-
Infection Feb 2023To assess and compare the relative efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody regimens for COVID-19. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To assess and compare the relative efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody regimens for COVID-19.
METHODS
This systematic review and random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA-NMA. Literature searches were conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CNKI up to February 20th, 2022. Interventions were ranked using P scores.
RESULTS
Fifty-five RCTs (N = 45,005) were included in the review. Bamlanivimab + etesevimab (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.77) was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to standard of care/placebo. Casirivimab + imdevimab reduced mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) in baseline seronegative patients only. Four different regimens led to a significant decrease in the incidence of hospitalization compared to standard of care/placebo with sotrovimab ranking first in terms of efficacy (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.48). No treatment improved incidence of mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital/ICU stay, and time to viral clearance. Convalescent plasma and anti-COVID IVIg both led to a significant increase in adverse events compared to standard of care/placebo, but no treatment increased the odds of serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs are safe, and could be effective in improving mortality and incidence of hospitalization. Convalescent plasma and anti-COVID IVIg were not efficacious and could increase odds of adverse events. Future trials should further examine the effect of baseline seronegativity, disease severity, patient risk factors, and SARS-CoV-2 strain variation on the efficacy of these regimes.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO-CRD42021289903.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; COVID-19 Serotherapy; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Network Meta-Analysis; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 35438413
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01825-8 -
Gynecologic Oncology Jun 2022Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown promise in hematologic and solid tumors. While data supports immunogenicity of gynecologic cancers, the benefit of ACT is not yet... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown promise in hematologic and solid tumors. While data supports immunogenicity of gynecologic cancers, the benefit of ACT is not yet clear. To address this question, we performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies included those reporting oncologic response or toxicity data in at least one patient with any gynecologic cancer treated with ACT. Chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of response. We retrieved 281 articles, and 28 studies met our inclusion criteria. These comprised of 401 patients including 238 patients with gynecologic cancers (61.8% ovarian, 34.0% cervical, 2.9% endometrial, and 1.2% other). In patients with gynecologic cancers, response rates to ACT were 8.1% complete response, 18.2% partial response, and 31.4% stable disease, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 26.3%, disease control rate (DCR) of 57.6%, and median response duration of 5.5 months. Patients in studies reporting ≤1 median line of prior therapy had a higher ORR (52.9% vs. 22.6% for >1, p < 0.001), although DCR in the >1 group was still 53.2%. ORRs by ACT type were tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) 41.4%, natural killer cells 26.7%, peripheral autologous T-cells 18.4%, T-cell receptor-modified T-cells 15.4%, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells 9.5% (p = 0.001). ORR was significantly improved with inclusion of lymphodepletion (34.8% vs. 15.4% without, p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis controlling for cancer type and lymphodepletion, TIL therapy was predictive of objective response (odds ratio 2.6, p = 0.011). The rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was 46.0%. All grade adverse events included fever, hypotension, dyspnea, confusion, hematologic changes, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and diarrhea. In conclusion, ACT is a promising treatment modality in gynecologic cancer. We observed a particular benefit of TIL therapy and suggest inclusion of lymphodepletion in future trials.
