-
The Journal of Tehran Heart Center Jul 2023Many studies have evaluated thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients, and most of them have reported a high estimation of the prevalence of such events. The present... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Many studies have evaluated thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients, and most of them have reported a high estimation of the prevalence of such events. The present study sought to evaluate the prevalence of thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19.
METHODS
This study is a systematic review with meta-analysis that investigated thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 from the start of the pandemic to August 31, 2021. The 4 main databases for collecting articles were Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, arterial thrombosis, and the overall rate of thromboembolic events were considered primary outcomes.
RESULTS
In a total of 63 studies (104 920 patients with COVID-19), the overall thrombosis rate was 21% (95% CI, 18% to 25%), the rate of deep vein thrombosis was 20% (95% Cl, 16% to 25%), the rate of pulmonary embolism was 8% (95% Cl, 6% to 10%), and the rate of arterial thrombosis was 5% (95% Cl, 3% to 7%). The prevalence of all primary outcomes in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly higher (P<0.05). In older patients, the prevalence of overall thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis was significantly higher (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that COVID-19 increases the risk of thromboembolic events, especially in elderly and critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. Therefore, more strategies are needed to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19, especially in ICU-admitted and elderly patients.
PubMed: 38146412
DOI: 10.18502/jthc.v18i3.14110 -
Journal of Vascular Nursing : Official... Dec 2023Venous thromboembolism is one of the most common cardiovascular disorders in the any intensive care units (ICUs), which annually leads to death and imposes great costs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Venous thromboembolism is one of the most common cardiovascular disorders in the any intensive care units (ICUs), which annually leads to death and imposes great costs on patients and society worldwide. The present study was conducted with the aim of determining the prevalence and factors related to venous thromboembolism in the ICUs as a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
The current study was conducted in international databases, on all descriptive and analytical studies and clinical and semi-experimental trial studies, without time limit until November 2, 2021. The present study was designed and implemented based on PRISMA guideline. The quality of the studies was checked using STROBE checklist and meta-analysis was performed using CMA software.
RESULTS
Among the 3204 articles found, after the evaluations, 189 articles entered the full text review phase, and as a result, 38 articles were included in the study. The reported prevalence of thromboembolism was 1-45%. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 12% in overall. The chance of venous thromboembolism was higher in ICUs patients >57 years old and ICUs patients with a history of venous thromboembolism.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study showed that venous thromboembolism has a higher prevalence in ICUs patients in comparison to non-ICUs patients. It is recommended to nurses and healthcare staffs to provide accurate decision and care for prevention of venous thromboembolism and paying attention to the patient's warning signs, timely administration of anticoagulants, and monitor coagulation factors.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Venous Thromboembolism; Prevalence; Anticoagulants; Intensive Care Units; Critical Care; Pulmonary Embolism
PubMed: 38072571
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2023.06.008 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Apr 2024This study aimed to provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in noncancer gynecologic surgeries. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in noncancer gynecologic surgeries.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Furthermore, we performed separate searches for randomized trials that addressed the effects of thromboprophylaxis.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Eligible studies were observational studies that enrolled ≥50 adult patients who underwent noncancer gynecologic surgery procedures and that reported the absolute incidence of at least 1 of the following: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding that required reintervention (including re-exploration and angioembolization), bleeding that led to transfusion, or postoperative hemoglobin level <70 g/L.
METHODS
A teams of 2 reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated the risk of bias of the eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine the cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery stratified by patient venous thromboembolism risk factors and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the evidence certainty.
