-
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Mar 2024Healthcare workers (HCWs), which include surgeons, anaesthesiologists, nurses, technicians, and other non-medical staff working in the operation theatre (OT), change to...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Healthcare workers (HCWs), which include surgeons, anaesthesiologists, nurses, technicians, and other non-medical staff working in the operation theatre (OT), change to surgical scrubs for providing designated services. This study was intended to investigate the association of moving in and out of OT to other hospital areas without changing scrubs and its impact on bacterial infection.
METHODS
After PROSPERO registration, we performed a systematic review to compare the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) with or without the movement of HCWs outside OT. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using relevant keywords. RoB-2 and ROBINS-E tools were used to assess the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, respectively.
RESULTS
We identified six articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: three RCTs and three observational studies. A risk of bias assessment revealed an overall low bias in the RCTs and an overall high bias in the observational studies. The analysis revealed a comparable incidence of bacterial infection in terms of colony-forming units when scrubs when HCWs moved in and out of OT with the same scrubs. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in participants and the OT set-up, as well as fewer studies and sample size.
CONCLUSION
The evidence is insufficient to suggest that wearing scrubs outside the OT could increase the incidence of SSI in surgical patients or transmit the organisms to patients, causing infection. The present review neither supports nor is against wearing surgical scrubs outside OT premises.
PubMed: 38476545
DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_949_23 -
Risk factors for tibial infections following osteosynthesis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and... Mar 2024This study aimed to quantitatively summarise risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) following surgically managed tibial fractures. (Review)
Review
AIM
This study aimed to quantitatively summarise risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) following surgically managed tibial fractures.
METHOD
We searched the Embase/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for relevant studies in October 2023. We included original studies investigating risk factors for SSI following surgically managed traumatic tibial fractures that included ≥10 adult patients with SSIs. Meta-analysis was performed when >5 studies investigated the same risk factor. The risk of bias was assessed using the critical appraisal checklist from Joanna Briggs Institute for cohort studies.
RESULTS
This study included 42 studies comprising 24,610 patients with surgically managed tibial fractures and 2,418 SSI cases. The following were identified as significant risk factors for SSI (p < 0.05): compartment syndrome (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-6.0), blood transfusion (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 2.1-6.6), open fracture (OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 2.5-5.1), Gustilo-Anderson classification >2 (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 2.1-4.6), external fixation (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 2.3-3.8), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >2 (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.5-4.1), polytrauma (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-4.0), dual incision approach (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.0), smoking (OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5-2.1), male sex (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-1.8), high energy trauma (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), and prolonged surgery time (OR = 0.62, 0.43-0.82). Other factors, including diabetes, hypertension, and time to surgery, were not identified as risk factors for SSI. However, the included studies were generally of poor quality and at risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The review provides a basis for preoperatively assessing a patient's risk of developing an SSI, which could be used to initiate adjusted antibiotic regimes and more frequent postoperative controls. Furthermore, it indicates the risk factors future research should include when adjusting for confounding factors.
PubMed: 38444773
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102376 -
Journal of Medical Case Reports Mar 2024Anesthesiologists prefer ketamine for certain surgeries due to its effectiveness as a non-competitive inhibitor of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in the brain....
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Anesthesiologists prefer ketamine for certain surgeries due to its effectiveness as a non-competitive inhibitor of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in the brain. Recently, this agent has also shown promise as an antidepressant. However, ketamine can cause hallucinogenic effects and is sometimes abused as an illicit drug. Ketamine abuse has been associated with liver and bile duct complications. This systematic study aims to better understand cholangiopathy in ketamine abusers by reviewing case reports.
METHODS AND MATERIAL
In this systematic review, a comprehensive literature search was conducted with the terms "biliary tract diseases" and "ketamine". Case reports and case series of adult patients with documented ketamine abuse and reported cholangiopathy or biliary tract disease were included. We extracted the data of relevant information and the results were reported through narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 48 studies were initially identified, and 11 studies were finally included in the review. The mean age of the patients was 25.88 years. Of the 17 patients, 64.7% were men. Symptoms often included abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Most patients were discharged with improved symptoms and liver function. Common bile duct dilation and other findings were observed in imaging results and other diagnostic studies.