Topics: Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell
PubMed: 35400527
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.013 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jun 2022Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Most CAR T cell therapy recipients... (Review)
Review
Clinical Presentation, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: A Systematic Review.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Most CAR T cell therapy recipients will experience clinical features of the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), a potentially life-threatening condition. Here we describe the clinical, biological, and radiological findings associated with ICANS in adults with hematologic malignancies treated with CAR T cell therapy, as well as the acute and long-term outcomes of ICANS. A literature search of Ovid Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted from each database's inception through February 1, 2022, using search terms reflecting CAR T cell therapy and ICANS. We included studies that enrolled adults (age ≥18 years) who received CAR T cell therapy as management for hematologic malignancies and reported the clinical presentation, predictors, and/or acute or long-term outcomes of ICANS. Two reviewers independently extracted data following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) reporting guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cohort studies. Of the 2928 studies screened, 23 observational studies (10 prospective, 11 retrospective, 1 mixed design, and 1 cross-sectional) with a total of 1666 participants met our eligibility criteria and were included in our review. The most common hematologic malignancies were diffuse large B cell lymphoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. ICANS onset was most often associated with the presence and severity of cytokine release syndrome, as well as with C-reactive protein and ferritin levels. Aphasia was the most common ICANS-related symptom reported, although the neurologic manifestations of ICANS were highly variable. Neuroimaging studies (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) were often normal in cases of ICANS; however, electroencephalography often showed generalized background slowing, abnormal rhythmic, and periodic discharge patterns. The pooled mean (± SD) onset of ICANS was 6.4 ± 3.2 days, with a pooled mean duration of 8.3 ± 10.5 days. Two of the 23 studies (9%) reported 5 ICANS-related deaths among 233 participants. A subset of patients experienced persistent neurocognitive complaints at ≥1-year after CAR T cell therapy. The clinical presentation, onset, severity, long-term sequelae, and grading system of ICANS are variable. Future studies should consider using a consensus grading/reporting scale that would permit cross-trial comparisons of the safety profile of various CAR T cell products and enable the development of interventions to mitigate or manage these neurotoxicities. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. This systematic review was conducted according to a published protocol (PROSPERO CRD42020207864) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) in systematic review reporting guidelines (Supplementary Table S1) [15,16].
Topics: Adult; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Prospective Studies; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35288347
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.006 -
The Oncologist Mar 2022Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. For the vast majority of patients with advanced CRC (ie, for those in whom...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. For the vast majority of patients with advanced CRC (ie, for those in whom metastatic tumors are unresectable), treatment is palliative and typically involves chemotherapy, biologic therapy, and/or immune checkpoint inhibition. In recent years, the use of adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT), leveraging the body's own immune system to recognize and target cancer, has become increasingly popular. Unfortunately, while ACT has been successful in the treatment of hematological malignancies, it is less efficacious in advanced CRC due in part to a lack of productive immune infiltrate. This systematic review was conducted to summarize the current data for the efficacy and safety of ACT in advanced CRC. We report that ACT is well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC. Favorable survival estimates among patients with advanced CRC receiving ACT demonstrate promise for this novel treatment paradigm. However, additional stage I/II clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of ACT in patients with CRC.
Topics: Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive
PubMed: 35274719
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab038 -
3 Biotech Mar 2022has emerged as one of major nosocomial pathogen and global emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has become a challenge for developing effective treatment options.... (Review)
Review
has emerged as one of major nosocomial pathogen and global emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has become a challenge for developing effective treatment options. has developed resistance to almost all the antibiotics viz beta-lactams, carbapenems, tigecycline and now colistin, a last resort of antibiotics. The world is on the cusp of post antibiotic era and the evolution of multi-, extreme- and pan-drug-resistant strains is its obvious harbinger. Various combinations of antibiotics have been investigated but no successful treatment option is available. All these failed efforts have led researchers to develop and implement prophylactic vaccination for the prevention of infections caused by this pathogen. In this review, the advantages and disadvantages of active and passive immunization, the types of sub-unit and multi-component vaccine candidates investigated against viz whole cell organism, outer membrane vesicles, outer membrane complexes, conjugate vaccines and sub-unit vaccines have been discussed. In addition, the benefits of Reverse vaccinology are emphasized here in which the potential vaccine candidates are predicted using bioinformatic online tools prior to in vivo validations.
