-
World Journal of Urology Apr 2021To provide most recent and high quality evidence concerning the comparison between monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To provide most recent and high quality evidence concerning the comparison between monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two researchers performed a systematic review of the current literature independently, to identify studies published in English language. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to 31st May 2019. The included primary endpoints of the study were: detrusor muscle sampling rates, cautery artifact occurrence among specimens and 1- or 2-year recurrence rates, overall complication rate, transfusion rate, obturator reflex and bladder perforation rates. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, operation room time, hemoglobin drop, urinary tract infections, TUR-syndrome, serum sodium drop and acute urinary retention rates.
RESULTS
23 studies (14 RCTs and 9 observational) were included for qualitative and quantitative synthesis, recruiting 9815 patients in monopolar resection group and 10,112 patients in bipolar resection group (experimental). We found significant differences in favor of bipolar energy in terms of cautery artifact and length of stay with bladder perforation rates were found to be significantly better in bipolar system even though these results did not sustain when RCT's only analysis was performed. No differences were found in rates of obturator reflex (even though RCT's analysis advised differently), tumor recurrence and most of the secondary endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS
Bipolar transurethral bladder tumor resection is as safe and efficient as its monopolar counterpart. Bipolar technology is related to less obturator nerve contractions and less tissue thermal artifacts during resection and may result in less hospital stay.
Topics: Cystectomy; Electrosurgery; Humans; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Treatment Outcome; Urethra; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 32591900
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03313-w -
Urologia Internationalis 2020Penile prosthesis implant is a safe and effective option in erectile dysfunction patients, being implant procedures safe with a low risk of infection. However, when...
INTRODUCTION
Penile prosthesis implant is a safe and effective option in erectile dysfunction patients, being implant procedures safe with a low risk of infection. However, when infection occurs, it represents a concrete problem for both surgeon and patient.
METHODS
This is a comprehensive review of all issues relating to prosthesis infection, including causes and risk factors, methods of prevention, and management. We analyzed all preoperative and perioperative factors, which can play a role in infection of the device.
RESULTS
Infection of penile prosthesis implant is hard to manage and correct. While the incidence of infection following first implant is up to 3%, in cases of re-implant surgery, the rate can reach as high as 18%. Many articles were found addressing prevention and treatment of penile prosthesis infection, and many analyzed all relevant pre- and perioperative factors associated with penile prosthesis implant. Although such factors have been well studied, there is no clear consensus worldwide on certain topics.
CONCLUSIONS
Penile prosthesis implant is a safe and effective option. Despite infection is a rare event, surgeons should follow strictly pre-, intra- and postoperative recommendations in order to reduce the risk of device's infection. An appropriate antibiotic therapy should be tailored on patient's characteristics and pathogens isolated.
Topics: Humans; Male; Penile Prosthesis; Prosthesis-Related Infections
PubMed: 32541156
DOI: 10.1159/000508472 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Feb 2021Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can cause considerable impact on several aspects of quality of life. Sexuality is a central aspect of quality of life. In recent years,...