RESULTS
We included 131 studies (1,741,519 patients) that reported venous thromboembolism risk estimates for 50 gynecologic noncancer procedures and bleeding requiring reintervention estimates for 35 procedures. The evidence certainty was generally moderate or low for venous thromboembolism and low or very low for bleeding requiring reintervention. The risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism varied from a median of <0.1% for several procedures (eg, transvaginal oocyte retrieval) to 1.5% for others (eg, minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy, 1.2%-4.6% across patient venous thromboembolism risk groups). Venous thromboembolism risk was <0.5% for 30 (60%) of the procedures; 0.5% to 1.0% for 10 (20%) procedures; and >1.0% for 10 (20%) procedures. The risk for bleeding the require reintervention varied from <0.1% (transvaginal oocyte retrieval) to 4.0% (open myomectomy). The bleeding requiring reintervention risk was <0.5% in 17 (49%) procedures, 0.5% to 1.0% for 12 (34%) procedures, and >1.0% in 6 (17%) procedures.
CONCLUSION
The risk for venous thromboembolism in gynecologic noncancer surgery varied between procedures and patients. Venous thromboembolism risks exceeded the bleeding risks only among selected patients and procedures. Although most of the evidence is of low certainty, the results nevertheless provide a compelling rationale for restricting pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis to a minority of patients who undergo gynecologic noncancer procedures.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Anticoagulants; Venous Thromboembolism; Postoperative Complications; Hemorrhage; Thrombosis; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38072372
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1255 -
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Jan 2024Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain... (Review)
Review
Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain anticancer drugs on haemostasis. This is true both for first episode venous thromboembolism and recurrence. The diagnosis and management of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer poses particular challenges, and these are reviewed in the present article, based on a systematic review of the relevant scientific literature published over the last decade. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether diagnostic algorithms for venous thromboembolism, validated principally in untreated non-cancer patients, are also valid in anticoagulated cancer patients: the available data suggests that clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing perform less well in this clinical setting. In patients with cancer, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venous ultrasound appear to be the most reliable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis respectively. Options for treatment of venous thromboembolism include low molecular weight heparins (at a therapeutic dose or an increased dose), fondaparinux or oral direct factor Xa inhibitors. The choice of treatment should take into account the nature (pulmonary embolism or VTE) and severity of the recurrent event, the associated bleeding risk, the current anticoagulant treatment (type, dose, adherence and possible drug-drug interactions) and cancer progression.
Topics: Humans; Venous Thromboembolism; Anticoagulants; Pulmonary Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Neoplasms; Recurrence
PubMed: 38065753
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.11.006 -
The American Surgeon May 2024This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare differences in clinical outcomes for adult patients diagnosed with ISSPE who were managed with anticoagulation vs... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare differences in clinical outcomes for adult patients diagnosed with ISSPE who were managed with anticoagulation vs clinical surveillance.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies evaluating the use of anticoagulation and/or clinical surveillance in patients diagnosed with ISSPE. The search included studies published up to August 3, 2023. Outcomes of interest included 90-day recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and all-cause mortality rates.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included with a total of 1224 patients. Of these patients, 791 were treated with anticoagulation and 433 underwent surveillance. Studies found no difference in recurrent VTE rates, with the majority of studies reporting no recurrence. Of the studies that reported VTE recurrence, rates were .5% to 1.4% for the anticoagulation groups and 3.1% to 3.2% for the surveillance groups. Major bleeding rates were also similar. In anticoagulated patients, major bleeding rates ranged from 1% to 10%. In clinical surveillance patients, the majority found no rate of major bleeding, with 2 studies reporting rates of .8% to 3.2%. Mortality rates ranged widely with no significant differences reported.
