-
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Jan 2024Artificial dermal substitutes (ADMs) have been trialled to improve outcomes at the donor site following the harvesting of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF). This...
BACKGROUND
Artificial dermal substitutes (ADMs) have been trialled to improve outcomes at the donor site following the harvesting of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF). This systematic review compares donor site aesthetic and functional outcomes, with the use of an ADM versus conventional practice.
METHODS
The databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus were searched for retrospective, prospective, and case-control studies and randomised control trials (RCTs) involving any ADM. Studies with adult patients having undergone RFFF harvesting and donor site repair with an ADM, commenting on appropriate clinical outcomes and without high risk of bias, were included. Direction-of-effect analysis was performed on relevant groupings of studies since heterogeneity in outcome measurement precluded meta-analyses.
RESULTS
Across eight non-comparative studies included, 132 patients had donor site coverage with AlloDerm™, Integra™, Matriderm™, or Rapiderm. Across 11 comparative studies included, 240 patients had donor site coverage with fish-skin matrix, AlloDerm™, amniotic membrane, MegaDerm™, Hyalomatrix, Integra™, or Matriderm™. Five out of 11 comparative studies demonstrated superior aesthetic outcomes with ADMs according to at least one aesthetic metric compared to controls, whilst 6/11 demonstrated superior functional outcomes with ADMs. No study demonstrated poorer aesthetic or functional outcomes with an ADM compared to conventional practice.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, the lack of studies reporting poorer outcomes with them compared to conventional practices, and a cumulative effect direction in their favour, provide strong indications in support of the use of AlloDerm™, Integra™, or Matriderm™ grafts. Further comparative studies, including RCTs, are needed to reinforce these initial indications.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Esthetics; Free Tissue Flaps; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Skin Transplantation
PubMed: 38101265
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.11.046 -
Wounds : a Compendium of Clinical... Nov 2023Since 2017, the clinical use of IFSG has increased substantially in the United States, with some use in Europe and Asia as well. However, scant consensus data have been...
BACKGROUND
Since 2017, the clinical use of IFSG has increased substantially in the United States, with some use in Europe and Asia as well. However, scant consensus data have been published on such use.
OBJECTIVE
The authors sought to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical use of IFSG in the management of acute and chronic LEWs.
METHODS
A panel of 8 expert clinicians in the United States used a 2-cycle NFG process to develop consensus statements based on their own clinical practice and the literature. At their initial meeting in October 2021, panel members discussed the management of DFUs, VLUs, atypical LEWs, and traumatic LEWs in their practices. Consensus statements were drafted, voted on, and rated by relative importance. At the second meeting in October 2022, the panel discussed the initial survey results; a second survey was conducted, and panel members revised the recommendations and indicated the relative importance of each in the final report. A systematic literature review of English-language articles published from January 2016 through November 2022 was conducted as well, using the search terms: "fish skin," "piscine graft," "fish tissue," "intact fish skin graft," "Cod skin," "Omega 3 fatty acid graft."
RESULTS
Forty-three statements were generated and grouped into 5 sections comprising general recommendations for LEWs and recommendations specific to DFUs, VLUs, atypical LEWs, and traumatic LEWs. The primary general recommendation is the need to determine wound etiology based on clinical evaluation and reviewing related test results. For DFUs and VLUs, the main recommendations are to adhere to first-line therapy (ie, standard of care, follow conventional guidelines [multilayer compression therapy], offloading, and assessment of wound perfusion) before introducing IFSG.
CONCLUSIONS
Publications on and clinical experience in the use of IFSGs have increased substantially in the past several years. The 43 consensus recommendations are meant to guide physicians in the optimal use of IFSG in the management of acute and chronic LEWs.
