .035) with similar initial height drop at the ankle. However, there were no differences in among the matched pairs of midfoot nail-only vs midfoot nail with STF as measured by displacement after fatigue or maximum force at load to failure.
CONCLUSION
The overall cadaveric comparisons between matched pairs of nails vs bolts, and nail-only vs nail with STF, did not provide noteworthy differences between the groups with regard to strength or stiffness. However, the compressive force of the midfoot fusion nail was far superior to the bolt in a synthetic bone model. These data provide valuable insight comparing implants used in Charcot midfoot arthrodesis.
PubMed: 38853769
DOI: 10.1177/10711007241251816 -
The American Journal of Case Reports Jun 2024BACKGROUND Cervical spondylolysis with spondylolisthesis is a rare disorder. According to previous reports, the spondylolisthesis is usually Meyerding Grade I, with only...
BACKGROUND Cervical spondylolysis with spondylolisthesis is a rare disorder. According to previous reports, the spondylolisthesis is usually Meyerding Grade I, with only a limited number of cases receiving surgical treatment. We hereby report a special case of cervical spondylolysis with Grade-II spondylolisthesis, treated with single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and present a literature review related to this problem. CASE REPORT Here, we report the case of a 52-year-old man who complained of posterior neck pain and numbness of the bilateral upper limbs. Radiological examination showed bilateral spondylolysis of the C6 and Meyerding Grade-II spondylolisthesis of C6 on C7 with instability. The patient underwent a single-level C6/C7 ACDF surgery. The symptoms of neck pain and bilateral upper-limb numbness were relieved immediately after surgery. The immediate postoperative radiological examination showed successful restoration of sagittal alignment. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had returned to normal life without any symptoms. At 2-year follow-up, computed tomography showed that C6-C7 fusion had been achieved and alignment was maintained. CONCLUSIONS Cervical spondylolysis, as an uncommon spinal disorder, has been regarded as a congenital abnormity, and has unique radiological characteristics. For most of the cases with cervical spondylolysis, even with Grade-II spondylolisthesis, single-level ACDF can achieve good clinical and radiological outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Male; Spondylolisthesis; Spinal Fusion; Middle Aged; Diskectomy; Cervical Vertebrae; Spondylolysis
PubMed: 38851881
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.943823 -
Foot & Ankle International Jun 2024Primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is a reliable treatment option, yet concerns remain about nonunion. Nitinol staple use has recently proliferated in...
BACKGROUND
Primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is a reliable treatment option, yet concerns remain about nonunion. Nitinol staple use has recently proliferated in midfoot arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to examine the union rate of primary arthrodesis of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocations treated with nitinol staples compared with traditional plate-and-screw fixation. The secondary objective is to assess the difference in operative times and reoperation rates.
METHODS
Midfoot fracture-dislocations treated with primary arthrodesis by 7 foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Of 160 eligible patients, 121 patients (305 joints) met the required 4-month minimum radiographic follow-up. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed at the individual joint level. Each joint was classified as either staples alone (45 patients, 154 joints), staples plus plates and screws (hybrid) (45 patients, 40 joints), or plates and screws alone (31 patients, 111 joints). The primary outcome was arthrodesis union at each joint fused.
RESULTS
Nonunion was more common (9.0%, 10/111) among joints fixed with plate and screws than with hybrid (2.5%, 1/40) or staples only (1.3%, 2/154) ( = .0085). Multivariable regression demonstrated that autograft use was independent associated with union ( = .0035) and plate-and-screw only fixation was an independent risk factor for nonunion ( = .0407). Median operating room and tourniquet times were shorter for hybrid (92 and 83 minutes) and staple only (67 and 63 minutes) constructs compared to plate-and-screw only fixation (105 and 95 minutes) ( .0001 and .0003). There was no difference in reoperation rates among patients with different fixation types.
CONCLUSION
We found that use of nitinol compression staple and bone autograft in primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc and midfoot fracture-dislocations was associated with both improved union rates and shorter tourniquet and operative times compared to traditional plate-and-screw fixation techniques.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, therapeutic.