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can cause considerable impact on several aspects of quality of life. Sexuality is a central aspect of quality of life. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of articles on HS and sexuality. To achieve our aim of synthesizing the available scientific evidence on HS and sexual health, we conducted a systematic review in February 2020. The clinical databases used included Medline and Embase. All types of epidemiological articles were included; reviews, guidelines, protocols, conference abstracts and case report articles were excluded. Eleven studies were included for review, representing 42 729 patients with HS. The most common study design was cross-sectional with or without comparison group(s), conducted in an outpatient setting or through surveys. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction ranged between 51-62%, and in the case of erectile dysfunction, a specific kind of sexual dysfunction affecting penile erection, it ranged from between 52% and 60% of patients studied using validated questionnaires. Potential risk factors for sexual dysfunction among men and women were identified, mainly related to disease activity, symptoms and partners. Mood disorders like depression and anxiety appear to be associated with sexual dysfunction. Women were more affected by sexual distress. HS patients with sexual dysfunction had a decreased overall quality of life. With respect to treatment, surgery did not improve sexual function and there is no scientific evidence regarding medical treatments. Patients stated that they would like to treat their sexual problems with healthcare professionals. In conclusion, sexual and erectile dysfunction are common in HS patients, and negatively affect their quality of life. There are clinical factors potentially associated with this which should be identified and treated by dermatologists in the comprehensive care of HS patients. Prospective studies are needed to provide more scientific evidence on this unmet need.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 32531099
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16726 -
Sexually Transmitted Infections Dec 2020To systematically review and appraise published data, to determine the prevalence of (MG) in men who have sex with men (MSM) tested at each anatomical site, that is, at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and appraise published data, to determine the prevalence of (MG) in men who have sex with men (MSM) tested at each anatomical site, that is, at the urethra, rectum and/or pharynx.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase were searched for articles from 1st January 1981 (the year MG was first identified) to 1st June 2018.
REVIEW METHODS
Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported MG prevalence in MSM tested at the urethra, rectum and/or pharynx, in at least 50 MSM, using nucleic acid amplification testing. Data were extracted by anatomical site, symptom and HIV status. Summary estimates (95% CIs) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity between studies.
RESULTS
Forty-six studies met inclusion criteria, with 34 reporting estimates of MG prevalence at the urethra (13 753 samples), 25 at the rectum (8629 samples) and 7 at the pharynx (1871 samples). MG prevalence was 5.0% (95% CI 3.5 to 6.8; I=94.0) at the urethra; 6.2% (95% CI 4.6 to 8.1; I=88.1) at the rectum and 1.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 5.1; I=96.0) at the pharynx. The prevalence of MG was significantly higher at urethral and rectal sites in symptomatic versus asymptomatic MSM (7.1% vs 2.2%, p<0.001; and 16.1% vs 7.5%, p=0.039, respectively). MG prevalence at the urethra was significantly higher in HIV-positive compared with HIV-negative MSM (7.0% vs 3.4%, p=0.006).
CONCLUSION
MG was common in MSM, particularly at urethral and rectal sites (5% to 6%). MG was more commonly detected in symptomatic men at both sites, and more common in HIV-positive men at the urethra. MG was uncommonly detected in the pharynx. Site-specific estimates are similar to those for chlamydia and will be helpful in informing testing practices in MSM.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42017058326.
Topics: Adult; Homosexuality, Male; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mycoplasma Infections; Mycoplasma genitalium; Pharynx; Prevalence; Rectum; Sexual Behavior; Urethra; Young Adult
PubMed: 32341023
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054310 -
The interplay of HIV and human papillomavirus-related cancers in sub-Saharan Africa: scoping review.Systematic Reviews Apr 2020People living with HIV (PLHIV) are at a high risk of developing HPV-related cancers. HPV-related malignancies occur frequently and/or are high among PLHIV, with cervical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
People living with HIV (PLHIV) are at a high risk of developing HPV-related cancers. HPV-related malignancies occur frequently and/or are high among PLHIV, with cervical cancer as a designated AIDS-defining condition. We aimed to explore the evidence on the interplay of HIV and HPV-related cancers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
METHODS
The scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We searched for literature from the following databases: PubMed; World Health Organization (WHO) Library; Science Direct; Google Scholar and EBSCOhost (Academic search complete, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, CINAHL). Studies reporting on evidence HIV and HPV-related cancers interplay in SSA were eligible for inclusion in this review. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used for reporting the search results. Thematic analysis used to reveal the emerging themes from the included studies.
RESULTS
A total of 74 potentially eligible articles were screened. Of these, nine (7 reviews, 1 transversal case controls, and 1 quantitative study) were eligible for data extraction. The studies reported about a total of 16,351 participants in different settings. The nine included studies showed evidence of cervical cancer among HIV-infected women and distribution of HPV infection and cervical abnormalities among HIV-positive individuals. In the four studies generalizing about HIV and anal cancer, only one reported about HPV. Two studies generally reported about HIV and head and neck cancers and one reported about interaction of HIV with vaginal cancer, vulvar cancer, and penile cancer, respectively.