CONCLUSION
This review highlights the diverse presentations and diagnostic modalities used in ketamine-induced cholangiography. These patients tend to be young men with deranged liver function tests and abdominal pain, which should be taken into consideration. These patients often require a multidisciplinary approach in their management.
Topics: Humans; Abdominal Pain; Bile Ducts; Biliary Tract; Biliary Tract Diseases; Illicit Drugs; Ketamine; Substance-Related Disorders; Case Reports as Topic
PubMed: 38431685
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04421-6 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2024Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a prevalent and consequential complication in hip fracture patients, leading to significant disability and heightened healthcare...
BACKGROUND
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a prevalent and consequential complication in hip fracture patients, leading to significant disability and heightened healthcare expenditures. Consequently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive systematic review to identify risk factors and establish early and effective preventive measures.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed across the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (up to August 31, 2023). Article screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently completed by two reviewers.
RESULTS
Forty-four studies were eligible for inclusion, yielding an overall incidence rate of 11% (95% CI: 8%-14%). Our pooled analysis revealed 18 significant risk factors, including being female (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.89-2.63), advanced age (MD = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.04-2.66), obesity (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.11-1.31), catheterization (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 2.29-6.32), blood transfusion (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.21-1.58), American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥III (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18-1.40), general anesthesia (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.43), intertrochanteric fracture (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.54), hemiarthroplasty (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.19-1.69), prolonged length of hospital stay (MD = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.66-2.23), delirium (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 2.05-3.47), dementia (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.62-2.06), Parkinson's disease (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.46-1.61), diabetes (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13-1.43), hypertension (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26), congestive heart failure (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.10-1.66), history of sepsis (OR = 7.13, 95% CI: 5.51-9.22), and chronic steroid use (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06-1.57).
CONCLUSION
Our study identifies numerous risk factors strongly associated with UTI, offering compelling evidence and actionable strategies for improving clinical prediction, enabling early intervention, and facilitating targeted UTI management.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
identifier [CRD42023459600], https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=459600.
PubMed: 38405191
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360058 -
Patient Safety in Surgery Feb 2024Joint replacement surgery of the lower extremities are common procedures in elderly persons who are at increased risk of postoperative falls. The use of mental state... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Joint replacement surgery of the lower extremities are common procedures in elderly persons who are at increased risk of postoperative falls. The use of mental state altering medications, such as opioids, antidepressants or benzodiazepines, can further contribute to impaired balance and risk of falls. The objective of the current systematic review was to evaluate the risk of the use of mental state altering medications on postoperative falls in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS
A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was conducted from 1 October 1975 to 1 September 2021. The search was repeated in may 2023 and conducted from 1 October 1975 to 1 June 2023. Clinical trials that evaluated the risk of medication on postoperative THA and TKA falls were eligible for inclusion. Articles were evaluated independently by two researchers for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the potential effect of postoperative use of mental state altering medications on the risk of falls. Lastly, a qualitative synthesis was conducted for preoperative mental state altering medications use.
RESULTS
Seven cohort studies were included, of which five studies focussed on the postoperative use of mental state altering medications and two investigated the preoperative use. Meta-analysis was performed for the postoperative mental state altering medications use. The postoperative use of mental state altering medications was associated with fall incidents (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.04; 3.17) (p < 0.01) after THA and TKA. The preoperative use of opioids > 6 months was associated with a higher risk of fall incidents, whereas a preoperative opioid prescription up to 3 months before a major arthroplasty had a similar risk as opioid-naïve patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The postoperative use of mental state altering medications increases the risk of postoperative falls after THA and TKA. Prior to surgery, orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthesiologists should be aware of the associated risks in order to prevent postoperative falls and associated injuries.
PubMed: 38347630
DOI: 10.1186/s13037-023-00387-4 -
Heliyon Jan 2024of Review: This evidence-based systematic review evaluated the safety of ketamine as regard the potential to provoke epilepsy to help better guide anesthesiologists in...
PURPOSE
of Review: This evidence-based systematic review evaluated the safety of ketamine as regard the potential to provoke epilepsy to help better guide anesthesiologists in their practice.