PubMed: 38850062
DOI: 10.1177/10711007241227880 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024Endoscopic spine lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is well-regarded within the academic community. However, it presents challenges such as intraoperative...
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic spine lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is well-regarded within the academic community. However, it presents challenges such as intraoperative disorientation, high rates of nerve damage, a steep learning curve, and prolonged surgical times, often occurring during the creation of the operative channel. Furthermore, the undefined safe operational zones under endoscopy continue to pose risks to surgical safety. We aimed to analyse the anatomical data of Kambin's triangle via CT imaging to define the parameters of the safe operating area for transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TPLIF), providing crucial insights for clinical practice.
METHODS
We selected the L4-L5 intervertebral space. Using three-dimensional (3D), we identified Kambin's triangle and the endocircle within it, and recorded the position of point 'J' on the adjacent facet joint as the centre 'O' of the circle shifts by angle 'β.' The diameter of the inscribed circle 'd,' the abduction angle 'β,' and the distances 'L1' and 'L2' were measured from the trephine's edge to the exiting and traversing nerve roots, respectively.
RESULTS
Using a trephine with a diameter of 8 mm in TPLIF has a significant safety distance. The safe operating area under the TPLIF microscope was also clarified.
CONCLUSIONS
Through CT imaging research, combined with 3D simulation, we identified the anatomical data of the L4-L5 segment Kambin's triangle, to clarify the safe operation area under TPLIF. We propose a simple and easy positioning method and provide a novel surgical technique to establish working channels faster and reduce nerve damage rates. At the same time, according to this method, the Kambin's triangle anatomical data of the patient's lumbar spine diseased segments can be measured through CT 3D reconstruction of the lumbar spine, and individualised preoperative design can be conducted to select the appropriate specifications of visible trephine and supporting tools. This may effectively reduce the learning curve, shorten the time operation time, and improve surgical safety.
Topics: Humans; Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Vertebrae; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Endoscopy; Models, Anatomic; Aged
PubMed: 38849945
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04830-9 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of zoledronic acid for reducing the incidence of cage subsidence and enhancing interbody fusion rates following...
Can zoledronic acid reduce the risk of cage subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the elderly population? A retrospective study.
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of zoledronic acid for reducing the incidence of cage subsidence and enhancing interbody fusion rates following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery, particularly as the first reported evidence of the role of zoledronic acid combined with OLIF.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 108 elderly patients treated for degenerative lumbar diseases using OLIF combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation from January 2018 to December 2021. Patients were divided into the zoledronic acid (ZOL) group (43 patients, 67 surgical segments) and the control group (65 patients, 86 surgical segments). A comparative analysis of the radiographic and clinical outcomes between the groups was performed, employing univariate and multivariate regression analyses to explore the relationships between cage subsidence and the independent variables.
RESULTS
Radiographic outcomes, including anterior height, posterior height, disc height, coronal disc angle, foraminal height, and lumbar lordosis, were not significantly different between the two groups. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were noted in the back visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the groups. However, at the 1-year follow-up, the leg VAS score was lower in the ZOL group than in the control group (P = 0.028). The ZOL group demonstrated a notably lower cage subsidence rate (20.9%) than did the control group (43.0%) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the interbody fusion rate between the ZOL group (93.0%) and the control group (90.8%). Non-use of zoledronic acid emerged as an independent risk factor for cage subsidence (OR = 6.047, P = 0.003), along with lower bone mineral density, lower postoperative anterior height, and concave endplate morphology. The model exhibited robust discriminative performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872.
CONCLUSION
The administration of zoledronic acid mitigates the risk of cage subsidence following OLIF combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in elderly patients; however, it does not improve the interbody fusion rate.
Topics: Humans; Zoledronic Acid; Spinal Fusion; Retrospective Studies; Female; Male; Aged; Lumbar Vertebrae; Pedicle Screws; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Postoperative Complications; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Aged, 80 and over; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
PubMed: 38849941
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04828-3 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024Lumbar spondylolysis is a bone defect in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar vertebral, which is a common cause of low back pain in youth. Although non-surgical...
