-
Neurourology and Urodynamics Aug 2022The mid-vagina (MV) represents Level II of the vagina. The surgical anatomy of the MV has not been recently subject to a comprehensive examination and description. MV... (Review)
Review
AIM
The mid-vagina (MV) represents Level II of the vagina. The surgical anatomy of the MV has not been recently subject to a comprehensive examination and description. MV surgery involving anterior and posterior colporrhaphy represents a key part of surgery for a majority of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS
Literature review and surgical observations of many aspects of the MV were performed including MV length and width; MV shape; immediate relationships; histological analysis; anterior and posterior MV prolapse assessment and anterior MV surgical aspects. Unpublished pre- and postoperative quantitative data on 300 women undergoing posterior vaginal compartment repairs are presented.
RESULTS
The MV runs from the lower limit of the vaginal vault (VV) to the hymen. Its length is a mean of 5 cm. Its shape in section overall is a compressed rectangle. Its longitudinal shape is created by its anterior and posterior walls being inverse trapezoid in shape. Histology comprises three layers: (i) mucosa; (ii) muscularis; (iii) adventitia. MV prolapse staging uses pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q). Anterior MV prolapse can be quantitatively assessed using POP-Q while posterior MV prolapse can be assessed with POP-Q or PR-Q. Around 50% of both cystocele and rectocele are due to VV defects. POP will increase anterior MV width and length. Native tissue anterior colporrhaphy is the current conventional repair with mesh disadvantages outweighing advantages. Posteriorly, Level II (MV) defects are far smaller (mean 1.3 cm) than Level I (mean 6.0 cm) and Level III (mean 2.9 cm).
CONCLUSION
An understanding of the surgical anatomy of the MV can assist anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. In particular, if VV support is employed, the Level II component of a posterior repair should be relatively small.
Topics: Cystocele; Female; Humans; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Postoperative Period; Surgical Mesh; Treatment Outcome; Vagina
PubMed: 35731184
DOI: 10.1002/nau.24994 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jan 2015The management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or... (Review)
Review
The management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or hydrocolontherapy, biofeedback, transanal electrostimulation, yoga and psychotherapy. According to our experience, nearly 20% of the patients need surgical treatment. If we consider ODS an "iceberg syndrome", with "emerging rocks", rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse, that may benefit from surgery, at least two out of ten patients also has "underwater rocks" or occult disorders, such as anismus, rectal hyposensation and anxiety/depression, which mostly require conservative treatment. Rectal prolapse excision or obliterative suture, rectocele and/or enterocele repair, retrograde Malone's enema and partial myotomy of the puborectalis muscle are effective in selected cases. Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy may be an effective surgical option. Stapled transanal rectal resection may lead to severe complications. The Transtar procedure seems to be safer, when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception. A multidisciplinary approach to ODS provides the best results.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Constipation; Defecation; Humans; Patient Care Team; Predictive Value of Tests; Recovery of Function; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25632177
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1053 -
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery Feb 2017Rectoceles are a very common finding in patients, and symptoms most commonly include pelvic pain, pressure, or difficulty with passing stool. However, there are often... (Review)
Review
Rectoceles are a very common finding in patients, and symptoms most commonly include pelvic pain, pressure, or difficulty with passing stool. However, there are often other associated pelvic floor disorders that accompany rectoceles, making the clinical significance of it in an individual patient often hard to determine. When evaluating a patient with a rectocele, a thorough history and physical exam must be conducted to help delineate other causes of these symptoms. Treatment consists of addressing other defecatory disorders through various methods, with surgery reserved for select cases in which obstructed defecation is well documented.
PubMed: 28144214
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593425 -
Medicine Dec 2023The study aimed to investigate the effects of cystocele and rectocele on the stages of vaginal birth and maternal and newborn outcomes. A total of 672 multiparous...
The study aimed to investigate the effects of cystocele and rectocele on the stages of vaginal birth and maternal and newborn outcomes. A total of 672 multiparous pregnant women between the ages of 18 to 40 who underwent normal vaginal delivery in our tertiary center between November 2022 and February 2023, were included in this prospective study. Among the participants, 348 (51.8%) had no abnormalities, 78 (11.6%) had rectocele only, 112 (16.7%) had cystocele only, and 134 (19.9) had both cystocele and rectocele. Patients with the coexistence of cystocele and rectocele experienced a notably extended duration for both the first stage and second stage of labor, although the extension in the second stage was not statistically significant. Among the maternal complications, the development of maternal laceration and chorioamnionitis was significantly more common in the patient group with cystocele and rectocele compared to the other groups. When the groups were assessed for postpartum bleeding, while the bleeding risk increased from the normal group to the rectocele + cystocele group, this increase was not statistically significant. There was no difference between the groups in terms of neonatal outcomes. The delivery time of pregnant women with cystocele and rectocele, in the absence of additional risk factors, was determined to be significantly longer than that of the control group. We think that these patients should receive more vigilant monitoring, and this criterion should be kept in mind when assessing the indication for a cesarean section.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Cystocele; Rectocele; Cesarean Section; Prospective Studies; Hernia
PubMed: 38134086
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036720