PubMed: 35261870
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-022-03148-9 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Convalescent plasma is a suggested treatment for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), but its efficacy is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of convalescent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
Convalescent plasma is a suggested treatment for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), but its efficacy is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of convalescent plasma is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with Covid-19.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched randomized controlled trials investigating the use of convalescent plasma in patients with Covid-19 in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and medRxiv from inception to October 17, 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method were used. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021284861. Of the 8874 studies identified in the initial search, sixteen trials comprising 16 317 patients with Covid-19 were included. In the overall population, the all-cause mortality was 23.8% (2025 of 8524) with convalescent plasma and 24.4% (1903 of 7769) with standard of care (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.04) (high-certainty evidence). All-cause mortality did not differ in the subgroups of noncritically ill (21.7% [1288 of 5929] vs. 22.4% [1320 of 5882]) and critically ill (36.9% [518 of 1404] vs. 36.4% [455 of 1247]) patients with Covid-19. The use of convalescent plasma in patients who tested negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline was not associated with significantly improved survival (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.02). In the overall study population, initiation of mechanical ventilation (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.07), time to clinical improvement (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.30), and time to discharge (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.02) were similar between the two groups. In patients with Covid-19, treatment with convalescent plasma, as compared with control, was not associated with lower all-cause mortality or improved disease progression, irrespective of disease severity and baseline antibody status.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021284861).
Topics: COVID-19; Critical Illness; Humans; Immunization, Passive; Respiration, Artificial; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Serotherapy
PubMed: 35197981
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.817829 -
Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical... 2022Convalescent plasma treatment for severe and critically ill Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Convalescent plasma may not be an effective treatment for severe and critically ill covid-19 patients: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
BACKGROUND
Convalescent plasma treatment for severe and critically ill Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical improvement and mortality risk of convalescent plasma treatment in patients with severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted in the electronic databases for the randomized controlled studies about convalescent plasma therapy in severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients. Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data. The primary outcomes were clinical improvement and mortality risk of severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients that were therapied by convalescent plasma.
RESULTS
A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with 4543 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to control, no significant difference was observed for either clinical improvement (6 studies, RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.17, p = 0.16, moderate certainty) or mortality risk (14 studies, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03, p= 0.18, low certainty) in patients of convalescent plasma therapy group.
CONCLUSION
Convalescent plasma did not increase the clinical improvement or reduce the mortality risk in the severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Topics: COVID-19; Critical Illness; Humans; Immunization, Passive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; COVID-19 Serotherapy
PubMed: 35149308
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.01.019 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) can attenuate chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell-mediated anti-tumoral immune responses. In this regard, co-administration...
BACKGROUND
Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) can attenuate chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell-mediated anti-tumoral immune responses. In this regard, co-administration of anti-PD-1 with CAR-T cells and PD-1 gene-editing of CAR-T cells have been suggested to disrupt this inhibitory axis. Herein, we aim to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches and propose a novel strategy to ameliorate the prognosis of glioma patients.
METHODS
Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched to obtain relevant peer-reviewed studies published before March 7, 2021. Then, the current study was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The random-effect model was applied to evaluate the effect size of administrated agents on the survival of animal models bearing gliomas using RevMan version 5.4. The Cochran Q test and I were performed to assess the possible between-study heterogeneity. Egger's and Begg and Mazumdar's tests were performed to objectively assess potential asymmetry and publication bias using CMA version 2.
RESULTS
Anti-PD-1 can substantially increase the survival of animal models on second-generation CAR-T cells. Also, PD-1 knockdown can remarkably prolong the survival of animal models on third-generation CAR-T cells. Regardless of the CAR-T generations, PD-1 gene-edited CAR-T cells can considerably enhance the survival of animal-bearing gliomas compared to the conventional CAR-T cells.
CONCLUSIONS
The single-cell sequencing of tumoral cells and cells residing in the tumor microenvironment can provide valuable insights into the patient-derived neoantigens and the expression profile of inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules in tumor bulk. Thus, single-cell sequencing-guided fourth-generation CAR-T cells can cover patient-derived neoantigens expressed in various subpopulations of tumoral cells and inhibit related inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules. The proposed approach can improve anti-tumoral immune responses, decrease the risk of immune-related adverse events, reduce the risk of glioma relapse, and address the vast inter-and intra-heterogeneity of gliomas.
Topics: Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Gene Editing; Glioma; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Mice; Precision Medicine; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Single-Cell Analysis
PubMed: 35126356
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.788211 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Recombinant antibodies such as nanobodies are progressively demonstrating to be a valid alternative to conventional monoclonal antibodies also for clinical applications....