BACKGROUND
Lumbar spondylolysis is a bone defect in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar vertebral, which is a common cause of low back pain in youth. Although non-surgical treatment is a mainstream option, surgery is necessary for patients with persistent symptoms. Buck technique is widely used as a classical direct repair technique, but it cannot achieve reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis and reconstruction of lumbosacral sagittal balance. We have described a novel surgical procedure based on Buck technique with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation, and report a series of clinical outcomes in 5 patients to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of young lumbar spondylolysis.
METHODS
Five young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis with a mean age of 19.20 ± 5.41 years underwent surgical treatment after an average of 7.60 ± 1.52 months of failure to respond to conservative treatment, using a new surgical procedure based on Buck technique combined with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation.
RESULTS
Five patients were successfully operated without serious complications such as nerve and vascular injury. The average operation time was 109.00 ± 7.42 min, the interpretative average blood loss was 148.00 ± 31.14 ml, and the average fusion time was 11.20 ± 1.64 months. All patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery, and the visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the Henderson's evaluation were rated excellent or good. After the removal of the internal fixation, it was observed that temporary intersegmental fixation could repair the isthmus, reduce lumbar spondylolisthesis, and reconstruct the sagittal balance of the lumbosacral vertebrae while preserving lumbar motion and preventing intervertebral disc degeneration. Postoperative MRI indicated the Pfirrmann classification of the affected discs: 1 case from grade III to grade II, 3 cases from grade II to grade I, and 1 case remained grade II.
CONCLUSIONS
Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation is a highly applicable and effective method for the treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. The isthmic fusion is accurate, and temporary intersegmental fixation can effectively prevent disc degeneration and reconstruct the sagittal balance of lumbosacral vertebra.
Topics: Humans; Spondylolysis; Pedicle Screws; Lumbar Vertebrae; Adolescent; Male; Female; Young Adult; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Spinal Fusion; Follow-Up Studies; Low Back Pain
PubMed: 38849937
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04823-8 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Jun 2024Posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis is an irreversible and often progressive condition. Many surgical treatments, used in (daily) practice, aim to relieve symptoms like...
BACKGROUND
Posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis is an irreversible and often progressive condition. Many surgical treatments, used in (daily) practice, aim to relieve symptoms like pain and restore function. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the patient reported and functional outcomes of the most common surgical interventions in patients with posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis. This overview can help clinicians select the best treatment and manage patient's expectations.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane for articles published between 1990 and November 2022 according to the PRISMA guidelines. The study protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017080427). Studies that describe patient reported outcomes (pain and Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) -score) and functional outcomes (range of motion (ROM) and grip strength) after surgical intervention with a minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. The identified surgical procedures included denervation, proximal row carpectomy, interpositional- and total arthroplasty, and midcarpal-, radiocarpal- and total arthrodesis. The pre-and postoperative outcomes were pooled and presented per salvage procedure.
RESULTS
Data from 50 studies was included. Pain score improved after all surgeries except denervation. Flexion/extension decreased after radiocarpal arthrodesis, did not show significant changes after proximal row carpectomy, and improved for all other surgeries. DASH score improved after arthroplasty, proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis. Grip strength improved after interposition arthroplasty and partial arthrodesis.
CONCLUSION
Evidence from this review did not support the indication for denervation in this particular patient population. In patients with SLAC/SNAC II, proximal row carpectomy might be favourable to a midcarpal arthrodesis solely based on better FE ROM of the radiocarpal joint after proximal row carpectomy. In terms of radiocarpal mobility, total wrist arthroplasty might be preferred to radiocarpal arthrodesis in patients with osteoarthritis after a distal radius fracture. More uniform measurements of outcomes would improve the understanding of the effect of surgical treatments of the posttraumatic osteoarthritic wrist.