CONCLUSION
Clinical surveillance appears to be a safe and effective alternative to anticoagulation in patients with ISSPE. Ninety-day rates of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and mortality were comparable between groups. These findings highlight the need for updated practice management guidelines to improve patient outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Anticoagulants; Venous Thromboembolism; Pulmonary Embolism; Hemorrhage; Blood Coagulation; Recurrence
PubMed: 38058129
DOI: 10.1177/00031348231220586 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery. Venous and... Mar 2024Thrombi in the axial calf veins have quite different anatomical and physiological characteristics from that in the muscular calf veins, but their treatment was usually... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Thrombi in the axial calf veins have quite different anatomical and physiological characteristics from that in the muscular calf veins, but their treatment was usually addressed in the same manner. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized and cohort studies to compare clinical outcomes among patients with isolated axial vs muscular calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
METHODS
Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) was selected as the primary outcome. Resolution, proximal propagation of calf DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeds, and clinically relevant non-major bleeds were separately analyzed as secondary outcomes. Data were pooled and compared with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Thirteen studies, consisting of 4889 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. A greater rate of recurrent VTE (FE model: RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00-1.53; I = 29%), resolution (FE model: RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01-1.72; I = 31%), proximal propagation (FE model: RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.10-2.41; I = 40%), and PE (FE model: RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.31-5.95; I = 0%) in the axial group compared with the muscular group. There was no difference in the pooled estimates for major bleeds (FE model: RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.95; I = 0%), and clinically relevant non-major bleeds (FE model: RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.93-3.48) in the axial and muscular arms.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with calf DVT limited to muscular veins might have a lower rate of recurrent VTE, resolution, proximal propagation, and PE vs those with axial calf vein involvement and exhibited similar safety outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Anticoagulants; Venous Thromboembolism; Mesenteric Ischemia; Venous Thrombosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Hemorrhage
PubMed: 38043681
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101727 -
Brain & Spine 2023To date, the available guidance on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in elective lumbar fusion surgery is largely open to surgeon interpretation and preference... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
To date, the available guidance on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in elective lumbar fusion surgery is largely open to surgeon interpretation and preference without any specific suggested chemoprophylactic regimen.
RESEARCH QUESTION
This study aimed to comparatively analyze the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with the use of commonly employed chemoprophylactic agents such as unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in lumbar fusion surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An independent systematic review of four scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting on DVT/PE outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery in adult patients with UH or LMWH chemoprophylaxis were included for analysis. Analysis was performed using the Stata software.
RESULTS
Twelve studies with 8495 patients were included in the analysis. A single-arm meta-analysis of the included studies found a DVT incidence of 14% (95%CI [8%-20%]) and 1% (95%CI [-6% - 8%]) with LMWH and UH respectively. Both the chemoprophylaxis agents prevented PE with a noted incidence of 0% (95%CI [0%-0.1%]) and 0% (95%CI [0%-1%]) with LMWH and UH respectively. The risk of bleeding-related complications with the usage of LMWH and UH was 0% (95% CI [0.0%-0.30%]) and 3% (95% CI [0.3%-5%]) respectively.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Both LMWH and UH reduces the overall incidence of DVT/PE, but there is a paucity of evidence analyzing the comparative effectiveness of the chemoprophylaxis regimens in lumbar fusion procedures. The heterogeneity in data prevents any conclusions, as there remains an evidence gap. We recommend future high-quality randomized controlled trials to investigate in this regard to help develop recommendations on thromboprophylaxis usage.
PubMed: 38021015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102711 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery. Venous and... Mar 2024The aim of this study was to determine the association between the duration of systemic anticoagulation therapy (ACT) and the risk of further venous thromboembolism... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis for the association between duration of anticoagulation therapy and the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower limb superficial venous thrombosis.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to determine the association between the duration of systemic anticoagulation therapy (ACT) and the risk of further venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT).
