-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Aug 2022Background and Objectives: Posterior compartment prolapse is associated with constipation and obstructed defecation syndrome. However, there is still a lack of consensus...
Background and Objectives: Posterior compartment prolapse is associated with constipation and obstructed defecation syndrome. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment for this condition. We aim to investigate functional, anatomical, and quality-of-life outcomes of native tissue transvaginal repair of isolated symptomatic rectocele. Materials and Methods: We retrospective analyzed patients who underwent transvaginal native tissue repair for stage ≥ II and symptomatic posterior vaginal wall prolapse between January 2018 and June 2021. Anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated. Wexner constipation score was used to assess bowel symptoms, while the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score was used to evaluate subjective satisfaction after surgery. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 64.5 years, and half of them underwent a previous hysterectomy for benign reasons. The median follow-up time was 33.5 months. A significant anatomical improvement in the posterior compartment was noticed compared with preoperative assessment (p < 0.001 for Ap and Bp), with only two (7.1%) anatomical recurrences. Additionally, obstructed defecation symptoms decreased significantly compared to baseline (p < 0.001), as well as vaginal bulging, with no new-onset cases of fecal incontinence or de novo dyspareunia. PGI-I resulted in 89.2% of patients being satisfied (PGI-I ≥ 2), with a median score of 1.5. Conclusions: Transvaginal native tissue repair for isolated posterior prolapse is safe and effective in managing bowel symptoms, with excellent anatomical and functional outcomes and satisfactory improvement in patients’ quality of life.
Topics: Constipation; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Middle Aged; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Prolapse
PubMed: 36143829
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58091152 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Dec 2022Surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is challenging, with several surgical options showing inconsistent functional results over time. The aim of...
BACKGROUND
Surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is challenging, with several surgical options showing inconsistent functional results over time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend in surgical management of ODS in a 10-year timeframe across Italian referral centers.
METHODS
Surgeons from referral centers for the management of pelvic floor disorders and affiliated to the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery provided data on the yearly volume of procedures for ODS from 2010 to 2019. Six common clinical scenarios of ODS were captured, including details on patient's anal sphincter function and presence of rectocele and/or rectal intussusception. Perineal repair, ventral rectopexy (VRP), transanal repair (internal Delorme), stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR), Contour Transtar, and transvaginal repair were considered in each clinical scenario.
RESULTS
Twenty-five centers were included providing data on 2943 surgical patients. Procedure volumes ranged from 10-20 (54%) to 21-50 (46%) per year across centers. The most performed techniques in patients with good sphincter function were transanal repair for isolated rectocele (243/716 [34%]), transanal repair for isolated rectal intussusception (287/677 [42%]) and VRP for combined abnormalities (464/976 [48%]). When considering poor sphincter function, these were perineal repair (112/194 [57.8%]) for isolated rectocele, and VRP for the other two scenarios (60/120 [50%] and 97/260 [37%], respectively). The use of STARR and Contour Transtar decreased over time in patients with impaired sphincter function.
CONCLUSIONS
The complexity of ODS treatment is confirmed by the variety of clinical scenarios that can occur and by the changing trend of surgical management over the last 10 years.
Topics: Female; Humans; Rectocele; Defecation; Intussusception; Constipation; Colorectal Surgery; Surgical Stapling; Treatment Outcome; Syndrome; Rectum
PubMed: 36104607
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02705-x -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Nov 2022More common in older women than younger women, rectoceles may be secondary to pelvic floor weakness and/or pelvic floor dysfunction with impaired rectal evacuation.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
More common in older women than younger women, rectoceles may be secondary to pelvic floor weakness and/or pelvic floor dysfunction with impaired rectal evacuation. Rectoceles may be small (<2 cm), medium (2-4 cm), or large (>4 cm). Arguably, large rectoceles are more likely to be associated with symptoms (e.g., difficult defecation). It can be challenging to ascertain the extent to which a rectocele is secondary to pelvic floor dysfunction and/or whether a rectocele, rather than associated pelvic floor dysfunction, is responsible for symptoms. Surgical repair should be considered when initial treatment measures (e.g., bowel modifying agents and pelvic floor biofeedback therapy) are unsuccessful.
