-
Medicine Jun 2024Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is widely used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis because it provides definitive decompression and fixation. Although it... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is widely used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis because it provides definitive decompression and fixation. Although it has several advantages, it has some disadvantages and risks, such as paraspinal muscle injury, potential intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, hardware failure, subsidence, and medical comorbidity. Lumbar decompressive bilateral laminectomy with interspinous fixation (DLISF) is less invasive and can be used on some patients with PLIF, but this has not been reported. To compare the efficacy and safety of DLISF in the treatment of low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with that of PLIF. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 81 patients with grade I spondylolisthesis, who had undergone PLIF or DLISF and were followed up for more than 1 year. Surgical outcomes, visual analog scale, radiologic outcomes, including Cobb angle and difference in body translation, and postoperative complications were assessed. Forty-one patients underwent PLIF, whereas 40 underwent DLISF. The operative times were 271.0 ± 57.2 and 150.6 ± 29.3 minutes for the PLIF and DLISF groups, respectively. The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the PLIF group versus the DLISF group (290.7 ± 232.6 vs 122.2 ± 82.7 mL, P < .001). Body translation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Overall pain improved during the 1-year follow-up when compared with baseline data. Medical complications were significantly lower in the DLISF group, whereas perioperative complications and hardware issues were higher in the PLIF group. The outcomes of DLISF, which is less invasive, were comparable to PLIF outcomes in patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. As a salvage technique, DLISF may be a good option when compared with PLIF.
Topics: Humans; Spondylolisthesis; Male; Female; Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Decompression, Surgical; Pilot Projects; Aged; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Laminectomy; Operative Time
PubMed: 38875412
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038501 -
Acta Orthopaedica Jun 2024There is conflicting evidence regarding treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. The primary...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There is conflicting evidence regarding treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. The primary aim of our cohort study was to investigate change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint surgery in daily practice in the Swedish Spine Registry. Secondary aims were to explore the proportion of patients reaching a patient acceptable symptom score (PASS) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain scores, physical function, and health-related quality of life outcomes; furthermore, to evaluate self-reported satisfaction, walking distance, and changes in proportions of patients on full sick leave/disability leave and report complications and reoperations.
METHODS
Data from the Swedish Spine Registry was collected for patients with first-time sacroiliac joint fusion, aged 21 to 70 years, with PROMs available preoperatively, at 1 or 2 years after last surgery. PROMs included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, and EQ-VAS, in addition to demographic variables. We calculated mean change from pre- to postoperative and the proportion of patients achieving MCID and PASS.
RESULTS
68 patients had available pre- and postoperative data, with a mean age of 45 years (range 25-70) and 59 (87%) were female. At follow-up the mean reduction was 2.3 NRS points (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9; P < 0.001) for LBP and 14.8 points (CI 10.6-18.9; P < 0.001) for ODI. EQ-VAS improved by 22 points (CI 15.4-30.3, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Approximately half of the patients achieved MCID and PASS for pain (MCID NRS LBP: 38/65 [59%] and PASS NRS LBP: 32/66 [49%]) and physical function (MCID ODI: 27/67 [40%] and PASS ODI: 24/67 [36%]). The odds for increasing the patient's walking distance to over 1 km at follow-up were 3.5 (CI 1.8-7.0; P < 0.0001), and of getting off full sick leave or full disability leave was 0.57 (CI 0.4-0.8; P = 0.001). In the first 3 months after surgery 3 complications were reported, and in the follow-up period 2 reoperations.
CONCLUSION
We found moderate treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion when applied in daily practice with moderate pain relief and small improvements in physical function.
Topics: Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Middle Aged; Sweden; Female; Male; Registries; Adult; Sacroiliac Joint; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Aged; Cohort Studies; Spinal Fusion; Pain Measurement; Low Back Pain; Disability Evaluation; Quality of Life; Patient Satisfaction; Young Adult; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38874434
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40817 -
Foot & Ankle International Jun 2024The management of failed total ankle replacements, with significant loss of bone stock, is challenging with high rates of complications and associated morbidity. Recent...