RECENT FINDINGS
Ketamine, originally developed as a dissociative anesthetic, has gained attention for its potential therapeutic applications in various medical conditions, including epilepsy. Ketamine is generally well-tolerated and widely used in anesthesia, however, conflicting data are confusing the anesthesiologists regarding the potential risk of seizures associated with its use. The literature that claimed the proepileeptic property are inconsistent and the mechanism of action is unclear. Moreover, the case reports had been in same certain contexts, such as procedural sedation where ketamine was used as a single agent. On the other hand, the retrospective data analysis confirmed the positive role ketamine plays as antiepileptic agent.
SUMMARY
Many studies have shown promising results for the use of ketamine as antiepileptic agent. In case of epileptic patients, there is no contraindication for using ketamine, however, combining with benzodiazepine or propofol may enhance the safety.
PubMed: 38293492
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24433 -
Current Pain and Headache Reports Apr 2024The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we helped the anesthesiologists to know the efficiency and the efficacy of both combinations in adult and pediatric patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 1, 2023. Our outcome parameters for efficacy were recovery time, pain score, and physician satisfaction while for safety were the related cardiorespiratory, neurological, and gastrointestinal adverse events.
RECENT FINDINGS
Twenty-two trials were included with a total of 1429 patients. We found a significantly longer recovery time in the ketadex group of 7.59 min (95% CI, 4.92, 10.26; I = 94%) and a significantly less pain score of - 0.72 (95% CI, - 1.10, - 0.34; I = 0%). Adults had a significantly better physician satisfaction score with the ketofol group, odds ratio of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12, 0.71; I = 0%). Recovery agitations were higher in the ketofol group with an odds ratio of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24, 0.98; I = 36%). Furthermore, we found a significant difference between the combinations with a higher incidence in the ketadex group with pooled odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06, 2.88; I = 15%). Ketadex was associated with lower pain scores, hypoxic events and airway obstruction, and emergence agitation. At the same time, ketofol had much more clinician satisfaction which might be attributed to the shorter recovery time and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, we suppose that ketadex is the better combination in periprocedural sedation for both adult and pediatric patients who are not at greater risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Propofol; Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Anesthesia, General; Vomiting; Pain; Hypnotics and Sedatives
PubMed: 38214834
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01208-0 -
BMC Anesthesiology Nov 2023The global low survival rate among ovarian cancer patients has resulted in significant social and economic burdens. Nevertheless, previous studies have produced mixed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The global low survival rate among ovarian cancer patients has resulted in significant social and economic burdens. Nevertheless, previous studies have produced mixed results when exploring the link between anesthetic techniques and the prognosis of ovarian cancer. The study aims to compare the effect of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia on survival time after cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer.
METHODS
The PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Cochrane library, Web of science, Embase, CNKI (China National Knowledge Internet), Wanfang Med Online (China database), were systematically searched from inception to May, 2023, using the Medical Subject Headings [MeSH] of "Ovarian Neoplasm" and "Anesthesia, Epidural" and free words to identify systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The research methodology involved analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as prospective or retrospective cohort studies, which compared the long-term prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer under general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (GEA) versus general anesthesia alone (GA). The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess methodological quality and bias. Data extraction and assessment of study quality were conducted by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was then performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary outcome, time to tumor recurrence (TTR) was the secondary outcome. Epidural anesthesia could be used intraoperatively and immediately postoperatively (EIP), or postoperatively only (EP). GEA includes EIP and EP.