PURPOSE
We summarize the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of rectoceles, with an emphasis on outcomes after surgical repair. This review accompanies a retrospective analysis of outcomes after multidisciplinary, transvaginal rectocele repair procedures undertaken by three colorectal surgeons in 215 patients at a large teaching hospital in the UK. A majority of patients had a large rectocele. Some patients also underwent an anterior levatorplasty and/or an enterocele repair. All patients were jointly assessed, and some patients underwent surgery by colorectal and urogynecologic surgeons. In this cohort, the perioperative data, efficacy, and harms outcomes are comparable with historical data predominantly derived from retrospective series in which patients had a good outcome (67%-78%), symptoms of difficult defecation improved (30%-50%), and patients had a recurrent rectocele 2 years after surgery (17%). Building on these data, prospective studies that rigorously evaluate outcomes after surgical repair are necessary.
Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Constipation; Defecography; Female; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rectocele; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36102693
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14453 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Jul 2022Anorectal functional disorder encompasses arrays of conditions including Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) and Fecal Incontinence (FI). Biofeedback Therapy (BFT)...
BACKGROUND
Anorectal functional disorder encompasses arrays of conditions including Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) and Fecal Incontinence (FI). Biofeedback Therapy (BFT) serves as first line therapy to re-train pelvic floor coordination, rectal sensation and strengthening pelvic floor muscle. The aim of this study is determining the efficacy of BFT in our centre.
METHODS
This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients attended biofeedback therapy session from January 2013 to December 2018. Descriptive statistic was used to analyse the data.
RESULT
Total 99 patients with mean age of 44.6 ± 18.1 with female 56% (n = 55) and male 44% (n = 44) attended BFT session. Overall, 77 had CC (77%) and 23 (23%) had FI. Mean number of sessions was 11.8. Overall improvement rate 42 (42%), no improvement 32 (32%) and defaulted 26 (26%). In patients with CC, 32 (41.6%) had improvement in symptoms, 23 (29.9%) had no improvements, 22 (28.6%) defaulted BFT.Patients with FI, 7 (30.4%) had Obstetric Sphincter Injury, 7 (30.4%) had traumatic anal injury, 3 (13.0%) has Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, 2 (8.7%) had sphincter injury following anal sepsis, 2 (13.0%) had rectocele repair and 1 (4.3%) were idiopathic. 9 patients (39.1%) had stoma created. Overall response rate was: 10 patients (43.5%) had improvement in symptoms, 9 patients (39.1%) had no improvement, 4 patients (17.4%) defaulted therapy.
CONCLUSION
Our outcome rate is lower compared to published due the limited access and logistic restrictions. This issue should be given great consideration such as broadening the service and training.
PubMed: 35860081
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103848 -
Neurourology and Urodynamics Aug 2022The mid-vagina (MV) represents Level II of the vagina. The surgical anatomy of the MV has not been recently subject to a comprehensive examination and description. MV... (Review)
Review
AIM
The mid-vagina (MV) represents Level II of the vagina. The surgical anatomy of the MV has not been recently subject to a comprehensive examination and description. MV surgery involving anterior and posterior colporrhaphy represents a key part of surgery for a majority of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS
Literature review and surgical observations of many aspects of the MV were performed including MV length and width; MV shape; immediate relationships; histological analysis; anterior and posterior MV prolapse assessment and anterior MV surgical aspects. Unpublished pre- and postoperative quantitative data on 300 women undergoing posterior vaginal compartment repairs are presented.