Custom Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Truss Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Implants for Failed Total Ankle Replacements: Classification, Technical Tips, and Treatment Algorithm.
BACKGROUND
The management of failed total ankle replacements, with significant loss of bone stock, is challenging with high rates of complications and associated morbidity. Recent technological advances have enabled the development of patient-customized 3D-printed titanium truss arthrodesis implants, which offer an alternative salvage option for failed total ankle replacements.
METHODS
A prospective observational study was performed of 6 cases of failed total ankle replacements that were managed using custom patient-specific 3D-printed titanium truss arthrodesis implants. Technical tips, classification, and a treatment algorithm were developed based on our initial experience.
RESULTS
Between November 2018 and March 2022, 6 patients underwent arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacements. Follow-up was available for all cases. The mean follow-up was 3.0 years (range 1-4.5). The mean MOXFQ Index improved from 73.1 to 32.3 ( < .05). The mean EQ-5D-5L Index improved from 0.366 to 0.743 ( < .05) and the EQ-VAS also improved from 53.0 to 63.3 ( = .36). The mean VAS-Pain score at final follow-up was 27.5. There were no cases of nonunion. None of the patients were smokers. The overall complication rate was 50%. Two patients returned to surgery: one for wound washout following TAR explantation and a second for removal of metalwork 2 years following surgery for a prosthetic joint infection secondary to hematogenous spread. No patients underwent revision fixation or amputation.
CONCLUSION
Custom patient-specific 3D-printed titanium truss arthrodesis implants are a viable treatment option for failed total ankle replacements.
PubMed: 38872312
DOI: 10.1177/10711007241255381 -
JBJS Case Connector Apr 2024We present a 64-year-old woman with loss of lumbar lordosis with a preoperative computed tomography scan demonstrating the presence of an intrapelvic kidney with...
CASE
We present a 64-year-old woman with loss of lumbar lordosis with a preoperative computed tomography scan demonstrating the presence of an intrapelvic kidney with aberrant vasculature. A 2-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with a 2-level oblique interbody fusion was planned. An anterior approach was successfully used to access the anterior spine without damaging the pelvic kidney.
CONCLUSION
Anatomic variations, both congenital and acquired, can pose significant challenges to surgeons during their dissection. We present a case where multilevel anterior interbody cage placement can be safely performed, even in a patient whose anatomy is complicated by an intrapelvic kidney.
Topics: Humans; Spinal Fusion; Female; Middle Aged; Lumbar Vertebrae; Kidney; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 38870326
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.23.00637 -
Minerva Anestesiologica Jun 2024Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate intraoperative analgesia with reduced postoperative opioid consumption. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of intraoperative OFA approach to the conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery.
METHODS
Forty-eight patients undergoing elective major spine surgery were randomly allocated to either receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (OFA group) or fentanyl during induction and intraoperative remifentanil (OBA group). All patients received intraoperative sevoflurane, propofol, rocuronium, ketamine, dexamethasone, ondansetron and postoperative paracetamol and patient-controlled analgesia device set to deliver intravenous morphine for 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was measured using numerical rating scale. Opioid side effects were documented, when present.
RESULTS
OFA group required less morphine in the first 24 hours post-surgery (17.28±12.25 mg versus 27.96±19.75 mg, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in the OFA group. More patients in the OFA group required antihypertensive medications compared to patients in the OBA group (P<0.05). In the post anesthesia care unit, OFA patients had a significantly longer stay than OBA patients (114.1±49.33 min versus 89.96±30.71 min, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
OFA can be an alternative to OBA in patients undergoing multilevel spine fusion surgery. OFA reduces opioids consumption in the first 24 hours and PONV.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Analgesics, Opioid; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pain, Postoperative; Adult; Spine; Dexmedetomidine; Aged; Spinal Fusion; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Remifentanil; Anesthesia
PubMed: 38869262
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17962-X -
Cureus May 2024Chronic unreduced dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint are uncommon, and management principles for these injuries have not been defined. The dislocation...