Recombinant antibodies such as nanobodies are progressively demonstrating to be a valid alternative to conventional monoclonal antibodies also for clinical applications. Furthermore, they do not solely represent a substitute for monoclonal antibodies but their unique features allow expanding the applications of biotherapeutics and changes the pattern of disease treatment. Nanobodies possess the double advantage of being small and simple to engineer. This combination has promoted extremely diversified approaches to design nanobody-based constructs suitable for particular applications. Both the format geometry possibilities and the functionalization strategies have been widely explored to provide macromolecules with better efficacy with respect to single nanobodies or their combination. Nanobody multimers and nanobody-derived reagents were developed to image and contrast several cancer diseases and have shown their effectiveness in animal models. Their capacity to block more independent signaling pathways simultaneously is considered a critical advantage to avoid tumor resistance, whereas the mass of these multimeric compounds still remains significantly smaller than that of an IgG, enabling deeper penetration in solid tumors. When applied to CAR-T cell therapy, nanobodies can effectively improve the specificity by targeting multiple epitopes and consequently reduce the side effects. This represents a great potential in treating malignant lymphomas, acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, multiple myeloma and solid tumors. Apart from cancer treatment, multispecific drugs and imaging reagents built with nanobody blocks have demonstrated their value also for detecting and tackling neurodegenerative, autoimmune, metabolic, and infectious diseases and as antidotes for toxins. In particular, multi-paratopic nanobody-based constructs have been developed recently as drugs for passive immunization against SARS-CoV-2 with the goal of impairing variant survival due to resistance to antibodies targeting single epitopes. Given the enormous research activity in the field, it can be expected that more and more multimeric nanobody molecules will undergo late clinical trials in the next future. Systematic Review Registration.
Topics: Animals; Autoimmune Diseases; Communicable Diseases; Humans; Immunomodulation; Molecular Imaging; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasms; Recombinant Proteins; Single-Domain Antibodies
PubMed: 35116045
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.838082 -
BMC Cancer Jan 2022Recently, chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T cell therapy for hematological malignancies has shown clinical efficacy. Hundreds of clinical trials have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recently, chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T cell therapy for hematological malignancies has shown clinical efficacy. Hundreds of clinical trials have been registered and lots of studies have shown hematologic toxic effects were very common. The main purpose of this review is to systematically analyze hematologic toxicity in hematologic malignancies treated with CAR-T cell therapy.
METHODS
We searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane up to January 2021. For safety analysis of overall hematologic toxicity, the rate of neutrophil, thrombocytopenia and anemia were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed for age, pathological type, target antigen, co-stimulatory molecule, history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and prior therapy lines. The incidence rate of aspartate transferase (AST) increased, alanine transaminase (ALT) increased, serum creatine increased, APTT prolonged and fibrinogen decreased were also calculated.
RESULTS
Overall, 52 studies involving 2004 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of any grade neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia was 80% (95% CI: 68-89%), 61% (95% CI: 49-73%), and 68% (95%CI: 54-80%) respectively. The incidences of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were 60% (95% CI: 49-70%), 33% (95% CI: 27-40%), and 32% (95%CI: 25-40%) respectively. According to subgroup analysis and the corresponding Z test, hematological toxicity was more frequent in younger patients, in patients with ≥4 median lines of prior therapy and in anti-CD19 cases. The subgroup analysis of CD19 CAR-T cell constructs showed that 41BB resulted in less hematological toxicity than CD28.
CONCLUSION
CAR-T cell therapy has dramatical efficacy in hematological malignancies, but the relevant adverse effects remain its obstacle. The most common ≥3 grade side effect is hematological toxicity, and some cases die from infections or severe hemorrhage in early period. In long-term follow-up, hematological toxicity is less life-threatening generally and most suffered patients recover to adequate levels after 3 months. To prevent life-threatening infections or bleeding events, clinicians should pay attention to intervention of hematological toxicity in the early process of CAR-T cell therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Infant; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Young Adult
PubMed: 35073859
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09102-x