Topics: Animals; United States; Skin Transplantation; Skin; Fishes; Europe; Lower Extremity
PubMed: 38048615
DOI: 10.25270/wnds/23130 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Jan 2024Neoumbilicoplasty aims to reconstruct an aesthetically pleasing new umbilicus following agenesis, malignancy, anatomical distortion, or umbilicus loss. Despite the wide... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Neoumbilicoplasty aims to reconstruct an aesthetically pleasing new umbilicus following agenesis, malignancy, anatomical distortion, or umbilicus loss. Despite the wide variety of surgical techniques described, literature is scarce when it comes to standardized categorization of these as well as the clear definition of patients' selections, specific indications, final outcomes, and possible complications. According to available literature, this work aims to evaluate different surgical approaches, and correlate them to specific surgical needs, to simplify the surgical choice and patient management.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in December 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 41 studies and 588 patients were finally included. On the basis of the evidence of the literature collected, we divided the studies into four groups according to the neoumbilicoplasty techniques: single suture or purse-string suture, single flap, multiple flap, and skin graft. Patients' surgical comorbidities, neoumbilicoplasty indications, and aesthetic and surgical outcomes were investigated. Direct suture and single and multiple flap techniques assured overall, satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications. Whereas suture-only techniques were chosen mostly by general surgeons/urologists in laparoscopic surgery, the single flap was the preferred method to reconstruct the umbilicus in open abdominal surgery or combined abdominoplasty with herniorrhaphy. Multiple flap and skin grafts were adopted in abdominoplasty-related umbilicus reconstruction, although the latter option showed impactful aesthetic and surgical complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Umbilicoplasty can assure generally pleasant aesthetic outcomes with relatively low complication rates. Indications for specific techniques correspond to different patient populations and surgical scenarios.
Topics: Humans; Abdominoplasty; Surgical Flaps; Abdominal Muscles; Abdomen; Umbilicus
PubMed: 37972443
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.094 -
Hepatology Communications Oct 2023Graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation is a serious and usually fatal complication. Data identifying the risk factors and specifying the diagnosis and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation is a serious and usually fatal complication. Data identifying the risk factors and specifying the diagnosis and treatment options of the disease are scarce and contentious. Moreover, recommendations for therapeutic approaches are similarly sparse.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature from 1988 to 2020 on graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation was performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Medical subject headings, such as graft-versus-host disease and GvHD were used in combination with solid organ transplant, transplantation, or liver transplant. Following duplicate removal, 9298 articles were screened for suitability. A total of 238 full-text articles were analyzed for eligibility, resulting in 130 eligible articles for meta-analysis. Two hundred twenty-five patients developing graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation reported herein were mainly published in case reports and case series.
RESULTS
Graft-versus-host disease occurred with an incidence of 1.2%. 85% developed following deceased donor liver transplant and 15% following living-related donor liver transplantation. The median follow-up period following liver transplantation was 84 days (interquartile range, 45-180). The median time from liver transplantation to graft-versus-host disease onset was 30 days (interquartile range, 21-42). The main clinical features included skin rash (59%), fever (43%), diarrhea (36%), and pancytopenia (30%). The overall mortality rate was 71%. Neither univariate (HR = 0.999; 95% CI, 0.493-2.023; p = 1.0) nor multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between adaptation of immunosuppression and survival probability (HR = 1.475; 95% CI, 0.659-3.303; p = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review suggests that an increase in immunosuppressive regimen does not yield any survival benefit in patients suffering from graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation.
Topics: Humans; Liver Transplantation; Living Donors; Graft vs Host Disease; Immunosuppressive Agents; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37755878
DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000260 -
Dermatology and Therapy Oct 2023The classical management of melanoma is surgery, but this can be challenging because of several factors, such as age, body area, lesion size, among others. Topical... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The classical management of melanoma is surgery, but this can be challenging because of several factors, such as age, body area, lesion size, among others. Topical imiquimod may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna melanoma due to its efficacy, tolerability, and non-invasiveness. The purpose of this systematic review is to assemble current evidence on the treatment of non-metastatic melanoma with topical imiquimod.