Chronic unreduced dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint are uncommon, and management principles for these injuries have not been defined. The dislocation can be volar or dorsal and closed reduction is rarely successful owing to soft tissue contractures. Treatment options in literature reviews for such rare injuries included open reduction of pip joint with volar plate arthroplasty, extension block pinning, hemi hamate arthroplasty, pip joint arthrodesis, Suzuki dynamic frame fixation, open reduction and repair of capsule and collateral ligaments with suture anchors. Few cases of amputation following treatment were even reported in literature emphasizing the role of meticulous soft tissue handling in such neglected cases of hand. We report six cases of neglected (more than three months old) dorsal dislocation of the PIP joint of the hand, treated with volar plate arthroplasty and extension block pinning. A functional range of motion with a stable joint can be achieved in such injuries with volar plate arthroplasty, as long as the articular cartilage is relatively preserved and bone loss is <30%.
PubMed: 38860079
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60077 -
Foot & Ankle International Jun 2024It has been assumed that diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy should not have pain associated with Charcot foot arthropathy.
BACKGROUND
It has been assumed that diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy should not have pain associated with Charcot foot arthropathy.
METHODS
During a 19-year period, 14 diabetic patients (15 feet) presented for treatment with pain following resolution of the acute phases of midfoot Charcot foot arthropathy. All were clinically plantigrade with plain radiographic evidence of bony union without deformity. Pain did not resolve with the use of appropriate therapeutic footwear. When used, CT scans uniformly demonstrated nonunion.
RESULTS
All 14 patients had resolution of their presenting pain following successful arthrodesis. Nonunion was confirmed at surgery in all of the patients. One patient developed a fatal pulmonary embolus following removal of the external fixator. Two required late exostectomy for bony overgrowth at the surgical site of fusion for nonunion.
CONCLUSION
This small series of patients would suggest that nonunion of the Charcot neuroarthropathy process was responsible for complaints of pain not able to be managed with therapeutic footwear. Successful arthrodesis resolved the pain. CT imaging may help identify a treatable source of pain in this population.
PubMed: 38859676
DOI: 10.1177/10711007241255128 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Jun 2024Minimally invasive posterior fixation surgery for pyogenic spondylitis is known to reduce invasiveness and complication rates; however, the outcomes of concomitant...
Pedicle screw insertion into infected vertebrae reduces operative time and range of fixation in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive posterior fixation surgery for pyogenic spondylitis is known to reduce invasiveness and complication rates; however, the outcomes of concomitant insertion of pedicle screws (PS) into the infected vertebrae via the posterior approach are undetermined. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of PS insertion into infected vertebrae in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis.
METHODS
This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 70 patients undergoing minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis across nine institutions. Patients were categorized into insertion and skip groups based on PS insertion into infected vertebrae, and surgical data and postoperative outcomes, particularly unplanned reoperations due to complications, were compared.
RESULTS
The mean age of the 70 patients was 72.8 years. The insertion group (n = 36) had shorter operative times (146 versus 195 min, p = 0.032) and a reduced range of fixation (5.4 versus 6.9 vertebrae, p = 0.0009) compared to the skip group (n = 34). Unplanned reoperations occurred in 24% (n = 17) due to surgical site infections (SSI) or implant failure; the incidence was comparable between the groups. Poor infection control necessitating additional anterior surgery was reported in four patients in the skip group.
CONCLUSIONS
PS insertion into infected vertebrae during minimally invasive posterior fixation reduces the operative time and range of fixation without increasing the occurrence of unplanned reoperations due to SSI or implant failure. Judicious PS insertion in patients with minimal bone destruction in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis can minimize surgical invasiveness.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Aged; Pedicle Screws; Thoracic Vertebrae; Lumbar Vertebrae; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Spondylitis; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Aged, 80 and over; Spinal Fusion; Treatment Outcome; Reoperation; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 38858717
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07565-0 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Jun 2024Postoperative infection after spinal deformity correction in pediatric patients is associated with significant costs. Identifying risk factors associated with...