RESULTS
In total, 8 retrospective cohort studies with 2036 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results demonstrated that GEA could extend OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84, I = 0%, P < 0.05, fixed-effect model) when compared with GA in ovarian cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery, but not TTR (sensitivity analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity among the included studies). The result of analyzing a total of 1490 patients in 4 studies was that EIP had a better prognosis on OS than GA (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.55-0.85, I = 61%, P < 0.05, random-effect model). However, EP had no advantage in TTR (sensitivity analysis revealed it was unstable outcome). Ovarian cancer FIGO(International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage III, stage IV compared to stage I on OS was statistically significant, HRs respectively are 3.67 (95%CI 2.25-5.98), I = 0%, fixed-effect model, P < 0.05, and 7.43 (95%CI 3.67-15.03), I = 31%, fixed-effect model, P < 0.05, but there was no statistically significant difference between stage II and stage I, HR 2.00, 95%CI0.98-4.09, I = 0%, fixed-effect model, P > 0.05. 1-10 mm tumor residuals shorten TTR compared with 0 residuals, HR 1.75, 95% CI1.50-2.04, I = 0%, fixed-effect model, P < 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS
It is hard to conclude that postoperative epidural analgesia offers greater benefits than GA. However, general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (EIP) can improve overall survival in ovarian cancer patients, allowing the anesthesiologist to use anesthesia techniques to provide a favorable prognosis for the ovarian cancer patient. Tumor staging and the extent of cell reduction are also critical factors that significantly influence the long-prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Disease-Free Survival; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prognosis; Anesthesia, Epidural
PubMed: 38030996
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02352-1 -
Risk Factors for Postanesthetic Emergence Delirium in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology Jul 2024Emergence delirium (ED) is delirium that occurs during or immediately after emergence from general anesthesia or sedation. Effective pharmacological treatments for ED... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Emergence delirium (ED) is delirium that occurs during or immediately after emergence from general anesthesia or sedation. Effective pharmacological treatments for ED are lacking, so preventive measures should be taken to minimize the risk of ED. However, the risk factors for ED in adults are unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the evidence for risk factors for ED in adults. The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase databases were searched for observational studies reporting the risk factors for ED in adults from inception to July 31, 2023. Twenty observational studies reporting 19,171 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Among the preoperative factors identified as risk factors for ED were age <40 or ≥65 years, male sex, smoking history, substance abuse, cognitive impairment, anxiety, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score III or IV. Intraoperative risk factors for ED were the use of benzodiazepines, inhalational anesthetics, or etomidate, and surgical factors including abdominal surgery, frontal craniotomy (vs. other craniotomy approaches) for cerebral tumors, and the length of surgery. Postoperative risk factors were indwelling urinary catheters, the presence of a tracheal tube in the postanesthetic care unit or intensive care unit, the presence of a nasogastric tube, and pain. Knowledge of these risk factors may guide the implementation of stratified management and timely interventions for patients at high risk of ED. The majority of studies included in this review investigated only hyperactive ED and further research is required to determine risk factors for hypoactive and mixed ED types.
Topics: Humans; Risk Factors; Emergence Delirium; Anesthesia, General; Adult; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37916963
DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000942 -
JAMA Network Open Oct 2023Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication after surgery. Various predisposing factors are associated with POD, but their magnitude and importance... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication after surgery. Various predisposing factors are associated with POD, but their magnitude and importance using an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis have not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE
To identify perioperative factors associated with POD and assess their relative prognostic value among adults undergoing noncardiac surgery.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception to May 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies were included that (1) enrolled adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, (2) assessed perioperative risk factors for POD, and (3) measured the incidence of delirium (measured using a validated approach). Data were analyzed in 2020.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Individual patient data were pooled from 21 studies and 1-stage meta-analysis was performed using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression after a multivariable imputation via chained equations model to impute missing data.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The end point of interest was POD diagnosed up to 10 days after a procedure. A wide range of perioperative risk factors was considered as potentially associated with POD.
RESULTS
A total of 192 studies met the eligibility criteria, and IPD were acquired from 21 studies that enrolled 8382 patients. Almost 1 in 5 patients developed POD (18%), and an increased risk of POD was associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 4 (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.42-4.14), older age (OR for 65-85 years, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.16-3.29; OR for >85 years, 6.24; 95% CI, 4.65-8.37), low body mass index (OR for body mass index <18.5, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.64-3.09), history of delirium (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.69-5.66), preoperative cognitive impairment (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.94-5.43), and preoperative C-reactive protein levels (OR for 5-10 mg/dL, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.59-3.50; OR for >10 mg/dL, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.46-5.17). Completing a college degree or higher was associated with a decreased likelihood of developing POD (OR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data, several important factors associated with POD were found that may help identify patients at high risk and may have utility in clinical practice to inform patients and caregivers about the expected risk of developing delirium after surgery. Future studies should explore strategies to reduce delirium after surgery.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Emergence Delirium; Delirium; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Patients
PubMed: 37819663
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37239