METHODS
The PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched as the primary sources using the main search terms "imiquimod" combined with "lentigo maligna" and "melanoma" with the command "AND." Articles were identified, screened, and extracted for relevant data, following the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 87 studies covering 1803 lesions treated with imiquimod cream were identified and included in this sytematic review. Forty-nine studies were case reports, 16 were retrospective analyses, 3 were open label trials, six were case series; one study was a controlled randomized trial, one was a randomized trial, and one was a single-arm phase III trial. Because of the high number of low-evidence studies, the overall risk of bias resulted high. In 55 studies, imiquimod 5% was used in monotherapy as the primary treatment; only in one study was imiquimod 3.75% introduced. In most cases, the topical treatment was applied once daily, with the exception of nine cases where an increased daily dosage was prescribed. The total duration of the treatment regimen was extremely variable and depended on body area and tolerability, with differences among patients of the same study. In six studies, imiquimod was used as neoadjuvant therapy before the surgical excision, and in 11 studies it was used after surgery as complementary or adjuvant therapy. In total, 1133 of the 1803 (62.8%) lesions were reported to be cleared after the treatment, taking into account that not all of the patients completed the treatment. Of these 1133 lesions, histological clearance was achieved in 645 (56.9%) lesions and clinical clearance only was achieved in 490 (43.2%) lesions; relapse occurred in 107 lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
The heterogeneity of the studies included in this systematic review precludes the drawing of any relevant conclusions regarding the application of imiquimod. Its efficacy in melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna melanoma has been demonstrated, but further evidence from controlled studies concerning the modalities is missing.
PubMed: 37615838
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-023-00993-1 -
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Aug 2023This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies to assess the predictive value of both tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma...
BACKGROUND
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies to assess the predictive value of both tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for active tuberculosis (TB) among solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients.
METHODS
Medline, Embase, and the CENTRAL databases were searched from 1946 until June 30, 2022. Two independent assessors extracted data from studies. Sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the effect of studies with high or low risk of bias. Methodological quality of each publication was assessed using QUADAS-2.
RESULTS
A total of 43 studies (36 403 patients) with patients who were screened for latent TB infection (LTBI) and who underwent SOT were included: 18 were comparative and 25 noncomparative (19 TST, 6 QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube [QFT-GIT]). For IGRA tests taken together, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 1.2% and 99.6%, respectively. For TST, PPV was 2.13% and NPV was 95.5%. Overall, PPV is higher when TB burden is higher, regardless of test type, although still low in absolute terms. Incidence of active TB was similar between studies using LTBI prophylaxis (mean incidence 1.22%; 95% confidence interval [CI], .2179-2.221) and those not using prophylaxis (mean incidence 1.045%; 95% CI, 0.2731-1.817; = .7717). Strengths of this study include the large number of studies available from multiple different countries; limitations include absence of gold standard for diagnosis of latent TB and low incidence of active TB.
CONCLUSIONS
We found both TST and IGRA had a low PPV and high NPV for the development of active TB posttransplant. Further studies are needed to better understand how to prevent active TB in the SOT population.
PubMed: 37559757
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad324 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology Aug 2023Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterised by vasculopathy and progressive fibrosis of the skin. The aim of this article is to analyse and summarise the efficacy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterised by vasculopathy and progressive fibrosis of the skin. The aim of this article is to analyse and summarise the efficacy and safety of autologous fat (AF), stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) grafting in the treatment of SSc, providing evidence for clinical application.