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using searches of Medline and Cochrane Library databases in September 2023. Papers that provided VTE incidence within mid-term follow-up of ≥45 days in patients who received any ACT were included. Patients were categorized into subgroups according to the course of treatment: (1) no ACT (0 days); (2) ACT of ≤14 days; (3) ACT of 15 to 30 days; (4) ACT of 31 to 45 days; and (5) ACT of >45 days. Reported events were transformed to events per 100 patient-years, and a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled rates for proportions. The primary outcome (VTE) was a combination of SVT progression or recurrence with the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Secondary outcomes included major and clinically relevant non-major or minor bleeding.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies (10 randomized controlled trials and 14 cohort studies) combining outcomes in 12,341 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Minimum VTE and SVT recurrence or progression rates were observed with the ACT duration of 31 to 45 days of 16.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4-23.3) and 8.2 (95% CI, 3.1-15.8) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Minimum DVT and PE rates observed with the treatment duration of 15 to 30 days were 5.5 (95% CI, 2.8-9.1) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.3) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Short-term treatment of ≤14 days was associated with the highest rates of VTE of 59.7 (95% CI, 37.7-86.4), DVT of 13.7 (95% CI, 9.6-18.4), and PE of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.4-5.6) events per 100 patient-years. Major bleeding rates were unrelated to the duration of ACT and did not exceed 0.5 events per 100 patient-years. The highest rate of clinically relevant non-major or minor bleeding was observed with ACT duration of 31 to 45 days of 14.2 (95% CI, 5.5-26.8) events per 100 patient-years. The most common risk factors for VTE included male sex, cancer, personal history of DVT, PE, or SVT, and thrombosis of non-varicose veins.
CONCLUSIONS
Prolonged systemic anticoagulation is associated with the tendency to decrease VTE rates in patients with lower limb SVT.
Topics: Humans; Male; Venous Thromboembolism; Anticoagulants; Venous Thrombosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Lower Extremity; Hemorrhage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38008180
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101726 -
European Journal of Medical Research Nov 2023Several clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in COVID-19 patients. Recently, there have been reports on critical patients, which are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Several clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in COVID-19 patients. Recently, there have been reports on critical patients, which are different from previous research results. The meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of baricitinib in COVID-19, by pooling data from all clinically randomized controlled trials (RCTs) available to increase power to testify.
METHODS
Studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases on January 31, 2023. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVID-19. This study is registered with INPLASY, number 202310086.
RESULTS
A total of 3010 patients were included in our analyses. All included studies were randomized controlled trials or prospective study. There was no difference in 14-day mortality between the two groups [OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.03-1.84), I = 72%, P = 0.17]. In subgroup analyses we found that baricitinib did not seem to improve significantly in 24-day mortality critically ill patients [OR 0.60 (95% CI 0.35-1.02), I = 0%, P = 0.06]. Fortunately, baricitinib have led to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays for COVID-19 patients. There were no difference in infections and infestations, major adverse cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
CONCLUSIONS
Baricitinib did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. At the same time, we can find that it reduces the mortality of COVID-19 patients, not including the critically ill.
Topics: Humans; Adult; COVID-19; Critical Illness; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Azetidines
PubMed: 37990249
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01403-0 -
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology :... Jan 2024This meta-analysis evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CB) of atrial fibrillation (AF). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This meta-analysis evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CB) of atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until July 31, 2023, for published works investigating efficacy and safety of CB of AF in which mean/median follow-up time was not less than 36 months. Safety was assessed by adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by AF recurrence, defined as any atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 30 s.
RESULTS
A total of 19 clinical studies were included. After an average of 58.1 months of follow-up, the overall AF recurrence rate was about 37%. The predictors of recurrence were duration of AF (HR 1.00; 95% CI [1.00 ∼ 1.01]), early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (HR 3.96; 95%CI [1.12 ∼ 14.02]), left atrial diameter (HR 1.04; 95%CI [1.02 ∼ 1.06]), and persistent AF (HR1.47; 95% CI [1.19 ∼ 1.82]). In terms of safety, the incidence of transient phrenic paralysis (PNP) was the highest, about 3%; followed by vascular complications (about 2%); pseudoaneurysm, permanent PNP, and all-cause death was (about 1%); and pericardial effusion and stroke / TIA was very low.
CONCLUSION
CB is associated with low rates of severe complications and reasonable success rates.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Cryosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Pulmonary Veins; Recurrence; Catheter Ablation
PubMed: 37988273
DOI: 10.1111/pace.14881