CONCLUSION
HIV positivity is associated with increased prevalence of HPV infection on different anatomic sites, which will result in increased burden of HPV-related cancers among PLHIV. Furthermore, primary studies with robust study designs aimed at investigating the risk developing HPV-related cancers among PLHIV are recommended. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017062403.
Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Alphapapillomavirus; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Neoplasms; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections
PubMed: 32321580
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01354-1 -
International Journal of Impotence... Nov 2020
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Male; Penile Diseases; Penile Implantation; Penile Prosthesis; Penis; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32152469
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0250-8 -
Journal of Pediatric Urology Apr 2020Complete primary repair of exstrophy (CPRE) was established as a method to reduce numbers of procedures for the reconstruction of bladder exstrophy (BE). Performed since... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Complete primary repair of exstrophy (CPRE) was established as a method to reduce numbers of procedures for the reconstruction of bladder exstrophy (BE). Performed since 1989, some suggest it as a replacement for the staged reconstructive procedure, the gold standard. Does CPRE reduce the numbers of procedures for reconstruction of BE?
METHODS
Literature was reviewed from 1989 to 2016, and articles evaluating outcomes of patients undergoing CPRE, extracted. Effort was made to obtain final data from each reporting institution/group. Eleven articles meeting criteria were evaluated for qualitative systematic review. Age at initial closure, complications, additional procedures, and outcomes were evaluated to provide an overview of CPRE.
RESULTS
Ten groups reported BE management using the CPRE technique. 236 patients (153 boys; 72 girls; 11 unknown sex) had primary closure ranging from birth to 5.6 years. Osteotomy was favored by most in infants closed beyond the first 72 h of life along with spica cast immobilization. Three groups recommended concomitant augmentation for infants with small bladder capacities. Ureteral reimplantation was required in 58 patients with recurrent urinary tract infections resistant to prophylaxis. Hypospadias repair was required for most boys having complete penile disassembly, and most children eventually required bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) for continence. Overall, voiding without BNR was noted in 16-37% of children in the reported series.
CONCLUSIONS
Complete primary repair of exstrophy has been suggested as a single procedure for the management of BE. Literature review suggests most patients require multiple procedures to complete reconstruction and attain continence.
Topics: Bladder Exstrophy; Child; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 32144016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.004 -
Actas Urologicas Espanolas Jun 2020Penile prosthesis surgery is currently the most effective treatment for erectile dysfunction when medical treatment is ineffective or contraindicated. Among the surgical...
CONTEXT
Penile prosthesis surgery is currently the most effective treatment for erectile dysfunction when medical treatment is ineffective or contraindicated. Among the surgical approaches described in the literature, the scrotal, infrapubic and subcoronal are the most common in the daily clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
The main objectives were to describe the infrapubic surgical technique evaluating its indications and complications, as well as comparing its advantages and disadvantages with the penoscrotal approach.
ACQUISITION AND SYNTHESIS OF THE EVIDENCE
A literature review from 1983 until current date was carried out in Medline (PubMed and Cochrane Library databases) following PRISMA standards. Sixteen studies were included: 4 prospective, 4 retrospective, one systematic review, one randomized trial, one original article, 5 expert opinion/surgical technique descriptive paper.
DISCUSSION
According to the literature reviewed, although the penoscrotal approach is the most applied, the infrapubic approach showed a shorter operative time and a tendency for an earlier recovery of sexual activity after surgery. Complications are rare, having similar rates to the penoscrotal approach; no cases of glans hypoesthesia have been reported and peri-prosthetic infection rates were less than 3%. Satisfaction rates of infrapubic penile prosthesis were higher than 80%.