METHODS
The research involves the efficacy and safety of AF, SVF and ADSC grafting in the treatment of patients with SSc. The studies were screened and selected independently by two authors based on pre-specified criteria. The data extraction and quality assessment were also performed independently by two authors.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies were eligible for inclusion. Skin thickness reduced following SVF or AF therapy, but there was no significant difference. All measures used to assess fingertip symptoms revealed a significant improvement. Notably, SVF and AF were found to have the most impact on Raynaud's phenomenon improvement. The ADSC group improved the most in terms of finger pain alleviation. SVF reported the highest proportion of adverse events, accounting for approximately half of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS
AF, SVF, and ADSC all displayed therapeutic effects of improving SSc, but differences existed in the effects on different symptoms. Plastic surgeons should choose the most suitable treatment strategy after comprehensively evaluating the patient's clinical manifestations.
Topics: Humans; Stem Cell Transplantation; Obesity; Scleroderma, Systemic; Adipose Tissue
PubMed: 37382451
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ycy3k7 -
Digestive Endoscopy : Official Journal... Feb 2024Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) is a rare challenging cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. We performed a systematic review of case reports and case series on...
OBJECTIVES
Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) is a rare challenging cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. We performed a systematic review of case reports and case series on BRBNS to gather information on the treatment options currently available.
METHODS
All studies reporting a case of BRBNS in humans were evaluated. Papers were ruled out if CARE criteria and explanations on patient's selection, ascertainment, causality, and reporting were not respected or identified. PROSPERO 2021 CRD 42021286982.
RESULTS
Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome was treated in 106 cases from 76 reports. 57.5% of the population was under 18 years old, and up to 50% of the cases reported a previous treatment. Clinical success was achieved in 98 patients (92.4%). Three main types of interventions were identified: systemic drug therapy, endoscopy, and surgery. After BRBNS recurrence or previous therapy failure, systemic drug therapy emerged as a preferred second-line treatment over endoscopy (P = 0.01), but with a higher rate of reported adverse events when compared with surgery and endoscopy (P < 0.001). Endoscopic treatment was associated with a higher number of required sessions to achieve complete eradication when compared with surgery (P < 0.001). No differences between the three main areas were found in the overall follow-up time (P = 0.19) or in the recurrence rate (P = 0.45).
CONCLUSION
Endoscopy, surgery, and systemic drug therapy are feasible treatment options for BRBNS. Systemic drug therapy was the favorite second-line treatment after endoscopic failure or recurrence of BRBNS, but adverse events were more frequently reported.
Topics: Humans; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Nevus, Blue; Skin Neoplasms; Syndrome
PubMed: 37029779
DOI: 10.1111/den.14564 -
Burns : Journal of the International... Aug 2023Our objective was to compare the outcomes of full thickness skin grafts versus split thickness skin grafts in paediatric hand burn patients. A systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Our objective was to compare the outcomes of full thickness skin grafts versus split thickness skin grafts in paediatric hand burn patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, and an electronic search was conducted to identify all Randomised Controlled Trials and non-randomised studies comparing the outcomes of full thickness skin grafts versus split thickness skin grafts in paediatric hand burn patients. Primary outcomes included development of post-graft contracture and the necessity for surgical release. Secondary outcomes consisted of evaluation of function, cosmesis and colour, scar and feeling, hair growth, and other complaints. For the analysis, fixed effects modelling was applied. Results: ten non-randomised trials with a total of 532 grafts were found. Full thickness skin grafts exhibited a statistically significant decrease in the development of post-graft contracture (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.35, P = 0.0001) and later surgical releases (OR = 0.06, P = 0.00001). For secondary outcomes, full thickness skin grafts outperformed split thickness skin grafts in post-operative functional ability. However, split thickness skin grafts, showed to be superior in scar, aesthetic, and colour assessments, and less hair growth was observed for split thickness skin grafts. No significant difference was seen in sensation and donor or recipient site complaints. Overall, full thickness skin grafts are a better alternative for paediatric hand burns than split thickness skin transplants because they are linked with reduced post-graft contracture and the requirement for surgical release.
Topics: Child; Humans; Skin Transplantation; Cicatrix; Burns; Contracture; Hand Injuries; Wrist Injuries
PubMed: 36280545
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.09.010