Topics: Humans; Osteoarthritis; Wrist Joint; Range of Motion, Articular; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Salvage Therapy; Arthrodesis; Hand Strength; Treatment Outcome; Wrist Injuries; Recovery of Function; Denervation
PubMed: 38849773
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07527-6 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024The biomechanical aspects of adjacent segment degeneration after Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis (AdIS) corrective surgery involving postoperative changes in motion and...
The biomechanical aspects of adjacent segment degeneration after Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis (AdIS) corrective surgery involving postoperative changes in motion and stress of adjacent segments have yet to be investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of corrective surgery on adjacent segments in adult idiopathic scoliosis by finite element analysis. Based on computed tomography data of the consecutive spine from T1-S1 of a 28-year-old male patient with adult idiopathic scoliosis, a three-dimensional finite element model was established to simulate the biomechanics. Two posterior long-segment fixation and fusion operations were designed: Strategy A, pedicle screws implanted in all segments of both sides, and Strategy B, alternate screws instrumentation on both sides. The range of motion (ROM), Maximum von Mises stress value of intervertebral disc (IVD), and Maximum von Mises stress of the facet joint (FJ) at the fixation adjacent segment were calculated and compared with data of the preoperative AdIS model. Corrective surgery decreased the IVD on the adjacent segments, increased the FJ on the adjacent segments, and decreased the ROM of the adjacent segments. A greater decrease of Maximum von Mises stress was observed on the distal adjacent segment compared with the proximal adjacent segment. The decrease of Maximum von Mises stress and increment of Maximum von Mises stress on adjacent FJ in strategy B was greater than that in strategy A. Under the six operation modes, the change of the Maximum von Mises stress on the adjacent IVD and FJ was significant. The decrease in ROM in the proximal adjacent segment was greater than that of the distal adjacent segment, and the decrease of ROM in strategy A was greater than that in strategy B. This study clarified the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent segments after AdIS corrective surgery, and further biomechanical analysis of two different posterior pedicle screw placement schemes by finite element method. Our study provides a theoretical basis for the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after corrective surgery for AdIS.
Topics: Humans; Finite Element Analysis; Scoliosis; Adult; Male; Biomechanical Phenomena; Range of Motion, Articular; Spinal Fusion; Pedicle Screws; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Stress, Mechanical; Intervertebral Disc; Thoracic Vertebrae
PubMed: 38849364
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63113-9 -
PloS One 2024We performed a meta-analysis to identify risk factors affecting spinal fusion. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
We performed a meta-analysis to identify risk factors affecting spinal fusion.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 6, 2023, for articles that report risk factors affecting spinal fusion. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed-effects models for each factor for which the interstudy heterogeneity I2 was < 50%, while random-effects models were used when the interstudy heterogeneity I2 was ≥ 50%. Using sample size, Egger's P value, and heterogeneity across studies as criteria, we categorized the quality of evidence from observational studies as high-quality (Class I), moderate-quality (Class II or III), or low-quality (Class IV). Furthermore, the trim-and-fill procedure and leave-one-out protocol were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity and verify result stability.
RESULTS
Of the 1,257 citations screened, 39 unique cohort studies comprising 7,145 patients were included in the data synthesis. High-quality (Class I) evidence showed that patients with a smoking habit (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.21) and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 3.33 to 5.86) were at higher risk for fusion failure. Moderate-quality (Class II or III) evidence showed that fusion failure was significantly associated with vitamin D deficiency (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.90), diabetes (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.59 to 7.36), allograft (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.96), conventional pedicle screw (CPS) fixation (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 2.23 to 10.20) and posterolateral fusion (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.25 to 10.49).
CONCLUSIONS
Conspicuous risk factors affecting spinal fusion include three patient-related risk factors (smoking, vitamin D deficiency, and diabetes) and four surgery-related risk factors (without the use of BMP-2, allograft, CPS fixation, and posterolateral fusion). These findings may help clinicians strengthen awareness for early intervention in patients at high risk of developing fusion failure.
Topics: Spinal Fusion; Humans; Risk Factors; Cohort Studies; Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2; Smoking
PubMed: 38848350
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304473