RESULTS
The MV runs from the lower limit of the vaginal vault (VV) to the hymen. Its length is a mean of 5 cm. Its shape in section overall is a compressed rectangle. Its longitudinal shape is created by its anterior and posterior walls being inverse trapezoid in shape. Histology comprises three layers: (i) mucosa; (ii) muscularis; (iii) adventitia. MV prolapse staging uses pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q). Anterior MV prolapse can be quantitatively assessed using POP-Q while posterior MV prolapse can be assessed with POP-Q or PR-Q. Around 50% of both cystocele and rectocele are due to VV defects. POP will increase anterior MV width and length. Native tissue anterior colporrhaphy is the current conventional repair with mesh disadvantages outweighing advantages. Posteriorly, Level II (MV) defects are far smaller (mean 1.3 cm) than Level I (mean 6.0 cm) and Level III (mean 2.9 cm).
CONCLUSION
An understanding of the surgical anatomy of the MV can assist anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. In particular, if VV support is employed, the Level II component of a posterior repair should be relatively small.
Topics: Cystocele; Female; Humans; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Postoperative Period; Surgical Mesh; Treatment Outcome; Vagina
PubMed: 35731184
DOI: 10.1002/nau.24994 -
Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista... 2022Apical prolapsus refers to downward displacement of the vaginal apex, uterus or cervix. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can significantly affect women's daily activities and...
BACKGROUND
Apical prolapsus refers to downward displacement of the vaginal apex, uterus or cervix. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can significantly affect women's daily activities and sexuality.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate, at the mid-term follow-up after laparoscopic pectopexy surgery, whether this procedure improved the patients' quality of life and sexual function.
DESIGN AND SETTING
In this cross-sectional study, data on patients who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy in the Gazi Yasargil Education and Research Hospital were evaluated.
METHODS
Thirty-five patients with symptomatic apical prolapse and POP quantification stage II and higher were included in this study. We used the Turkish version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire to assess preoperative and postoperative sexual dysfunction, and the Turkish version of the Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) to evaluate the severity of POP and its impact on quality of life.
RESULTS
The mean age, parity and length of follow-up of the patients were 36.08 ± 9.04 years, 4.00 ± 1.86 and 28.88 ± 5.88 months, respectively. The most common complications were de novo rectocele in three patients (8.6%) and de novo cystocele in two patients (5.7%). All the FSFI and P-QOL scores were statistically significantly improved in the postoperative period (P < 0.001 for all scores of both FSFI and P-QOL).
CONCLUSION
The quality of life and sexual function of the patients who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy were found to have become statistically improved at the midterm follow-up. Laparoscopic pectopexy was found to be a viable, effective and safe procedure.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Laparoscopy; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Prolapse; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35674612
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0488.R1.171121 -
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice May 2022Treatment of total genital prolapse in elderly patients is still controversial in terms of postoperative objective and subjective results.
Comparison of long-term results of obliterative colpocleisis and reconstructive vaginal surgery including sacrospinous ligament fixation in patients with total genital prolapse.
BACKGROUND
Treatment of total genital prolapse in elderly patients is still controversial in terms of postoperative objective and subjective results.
AIM
The present study aimed to compare the long-term objective and subjective cure rates of sacrospinous ligament fixation and Le Fort operation for treatment of total genital prolapse.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients over the age of 60 with stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse that presented to the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic of the Faculty of Medicine of *** University. The study sample consisted of 17 patients that underwent Le Fort operation and 29 patients that underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation. Data on duration of operation, intraoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and differences between preoperative and postoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and relapse in the long term were obtained. Questionnaires exploring quality of life, incontinence, and pelvic floor disorders were applied to the patients.
RESULTS
As subjective cure rates, postoperative patient satisfaction (P = 0.001), regret rate (P = 0.038) and recommendation rate (P = 0.044), as well as postoperative questionnaire results, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire and SF36 were found to be significantly better in the Le Fort group (respectively P = 0.039 and 0.042). As objective cure rates, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative cystocele, rectocele, and cystorectocele (P = 0.955) and postoperative recurrence of prolapse beyond the hymen (P: 0.893). Duration of operation and duration of hospital stay were found to be significantly shorter in the Le Fort group (respectively P = 0.032 and 0.012).