CONCLUSIONS
Penile prosthesis implantation requires of a profound knowledge of the different surgical approaches in order to best adapt each technique based on each individualized case. The infrapubic approach, even if it is not the most used, is as feasible and reliable as the penoscrotal approach. The infrapubic approach is effective and safe, with high level of both, patients and partners' satisfaction.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Implantation; Pubic Bone
PubMed: 32115278
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.10.010 -
PloS One 2020This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of genital, anal and oral HPV infection in Brazil through systematic review and meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of genital, anal and oral HPV infection in Brazil through systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, Web of Science and SciELO from inception to December 2018. Original research articles that assessed the prevalence of genital (i.e., cervical, penile), anal and oral HPV infection in Brazil were selected in pairs by independent authors. No sex, age, HPV vaccination, language or date restrictions were applied. HPV prevalence was estimated and stratified according to risk factors population and by geographic area throughout the country. The study prevalence was pooled using a random effects model. Analysis was performed using R (version 3.5.2), packages meta version 4.9-4 and metaphor 2.0-0. This review is registered on PROSPERO under protocol number CRD42016032751.
RESULTS
We identified 3,351 references. After the screening process, 139 of them were eligible for this systematic review (57,513 total participants). Prevalence of cervical HPV was 25.41% (95% CI 22.71-28.32). Additionally, prevalence was 36.21% (95% CI 23.40, 51.33) in the penile region, 25.68% (95%CI 14.64, 41.04) in the anal region, and 11.89% (95%CI 6.26, 21.43) in the oral region. Subgroup analysis showed prevalence in each anatomic site was higher in high-risk populations.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of HPV is high in the Brazilian population and varies by population risk and anatomic body site, with lower rates in the oral cavity compared to that in the cervical, penile and anal region. Studies on HPV have primarily been developed to evaluate infection and cancer in the cervical region. There is a profound lack of HPV data in many geographic regions of Brazil and for different anatomic sites.
Topics: Brazil; Humans; Papillomaviridae; Prevalence
PubMed: 32084177
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229154 -
European Urology Focus Mar 2021Genital reconstructive surgery (GRS) is a necessary part of transitioning for many transwomen, and there is evidence of positive effects on a person's well-being and... (Review)
Review
Genital Reconstructive Surgery in Male to Female Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review of Primary Surgical Techniques, Complication Profiles, and Functional Outcomes from 1950 to Present Day.
CONTEXT
Genital reconstructive surgery (GRS) is a necessary part of transitioning for many transwomen, and there is evidence of positive effects on a person's well-being and sexual function. Surgical techniques have evolved, from pursuing aesthetic outcome to now functional outcome with natal females as the standard.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the evidence, identifying the surgical techniques used in primary GRS, their complications, functional outcomes, and the tools used to assess them.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
The clinical question was designed using the standard PICOS format. The search complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 statement and was performed by two independent reviewers.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Europe, USA, and Thailand favour the penoscrotal technique for vaginoplasty, whereas in the UK, the penile inversion (PI) technique predominates. Primary vaginoplasty using a segment of bowel is less common, and all three techniques have comparable rates of intraoperative rectal injury. The incidence of rectovaginal fistula is reportedly higher in the PI technique. Wound haematoma and vaginal prolapse rates are comparable. Higher rates of clitoral necrosis, urethral meatal stenosis, and wound infection are reported in PI. However, the ability to orgasm, ability to have penetrative sexual intercourse, and satisfaction with aesthetic result are better with PI.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence for GRS complications and functional outcomes is of low level. Standardised nomenclature reporting of adverse events and robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are lacking. PROMs are a powerful assessment tool, and standardised definitions of adverse events and functional outcomes should be a priority of future research.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We looked at all studies published on genital reconstructive surgery from 1950 to the present day. We assessed each surgical technique and their associated complication rates, sexual and urinary function outcomes, and how they were reported. We found the evidence to be low and weak. We suggest more robust ways of reporting complications, and the impact on patients' quality of life should be investigated.
Topics: Europe; Female; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Genitalia, Male; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Transgender Persons
PubMed: 32061539
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.004