Risk stratification for early postoperative infection in Pediatric spinal deformity correction: development and validation of the Pediatric scoliosis infection risk score (PSIR score).
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Postoperative infection after spinal deformity correction in pediatric patients is associated with significant costs. Identifying risk factors associated with postoperative infection would help surgeons identify high-risk patients that may require interventions to minimize infection risk.
PURPOSE
To investigate risk factors associated with 30-day postoperative infection in pediatric patients who have received posterior arthrodesis for spinal deformity correction.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
PATIENT SAMPLE
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database for years 2016-2021 was used for this study. Patients were included if they received posterior arthrodesis for scoliosis or kyphosis correction (CPT 22,800, 22,802, 22,804). Anterior only approaches were excluded.
OUTCOME MEASURES
TThe outcome of interest was 30-day postoperative infection.
METHODS
Patient demographics and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using likelihood ratio backward selection method was used to identify significant risk factors for 30-day infection to create the Pediatric Scoliosis Infection Risk Score (PSIR Score). ROC curve analysis, predicted probabilities, and Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were done to assess the scoring system on a validation cohort.
RESULTS
A total of 31,742 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 13.8 years and 68.7% were female. The 30-day infection rate was 2.2%. Reoperation rate in patients who had a post-operative infection was 59.4%. Patients who had post-operative infection had a higher likelihood of non-home discharge (X2 = 124.8, p < 0.001). In our multivariable regression analysis, high BMI (OR = 1.01, p < 0.001), presence of open wound (OR = 3.18, p < 0.001), presence of ostomy (OR = 1.51, p < 0.001), neuromuscular etiology (OR = 1.56, p = 0.009), previous operation (OR = 1.74, p < 0.001), increasing ASA class (OR = 1.43, p < 0.001), increasing operation time in hours (OR = 1.11, p < 0.001), and use of only minimally invasive techniques (OR = 4.26, p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of 30-day post-operative infection. Idiopathic etiology (OR = 0.53, p < 0.001) and intraoperative topical antibiotic use (B = 0.71, p = 0.003) were associated with reduced risk of 30-day postoperative infection. The area under the curve was 0.780 and 0.740 for the derivation cohort and validation cohort, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
To our knowledge, this is the largest study of risk factors for infection in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. We found 5 patient factors (BMI, ASA, osteotomy, etiology, and previous surgery, and 3 surgeon-controlled factors (surgical time, antibiotics, MIS) associated with risk. The Pediatric Scoliosis Infection Risk Score (PSIR) Score can be applied for risk stratification and to investigate implementation of novel protocols to reduce infection rates in high-risk patients.
PubMed: 38858267
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08359-7 -
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Jun 2024Both arthrodesis and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI) arthroplasty are reliable surgical procedures for thumb...
BACKGROUND
Both arthrodesis and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI) arthroplasty are reliable surgical procedures for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Here, we compared surgical outcomes between arthrodesis and T + LRTI for female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis to determine an optimal procedure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Fourteen thumbs of 13 patients who underwent arthrodesis with locking plates and 11 thumbs of 10 patients who underwent T + LRTI and were followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. For the two groups, we investigated the range of motion (ROM) of the thumb, grip strength, pinch strength, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Hand20 score, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at 1-year follow-up and compared them between the two groups. In addition, we investigated surgical complications and resumption of work.
RESULTS
Both procedures provided similar subjective outcomes in terms of Hand20 and VAS scores; however, arthrodesis provided significantly larger ROM of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the thumb, grip and pinch strength, and DASH score, whereas T + LRTI provided a significantly better palmar abduction at 1-year follow-up. There were three and four postoperative complications in the arthrodesis and T + LRTI groups, respectively. One patient in the arthrodesis group had resigned, whereas two patients in T + LRTI had changed their jobs to less physically demanding ones postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
Both procedures satisfy female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, arthrodesis can provide favorable outcomes that are equal to or better than T + LRTI.
PubMed: 38855527
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768480