CONCLUSION
Le Fort operation could be the intervention of choice in sexually inactive elderly patients with stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse.
Topics: Aged; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Ligaments; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Pregnancy; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Vagina
PubMed: 35593601
DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1449_21 -
Cureus Apr 2022Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) is defined as the descent of one or more of the pelvic organs from their normal position. This is commonly associated with multiparity,...
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) is defined as the descent of one or more of the pelvic organs from their normal position. This is commonly associated with multiparity, postmenopausal status, and obesity. Most of the cases present as uterine descent with or without cystocele, rectocele, or enterocele. But, the descent of pelvic organs in adolescent and young, nulliparous women is an uncommon presentation. We report a case of a 19-year-old girl with extreme elongation of the cervix without uterine descent. Uterus size was normal, no adnexal abnormality was there. The patient was apprehensive about her future fertility and pregnancy outcome. This is a rare case as it has not been reported in the preceding three decades of literature searches and poses a challenge in management decisions because we must consider future fertility while restoring normal anatomy.
PubMed: 35586349
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24168 -
Biomedical Papers of the Medical... Dec 2023The aim of this retrospective study was to try to find correlations between different diagnoses established by clinical examination, anorectal manometry and...
AIMS
The aim of this retrospective study was to try to find correlations between different diagnoses established by clinical examination, anorectal manometry and MRI-defecography and, the association with psychiatric disorders.
METHODS
44 patients (median age 53.81 years) presenting with intestinal motility disorders and who underwent clinical, biological and psychiatric examination, dynamic defecographic-MRI (resting, squeezing, straining, defecation and evacuation phases), anorectal manometry, colonoscopy. MRI was performed using the 1,5 T.
RESULTS
MRI-defecography revealed the following changes: anismus (16), rectocele (12), pelvic floor dysfunction (6), peritoneocele (2), cervical-cystic-ptosis (1), rectal prolapse (6), and in 1 case the examination was normal. Hypertonic anal sphincter (16) and lack of defecation reflex (12) at anorectal manometry correlated with anismus in all patients at MRI-defecography. Lack of inhibitor anal reflex (6) was associated with rectocele (4), cervix-cysto-ptosis (1) and peritoneocele (2). Anxiety (11), depression (6) and anxiety-depressive disorders (10) were found in 27/44, somatization disorders in 9/44 and no psychiatric changes in 8/44 cases.
CONCLUSION
As multiparous women are at risk for outlet obstruction constipation, MRI-defecography is suggested in this category. There is good correlation between diagnosis using anorectal manometry and MRI-defecography in patients with terminal constipation and anismus. Lower defecation dysfunction is often associated with psychiatric disorders.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Defecation; Rectocele; Defecography; Retrospective Studies; Constipation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 35582728
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2022.023 -
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon 2022Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a condition wherein one or more of the organs in the pelvis slip down from their original position and protrude into the vagina. Pelvic... (Review)
Review
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a condition wherein one or more of the organs in the pelvis slip down from their original position and protrude into the vagina. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery has increased in the urogynecological field due to higher aging society. POP patients often suffer from bowel dysfunction, such as difficulty of bowel movements and the need to strain or push on the vagina to have a bowel movement. Rectocele is often treated with the same method used for POP, but sometimes it is treated transanally. In the transabdominal approach, the vagina is divided from the rectum, and the mesh is fixed between the vagina and rectum. On the other hand, rectal prolapse is a condition wherein the rectum slips down from its original position and protrudes from the anus. Like POP surgery, rectal prolapse has been treated laparoscopically. Even though the protruding position is different, both are pelvic conditions, and the concept of treatment is similar. Recently, POP and rectal prolapse have been diagnosed at the same time, and sometimes these diseases have been treated together. In the higher aging society, incidences of POP and rectal prolapse will increase, and both will have greater chance to be treated. Although POP is a urogynecological disease, coloproctologists need to know the bowel dysfunction in order to treat POP.
PubMed: 35572489
DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2020-007